Peter A. Starreveld
University of Amsterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Peter A. Starreveld.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance | 2005
Karen Mortier; Jan Theeuwes; Peter A. Starreveld
In feature search tasks, uncertainty about the dimension on which targets differ from the nontargets hampers search performance relative to a situation in which this dimension is known in advance. Typically, these cross-dimensional costs are associated with less efficient guidance of attention to the target. In the present study, participants either had to perform a feature search task or had to perform a nonsearch task, that is, respond to a target presented without nontargets. The target varied either in one dimension or across dimensions. The results showed similar effects both in search and nonsearch conditions: Preknowledge of the target dimension gave shorter response times than when the dimension was unknown. Similar results were found using a trial-by-trial cueing. It is concluded that effects that typically have been attributed to early top-down modulation of attentional guidance may represent effects that occur later in processing.
Language and Cognitive Processes | 2004
Peter A. Starreveld; Wido La Heij
In Dutch, the gender of nouns is marked by the definite articles de (common gender) and het (neuter gender). Most models of language production assume that gender information is retrieved via the nouns syntactic representation (or lemma). The authors test Caramazzas (1997) alternative proposal, according to which gender information is retrieved via the nouns phonological word form (or lexeme). In three picture-word experiments, which differed in the tasks to be performed (noun production, article+noun production, article production, and gender decision), clear phonological effects were obtained in tasks involving the retrieval of the nouns gender information. It is argued that traditional models of language production have difficulty in accounting for the occurrence and/or the size of these effects whereas they follow quite naturally from Caramazzas (1997) Independent Network model.
Language and Cognitive Processes | 2013
Peter A. Starreveld; Wido La Heij; Rinus G. Verdonschot
The response exclusion account (REA), advanced by Mahon and colleagues, localises the distractor frequency effect and the semantic interference effect in picture naming at the level of the response output buffer. We derive four predictions from the REA: (1) the size of the distractor frequency effect should be identical to the frequency effect obtained when distractor words are read aloud, (2) the distractor frequency effect should not change in size when stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) is manipulated, (3) the interference effect induced by a distractor word (as measured from a nonword control distractor) should increase in size with increasing SOA, and (4) the word frequency effect and the semantic interference effect should be additive. The results of the picture-naming task in Experiment 1 and the word-reading task in Experiment 2 refute all four predictions. We discuss a tentative account of the findings obtained within a traditional selection-by-competition model in which both context effects are localised at the level of lexical selection.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance | 2004
Peter A. Starreveld; Jan Theeuwes; Karen Mortier
The authors used visual search tasks in which components of the classic flanker task (B. A. Eriksen & C. W. Eriksen, 1974) were introduced. In several experiments the authors obtained evidence of parallel search for a target among distractor elements. Therefore, 2-stage models of visual search predict no effect of the identity of those distractors. However, clear compatibility effects of the distractors were obtained: Responses were faster when the distractors were compatible with the response than when they were incompatible. These results show that even in parallel search tasks identity information is extracted from the distractors. In addition, alternative interpretations of the results in terms of the occasional identification of a distractor before or after the target was identified could be ruled out. The results showed that flat search slopes obtained in visual search experiments provide no benchmark for preattentive processing.
Acta Psychologica | 1999
W. La Heij; M. C. Puerta-Melguizo; M. Van Oostrum; Peter A. Starreveld
Abstract In picture naming, the effects of identical or repetition priming and language frequency are most probably localized at the same processing level: the retrieval of the phonological word form of the pictures name. This conclusion is supported by the observation that repetition priming is larger for pictures with low-frequency names than for pictures with high-frequency names. However, in two recent studies in which the prime word was masked, identical priming and word frequency combined additively. The cause of this unexpected finding was investigated in four experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that the use of the masked-priming technique is not the underlying factor. Instead, Experiments 3 and 4 revealed that the discrepancy most probably resulted from the use of unrelated prime words as the baseline from which identical priming was measured. When neutral (non word) primes were used as the baseline, word frequency and identical priming showed the expected interaction.
Language and Cognitive Processes | 2007
Wido La Heij; Peter A. Starreveld; Jan-Rouke Kuipers
In the last two decades, La Heij and colleagues have presented accounts of a number of context effects in Stroop-like word-production tasks. Roelofs (2007 this issue) criticises various aspects of our proposals, ranging from the number of processing stages assumed to details of simulation results. In this reply we first argue that we do not challenge spoken-word production models developed in the psycholinguistic tradition for being ‘too complex’, as Roelofs asserts. Next we discuss Roelofs’ detailed criticisms on our proposed solutions. Finally, in response to Roelofs’ argument that increasing the structural complexity of our model would render it similar to its main competitor, WEAVER++, we discuss the crucial differences that would still remain.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | 2017
Peter A. Starreveld; Wido La Heij
The picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm and the Stroop color-word interference task are often assumed to reflect the same underlying processes. On the basis of a PRP study, Dell’Acqua et al. (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14: 717-722, 2007) argued that this assumption is incorrect. In this article, we first discuss the definitions of Stroop- and picture-word interference. Next, we argue that both effects consist of at least four components that correspond to four characteristics of the distractor word: (1) response-set membership, (2) task relevance, (3) semantic relatedness, and (4) lexicality. On the basis of this theoretical analysis, we conclude that the typical Stroop effect and the typical PWI effect mainly differ in the relative contributions of these four components. Finally, the results of an interference task are reported in which only the nature of the target – color or picture – was manipulated and all other distractor task characteristics were kept constant. The results showed no difference between color and picture targets with respect to all behavioral measures examined. We conclude that the assumption that the same processes underlie verbal interference in color and picture naming is warranted.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition | 1996
Peter A. Starreveld; Wido La Heij
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition | 1995
Peter A. Starreveld; Wido La Heij
Journal of Memory and Language | 2000
Peter A. Starreveld