Pei Wen Chao

Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Survivors of Infective Endocarditis A Nationwide Population-Based Study

Background— Substantial infective endocarditis (IE)–related morbidity and mortality may occur even after successful treatment. However, no previous study has explored long-term hard end points (ie, stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, cardiovascular death) in addition to all-cause mortality in IE survivors. Methods and Results— A nationwide population-based cohort study was conducted among IE survivors identified with the use of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database during 2000 to 2009. IE survivors were defined as those who survived after discharge from first hospitalization with a diagnosis of IE. A total of 10 116 IE survivors were identified. IE survivors were matched to control subjects without IE at a 1:1 ratio through the use of propensity scores. The primary outcomes were stroke, myocardial infarction, readmission for heart failure, and sudden cardiac death or ventricular arrhythmia. The secondary outcomes were repeat IE and all-cause mortality. Compared with the matched cohort, IE survivors had higher risks of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40–1.80), hemorrhagic stroke (aHR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.90–2.96), myocardial infarction (aHR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.17–1.79), readmission for heart failure (aHR, 2.24; 95% CI, 2.05–2.43), sudden death or ventricular arrhythmia (aHR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.44–1.98), and all-cause death (aHR, 2.27; 95% CI, 2.14–2.40). Risk factors for repeat IE were older age, male sex, drug abuse, and valvular replacement after an initial episode of IE. Conclusion— Despite treatment, the risk of long-term major adverse cardiac events was substantially increased in IE survivors.

Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Adding Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors Versus Sulfonylureas to Metformin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND Recent studies concluded that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors provide glycemic control but also raised concerns about the risk for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, large-scale studies of the effects on cardiovascular outcomes of adding DPP-4 inhibitors versus sulfonylureas to metformin therapy remain scarce. OBJECTIVE To compare clinical outcomes of adding DPP-4 inhibitors versus sulfonylureas to metformin therapy in patients with T2DM. DESIGN Nationwide study using Taiwans National Health Insurance Research Database. SETTING Taiwan. PATIENTS All patients with T2DM aged 20 years or older between 2009 and 2012. A total of 10,089 propensity score-matched pairs of DPP-4 inhibitor users and sulfonylurea users were examined. MEASUREMENTS Cox models with exposure to sulfonylureas and DPP-4 inhibitors included as time-varying covariates were used to compare outcomes. The following outcomes were considered: all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (including ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction), hospitalization for heart failure, and hypoglycemia. Patients were followed until death or 31 December 2013. RESULTS DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with lower risks for all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.72]), MACEs (HR, 0.68 [CI, 0.55 to 0.83]), ischemic stroke (HR, 0.64 [CI, 0.51 to 0.81]), and hypoglycemia (HR, 0.43 [CI, 0.33 to 0.56]) compared with sulfonylureas as add-on therapy to metformin but had no effect on risks for myocardial infarction and hospitalization for heart failure. LIMITATION Observational study design. CONCLUSION Compared with sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with lower risks for all-cause death, MACEs, ischemic stroke, and hypoglycemia when used as add-ons to metformin therapy. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE None.

Association of Postdischarge Rehabilitation with Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Survivors of Sepsis

RATIONALE Intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness is a common issue for sepsis survivors that is characterized by impaired muscle strength and causes functional disability. Although inpatient rehabilitation has not been found to reduce in-hospital mortality, the impact of postdischarge rehabilitation on sepsis survivors is uncertain. OBJECTIVES To investigate the benefit of postdischarge rehabilitation to long-term mortality in sepsis survivors. METHODS We conducted a nationwide, population-based, high-dimensional propensity score-matched cohort study using Taiwans National Health Insurance Research Database. The rehabilitation cohort comprised 15,535 ICU patients who survived sepsis and received rehabilitation within 3 months after discharge between 2000 and 2010. The control cohort consisted of 15,535 high-dimensional propensity score-matched subjects who did not receive rehabilitation within 3 months after discharge. The endpoint was mortality during the 10-year follow-up period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Compared with the control cohort, the rehabilitation cohort had a significantly lower risk of 10-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.97; P < 0.001), with an absolute risk reduction of 1.4 per 100 person-years. The frequency of rehabilitation was inversely associated with 10-year mortality (≥3 vs. 1 course: adjusted hazard ratio, 0.82; P < 0.001). Compared with the control cohort, improved survival was observed in the rehabilitation cohort among ill patients who had more comorbidities, required more prolonged mechanical ventilation, and had longer ICU or hospital stays, but not among those with the opposite conditions (i.e., less ill patients). CONCLUSIONS Postdischarge rehabilitation may be associated with a reduced risk of 10-year mortality in the subset of patients with particularly long ICU courses.

Long-Term Mortality and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Sepsis Survivors. A Nationwide Population-based Study

RATIONALE Patients with sepsis who survive to hospital discharge may present with ongoing high morbidity and mortality. However, little is known about the risk of long-term, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes after sepsis. OBJECTIVES Our study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes in sepsis survivors. METHODS In this nationwide population-based study, data from patients with sepsis were retrieved from Taiwans National Health Insurance Research Database between 2000 and 2002. Each sepsis survivor was 1:1 propensity-matched to control subjects from two different control populations: subjects who were in the general population and subjects who were hospitalized for a nonsepsis diagnosis. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, and sudden cardiac death or ventricular arrhythmia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Compared with matched population control subjects, sepsis survivors had higher risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.14-2.22), major adverse cardiovascular events (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.34-1.41), ischemic stroke (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.23-1.32), hemorrhagic stroke (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.26-1.46), myocardial infarction (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14-1.30), heart failure (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.43-1.53), and sudden cardiac death or ventricular arrhythmia (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.57-1.74). Similar results, although slightly attenuated risks, were found when comparisons were made with hospitalized control subjects without sepsis. CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that sepsis survivors had substantially increased risks of subsequent all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year after discharge, which persisted for up to 5 years after discharge.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use is associated with cancer risk reduction in chronic dialysis patients

Previous studies have shown that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use might be associated with a lower risk of developing cancer in the general population. Patients on dialysis have increased risk for cancer, but there are no studies to determine the relationship between NSAID use and cancer risk in these patients. To identify any association between NSAID use and cancer risk in patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis, we used Taiwans National Health Insurance database to conduct a nationwide population-based, propensity score-matched cohort study. All cancers between groups were compared by Cox proportional hazards models. Compared to nonuse of NSAIDs, the use of non-COX-2-selective inhibitors (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.97) or COX-2-selective inhibitors (0.78, 0.62-0.98) was associated with a lower risk of developing cancer. NSAID use reduced the risk of respiratory (0.39, 0.19-0.79), breast (0.41, 0.19-0.89), kidney (0.58, 0.38-0.88), digestive tract (0.64, 0.49-0.85), and bladder cancers (0.73, 0.55-0.96). NSAID use, however, significantly increased risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (odds ratio, 1.15, 1.07-1.23) but not adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events. Thus, NSAID use was associated with a lower risk of developing cancer in chronic dialysis patients; however, they should still be used with caution due to the side effects of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Acute cholecystitis in end-stage renal disease patients: A nation-wide longitudinal study

BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the risks of acute cholecystitis among end-stage renal disease patients and compare the incidence between two dialysis modality. STUDY DESIGN In this retrospective cohort study, records of fifty thousand end-stage renal disease patients older than 20 years of age from 1998 to 2007 and an age, gender, Charlsons score, diabetes, and dyslipidemia matched control cohort were retrieved from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Hospitalizations for acute cholecystitis were retrieved using ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes and ICD-9-CM operation codes from in-patient claims. RESULTS The incidence rates were 5.8 per 1000 patient-years in the end-stage renal disease patients and 0.92 per 1000 patient-years in the control group. End-stage renal disease was an independent risk factor for acute cholecystitis. In the end-stage renal disease patients, independent risk factors were old age, higher Charlsons score, diabetes, severe liver disease, atrial fibrillation, and haemodialysis (all p<0.05). However, the peritoneal dialysis patients had a higher mortality rate after developing acute cholecystitis. CONCLUSION Acute cholecystitis is not uncommon in end-stage renal disease patients. The independent risk factors were older age, higher Charlsons score, atrial fibrillation, severe liver disease, diabetes, and dialysis modality. Haemodialysis patients had a higher risk of acute cholecystitis than PD patients.

Long-term outcomes in critically ill septic patients who survived cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Objective:To evaluate the long-term survival rate of critically ill sepsis survivors following cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a national scale. DesignRetrospective and observational cohort study. SettingData were extracted from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. PatientsA total of 272,897 ICU patients with sepsis were identified during 2000-2010. Patients who survived to hospital discharge were enrolled. Post-discharge survival outcomes of ICU sepsis survivors who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation were compared with those of patients who did not experience cardiopulmonary arrest using propensity score matching with a 1:1 ratio. InterventionNone. Measurements and Main Results:Only 7% (n = 3,207) of sepsis patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation survived to discharge. The overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year postdischarge survival rates following cardiopulmonary resuscitation were 28%, 23%, and 14%, respectively. Compared with sepsis survivors without cardiopulmonary arrest, sepsis survivors who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation had a greater risk of all-cause mortality after discharge (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.34–1.46). This difference in mortality risk diminished after 2 years (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.96–1.28). Multivariable analysis showed that independent risk factors for long-term mortality following cardiopulmonary resuscitation were male sex, older age, receipt of care in a nonmedical center, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score, chronic kidney disease, cancer, respiratory infection, vasoactive agent use, and receipt of renal replacement therapy during ICU stay. Conclusion:The long-term outcome was worse in ICU survivors of sepsis who received in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation than in those who did not, but this increased risk of mortality diminished at 2 years after discharge.

Pyogenic liver abscess in end-stage renal disease patients: A nationwide longitudinal study

End‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are more prone to infectious disease because of their immunocompromised status. However, the association between pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) and ESRD remains not clear. The aim of our study is to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of PLA in ESRD patients. We recruited all incident ESRD patients from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database from 1998 to 2006. The incidence rate of PLA in ESRD patients was compared with that of a randomly selected non‐ESRD control group matched for age, sex gender, Charlson comorbidity score, diabetes mellitus, and cirrhosis. Among the 57,761 incident dialysis patients, there were 538 cases of PLA. The incidence rate of PLA was 18.20 per 10,000 person‐years in the ESRD cohort and 6.34 per 10,000 person‐years in matched control cohort. The rate of PLA was significantly higher in the ESRD cohort (hazard ratio 3.63, 95% confidence interval 2.83–4.65, P < 0.001). The mortality rates of PLA were higher in the ESRD cohort than those in matched control cohort. Diabetes mellitus was an independent risk factor for mortality of PLA. Compared with non‐ESRD patients, ESRD patients have a higher risk of PLA and poorer outcomes.

Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Terms of Major Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Elderly Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

AbstractRenin and aldosterone activity levels are low in elderly patients, raising concerns about the benefits and risks of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) use. However, data from direct comparisons of the effects of ACEIs on ARBs in the elderly population remain inconclusive.In this nationwide study, all patients aged ≥ 70 years were retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database for the period 2000 to 2009 and were followed up until the end of 2010. The ARB cohort (12,347 patients who continuously used ARBs for ≥ 90 days) was matched to ACEI cohort using high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS). Intention-to-treat (ITT) and as-treated (AT) analyses were conducted.In the ITT analysis, after considering death as a competing risk, the ACEI cohort had similar risks of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79–1.06), ischemic stroke (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90–1.07), and heart failure (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.83–1.04) compared with the ARB cohort. No difference in adverse effects, such as acute kidney injury (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.89–1.09) and hyperkalemia (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.87–1.20), was observed between cohorts. AT analysis produced similar results to those of ITT analysis. We were unable to demonstrate a survival difference between cohorts (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.88–1.21) after considering drug discontinuation as a competing risk in AT analysis.Our study supports the notion that ACEI and ARB users have similar risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), even in elderly populations.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers and the risk of major adverse cardiac events in patients with diabetes and prior stroke: A nationwide study

Objective: Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system blockers are the preferred antihypertensive medications in patients with diabetes and prior stroke. This study aimed to compare the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in terms of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with diabetes who survived ischemic stroke. Methods: We conducted an observational, nationwide, propensity score-matched cohort study using Taiwans National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients aged at least 20 years with type 2 diabetes who initiated ACEI (n = 15 959) or ARB (n = 23 929) use within 90 days after discharge for first ischemic stroke between January 2000 and December 2011 were allocated to ACEI and ARB groups, respectively. The primary outcomes were MACEs (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular mortality). The secondary outcomes were hospitalization for acute kidney injury and hyperkalemia. Intention-to-treat and as-treated models were used. Results: Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference between the ACEI and ARB groups in the outcomes of MACEs [hazard ratio (HR), 0.99; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95–1.04], including ischemic stroke (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.97–1.06), myocardial infarction (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.95–1.18), and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91–1.06). As-treated analysis produced similar results. Additionally, the groups showed no difference in the risk of hospitalization for acute kidney injury or hyperkalemia. Conclusion: Our study supports the hypothesis that the risks of MACEs and two additional secondary outcomes in patients with diabetes who survived ischemic stroke did not differ according to ACEI versus ARB use.