Pavel Alekseychik
University of Helsinki
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Pavel Alekseychik.
Global Change Biology | 2014
Ville Kasurinen; Knut Alfredsen; Pasi Kolari; Ivan Mammarella; Pavel Alekseychik; Janne Rinne; Timo Vesala; Pierre Y. Bernier; Julia Boike; Moritz Langer; Luca Belelli Marchesini; Ko van Huissteden; Han Dolman; Torsten Sachs; Takeshi Ohta; Andrej Varlagin; Adrian V. Rocha; Altaf Arain; Walter C. Oechel; Magnus Lund; Achim Grelle; Anders Lindroth; Andy Black; Mika Aurela; Tuomas Laurila; Annalea Lohila; Frank Berninger
In this study latent heat flux (λE) measurements made at 65 boreal and arctic eddy-covariance (EC) sites were analyses by using the Penman-Monteith equation. Sites were stratified into nine different ecosystem types: harvested and burnt forest areas, pine forests, spruce or fir forests, Douglas-fir forests, broadleaf deciduous forests, larch forests, wetlands, tundra and natural grasslands. The Penman-Monteith equation was calibrated with variable surface resistances against half-hourly eddy-covariance data and clear differences between ecosystem types were observed. Based on the modeled behavior of surface and aerodynamic resistances, surface resistance tightly control λE in most mature forests, while it had less importance in ecosystems having shorter vegetation like young or recently harvested forests, grasslands, wetlands and tundra. The parameters of the Penman-Monteith equation were clearly different for winter and summer conditions, indicating that phenological effects on surface resistance are important. We also compared the simulated λE of different ecosystem types under meteorological conditions at one site. Values of λE varied between 15% and 38% of the net radiation in the simulations with mean ecosystem parameters. In general, the simulations suggest that λE is higher from forested ecosystems than from grasslands, wetlands or tundra-type ecosystems. Forests showed usually a tighter stomatal control of λE as indicated by a pronounced sensitivity of surface resistance to atmospheric vapor pressure deficit. Nevertheless, the surface resistance of forests was lower than for open vegetation types including wetlands. Tundra and wetlands had higher surface resistances, which were less sensitive to vapor pressure deficits. The results indicate that the variation in surface resistance within and between different vegetation types might play a significant role in energy exchange between terrestrial ecosystems and atmosphere. These results suggest the need to take into account vegetation type and phenology in energy exchange modeling.
Science of The Total Environment | 2016
Tingting Li; Maarit Raivonen; Pavel Alekseychik; Mika Aurela; Annalea Lohila; Xunhua Zheng; Qing Zhang; Guocheng Wang; Ivan Mammarella; Janne Rinne; Lijun Yu; Baohua Xie; Timo Vesala; Wen Zhang
Boreal/arctic wetlands are dominated by diverse plant species, which vary in their contribution to CH4 production, oxidation and transport processes. Earlier studies have often lumped the processes all together, which may induce large uncertainties into the results. We present a novel model, which includes three vegetation classes and can be used to simulate CH4 emissions from boreal and arctic treeless wetlands. The model is based on an earlier biogeophysical model, CH4MODwetland. We grouped the vegetation as graminoids, shrubs and Sphagnum and recalibrated the vegetation parameters according to their different CH4 production, oxidation and transport capacities. Then, we used eddy-covariance-based CH4 flux observations from a boreal (Siikaneva) and a subarctic fen (Lompolojänkkä) in Finland to validate the model. The results showed that the recalibrated model could generally simulate the seasonal patterns of the Finnish wetlands with different plant communities. The comparison between the simulated and measured daily CH4 fluxes resulted in a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.82 with a slope of 1.0 and an intercept of -0.1mgm-2h-1 for the Siikaneva site (n=2249, p<0.001) and an R2 of 0.82 with a slope of 1.0 and an intercept of 0.0mgm-2h-1 for the Lompolojänkkä site (n=1826, p<0.001). Compared with the original model, the recalibrated model in this study significantly improved the model efficiency (EF), from -5.5 to 0.8 at the Siikaneva site and from -0.4 to 0.8 at the Lompolojänkkä site. The simulated annual CH4 emissions ranged from 7 to 24gm-2yr-1, which was consistent with the observations (7-22gm-2yr-1). However, there are some discrepancies between the simulated and observed daily CH4 fluxes for the Siikaneva site (RMSE=50.0%) and the Lompolojänkkä site (RMSE=47.9%). Model sensitivity analysis showed that increasing the proportion of the graminoids would significantly increase the CH4 emission levels. Our study demonstrated that the parameterization of the different vegetation processes was important in estimating long-term wetland CH4 emissions.
Environmental Research Letters | 2016
A F Sabrekov; M. V. Glagolev; Pavel Alekseychik; B A Smolentsev; Irina Terentieva; L A Krivenok; Shamil Maksyutov
This study combines a literature survey andfield observation data in an ad initio attempt to construct a process-basedmodel ofmethane sink in upland soils including both the biological and physical aspects of the process. Comparison is drawn between the predicted sink rates and chamber measurements in several forest and grassland sites in the southern part ofWest Siberia. CH4 flux, total respiration, air and soil temperature, soilmoisture, pH, organic content, bulk density and solid phase density weremeasured during a field campaign in summer 2014. Twodatasets from literature were also used formodel validation. Themodeled sink rates were found to be in relatively good correspondence with the values obtained in the field. Introduction of the rhizosphericmethanotrophy significantly improves thematch between themodel and the observations. TheQ10 values ofmethane sink observed in the fieldwere 1.2–1.4, which is in good agreementwith the experimental results from the other studies. Based onmodeling results, we also conclude that soil oxygen concentration is not a limiting factor formethane sink in upland forest and grassland ecosystems.
Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2018
Janne Rinne; Eeva-Stiina Tuittila; Olli Peltola; Xuefei Li; Maarit Raivonen; Pavel Alekseychik; Sami Haapanala; Mari Pihlatie; Mika Aurela; Ivan Mammarella; Timo Vesala
We have analyzed decade-long methane flux data set from a boreal fen, Siikaneva, together with data on environmental parameters and carbon dioxide exchange. The methane flux showed seasonal cycle but no systematic diel cycle. The highest fluxes were observed in July–August with average value of 73 nmol m−2 s−1. Wintertime fluxes were small but positive, with January–March average of 6.7 nmol m−2 s−1. Daily average methane emission correlated best with peat temperatures at 20–35 cm depths. The second highest correlation was with gross primary production (GPP). The best correspondence between emission algorithm and measured fluxes was found for a variable-slope generalized linear model (r2 = 0.89) with peat temperature at 35 cm depth and GPP as explanatory variables, slopes varying between years. The homogeneity of slope approach indicated that seasonal variation explained 79% of the sum of squares variation of daily average methane emission, the interannual variation in explanatory factors 7.0%, functional change 5.3%, and random variation 9.1%. Significant correlation between interannual variability of growing season methane emission and that of GPP indicates that on interannual time scales GPP controls methane emission variability, crucially for development of process-based methane emission models. Annual methane emission ranged from 6.0 to 14 gC m−2 and was 2.7 ± 0.4% of annual GPP. Over 10-year period methane emission was 18% of net ecosystem exchange as carbon. The weak relation of methane emission to water table position indicates that space-to-time analogy, used to extrapolate spatial chamber data in time, may not be applicable in seasonal time scales. (Less)
Geophysical Research Letters | 2017
Pavel Alekseychik; Aino Korrensalo; Ivan Mammarella; Timo Vesala; Eeva Stiina Tuittila
Leaf area index (LAI) is an important parameter in natural ecosystems, representing the seasonal development of vegetation and photosynthetic potential. However, direct measurement techniques require labor-intensive field campaigns that are usually limited in time, while remote sensing approaches often do not yield reliable estimates. Here, we propose that the bulk LAI of sedges (LAIs) can be estimated alternatively from a micrometeorological parameter, the aerodynamic roughness length for momentum (z0). z0 can be readily calculated from high-response turbulence and other meteorological data, typically measured continuously and routinely available at ecosystem research sites. The regressions of LAI versus z0 were obtained using the data from two Finnish natural sites representative of boreal fen and bog ecosystems. LAIs was found to be well-correlated with z0 and sedge canopy height. Superior method performance was demonstrated in the fen ecosystem where the sedges make a bigger contribution to overall surface roughness than in bogs.
Geography, Environment, Sustainability | 2018
Hanna K. Lappalainen; Nuria Altimir; Veli-Matti Kerminen; Tuukka Petäjä; R. Makkonen; Pavel Alekseychik; Nina Zaitseva; Irina Bashmakova; Joni Kujansuu; Antti Lauri; Päivi Haapanala; Stephany Buenrostro Mazon; Alla Borisova; Pavel Konstantinov; Sergej Chalov; Tuomas Laurila; Eija Asmi; Heikki Lihavainen; Jaana Bäck; Michael Arshinov; Alexander Mahura; Steven Arnold; Timo Vihma; Petteri Uotila; Gerrit de Leeuw; Ilmo T. Kukkonen; Svetlana Malkhazova; Veli-Pekka Tynkkynen; Irina Fedorova; Hans Hansson
The Pan-Eurasian Experiment (PEEX) program was initiated as a bottom-up approach by the researchers coming fromFinlandandRussiain October 2012. The PEEX China kick off meeting was held in November 2013. During its five years in operation, the program has established a governance structure and delivered a science plan for the Northern Eurasian region. PEEX has also introduced a concept design for a modelling platform and ground-based in situ observation systems for detecting land-atmosphere and ocean-atmosphere interactions. Today, PEEX has an extensive researcher’s network representing research communities coming from the Nordic countries,RussiaandChina. PEEX is currently carrying out its research activities on a project basis, but is looking for more coordinated funding bases, especially inRussiaand inChina. The near-future challenge in implementing the PEEX research agenda is to achieve a successful integration and identification of the methodological approaches of the socio-economic research to environmental sciences. Here we give insight into these issues and provide an overview on the main tasks for the upcoming years.
Biogeosciences | 2015
Jorien E. Vonk; Suzanne E. Tank; William B. Bowden; Isabelle Laurion; Warwick F. Vincent; Pavel Alekseychik; Marc Amyot; M. F. Billet; J. Canario; Rose M. Cory; Bethany Deshpande; Manuel Helbig; Mathilde Jammet; Jan Karlsson; Julia R. Larouche; Gwyneth A. MacMillan; Milla Rautio; K. M. Walter Anthony; Kimberly P. Wickland
Archive | 2011
L. Liao; Miikka Dal Maso; Risto Taipale; Janne Rinne; Mikael Ehn; Heikki Junninen; Mikko Äijälä; Tuomo Nieminen; Pavel Alekseychik; Mira Hulkkonen; Douglas R. Worsnop; Veli-Matti Kerminen; Markku Kulmala
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology | 2013
Pavel Alekseychik; Ivan Mammarella; Samuli Launiainen; Üllar Rannik; Timo Vesala
Boreal Environment Research: An International Interdisciplinary Journal; 16(4), pp 337-362 (2011) | 2011
Markku Kulmala; Pavel Alekseychik; Mikhail Paramonov; Tuomas Laurila; Eija Asmi; Almut Arneth; S. S. Zilitinkevich; Veli-Matti Kerminen