Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter A. Bogenschutz is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter A. Bogenschutz.


Journal of Climate | 2013

Higher-Order Turbulence Closure and Its Impact on Climate Simulations in the Community Atmosphere Model

Peter A. Bogenschutz; Andrew Gettelman; Hugh Morrison; Vincent E. Larson; Cheryl Craig; David P. Schanen

AbstractThis paper describes climate simulations of the Community Atmosphere Model, version 5 (CAM5), coupled with a higher-order turbulence closure known as Cloud Layers Unified by Binormals (CLUBB). CLUBB is a unified parameterization of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) and shallow convection that is centered around a trivariate probability density function (PDF) and replaces the conventional PBL, shallow convection, and cloud macrophysics schemes in CAM5. CAM–CLUBB improves many aspects of the base state climate compared to CAM5. Chief among them is the transition of stratocumulus to trade wind cumulus regions in the subtropical oceans. In these regions, CAM–CLUBB provides a much more gradual transition that is in better agreement with observational analysis compared to CAM5, which is too abrupt. The improvement seen in CAM–CLUBB can be largely attributed to the gradual evolution of the simulated turbulence, which is in part a result of the unified nature of the parameterization, and to the general i...


Journal of Climate | 2015

Advanced Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics for Global Models. Part II: Global Model Solutions and Aerosol-Cloud Interactions*

Andrew Gettelman; Hugh Morrison; S. Santos; Peter A. Bogenschutz; Peter Caldwell

A modified microphysics scheme is implemented in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 5 (CAM5). The new scheme features prognostic precipitation. The coupling between the microphysics and the rest of the model is modified to make it more flexible. Single-column tests show the new microphysics can simulate a constrained drizzling stratocumulus case. Substepping the cloud condensation (macrophysics) within a time stepimprovessingle-column results.Simulationsofmixed-phasecases arestronglysensitivetoice nucleation. The new microphysics alters process rates in both single-column and global simulations, even at low (200km) horizontal resolution. Thus, prognostic precipitation can be important, even in low-resolution simulations where advection of precipitation is not important. Accretion dominates as liquid water path increases in agreement with cloud-resolving model simulations and estimates from observations. The new microphysics withprognostic precipitation increasestheratioofaccretionoverautoconversion.Thechangeinprocessrates appears to significantly reduce aerosol‐cloud interactions and indirect radiative effects of anthropogenic aerosols by up to 33% (depending on substepping) to below 1Wm 22 of cooling between simulations with preindustrial (1850) and present-day (2000) aerosol emissions.


Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems | 2014

A sensitivity analysis of cloud properties to CLUBB parameters in the single-column Community Atmosphere Model (SCAM5)

Zhun Guo; Minghuai Wang; Yun Qian; Vincent E. Larson; Steven J. Ghan; Mikhail Ovchinnikov; Peter A. Bogenschutz; Chun Zhao; Guang Lin; Tianjun Zhou

In this study, we investigate the sensitivity of simulated shallow cumulus and stratocumulus to selected tunable parameters of Cloud Layers Unified by Binormals (CLUBB) in the single-column version of Community Atmosphere Model version 5 (SCAM5). A quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) sampling approach is adopted to effectively explore the high-dimensional parameter space and a generalized linear model is adopted to study the responses of simulated cloud fields to tunable parameters. One stratocumulus and two shallow cumulus cases are configured at both coarse and fine vertical resolutions in this study. Our results show that most of the variance in simulated cloud fields can be explained by a small number of tunable parameters. The parameters related to Newtonian and buoyancy-damping terms of total water flux are found to be the most influential parameters for stratocumulus. For shallow cumulus, the most influential parameters are those related to skewness of vertical velocity, reflecting the strong coupling between cloud properties and dynamics in this regime. The influential parameters in the stratocumulus case are sensitive to the vertical resolution while little sensitivity is found for the shallow cumulus cases, as eddy mixing length (or dissipation time scale) plays a more important role and depends more strongly on the vertical resolution in stratocumulus than in shallow convections. The influential parameters remain almost unchanged when the number of tunable parameters increases from 16 to 35. This study improves understanding of the CLUBB behavior associated with parameter uncertainties and provides valuable insights for other high-order turbulence closure schemes.


Journal of Climate | 2015

Regional Assessments of Low Clouds against Large-Scale Stability in CAM5 and CAM-CLUBB Using MODIS and ERA-Interim Reanalysis Data

Terence L. Kubar; Graeme L. Stephens; Matthew Lebsock; Vincent E. Larson; Peter A. Bogenschutz

AbstractDaily gridded cloud data from MODIS and ERA-Interim reanalysis have been assessed to examine variations of low cloud fraction (CF) and cloud-top height and their dependence on large-scale dynamics and a measure of stability. To assess the stratocumulus (Sc) to cumulus (Cu) transition (STCT), the observations are used to evaluate two versions of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model version 5 (CAM5), both the base model and a version that has implemented a new subgrid low cloud parameterization, Cloud Layers Unified by Binormals (CLUBB).The ratio of moist static energy (MSE) at 700–1000 hPa (MSEtotal) is a skillful predictor of median CF of screened low cloud grids. Values of MSEtotal less than 1.00 represent either conditionally or absolutely unstable layers, and probability density functions of CF suggest a preponderance of either trade Cu (median CF 1.00), an abundance of overcast or nearly overcast low clouds ...


Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems | 2017

A cloudy planetary boundary layer oscillation arising from the coupling of turbulence with precipitation in climate simulations

X. Zheng; S. A. Klein; Hsi-Yen Ma; Peter Caldwell; Vincent E. Larson; Andrew Gettelman; Peter A. Bogenschutz

The Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) adopts Cloud Layers Unified By Binormals scheme (CLUBB) and an updated microphysics (MG2) scheme for a more unified treatment of cloud processes. This makes interactions between parameterizations tighter and more explicit. In this study, a cloudy planetary boundary layer (PBL) oscillation related to interaction between CLUBB and MG2 is identified in CAM. This highlights the need for consistency between the coupled sub-grid processes in climate model development. This oscillation occurs most often in the marine cumulus cloud regime. The oscillation occurs only if the modeled PBL is strongly decoupled and precipitation evaporates below the cloud. Two aspects of the parameterized coupling assumptions between CLUBB and MG2 schemes cause the oscillation: 1) a parameterized relationship between rain evaporation and CLUBBs sub-grid spatial variance of moisture and heat that induces an extra cooling in the lower PBL; and 2) rain evaporation which happens at a too low an altitude because of the precipitation fraction parameterization in MG2. Either one of these two conditions can overly stabilize the PBL and reduce the upward moisture transport to the cloud layer so that the PBL collapses. Global simulations prove that turning off the evaporation-variance coupling and improving the precipitation fraction parameterization effectively reduces the cloudy PBL oscillation in marine cumulus clouds. By evaluating the causes of the oscillation in CAM, we have identified the PBL processes that should be examined in models having similar oscillations. This study may draw the attention of the modeling and observational communities to the issue of coupling between parameterized physical processes.


Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems | 2018

Regional Climate Simulations With the Community Earth System Model: CESM REGIONAL CLIMATE

Andrew Gettelman; P. Callaghan; Vincent E. Larson; Colin M. Zarzycki; Julio T. Bacmeister; Peter H. Lauritzen; Peter A. Bogenschutz; Richard Neale

The spectral element (SE) variable-resolution (VR) mesh dynamical core is tested in developmental versions of the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2). The SE dynamical core is tested in baroclinic wave, aquaplanet and full physics configurations to evaluate variable-resolution simulations against uniform high and uniform low-resolution simulations. Different physical parameterization suites are also evaluated to gauge their sensitivity to resolution. Dry dynamical core variable-resolution cases compare well to high-resolution tests. More recent versions of the atmospheric physics, including cloud schemes for CESM2, are less sensitive to changes in horizontal resolution. Most of the sensitivity is due to sensitivity to time step and interactions between deep convection and large-scale condensation, which is expected from the closure methods. The resulting full physics SE-VR model produces a similar climate to the global lowresolution mesh and similar high-frequency statistics in the high-resolution region. The SE-VR simulations are able to reproduce uniform high-resolution results, making them an effective tool for regional climate simulations at lower computational cost. Some biases are reduced (orographic precipitation in Western United States), but biases do not necessarily go away at high resolution (e.g., summertime surface temperatures). Variable-resolution grids are a viable alternative to traditional nesting for regional climate studies and are available in CESM2. Plain Language Summary This manuscript describes comprehensive tests of a numerical climate model that has high horizontal resolution in one region. This enables high-resolution simulations of climate, and extreme weather events that occur on small scales to be simulated at lower computational costs. Results indicate that the model represents low-resolution climate well, and also reproduces extreme climate statistics in the region with high resolution. We conclude that the variable resolution model is a good way to simulate and predict regional climate.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2018

Future Community Efforts in Understanding and Modeling Atmospheric Processes

Xubin Zeng; Daniel Klocke; Ben Shipway; Martin S. Singh; Irina Sandu; Walter M. Hannah; Peter A. Bogenschutz; Yunyan Zhang; Hugh Morrison; Michael S. Pritchard; Catherine Rio

What: About 160 participants from some 20 countries, representing the weather and climate modeling community, held an international workshop to overview the progress in understanding and modeling atmospheric processes and to discuss promising ideas for future community projects. When: 26 February–2 March 2018 Where: Lorne, Victoria, Australia FUTURE COMMUNITY EFFORTS IN UNDERSTANDING AND MODELING ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES


Archive | 2015

High-Resolution Global Modeling of the Effects of Subgrid-Scale Clouds and Turbulence on Precipitating Cloud Systems

Peter A. Bogenschutz; Chin-Hoh Moeng

The PI’s at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Chin-Hoh Moeng and Peter Bogenschutz, have primarily focused their time on the implementation of the Simplified-Higher Order Turbulence Closure (SHOC; Bogenschutz and Krueger 2013) to the Multi-scale Modeling Framework (MMF) global model and testing of SHOC on deep convective cloud regimes.


Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems | 2009

Large‐Eddy Simulation of Maritime Deep Tropical Convection

Marat Khairoutdinov; Steve K. Krueger; Chin-Hoh Moeng; Peter A. Bogenschutz; David A. Randall


Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems | 2013

A simplified PDF parameterization of subgrid‐scale clouds and turbulence for cloud‐resolving models

Peter A. Bogenschutz; Steven K. Krueger

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter A. Bogenschutz's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vincent E. Larson

University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew Gettelman

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hugh Morrison

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cheryl Craig

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Caldwell

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard Neale

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven J. Ghan

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yun Qian

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge