Penélope Pacheco-López
University of Kent
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Penélope Pacheco-López.
Journal of Post Keynesian Economics | 2014
Penélope Pacheco-López
The aim of this paper is to disentangle the effects of trade liberalization during the mid-1980s from the liberalization involved in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) on exports, imports, and the balance of trade in Mexico. The main empirical results suggest that the trade reforms during the mid-1980s had a significant effect on trade, exports, and imports; however, the effects of NAFTA, at least on exports, are negligible. Since the mid-1980s, the propensity to import has exceeded the propensity to export, and this has worsened the growth rate consistent with balanced trade, which is a major explanation of the slowdown of Mexicos growth in recent years. NAFTA has not delivered the improved growth performance that was promised by Mexicos political leaders at the time.
International Review of Applied Economics | 2007
Penélope Pacheco-López; A. P. Thirlwall
Abstract The broad purpose of trade liberalisation is to raise the rate of growth of countries on a sustainable basis, consistent with the achievement of other macroeconomic objectives. In this article we consider whether trade liberalisation in 17 countries of Latin America has improved the trade‐off between gross domestic product (GDP) growth and the trade balance, allowing the countries to grow faster without sacrificing foreign exchange. We find that in the aftermath of liberalisation, the majority of countries did grow faster, but at the expense of a deteriorating trade balance. Testing formally for the impact of trade liberalisation in a full model of trade balance determination, we find that only in Chile and Venezuela has the trade‐off unequivocally improved. In other countries there has been a significant deterioration or no change. Nine out of the 17 countries have grown faster post‐liberalisation than pre‐liberalisation but, except for Chile and Venezuela, at the expense of a wider trade or current account deficit.
PANORAMA ECONÓMICO | 2017
Penélope Pacheco-López; A. P. Thirlwall
Este trabajo revisa la evidencia del impacto de la liberalizacion comercial sobre el desempeno economico de paises pobres en desarrollo con respecto a la reduccion de la pobreza, la distribucion del ingreso dentro y entre los paises, el comercio y la balanza de pagos, y el crecimiento economico, y encuentra que la liberalizacion no ha proporcionado los beneficios esperados. La teoria economica, asi como la evidencia historica y contemporanea, proporcionan argumentos para la proteccion de las actividades industriales en paises en desarrollo. / The paper reviews the evidence of the impact of trade liberalisation on the economic performance of poor developing countries with respect to poverty reduction, the distribution of income within countries, the distribution of income between countries, trade and the balance of payments, and economic growth, and finds that liberalisation has not delivered the benefits expected. Economic theory, and the historical and contemporary evidence, all provide arguments for protection of industrial activities in developing countries.
Archive | 2004
Penélope Pacheco-López
Archive | 2008
A. P. Thirlwall; Penélope Pacheco-López
Review of Keynesian Economics | 2014
Penélope Pacheco-López; A. P. Thirlwall
Studies in Economics | 2005
Penélope Pacheco-López
Archive | 2011
A. P. Thirlwall; Penélope Pacheco-López
Studies in Economics | 2005
Penélope Pacheco-López; A. P. Thirlwall
Studies in Economics | 2009
Penélope Pacheco-López; A. P. Thirlwall