Pete Martin

Effect of high throughput RHD typing of fetal DNA in maternal plasma on use of anti-RhD immunoglobulin in RhD negative pregnant women: prospective feasibility study.

Objectives To assess the feasibility of applying a high throughput method, with an automated robotic technique, for predicting fetal RhD phenotype from fetal DNA in the plasma of RhD negative pregnant women to avoid unnecessary treatment with anti-RhD immunoglobulin. Design Prospective comparison of fetal RHD genotype determined from fetal DNA in maternal plasma with the serologically determined fetal RhD phenotype from cord blood. Setting Antenatal clinics and antenatal testing laboratories in the Midlands and north of England and an international blood group reference laboratory. Participants Pregnant women of known gestation identified as RhD negative by an antenatal testing laboratory. Samples from 1997 women were taken at or before the 28 week antenatal visit. Main outcome measures Detection rate of fetal RhD from maternal plasma, error rate, false positive rate, and the odds of being affected given a positive result. Results Serologically determined RhD phenotypes were obtained from 1869 cord blood samples. In 95.7% (n=1788) the correct fetal RhD phenotype was predicted by the genotyping tests. In 3.4% (n=64) results were either unobtainable or inconclusive. A false positive result was obtained in 0.8% (14 samples), probably because of unexpressed or weakly expressed fetal RHD genes. In only three samples (0.2%) were false negative results obtained. If these results had been applied as a guide to treatment, only 2% of the women would have received anti-RhD unnecessarily, compared with 38% without the genotyping. Conclusions High throughput RHD genotyping of fetuses in all RhD negative women is feasible and would substantially reduce unnecessary administration of anti-RhD immunoglobulin to RhD negative pregnant women with an RhD negative fetus.

Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal blood group phenotypes: current practice and future prospects

Fetuses of women with alloantibodies to RhD (D) are at risk from hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn, but only if the fetal red cells are D‐positive. In such pregnancies, it is beneficial to determine fetal D type, as this will affect the management of the pregnancy. It is possible to predict, with a high level of accuracy, fetal blood group phenotypes from genotyping tests on fetal DNA. The best source is the small quantity of fetal DNA in the blood of pregnant women, as this avoids the requirement for invasive procedures of amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Many laboratories worldwide now provide noninvasive fetal D genotyping as a routine service for alloimmunized women, and some also test for c, E, C and K.

Fetal blood group genotyping from DNA from maternal plasma: an important advance in the management and prevention of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn

The cloning of blood group genes and subsequent identification of the molecular bases of blood group polymorphisms has made it possible to predict blood group phenotypes from DNA with a reasonable degree of accuracy. The major application of this technology, which has now become the standard of care, is the determination of a fetal RHD genotype in women with anti‐D, to assess whether the fetus is at risk of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Initially, the procurement of fetal DNA required the invasive procedures of amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling. Since the discovery of fetal DNA in maternal plasma in 1997, the technology of detecting an RHD gene in this very small quantity of fetal DNA has developed rapidly, so that non‐invasive fetal D typing can now be provided as a diagnostic service for D‐negative pregnant women with anti‐D. Within a few years, it is probable that fetuses of all D‐negative pregnant women will be tested for RHD, to establish whether the mother requires antenatal anti‐D immunoglobulin prophylaxis.

Fetal Blood Group Genotyping

Abstract:  Prediction of fetal blood group from DNA is usually performed when the mother has antibodies to RhD, to assess whether the fetus is at risk from hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Over the last five years RhD testing on fetal DNA in maternal plasma has been introduced. At the International Blood Group Reference Laboratory (IBGRL) we employ real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ‐PCR) to detectRHDexons 4, 5, and 10, which also revealsRHDψ. SRYand, in RhD‐negative (RhD–) females, eight biallelic polymorphisms are incorporated in an attempt to provide an internal positive control. Since 2000 we have tested 533 pregnancies for RhD. In 327 pregnancies where the RhD of the infant is known, we had one false‐positive and one false‐negative result. In 2004 we introduced fetal typing from DNA in maternal plasma for K, Rhc, and RhE, which represent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on theKELandRHCEgenes.

The Use of Maternal Plasma for Prenatal RhD Blood Group Genotyping

Alloimmunization to the blood group antibody anti-RhD (anti-D) is the most common cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Knowledge of fetal D type in women with anti-D makes management of the pregnancy much easier and avoids unnecessary procedures in those women with a D-negative fetus. Fetal D typing can be performed by detection of an RHD gene in cell-free DNA in the plasma of D-negative pregnant women. The technology involves real-time quantitative polymerase chain reactions targeting exons 4, 5, and 10 of RHD, with the exons 4 and 10 tests performed as a multiplex. Testing for SRY in multiplex with the RHD exon 5 test provides an internal control for the presence of fetal DNA when the fetus is male. Fetal D typing has become the standard of care in England in pregnant women with a significant level of anti-D.

Noninvasive fetal blood grouping: present and future.

Identification of the molecular basis of the D polymorphism of the Rh blood group system in the 1990s made it possible to predict D phenotype from DNA. The most valuable application of this has been the determination of fetal D type in pregnant D-negative women with anti-D. Knowledge of fetal D type reveals whether the fetus is at risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn so that the pregnancy can be managed appropriately. Noninvasive fetal D typing for D-negative pregnant women with anti-D, performed on the small quantity of fetal DNA present in the blood of pregnant women, is now routine practice in several European countries. Noninvasive fetal blood grouping for C, c, E, and K also may be provided as a routine service for alloimmunized pregnant women. In many countries, all D-negative pregnant women are offered anti-D prophylaxis antenatally, yet in a predominantly Caucasian population, about 38% will be carrying a D-negative fetus and will receive the treatment unnecessarily. Large-scale trials to ascertain the accuracy of high-throughput, automated methods suggest that fetal D screening of all D-negative pregnant women is feasible, and it is likely that fetal D screening in D-negative pregnant women will be policy in some European countries within the next few years.