Pavel Hrubes
University of Calgary
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Pavel Hrubes.
Theory of Computing | 2011
Pavel Hrubes; Amir Yehudayoff
Given a polynomial f with coefficients from a field F, is it easier to compute f over an extension ring R than over F? We address this question, and show the following. For every polynomial f , there is a noncommutative extension ring R such that F is in the center of R and f has a polynomial-size formula over R. On the other hand, if F is algebraically closed, no commutative extension ring R can reduce formula or circuit complexity of f . To complete the picture, we prove that over any field, there exist hard polynomials with zero-one coefficients. (This is a basic theorem, but we could not find it written explicitly.) Finally, we show that low-dimensional extensions are not very helpful in computing polynomials. As a corollary, we obtain that the elementary symmetric polynomials have formulas of size n O(log log n) over any field, and that division gates can be efficiently eliminated from circuits,
Annals of Pure and Applied Logic | 2009
Pavel Hrubes
Abstract We give proofs of the effective monotone interpolation property for the system of modal logic K , and others, and the system I L of intuitionistic propositional logic. Hence we obtain exponential lower bounds on the number of proof-lines in those systems. The main results have been given in [P. Hrubes, Lower bounds for modal logics, Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (3) (2007) 941–958; P. Hrubes, A lower bound for intuitionistic logic, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 146 (2007) 72–90]; here, we give considerably simplified proofs, as well as some generalisations.
Annals of Pure and Applied Logic | 2007
Pavel Hrubes
Abstract We give an exponential lower bound on the number of proof-lines in intuitionistic propositional logic, I L , axiomatised in the usual Frege-style fashion; i.e., we give an example of I L -tautologies A 1 , A 2 , … s.t. every I L -proof of A i must have a number of proof-lines exponential in terms of the size of A i . We show that the results do not apply to the system of classical logic and we obtain an exponential speed-up between classical and intuitionistic logic.
SIAM Journal on Computing | 2015
Pavel Hrubes; Iddo Tzameret
We study arithmetic proof systems
foundations of computer science | 2017
Pavel Hrubes
{\mathbb P}_c({\mathbb F})
symposium on the theory of computing | 2012
Pavel Hrubes; Iddo Tzameret
and
conference on computational complexity | 2015
Pavel Hrubes; Anup Rao
{\mathbb P}_f({\mathbb F})
Theory of Computing | 2013
Pavel Hrubes
operating with arithmetic circuits and arithmetic formulas, respectively, and that prove polynomial identities over a field
international colloquium on automata, languages and programming | 2016
Pavel Hrubes; Amir Yehudayoff
{\mathbb F}
Information Processing Letters | 2012
Pavel Hrubes
. We establish a series of structural theorems about these proof systems, the main one stating that