Peter B. Forgacs
Cornell University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Peter B. Forgacs.
Annals of Neurology | 2014
Peter B. Forgacs; Mary M. Conte; Esteban A. Fridman; Henning U. Voss; Jonathan D. Victor; Nicholas D. Schiff
Standard clinical characterization of patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) relies on observation of motor output and may therefore lead to the misdiagnosis of vegetative state or minimally conscious state in patients with preserved cognition. We used conventional electroencephalographic (EEG) measures to assess a cohort of DOC patients with and without functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)‐based evidence of command‐following, and correlated the findings with standard clinical behavioral evaluation and brain metabolic activity.
Frontiers in Neuroscience | 2016
Peter B. Forgacs; Esteban A. Fridman; Andrew M. Goldfine; Nicholas D. Schiff
Here, we present the first description of an isolation syndrome in a patient who suffered prolonged cardiac arrest and underwent a standard therapeutic hypothermia protocol. Two years after the arrest, the patient demonstrated no motor responses to commands, communication capabilities, or visual tracking at the bedside. However, resting neuronal metabolism and electrical activity across the entire anterior forebrain was found to be normal despite severe structural injuries to primary motor, parietal, and occipital cortices. In addition, using quantitative electroencephalography, the patient showed evidence for willful modulation of brain activity in response to auditory commands revealing covert conscious awareness. A possible explanation for this striking dissociation in this patient is that altered neuronal recovery patterns following therapeutic hypothermia may lead to a disproportionate preservation of anterior forebrain cortico-thalamic circuits even in the setting of severe hypoxic injury to other brain areas. Compared to recent reports of other severely brain-injured subjects with such dissociation of clinically observable (overt) and covert behaviors, we propose that this case represents a potentially generalizable mechanism producing an isolation syndrome of blindness, motor paralysis, and retained cognition as a sequela of cardiac arrest and therapeutic hypothermia. Our findings further support that highly-preserved anterior cortico-thalamic integrity is associated with the presence of conscious awareness independent from the degree of injury to other brain areas.
Annals of clinical and translational neurology | 2017
Peter B. Forgacs; Hans-Peter Frey; Angela Velazquez; Stephanie Thompson; Daniel Brodie; Vivek Moitra; Leroy Rabani; Soojin Park; Sachin Agarwal; Maria Cristina Falo; Nicholas D. Schiff; Jan Claassen
Recognition of potential for neurological recovery in patients who remain comatose after cardiac arrest is challenging and strains clinical decision making. Here, we utilize an approach that is based on physiological principles underlying recovery of consciousness and show correlation with clinical recovery after acute anoxic brain injury.
Annals of Neurology | 2015
Peter B. Forgacs; Mary M. Conte; Esteban A. Fridman; Henning U. Voss; Jonathan D. Victor; Nicholas D. Schiff
ing consensus for inclusion of standard EEG in the neurophysiological evaluation of patients with DOC, several questions remain to be answered. In particular, it has not been clarified whether we should refer to common EEG patterns or combine classic EEG descriptors. Also, it has not been settled whether sleep architecture study adds significant information. Moreover, it remains to be resolved whether a prolonged EEG recording is required to obtain essential data or whether a standard-duration recording is adequate. Data acquired from patients in a coma are scarcely useful because the pathophysiology of coma is different from that of UWS or MCS. Accordingly, it is our view that specific standardized criteria should be defined in the evaluation of EEG data obtained from these patients. Otherwise, neither patients nor clinicians will benefit fully from the advantages of EEG.
Annals of Neurology | 2014
Peter B. Forgacs; Mary M. Conte; Esteban A. Fridman; Henning U. Voss; Jonathan D. Victor; Nicholas D. Schiff
Standard clinical characterization of patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) relies on observation of motor output and may therefore lead to the misdiagnosis of vegetative state or minimally conscious state in patients with preserved cognition. We used conventional electroencephalographic (EEG) measures to assess a cohort of DOC patients with and without functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)‐based evidence of command‐following, and correlated the findings with standard clinical behavioral evaluation and brain metabolic activity.
Annals of Neurology | 2015
Peter B. Forgacs; Mary M. Conte; Esteban A. Fridman; Henning U. Voss; Jonathan D. Victor; Nicholas D. Schiff
ing consensus for inclusion of standard EEG in the neurophysiological evaluation of patients with DOC, several questions remain to be answered. In particular, it has not been clarified whether we should refer to common EEG patterns or combine classic EEG descriptors. Also, it has not been settled whether sleep architecture study adds significant information. Moreover, it remains to be resolved whether a prolonged EEG recording is required to obtain essential data or whether a standard-duration recording is adequate. Data acquired from patients in a coma are scarcely useful because the pathophysiology of coma is different from that of UWS or MCS. Accordingly, it is our view that specific standardized criteria should be defined in the evaluation of EEG data obtained from these patients. Otherwise, neither patients nor clinicians will benefit fully from the advantages of EEG.
Annals of Neurology | 2015
Peter B. Forgacs; Mary M. Conte; Esteban A. Fridman; Henning U. Voss; Jonathan D. Victor; Nicholas D. Schiff
ing consensus for inclusion of standard EEG in the neurophysiological evaluation of patients with DOC, several questions remain to be answered. In particular, it has not been clarified whether we should refer to common EEG patterns or combine classic EEG descriptors. Also, it has not been settled whether sleep architecture study adds significant information. Moreover, it remains to be resolved whether a prolonged EEG recording is required to obtain essential data or whether a standard-duration recording is adequate. Data acquired from patients in a coma are scarcely useful because the pathophysiology of coma is different from that of UWS or MCS. Accordingly, it is our view that specific standardized criteria should be defined in the evaluation of EEG data obtained from these patients. Otherwise, neither patients nor clinicians will benefit fully from the advantages of EEG.
Annals of Neurology | 2014
Peter B. Forgacs; Mary M. Conte; Esteban A. Fridman; Henning U. Voss; Jonathan D. Victor; Nicholas D. Schiff
Standard clinical characterization of patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) relies on observation of motor output and may therefore lead to the misdiagnosis of vegetative state or minimally conscious state in patients with preserved cognition. We used conventional electroencephalographic (EEG) measures to assess a cohort of DOC patients with and without functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)‐based evidence of command‐following, and correlated the findings with standard clinical behavioral evaluation and brain metabolic activity.
Brain | 2018
William H Curley; Peter B. Forgacs; Henning U. Voss; Mary M. Conte; Nicholas D. Schiff
Clinical Neurophysiology | 2016
Zoe M. Adams; Peter B. Forgacs; Mary M. Conte; Tanya Nauvel; Jonathan D. Drover; Nicholas D. Schiff