Per Westrin

The induction dose of propofol in infants 1-6 months of age and in children 10-16 years of age

The propofol dose needed for satisfactory induction of anesthesia was determined in 22 infants 1-6 months of age and 22 children 10-16 yr of age. A single bolus of propofol was given over 10 s. Thirty seconds after injection the lid reflex was tested and the anesthesia mask was applied. The patient was considered to be asleep if there were no gross movements during the next 30 s while the patient breathed O2. The dose required for satisfactory induction in 50% of patients (ED50) (+/- SE) was 3.0 +/- 0.2 mg/kg in infants and 2.4 +/- 0.1 mg/kg in older children (P less than 0.02). Pain on injection occurred in 50% of the infants and 18% of the children.

Thiopental Requirements for Induction of Anesthesia in Neonates and in Infants One to Six Months of Age

The authors determined the thiopental dose needed for satisfactory induction in ten neonates, 0-14 days of age, and 20 infants, 1-6 months of age. A single iv bolus of thiopental was given. Thirty seconds after injection the anesthesia mask was applied and the response was observed during the following 30 s while the patient breathed oxygen. Induction was considered satisfactory if there were no gross movements or coughing. The dose required for satisfactory induction in 50% of patients, ED50 (+/- SE), was 3.4 +/- 0.2 mg/kg in neonates and 6.3 +/- 0.7 mg/kg in infants (P less than 0.001). It is concluded that the thiopental dose needed for satisfactory induction is less in neonates than in infants.

Methohexital dissolved in lipid emulsion for intravenous induction of anesthesia in infants and children

The induction dose of thiopental and propofol has been shown previously to vary during childhood. The methohexital dose needed for satisfactory induction of anesthesia in 50% of patients (ED50) was determined in 75 infants and children, 1 month to 16 yr of age. An intravenous bolus of methohexital, dissolved in a lipid emulsion to decrease pain on injection, was given over 10 s. After 30 s the anesthesia mask was applied. The patient was considered to be asleep if there were no gross movements when the head was placed in the sniffing position and the anesthesia mask applied, and no response to verbal command (tested in children more than 4 yr of age) during the next 30 s while the patient breathed O2. ED50 (+/- SE) was 2.6 +/- 0.2 mg/kg in infants 1-6 months of age, 1.9 +/- 0.1 mg/kg in infants 7-11 months of age, 1.4 +/- 0.1 mg/kg in children 1-3 yr of age, 1.1 +/- 0.1 mg/kg in children 4-7 yr of age, and 1.3 +/- 0.1 mg/kg in children 8-16 yr of age. ED50 in each of the two groups of infants was significantly greater than ED50 in each of the three other groups (P less than 0.05). Pain or discomfort on injection was observed in 1 infant and 3 children (5%). Eight patients (11%) had apnea longer than 15 s, and excitatory phenomena occurred in 9 (12%). It is concluded that the dose of methohexital needed for induction of anesthesia varies with age.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dissolving methohexital in a lipid emulsion reduces pain associated with intravenous injection

Pain often accompanies intravenous injection of 1% methohexital. The aim of the present study was to test whether pain on injection could be reduced by dissolving methohexital in a lipid emulsion (study A) and whether this would affect anesthetic potency (study B). In study A, 24 healthy volunteers, 36 +/- 1 yr (mean +/- SE), were given 1 ml 1% methohexital in saline, 1 ml 1% methohexital in lipid emulsion, and 5 ml 0.1% methohexital in saline in random order. The injections were given in a small vein in the forearm at 5-min intervals. One minute after each injection, the subject was asked to assess the injection pain on a visual analog scale (0-100 mm). The pain score (median [range]) was 44.5 (0-77) after 1% methohexital in saline, 0.5 (0-26) after 1% methohexital in a lipid emulsion, and 1.0 (0-26) after 0.1% methohexital in saline. The pain score for 1% methohexital in saline was significantly greater than those for the other two solutions (P less than 0.001 for each comparison). In study B, 42 patients, 41 +/- 3 yr, were given 1% methohexital in lipid emulsion (n = 22) or 1% methohexital in saline (n = 20). A bolus of either solution was administered over 10 s, and the patient was considered asleep if there was no gross movement or response to verbal command 40-70 s after injection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Faster Recovery after Anesthesia in Infants after Intravenous Induction with Methohexital Instead of Thiopental

Background To determine possible delays in recovery after intravenous anesthesia induction with thiopental, the drug was compared with methohexital in infants 1–12 months of age who were scheduled for hernia repair or circumcision.