Paxton K. Giffin
Mississippi State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Paxton K. Giffin.
Volume 1: Low/Intermediate-Level Radioactive Waste Management; Spent Fuel, Fissile Material, Transuranic and High-Level Radioactive Waste Management | 2013
Charles A. Waggoner; Michael S. Parsons; Paxton K. Giffin
Processing liquid wastes frequently generates off gas streams with high humidity and liquid aerosols. Droplet laden air streams can be produced from tank mixing or sparging and processes such as reforming or evaporative volume reduction. Unfortunately these wet air streams represent a genuine threat to HEPA filters. High efficiency mist eliminators (HEME) are one option for removal of liquid aerosols with high dissolved or suspended solids content.HEMEs have been used extensively in industrial applications, however they have not seen widespread use in the nuclear industry. Filtering efficiency data along with loading curves are not readily available for these units and data that exist are not easily translated to operational parameters in liquid waste treatment plants.A specialized test stand has been developed to evaluate the performance of HEME elements under use conditions of a US DOE facility. HEME elements were tested at three volumetric flow rates using aerosols produced from an iron-rich waste surrogate. The challenge aerosol included submicron particles produced from Laskin nozzles and super micron particles produced from a hollow cone spray nozzle. Test conditions included ambient temperature and relative humidities greater than 95%.Data collected during testing HEME elements from three different manufacturers included volumetric flow rate, differential temperature across the filter housing, downstream relative humidity, and differential pressure (dP) across the filter element. Filter challenge was discontinued at three intermediate dPs and the filter to allow determining filter efficiency using dioctyl phthalate and then with dry surrogate aerosols. Filtering efficiencies of the clean HEME, the clean HEME loaded with water, and the HEME at maximum dP were also collected using the two test aerosols.Results of the testing included differential pressure vs. time loading curves for the nine elements tested along with the mass of moisture and solid material on each element at final dP. Plots of overall filtering efficiencies for DOP (spherical aerosol) and dry surrogate (aspherical aerosols) at specified dPs were computed for each filter. Filtering efficiencies were determined as a function of particle size. Curves were also generated showing the most penetrating particle size as a function of dP.A preliminary set of tests was conducted to evaluate spray location, duration, pressure, and wash volume for in-place cleaning the interior surface (reducing dP) of the HEME element. A variety of nozzle designs were evaluated and test results demonstrated the potential to overload the HEME (saturate filter medium) resulting in very high dPs and extensive drain times. At least one combination of spray nozzle design, spray location on the surface of the element, and spray time/pressure was successful in achieving extension of operational life.© 2013 ASME
Aerosol Science and Technology | 2013
Paxton K. Giffin; Charles A. Waggoner; Michael S. Parsons
The Institute for Clean Energy Technology (ICET) at Mississippi State University (MSU) has developed testing capabilities for evaluating the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code on Nuclear Air and Gas Treatment (AG-1) section FK radial flow HEPA filters. These high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters are typically used at sites within the DOE complex to control particulate matter emissions. The goal of this testing was to provide information related to the performance of radial flow HEPA filters that use dimple pleat separators. Prior to this testing, insufficient data were available to determine the lifecycle performance of these filters. Two different types of dimple pleated radial flow HEPA filters were tested: a safe change design and a remote change design. Filters were tested at both ambient and elevated conditions of temperature and relative humidity. The challenge aerosols were Alumina (Al(OH)3), Carbon black, and Arizona road dust. The performance of these filters at ambient conditions was determined by the filters’ mass loading capacity and filtering efficiency. Elevated condition performance was evaluated by the filters’ resistance to elevated temperature and relative humidity. The results indicated that the challenge aerosol had a large impact on the total loading capacity of the filters. Testing at elevated conditions of temperature and relative humidity revealed an issue with the strength of the dimple pleats. The dimples softened when challenged with elevated conditions, which led to filter failure due to a cascading reduction in free flow area and increase in differential pressure. Copyright 2013 American Association for Aerosol Research
Review of Scientific Instruments | 2012
Paxton K. Giffin; Michael S. Parsons; Ronald J. Unz; Charles A. Waggoner
The Institute for Clean Energy Technology (ICET) at Mississippi State University has developed a test stand capable of lifecycle testing of high efficiency particulate air filters and other filters specified in American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code on Nuclear Air and Gas Treatment (AG-1) filters. The test stand is currently equipped to test AG-1 Section FK radial flow filters, and expansion is currently underway to increase testing capabilities for other types of AG-1 filters. The test stand is capable of producing differential pressures of 12.45 kPa (50 in. w.c.) at volumetric air flow rates up to 113.3 m(3)/min (4000 CFM). Testing is performed at elevated and ambient conditions for temperature and relative humidity. Current testing utilizes three challenge aerosols: carbon black, alumina, and Arizona road dust (A1-Ultrafine). Each aerosol has a different mass median diameter to test loading over a wide range of particles sizes. The test stand is designed to monitor and maintain relative humidity and temperature to required specifications. Instrumentation is implemented on the upstream and downstream sections of the test stand as well as on the filter housing itself. Representative data are presented herein illustrating the test stands capabilities. Digital images of the filter pack collected during and after testing is displayed after the representative data are discussed. In conclusion, the ICET test stand with AG-1 filter testing capabilities has been developed and hurdles such as test parameter stability and design flexibility overcome.
Review of Scientific Instruments | 2012
Paxton K. Giffin; Michael S. Parsons; Charles A. Waggoner
High efficiency mist eliminators (HEME) are airstream filtering elements primarily used to remove liquid and solid aerosols. HEME elements are designed to reduce aerosol load on downstream high efficiency particulate air filters and to have a liquid particle removal efficiency of 99.5% for aerosols as small as 1 μm in size. The test stand described herein is designed to evaluate the loading capacity and filtering efficiency of a single HEME element. The loading capacity was determined with or without use of a water spray cleaning system to wash the interior surface of the element. The HEME element is challenged with a liquid waste surrogate using Laskin nozzles and large dispersion nozzles. The waste surrogate used was a highly caustic solution with both suspended and dissolved solids representative of actual exposures at mixed, hazardous, and radiological, waste treatment facilities. The filtering efficiency performance was determined by challenging the element with a dried waste surrogate aerosol and di-octyl phthalate intermittently during the loading process. Capabilities of the test stand and representative results obtained during testing are presented.
Archive | 2011
Paxton K. Giffin; Michael S. Parsons; Jaime G. Rickert; Charles A. Waggoner
Archive | 2013
John A. Wilson; Paxton K. Giffin; Michael S. Parsons; Charles A. Waggoner
Archive | 2013
Paxton K. Giffin; Michael S. Parsons; John A. Wilson; Charles A. Waggoner
Archive | 2012
Paxton K. Giffin; Michael S. Parsons; Jaime G. Rickert; Charles A. Waggoner
Archive | 2012
John A. Wilson; Paxton K. Giffin; Michael S. Parsons; Charles A. Waggoner
Archive | 2012
Paxton K. Giffin; Michael S. Parsons; Charles A. Waggoner