Paz Lavilla

Morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus during a 10-year period. A comparison of early and late manifestations in a cohort of 1,000 patients.

In the present study, we assessed the frequency and characteristics of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) during a 10-year period and compared the frequency of early manifestations with those that appeared later in the evolution of the disease. In 1990, we started a multicenter study of 1,000 patients from 7 European countries. All had medical histories documented and underwent medical interview and routine general physical examination when entered in the study, and all were followed prospectively by the same physicians during the ensuing 10 years (1990–2000).A total of 481 (48.1%) patients presented 1 or more episodes of arthritis at any time during the 10 years, 311 (31.1%) patients had malar rash, 279 (27.9%) active nephropathy, 194 (19.4%) neurologic involvement, 166 (16.6%) fever, 163 (16.3%) Raynaud phenomenon, 160 (16.0%) serositis (pleuritis and/or pericarditis), 134 (13.4%) thrombocytopenia, and 92 (9.2%) thrombosis. When the prevalences of the clinical manifestations during the initial 5 years of follow-up (1990–1995) were compared with those during the ensuing 5 years (1995–2000), most manifestations were found to be more frequent during the initial 5 years. Of the 1,000 patients, 360 (36%) presented infections, 169 (16.9%) hypertension, 121 (12.1%) osteoporosis, and 81 (8.1%) cytopenia due to immunosuppressive agents. Twenty-three (2.3%) patients developed malignancies; the most frequent primary localizations were the uterus and the breast.Sixty-eight (6.8%) patients died, and the most frequent causes of death were similarly divided between active SLE (26.5%), thromboses (26.5%), and infections (25%). A survival probability of 92% at 10 years was found. A lower survival probability was detected in those patients who presented at the beginning of the study with nephropathy (88% versus 94% in patients without nephropathy, p = 0.045). When the causes of death during the initial 5 years of follow-up (1990–1995) were compared with those during the ensuing 5 years (1995–2000), active SLE and infections (28.9% each) appeared to be the most common causes during the initial 5 years, while thromboses (26.1%) became the most common cause of death during the last 5 years.In conclusion, most of the SLE inflammatory manifestations appear to be less common after a long-term evolution of the disease, probably reflecting the effect of therapy as well as the progressive remission of the disease in many patients. Meanwhile, a more prominent role of thrombotic events is becoming evident, affecting both morbidity and mortality in SLE.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Clinical and Immunologic Patterns of Disease Expression in a Cohort of 1,000 Patients

: In the present study we have analyzed the prevalence and characteristics of the most relevant clinical and immunologic features in 1,000 patients with SLE. Several differences in the expression of the disease have been observed in relation to the patients age at onset, sex, and autoantibody serology. The childhood-onset patients more often had malar rashes (55% vs 39%) and nephropathy (28% vs 15%) as presenting manifestations. During the evolution of the disease, these patients had an increased prevalence only of malar rash (79% vs 56%) and a lower prevalence of rheumatoid factor (6% vs 19%). The older-onset patients (age 50 or older) less often showed malar rash (21% vs 42%), arthritis (52% vs 71%), and nephropathy (3% vs 17%) as the first symptom. During the evolution of their disease, these patients had a decreased prevalence of malar rash (33% vs 60%), photosensitivity (29% vs 47%), arthritis (73% vs 85%), nephropathy (22% vs 41%), thrombosis (4% vs 15%), and anti-La antibodies (6% vs 20%), but an increased prevalence of sicca syndrome (33% vs 15%). Males more often had serositis (28% vs 16%) as a first symptom, but they presented with a lower prevalence of arthritis (74% vs 85%) during the evolution of the disease. The presence of ANA, a high titer of anti-dsDNA, rheumatoid factor, anti-ENA, and antiphospholipid antibodies also distinguished additional homogeneous SLE subsets of clinical significance.

Morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus during a 5-year period - A multicenter prospective study of 1,000 patients

In the present study we assessed the frequency and characteristics of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in SLE during a 5-year period and analyzed the prognostic significance for morbidity and mortality of the main immunologic parameters used in clinical practice. We started in 1990 a multicenter study of 1,000 patients from 7 European countries. All had medical histories documented and underwent medical interview and routine general physical examination when entered in the study, and all were followed prospectively by the same physicians during the ensuing 5 years (1990-1995). Four hundred thirteen patients (41.3%) presented 1 or more episodes of arthritis, 264 (26.4%) had malar rash, 222 (22.2%) active nephropathy, 139 (13.9%) fever, 136 (13.6%) neurologic involvement, 132 (13.2%) Raynaud phenomenon, 129 (12.9%) serositis (pleuritis and/or pericarditis), 95 (9.5%) thrombocytopenia, and 72 (7.2%) thrombosis. Two hundred seventy patients (27%) presented infections, 113 (11.3%) hypertension, 75 (7.5%) osteoporosis, and 59 (5.9%) cytopenia due to immunosuppressive agents. Sixteen patients (1.6%) developed malignancies, with the most frequent primary localizations the uterus and the breast. Several immunologic parameters (anti-dsDNA or antiphospholipid antibodies) were found to have a predictive value for the development of SLE manifestations during the period of the study. Forty-five patients (4.5%) died; the most frequent causes of death were divided similarly among active SLE (28.9%), infections (28.9%), and thromboses (26.7%). A survival probability of 95% at 5 years was found. A lower survival probability (92%) was detected in those patients who presented at the beginning of the study with nephropathy.

Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) as potential markers of antiphospholipid syndrome.

The antiphospholipid antibodies present in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are directed at a number of phospholipid-binding proteins: β2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI), prothrombin, and so on. Antibodies directed at β2GPI are accepted as a classification criterion for APS, while the presence of antiprothrombin antibodies is not. In the present article, we investigated the possible role of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) as marker of APS on a cohort of 295 individuals with APS (95 primary APS and 45 secondary APS) and APS-related diseases. We found aPS/PT to be highly associated with venous thrombosis (immunoglobulin G [IgG] aPS/PT odds ratio [OR], 7.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.97-13.92 and IgM aPS/PT OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.35-4.77) and obstetric abnormalities (IgG aPS/PT OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.04-5.43), but not with arterial thrombosis. A very high degree of concordance between the concentration of aPS/PT and lupus anticoagulant activity was demonstrated. Therefore, we support the inclusion of aPS/PT determination as second-level assay to confirm APS classification.

Hydrochlorothiazide Versus Spironolactone: Long‐Term Metabolic Modifications in Patients with Essential Hypertension

The metabolic side effects of thiazide diuretics are believed to be responsible for the failure of thiazide diuretics to reduce cardiovascular morbidity in patients with hypertension. However, the decrease in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures that are associated with thiazide administration may be relevant in elderly patients with arterial hypertension. Spironolactone (SP) appears not to influence the metabolic risk profile of the patient with hypertension, and no studies have examined its effect on calcium metabolism. Therefore, in 22 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, the authors performed a parallel, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study that compared the effects on serum urate and lipid, potassium, magnesium, and calcium metabolism of hydrochlorothiazide (HC) (mean [±SD] dose, 72 ± 26 mg/d) and SP (144 ± 53 mg/d) during a 52‐week period. As compared with placebo, HC significantly increased serum urate and total cholesterol concentrations, and decreased serum potassium levels. SP did not affect serum urate or cholesterol levels but increased serum potassium concentrations. Neither diuretic significantly modified magnesium metabolism. Little changes were seen in serum calcium levels during HC or SP treatment, whereas urinary calcium excretion was significantly decreased by HC (mean decrease, 45%; P < .01) or SP (40%; P < .01). The authors conclude that SP, in addition to its potassium‐sparing properties, has a calcium‐sparing effect that may be beneficial for patients in whom reduction of urinary calcium excretion has a therapeutic value.

Hepatic amyloidosis associated with systemic lupus erythematosus

The association between amyloidosis and systemic lupus erythematosus has rarely been described. We report a case of a 37-year-old man with a long-standing SLE who developed clinical and laboratory signs of hepatic dysfunction. A liver biopsy revealed secondary amyloidosis.

El consentimiento informado en la investigación clínica

El concepto de soberania del individuo sobre su cuerpo y su espiritu, defendido por Stuart Mill, puede considerarse el inicio del cambio de mentalidad de la medicina paternalista tradicional al de la responsabilidad compartida y del respeto por las personas (principio de autonomia). El consentimiento informado es el hecho basico garante del principio de autonomia y del derecho a la privacidad de los datos del paciente en la investigacion. Mediante su firma, los individuos competentes eligen libremente participar en la investigacion y autorizan el procesamiento y analisis de los datos de sus historias clinicas. Muchos clinicos tienen importantes problemas con la elaboracion de la hoja de informacion al participante en los proyectos de investigacion, debido fundamentalmente al desconocimiento de las normas de buena practica clinica y a la todavia excesiva actitud paternalista en su actividad profesional. A xe l O liv er es

IgA anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies: Experience from a large center

OBJECTIVEnIgG and IgM antibodies directed at β2-glycoprotein I are included in the classification criteria for the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) while the IgA antibodies against β2-glycoprotein I (IgA aβ2GPI) are not. Conflicting data about the significance of IgA aβ2GPI and APS manifestation can be found and more studies are necessary in order to define the diagnostic value of IgA aβ2GPI. In the present article, we investigated the possible role of IgA aβ2GPI as marker of APS.nnnMETHODSnA cohort of 314 patients with APS and systemic autoimmune disease was investigated for the presence of IgA aβ2GPI and its association with clinical manifestation of APS.nnnRESULTSnEighty-nine patients presented IgA aβ2GPI, 68 cases associated with others antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and in 21 cases being the only aPL present. In primary APS IgA aβ2GPI are highly coincidental with other aPL (92,2%) while most of the isolated IgA aβ2GPI were present in the SLE group (16/21). No association between IgA aβ2GPI and APS manifestations: thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity was found, while a positive association between IgA aβ2GPI and the presence of anti-nDNA, anti-RNP, anti-Sm, anti-SSA, anti-SSB antibodies was encountered.nnnCONCLUSIONnOur study does not show association between IgA aβ2GPI and APS manifestations and does not support the inclusion of IgA aβ2GPI as a classification criteria for APS.

Informed consent in clinical research; Do patients understand what they have signed?

Informed consent is an essential element of research, and signing this document is required to conduct most clinical trials. Its aim is to inform patients what their participation in the study will involve. However, increasingly, their complexity and length are making them difficult to understand, which might lead patients to give their authorization without having read them previously or without having understood what is stated. In this sense, the Ethics Committees for Clinical Research, and Pharmacists specialized in Hospital Pharmacy and Primary Care in their capacity as members of said committees, play an important and difficult role in defending the rights of patients. These Committees will review thoroughly these documents to guarantee that all legal requirements have been met and, at the same time, that they are easy to understand by the potential participants in a clinical trial.