Pedro A. Maldonado
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Pedro A. Maldonado.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2015
Pedro A. Maldonado; Kathleen Chin; Alyson A. Garcia; Marlene M. Corton
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to examine the anatomic variation of the pudendal nerve in the pelvis, on the dorsal surface of the sacrospinous ligament, and in the pudendal canal. STUDY DESIGN Detailed dissections of the pudendal nerve were performed in unembalmed female cadavers. Pelvic measurements included the distance from the origin of the pudendal nerve to the tip of ischial spine and the nerve width at its origin. The length of the pudendal canal was measured. The inferior rectal nerve was identified in the ischioanal fossa and its course documented. Lastly, the relationship of the pudendal nerve to the dorsal surface of the sacrospinous ligament was examined after transecting the lateral surface of the sacrospinous ligament. Descriptive statistics were used for data analyses and reporting. RESULTS Thirteen female cadavers (26 hemipelvises) were examined. A single pudendal nerve trunk was identified in 61.5% of hemipelvises. The median distance from the point of the pudendal nerve formation to the ischial spine was 27.5 mm (range, 14.5-37 mm). The width of the pudendal nerve in the pelvis was 4.5 mm (range, 2.5-6.3 mm). The length of the pudendal canal was 40.5 mm (range, 20.5-54.5 mm). The inferior rectal nerve was noted to enter the pudendal canal in 42.3% of hemipelvises; in these cases, the nerve exited the canal at a distance of 32.5 mm (range, 16-45 mm) from the ischial spine. In the remaining specimens, the inferior rectal nerve passed behind the sacrospinous ligament and entered the ischioanal fossa without entering the pudendal canal. In all specimens, the pudendal nerve was fixed by connective tissue to the dorsal surface of the sacrospinous ligament. CONCLUSION Great variability exists in pudendal nerve anatomy. Fixation of the pudendal nerve to the dorsal surface of the sacrospinous ligament is a consistent finding; thus, pudendal neuralgia attributed to nerve entrapment may be overestimated. The path of the inferior rectal nerve relative to the pudendal canal may have implications in the development of anorectal symptoms. Improved characterization of the pudendal nerve and its branches can help avoid intraoperative complications and enhance existing treatment modalities for pudendal neuropathy.
Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2014
Pedro A. Maldonado; Benjamin K. Kogutt; Clifford Y. Wai
Purpose of review Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction are recognized as being equally important as traditional objective measures of success following midurethral sling (MUS) procedures. The objective of this article is to review the success after MUSs in the context of patient satisfaction. Recent findings Patient satisfaction for both transobturator and retropubic MUSs at 2 years is high with rates up to 88%. Factors that positively influence satisfaction include improvement in quality of life and reduction in severity of symptoms. Satisfaction has been found to be negatively impacted by persistent stress incontinence, preoperative urinary urgency, mixed urinary incontinence, detrusor overactivity, and selected comorbidities such as diabetes. Factors, such as postoperative incomplete bladder emptying, irritative voiding, and complications after MUS surgery, can also influence satisfaction adversely. Summary Combining patient-reported outcome measures with customary objective measures offer a more comprehensive assessment of success. Even though the data are limited, the short-term and intermediate-term rates of satisfaction are promising for both transobturator and retropubic MUSs. Future studies should focus on further elucidating long-term predictors of satisfaction after MUS placement.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America | 2016
Pedro A. Maldonado; Clifford Y. Wai
As the field of reconstructive pelvic surgery continues to evolve, with descriptions of new procedures to repair pelvic organ prolapse, it remains imperative to maintain a functional understanding of pelvic floor anatomy and support. The goal of this review was to provide a focused, conceptual approach to differentiating anatomic defects contributing to prolapse in the various compartments of the vagina. Rather than provide exhaustive descriptions of pelvic floor anatomy, basic pelvic floor anatomy is reviewed, new and historical concepts of pelvic floor support are discussed, and relevance to the surgical management of specific anatomic defects is addressed.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2014
Pedro A. Maldonado; Paul Slocum; Kathleen Chin; Marlene M. Corton
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to examine the anatomic relationship of the genitofemoral and femoral nerves to the psoas major muscle. STUDY DESIGN Dissections were performed in 17 unembalmed female cadavers. Point A was used as the approximate location for placement of psoas hitch sutures and as the reference point from which all measurements were taken. Measurements included the width of the psoas major muscle, psoas minor tendon, genitofemoral nerve branches, and femoral nerve. The relative location of the genitofemoral and femoral nerves to point A and the presence or absence of a psoas minor tendon were documented. RESULTS The psoas minor tendon was absent on at least 1 side in 11 specimens (64.7%). The median width of the psoas minor tendon was 7 mm (range, 3-11.5 mm). The median width and depth of the psoas major muscle was 21.5 mm (range, 10-35 mm) and 20.0 mm (range, 11.5-32 mm), respectively. The median width of the genitofemoral nerve was 2 mm (range, 1-4.5 mm) and that of the femoral nerve was 6.3 mm (range, 5-10.5 mm). Overall, 54 genitofemoral nerve branches were identified in 17 cadavers, 30 medial (55.5%), 22 lateral (40.7%), and 2 directly overlying point A (3.7%). CONCLUSION The exact location for the placement of the psoas hitch sutures will vary, depending on the location of the ureteral injury and the anatomy of the psoas muscle and surrounding structures. A thorough understanding of this regional anatomy should optimize the placement of psoas hitch sutures during ureteral reimplantation procedures and help avoid nerve and vessel injury.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2016
Sunil Balgobin; Pedro A. Maldonado; Kathleen Chin; Joseph I. Schaffer; Cherine A. Hamid
Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery | 2018
Pedro A. Maldonado; Donald D. McIntire; Marlene M. Corton
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey | 2017
Pedro A. Maldonado; Mallory A. Stuparich; Donald D. McIntire; Clifford Y. Wai
International Urogynecology Journal | 2017
Pedro A. Maldonado; Mallory A. Stuparich; Donald D. McIntire; Clifford Y. Wai
Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery | 2017
Pedro A. Maldonado; Kyle P. Norris; Maria E. Florian-Rodriguez; Nemi M. Shah; Clifford Y. Wai
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2017
Pedro A. Maldonado; K.P. Norris; Maria E. Florian-Rodriguez; N.M. Shah; Clifford Y. Wai