Peter Blum
Ocean Drilling Program
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Peter Blum.
Archive | 2012
Damon A. H. Teagle; Benoit Ildefonse; Peter Blum
Expedition 335 of the riserless drilling platform Puntarenas, Costa Rica, to Balboa, Panama Site 1256 13 April-3 June 2011
Geosphere | 2017
C. M. G. McHugh; Craig S. Fulthorpe; Koichi Hoyanagi; Peter Blum; Gregory S. Mountain; Kenneth G. Miller
We evaluate lithofacies, chronology, and seismic sequences from the Canterbury Basin, New Zealand passive continental slope (Integrated Ocean Drilling Program [IODP] Expedition 317 Site U1352 and environs) and compare this with slope sequences from the New Jersey passive margin. Our goal is to understand continental slope sedimentation in response to glacio-eustasy and test the concepts of sequence stratigraphy. High-resolution geochemical elemental and lithostratigraphic analyses were calibrated to a chronology constructed from benthic foramininferal oxygen isotopes for the past ~1.8 m.y. We identify lithofacies successions by their unique geochemical and lithologic signature and correlate them with marine isotope stages (MIS) at Milankovitch 100 k.y. (MIS 1–12) and 41 k.y. (MIS 13–63) periods. Eight seismic sequence boundaries (U13–U19) were identified from high-resolution multichannel seismic data, providing a seismic stratigraphic framework. Except for MIS 1–5 and MIS 54–55, there are 2–16 MIS stages and a comparable number of lithofacies contained within each seismic sequence, indicating that it took one to several glacio-eustatic cycles to build each seismic stratigraphic sequence. These findings support prior results obtained by the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Leg 174A on the New Jersey continental slope. On both margins, there is a strong correlation between seismic sequences, lithofacies, and MIS, thus linking them to glacio-eustasy. However, the correlation between MIS and seismic sequences is not one-to-one, and Pleistocene seismic sequences on the two margins are not synchronous. Local conditions, including differences in sedimentation rates and creation of accommodation space, strongly influenced sediment preservation at each location, revealing that high-frequency Pleistocene seismic sequences need not correlate globally. INTRODUCTION The impact of past sea-level change has been preserved in the thick sediments along continental margins. Global sea-level (eustatic) change directly affects coastal plain, continental shelf, and continental slope sedimentation through shoreline migration, generating regionally extensive unconformities that bound packets of sediment known as sequences. Claims of a causal link between eustasy and the unconformity-bounded sequences that pervade continental-margin sedimentary deposits have been made since the concept of sequence stratigraphy was first presented in its current form (Mitchum et al., 1977; Vail et al., 1977; Haq et al., 1987; Posamentier et al., 1988), and it is generally agreed that glacio-eustasy is the main driver of sequence formation during the Earth’s most recent Icehouse period ca. 34 Ma to present (Miller et al., 1991, 1996). During the Quaternary (past 2.55 m.y.), Milankovitch orbital cyclicity (eccentricity, obliquity, and precession) has driven large-scale changes in both Antarctic and Northern Hemisphere glaciation that are manifested as large-amplitude glacial-interglacial cycles and attendant sea-level changes (e.g., Hays et al., 1976; Imbrie et al., 1984; Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005). It is commonly accepted that sedimentation at continental margins during the Late to Middle Pleistocene (past 800 k.y.) has been controlled by 100 k.y. cyclicity as indicated by the δ18O proxy for ice volume (Hays et al., 1976; Lisiecki and Raymo, 2005). Under ideal circumstances of sufficient accommodation and sediment supply, depositional sequences on continental margins over the past 800 k.y. would follow a sequence stratigraphic conceptual model reflecting the influence of one 100 k.y. Milankovitch cycle per seismic sequence. Such a correlation is strong for the past 125 k.y. (i.e., the last glacial-interglacial cycle), where seismic sequences on several margins have been successfully correlated to marine δ18O record across marine isotope stages (MIS) 1–5 in both tectonically active and passive margins (e.g., Hernández-Molina et al., 2000; Kolla et al., 2000; Anderson et al., 2004; Çağatay et al., 2009). On margins with very high sedimentation rates, the 100 k.y. cyclicity is punctuated by a 20 k.y. cyclicity (Hernández-Molina et al., 2000; Kolla et al., 2000; Çağatay et al., 2009). However, for sediments older than 125 k.y., such correlations are rare. One example from the Adriatic margin shows a continuous correlation between 100 k.y. Milankovitch cyclicity and seismic sequences for the past ~370 k.y., spanning MIS 1 to the top of MIS 11 (Ridente et al., 2008, 2009). Ultra-high-resolution chirp sonar was used by Ridente et al. (2008, 2009) to define the seismic stratigraphic sequences that were calibrated to a chronology constructed from oxygen isotopes. One-to-one GEOSPHERE GEOSPHERE, v. 14, no. 1 doi:10.1130/GES01569.1 10 figures; 3 tables CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] CITATION: McHugh, C.M., Fulthorpe, C.S., Hoyanagi, K., Blum, P., Mountain, G.S., and Miller, K.G., 2018, The sedimentary imprint of Pleistocene glacio-eustasy: Implications for global correlations of seismic se quences: Geosphere, v. 14, no. 1, p. 265– 285, doi:10.1130 /GES01569.1. Received 7 June 2017 Revision received 9 August 2017 Accepted 12 October 2017 Published online 8 December 2017 Science Editor: Raymond M. Russo
Archive | 2007
Dick Kroon; James C. Zachos; Peter Blum; Julie Bowles; P Gailott; Takashi Hasegawa; Ed C. Hathorne; David A. Hodell; D. Clay Kelly; J-H Jung; Sm Keller; Y-S Lee; Dirk C Leuschner; Zl Kyger; C Lohmann; Lucas J. Lourens; Simonetta Monechi; Micah J. Nicolo; I. Raffi; C. R. Riesselman; Ursula Röhl; Stephen A. Schellenberg; Daniela N. Schmidt; Appy Sluijs; David A. J. Thomas; H Vallius
Scientific Drilling | 2012
Damon A. H. Teagle; Benoit Ildefonse; Peter Blum
Archive | 2012
Damon A. H. Teagle; Benoit M. Ildefonse; Peter Blum; Gilles Guerin; Natalia Zakharova; Natsue Abe; Bénédicte Abily; Yoshiku Adachi; Jeffrey C. Alt; Graham Baines; Jeremy Deans; Henry J. B. Dick; Daisuke Endo; Eric C. Ferré; Marguerite Godard; Michelle Harris; Yoon-Mi Kim; Juergen Koepke; Mark D. Kurz; Cornelis Johan Lissenberg; Sumio Miyashita; Antony Morris; Ryo Ozumi; Betchaida D. Payot; Marie Python; J. L. Till; Masako Tominaga; Douglas S. Wilson
Scientific Drilling | 2011
Craig S. Fulthorpe; Koichi Hoyanagi; Peter Blum
Archive | 2001
Carl Richter; Peter Blum; Ursula Röhl
Archive | 2017
T.E. Van Peer; Diederik Liebrand; Chuang Xuan; Peter C. Lippert; Claudia Agnini; Nevin Blum; Peter Blum; Steven M. Bohaty; Paul R. Bown; Rosanna Greenop; Wendy E C Kordesch; Dominik Leonhardt; Oliver Friedrich; Paul A. Wilson
Archive | 2010
Damon A. H. Teagle; Benoit Ildefonse; Peter Blum
Integrated Ocean Drilling Program: Preliminary Reports | 2018
Rupert Sutherland; Gerald R. Dickens; Peter Blum; Claudia Agnini; Laia Alegret; Joyeeta Bhattacharya; Aurelien Bordenave; Liao Chang; Julien Collot; Margot J. Cramwinckel; dai; Edoardo Dallanave; Michelle K. Drake; S. Etienne; Martino Giorgioni; Michael Gurnis; Dustin T. Harper; Huai Hsuan May Huang; Allison L. Keller; Adriane R. Lam; He Li; Hiroki Matsui; Cherry Newsam; Yu Hyeon Park; Kristina M. Pascher; Stephen F. Pekar; Donald E. Penman; Saneatsu Saito; Wanda R. Stratford; Thomas Westerhold