Paulo N. F. Ferrao
University of the Witwatersrand
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Paulo N. F. Ferrao.
Foot & Ankle International | 2012
Paulo N. F. Ferrao; Mark S. Myerson; John M. Schuberth; Michael J. McCourt
Background: Postoperative infection can be a devastating complication of ankle replacement and arthrodesis surgery. Management consists of eradication of the infection and either, revision of the initial surgery or some form of salvage procedure. There are instances however when the patient is asymptomatic, medically unfit, or the local tissue is too tenuous to warrant performing additional surgery. We conducted a retrospective review of the outcome of the use of an antibiotic impregnated cement spacer as the definitive procedure in this kind of patient. Methods: There were nine patients with post operative deep ankle infection following surgery who did not undergo subsequent revision surgery. The initial surgeries were either total ankle replacement (TAR) (n = 6) or ankle arthrodesis (n = 3). The indications for the retention of the cement spacer were patients who were asymptomatic following insertion of the cement spacer, did not desire further surgery, or were medically unfit for further surgery. The patients all underwent removal of hardware or implants, debridement, and insertion of an antibiotic impregnated cement spacer. Six weeks of intravenous antibiotics were administered according to culture sensitivity results. Patients were followed up closely for complications (wound dehiscence, spacer migration, bone loss), resolution of infection, functionality, and satisfaction. Results: The average time of cement spacer retention was 20.1 months, ranging from 6 to 62 months. The most common infecting organisms were Staph. Aureus (n = 3) and Staph. Epidermidis (n = 3). One patient had wound complications, possibly due to the proximity of the cement spacer to the anterior skin surface. One patient had a repeat infection at 52 months. The most common co-morbidities were rheumatoid arthritis (n = 3) and diabetes (n = 2). At final followup, seven patients still had a retained cement spacer and two had subsequent below knee amputations (BKA) performed as a result of delayed complications. Review of the X-rays revealed two patients with loosening and migration of the cement spacer. No patients had signs of excessive bone loss. All patients with a retained antibiotic cement spacer were mobile and able to perform basic activities of daily living with minimal discomfort. Conclusion: The long-term use of antibiotic impregnated cement spacers following postoperative ankle infection is a reasonable option in the low demand patient with surgical or medical co-morbidities. Level of Evidence: IV; Retrospective Case Series
Foot and Ankle Surgery | 2014
Nikiforos Pandelis Saragas; Paulo N. F. Ferrao; Evanthia Saragas; Barry F. Jacobson
BACKGROUND The purpose of this prospective study was to determine whether the more frequently quoted procedure and patient specific risk factors have any impact in the implementation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following foot and ankle surgery. METHODS Two hundred and sixteen patients were included in the study. A variety of operative procedures was carried out with the common denominator being a below knee cast for at least 4 weeks and nonweightbearing for an average of 6 weeks in 130 patients. The remainder of the patients (88) had hallux surgery not requiring a cast and were allowed to weightbear. No patient received any form of thromboprophylaxis postoperatively. All patients were subjected to compression ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) between 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS There was a 5.09% incidence of VTE (0.9% pulmonary embolism) overall. As no VTE (neither DVT nor pulmonary embolus) developed in the hallux subgroup, i.e. patients not requiring immobilization and were allowed to weightbear, the incidence of VTE in the cast/nonweightbearing group was 8.46%. The results are descriptive and only statistically analyzed where possible, as the sample size of the VTE group was small. There was no significant difference in number of risk factors and no association between gender in the VTE and non VTE groups. 90.9% of patients in the VTE group had a total risk factor score of 5 or more and 73.7% of patients in the non VTE group had a total risk factor score of 5 or more. The average timing to the diagnosis of VTE in this current study was 33.1 days. CONCLUSIONS In view of the unacceptable incidence of VTE and the average total risk factor score of 5 or more (for which thromboprophylaxis is recommended) in the majority of the patients, the authors feel that the routine use of thromboprophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery requiring nonweightbearing in combination with short leg cast immobilization, is warranted. This prophylaxis should continue until the patient regains adequate mobility either by weightbearing (in or out of the cast) or removal of cast immobilization (weightbearing or nonweightbearing), usually between 28 and 42 days.
Foot and Ankle Surgery | 2016
Nikiforos Pandelis Saragas; Paulo N. F. Ferrao; Ziyaad Mayet; Hooman Eshraghi
BACKGROUND Dislocating or subluxing peroneal tendons is a relatively infrequent injury. Although infrequent it is very debilitating for the athlete. This retrospective study addresses primarily the surgical technique. METHODS Twenty-three patients between 2005 and 2014 were operated on for symptomatic dislocating or subluxing peroneal tendons. Five patients presented in the acute phase and 18 patients were late cases. Twenty patients were available for follow-up at a mean of 53.1 months. Three patients were classified as Stage III and 17 as Stage I/II. The procedures varied from pure repair of the superior peroneal retinaculum (SPR), reattachment of the SPR, groove-deepening or a combination of the above. No one procedure was favoured over the other. The choice of procedure was decided intraoperatively depending on the findings. RESULTS The mean postoperative VAS score was 1.5 with a mean AOFAS score of 85. Sixteen patients rated their results as excellent, one as good, one uncertain and two poor. The results showed no one procedure superior to another with respect to chronicity, stage or satisfaction score. CONCLUSIONS Several procedures have been described for this condition. Most published studies however, comprise of a small cohort of patients with good results following surgery. The surgical techniques vary and depend largely on the surgeons clinical experience and preference. The authors conclude that the surgical technique described in this article is largely successful with a low complication rate and a high satisfaction rate.
Foot and Ankle Surgery | 2017
Andrew Strydom; Nikiforos Pandelis Saragas; Paulo N. F. Ferrao
BACKGROUND The hallux valgus interphalangeus (HVI) deformity is described as rare, but improved outcomes in hallux valgus (HV) surgery is associated with its surgical correction via an Akin osteotomy. The hypothesis of this study is that HVI is common and makes a significant contribution to the total valgus deformity of the hallux (TVDH). METHODS 285 pre-operative foot radiographs (193 with HV, 92 non-HV), utilising standardised radiographic and measurement techniques, were analysed retrospectively. The hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), interphalangeal angle (IPA) and distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) were measured. The TVDH was calculated as the sum of the HVA and IPA. RESULTS 163 (57.2%) of the study population were Caucasian, 119 (41.8%) African and 3 Indian (1.0%). 236 (82.8%) of the population was female. There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of abnormal IPA in the Caucasian population 112 (68.7%) compared to the proportion of abnormal IPA in the African population 64 (53.8%), p=0.01. The average contribution of the IPA to the TVDH across the whole study population was a mean (SD) of 37.9% (21.2). The average contribution of IPA to TVDH was greater in feet without HV (58.0%) when compared to feet with HV (28.3%). HVI is common, particularly in Caucasians (p=0.01) and makes a significant contribution to the TVDH (p<0.01). The contribution to the TVDH is more significant in mild HV. There is an inverse relationship between the IPA and other angular measurements in the foot. CONCLUSION HVI is a common entity. The significant contribution of the IPA to the TVDH dictates that HVI must be incorporated in management algorithms. The TVDH should replace the isolated concepts of HV and HVI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective cohort.
Foot and Ankle Clinics of North America | 2014
Paulo N. F. Ferrao; Nikiforos Pandelis Saragas
There are more than 150 different procedures described for correction of the hallux valgus deformity, the treatment of which is usually guided by severity. Moderate to severe hallux valgus has traditionally been managed with a shaft or proximal osteotomy together with distal soft-tissue release. Proximal osteotomies can be classified as translation or rotational. Rotational osteotomies such as the Ludloff and proximal opening wedge have not been popular historically because of instability from lack of fixation, resulting in complications. This article describes modified techniques with modern fixation of these 2 osteotomies, which offer stable fixation and reproducible results.
The Foot | 2017
Makgabo John Tladi; Nikiforos Pandelis Saragas; Paulo N. F. Ferrao; Andrew Strydom
We present two case reports of peripheral nerve tumors (schwannoma and neurofibroma) that presented as tarsal tunnel syndrome for many years. There has never been a report of multiple neurofibroma of the posterior tibial nerve presenting as a tarsal tunnel syndrome. Both patients were treated surgically with good outcomes.
Jbjs Essential Surgical Techniques | 2016
Paulo N. F. Ferrao; Nikiforos Pandelis Saragas; Andrew Strydom
Introduction An isolated subtalar arthrodesis through a sinus tarsi approach with cannulated screw fixation is safe, reproducible, and effective for specific hindfoot pathology in adults. Indications & Contraindications Step 1 Preoperative Planning Perform a comprehensive clinical and radiographic assessment. Step 2 Patient Positioning Position the patient supine on the operating table with a bump under the ipsilateral hip, to internally rotate the involved leg. Step 3 Incision Mark a longitudinal incision from just inferior to the tip of the lateral malleolus and extending toward the base of the 4th metatarsal. Step 4 Approach Expose the subtalar joint by reflecting the extensor digitorum brevis and protecting the peroneal tendons. Step 5 Joint Preparation Meticulously prepare the subtalar joint using osteotomes and curets down to healthy bleeding subchondral bone. Step 6 Reduction and Fixation Reduce the subtalar joint into 5° of valgus and fix it with cannulated screws. Step 7 Wound Closure Meticulously close the wound in layers and place the lower leg in a well-padded plaster back slab with the ankle in a neutral position. Step 8 Postoperative Care The operatively treated leg is kept immobilized and non-weight-bearing for the first 6 weeks. Results Numerous retrospective articles have reported high fusion rates and good functional outcomes after isolated subtalar arthrodesis, for all indications. Pitfalls & Challenges
Foot & Ankle International | 2018
Eoghan T. Hurley; Christopher D. Murawski; Jochen Paul; Alberto Marangon; Marcelo Pires Prado; Xiangyang Xu; László Hangody; John G. Kennedy; Jakob Ackermann; Samuel B. Adams; Carol L. Andrews; Chayanin Angthong; Jorge Batista; Onno L. Baur; Steve Bayer; Christoph Becher; Gregory C. Berlet; Lorraine A. T. Boakye; Alexandra J. Brown; Roberto Buda; James Calder; Gian Luigi Canata; Dominic S. Carreira; Thomas O. Clanton; Jari Dahmen; Pieter D’Hooghe; Christopher W. DiGiovanni; Malcolm E. Dombrowski; Mark C. Drakos; Richard D. Ferkel
Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle is based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on “Osteochondral Allograft” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; and unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 15 statements on osteochondral allograft reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. One achieved unanimous support and 14 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 85% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with osteochondral allograft as a treatment strategy for osteochondral lesions of the talus.
Foot & Ankle International | 2018
Mikel L. Reilingh; Christopher D. Murawski; Christopher W. DiGiovanni; Jari Dahmen; Paulo N. F. Ferrao; Kaj T. A. Lambers; Jeffrey S. Ling; Yasuhito Tanaka; Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs; Jakob Ackermann; Samuel B. Adams; Carol L. Andrews; Chayanin Angthong; Jorge Batista; Onno L. Baur; Steve Bayer; Christoph Becher; Gregory C. Berlet; Lorraine A. T. Boakye; Alexandra J. Brown; Roberto Buda; James Calder; Gian Luigi Canata; Dominic S. Carreira; Thomas O. Clanton; Pieter D’Hooghe; Malcolm E. Dombrowski; Mark C. Drakos; Richard D. Ferkel; Lisa A. Fortier
Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle is based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on “Fixation Techniques” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; and unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 15 statements on fixation techniques reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. All 15 statements achieved strong consensus, with at least 82% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with using fixation techniques in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus.
Foot & Ankle International | 2018
Peter N. Mittwede; Christopher D. Murawski; Jakob Ackermann; Simon Görtz; Beat Hintermann; Hak Jun Kim; David B. Thordarson; Francesca Vannini; Alastair Younger; Samuel B. Adams; Carol L. Andrews; Chayanin Angthong; Jorge Batista; Onno L. Baur; Steve Bayer; Christoph Becher; Gregory C. Berlet; Lorraine A. T. Boakye; Alexandra J. Brown; Roberto Buda; James Calder; Gian Luigi Canata; Dominic S. Carreira; Thomas O. Clanton; Jari Dahmen; Pieter D’Hooghe; Christopher W. DiGiovanni; Malcolm E. Dombrowski; Mark C. Drakos; Richard D. Ferkel
Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article was to report on the consensus statements on “Revision and Salvage Management” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 8 statements on revision and salvage management reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. One achieved unanimous support and 7 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 85% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with revision and salvage management in the cartilage repair of the ankle.