Pauline O'Reilly
University of Limerick
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Pauline O'Reilly.
Journal of Advanced Nursing | 2015
Mary Casey; Gerard M. Fealy; Catriona Kennedy; Josephine Hegarty; Geraldine Prizeman; Martin McNamara; Pauline O'Reilly; Anne-Marie Brady; Daniela Rohde
AIM This paper reports on the qualitative findings from a national review of a nursing and midwifery scope of practice framework. BACKGROUND Scope of professional practice frameworks offers a system of rules and principles to regulate its members and demonstrate its responsibility to society. Key issues in reviewing the scope of practice include notions of specialist and advanced practice, accountability, autonomy, competence, supervision, continuing professional development and delegation. Evaluation of scope of practice frameworks has particular application value to nurses, midwives, regulatory bodies and healthcare employers across the globe. DESIGN A mixed methods approach was used. This included a national survey of nurses and midwives and focus groups and interviews with key stakeholders. The qualitative data are reported in this paper. METHODS Focus groups and interviews were conducted among a convenience purposive sample of key stakeholders, including nurses and midwives working in the widest range of services and settings in 2014. The participants contributed to thirteen focus groups and thirteen interviews. FINDINGS Six global themes, as follows: Evolution of the nursing and midwifery professions and practice; Scope of practice: understanding and use; Expanding scope of practice; Professional competence; Practice setting and context; Reflections on the current framework. CONCLUSION Practitioners understand the scope of professional practice and while some see it as empowering others see it as potentially restrictive. Nurses and midwives are generally willing to expand their scope of practice and see it as resulting in improved patient care, improvement in overall quality of standards and increased job satisfaction.
Nurse Education Today | 2017
Kate Stewart; Pauline O'Reilly
OBJECTIVES To explore current literature surrounding the knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of nurses and midwives of the healthcare needs of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ) patients and their influence on equal and non-discriminatory care for LGBTQ individuals. DESIGN Systematic integrative review. DATA SOURCES CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, InterNurse. REVIEW METHODS This integrative review used Wakefields (2014) framework to establish the knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of nurses and midwives of the healthcare needs of LGBTQ patients. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies carried out between 2006 and 2015 from 7 countries were included. Four databases were searched and 98 studies were screened for eligibility by two researchers. Level of evidence was assessed by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN, 2010) criteria and quality was assessed by a screening tool adapted from Noyes and Popay (2007) for qualitative papers and Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies adapted from the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP, 2010). Following PRISMA guidelines, this integrative review analysed and synthesised evidence using thematic analysis to generate themes. RESULTS 24 papers were included in the final synthesis which revealed four primary themes: Heteronormativity across Healthcare; Queerphobia; Rainbow of Attitudes; Learning Diversity. CONCLUSIONS Nurses and midwives possess a wide spectrum of attitudes, knowledge and beliefs which impact the care received by LGBTQ patients. Many issues of inadequate care appear to be due to a culture of heteronormativity and a lack of education on LGBTQ health. Further research is needed on interventions which could facilitate disclosure of sexual orientation and interrupt heteronormative assumptions by staff. It is recommended that LGBTQ issues be included within undergraduate nursing and midwifery education or as part of continued professional development.
Journal of Advanced Nursing | 2015
Anne-Marie Brady; Gerard M. Fealy; Mary Casey; Josephine Hegarty; Catriona Kennedy; Martin McNamara; Pauline O'Reilly; Geraldine Prizeman; Daniela Rohde
AIM Analysis of a national database of enquiries to a professional body pertaining to the scope of nursing and midwifery practice. BACKGROUND Against a backdrop of healthcare reform is a demand for flexibility in nursing and midwifery roles with unprecedented redefinition of role boundaries and/or expansion. Guidance from professional regulatory bodies is being sought around issues of concern that are arising in practice. DESIGN Qualitative thematic analysis. METHOD The database of telephone enquiries (n = 9818) made by Registered Nurses and midwives to a national regulatory body (2001-2013) was subjected to a cleaning process and examined to detect those concerns that pertained to scope of practice. A total of 978 enquiries were subjected to thematic analysis. FINDINGS Enquiries were concerned with three main areas: medication management, changing and evolving scope of practice and professional role boundaries. The context was service developments, staff shortages and uncertainty about role expansion and professional accountability. Other concerns related to expectations around responsibility and accountability for other support staff. CONCLUSION Efforts by employers to maximize the skill mix of their staff and optimally deploy staff to meet service needs and/or address gaps in service represented the primary service context from which many enquiries arose. The greatest concern for nurses arises around medication management but innovation in healthcare delivery and the demands of service are also creating challenges for nurses and midwives. Maintaining and developing competence is a concern among nurses and midwives particularly in an environment of limited resources and where re-deployment is common.
Journal of Advanced Nursing | 2017
Mary Casey; Adeline Cooney; Rhona O'Connell; Josephine-Mary Hegarty; Anne-Marie Brady; Pauline O'Reilly; Catriona Kennedy; Elizabeth Heffernan; Gerard Fealy; Martin McNamara; Laserina O'Connor
AIM To present the qualitative findings from a study on the development of scheme(s) to give evidence of maintenance of professional competence for nurses and midwives. BACKGROUND Key issues in maintenance of professional competence include notions of self- assessment, verification of engagement and practice hours, provision of an evidential record, the role of the employer and articulation of possible consequences for non-adherence with the requirements. Schemes to demonstrate the maintenance of professional competence have application to nurses, midwives and regulatory bodies and healthcare employers worldwide. DESIGN A mixed methods approach was used. This included an online survey of nurses and midwives and focus groups with nurses and midwives and other key stakeholders. The qualitative data are reported in this study. METHODS Focus groups were conducted among a purposive sample of nurses, midwives and key stakeholders from January-May 2015. A total of 13 focus groups with 91 participants contributed to the study. FINDINGS Four major themes were identified: Definitions and Characteristics of Competence; Continuing Professional Development and Demonstrating Competence; Assessment of Competence; The Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland and employers as regulators and enablers of maintaining professional competence. CONCLUSION Competence incorporates knowledge, skills, attitudes, professionalism, application of evidence and translating learning into practice. It is specific to the nurses/midwifes role, organizational needs, patients needs and the individual nurses/midwifes learning needs. Competencies develop over time and change as nurses and midwives work in different practice areas. Thus, role-specific competence is linked to recent engagement in practice.
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing | 2015
Daniel Newman; Pauline O'Reilly; Siew Hwa Lee; Catriona Kennedy
Journal of Advanced Nursing | 2015
Catriona Kennedy; Pauline O'Reilly; Gerard M. Fealy; Mary Casey; Anne-Marie Brady; Martin McNamara; Geraldine Prizeman; Daniela Rohde; Josephine Hegarty
Journal of Clinical Nursing | 2015
Gerard M. Fealy; Daniela Rohde; Mary Casey; Anne-Marie Brady; Josephine Hegarty; Catriona Kennedy; Martin McNamara; Pauline O'Reilly; Geraldine Prizeman
Journal of Clinical Nursing | 2015
Gerard M. Fealy; Mary Casey; Daniela Rohde; Anne-Marie Brady; Josephine Hegarty; Catriona Kennedy; Martin McNamara; Pauline O'Reilly; Geraldine Prizeman
Nurse Researcher | 2017
Daniel Newman; Pauline O'Reilly; Siew Hwa Lee; Catriona Kennedy
Archive | 2014
Gerard M. Fealy; Mary Casey; Anne-Marie Brady; Josephine-Mary Hegarty; Catriona Kennedy; Martin McNamara; Pauline O'Reilly; Geraldine Prizeman; Daniela Rohde