Peter Bogaty

Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Despite Preserved Ejection Fraction Is Associated With Higher Afterload and Reduced Survival

Background— Recent studies and current clinical observations suggest that some patients with severe aortic stenosis on the basis of aortic valve area may paradoxically have a relatively low gradient despite the presence of a preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. The objective of the present study was to document the prevalence, potential mechanisms, and clinical relevance of this phenomenon. Methods and Results— We retrospectively studied the clinical and Doppler echocardiographic data of 512 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (indexed aortic valve area ≤0.6 cm2 · m−2) and preserved LV ejection fraction (≥50%). Of these patients, 331 (65%) had normal LV flow output defined as a stroke volume index >35 mL · m2, and 181 (35%) had paradoxically low-flow output defined as stroke volume index ≤35 mL · m−2. When compared with normal flow patients, low-flow patients had a higher prevalence of female gender (P<0.05), a lower transvalvular gradient (32±17 versus 40±15 mm Hg; P<0.001), a lower LV diastolic volume index (52±12 versus 59±13 mL · m−2; P<0.001), lower LV ejection fraction (62±8% versus 68±7%; P<0.001), a higher level of LV global afterload reflected by a higher valvulo-arterial impedance (5.3±1.3 versus 4.1±0.7 mm Hg · mL−1 · m−2; P<0.001) and a lower overall 3-year survival (76% versus 86%; P=0.006). Only age (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.08; P=0.025), valvulo-arterial impedance >5.5 mm Hg · mL−1 · m−2 (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.7; P=0.017), and medical treatment (hazard ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.8 to 6.7; P=0.0003) were independently associated with increased mortality. Conclusion— Patients with severe aortic stenosis may have low transvalvular flow and low gradients despite normal LV ejection fraction. A comprehensive evaluation shows that this pattern is in fact consistent with a more advanced stage of the disease and has a poorer prognosis. Such findings are clinically relevant because this condition may often be misdiagnosed, which leads to a neglect and/or an underestimation of symptoms and an inappropriate delay of aortic valve replacement surgery.

Elevated C-Reactive Protein Another Component of the Atherothrombotic Profile of Abdominal Obesity

Recent studies have suggested that elevated plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are associated with the features of insulin resistance syndrome. In the present study, we have examined the contribution of body composition measured by hydrostatic weighing and of abdominal adipose tissue (AT) accumulation assessed by computed tomography to the variation in plasma CRP levels associated with atherogenic dyslipidemia of the insulin resistance syndrome in a sample of 159 men, aged 22 to 63 years, covering a wide range of adiposity (body mass index values from 21 to 41 kg/m2). Plasma CRP levels showed positive and significant correlations with body fat mass (r =0.41, P <0.0001), waist girth (r =0.37, P <0.0001), and visceral AT accumulation measured by computed tomography at L4 to L5 (r =0.28, P < 0.0003). Although CRP levels were associated with plasma insulin levels measured in the fasting state and after a 75-g oral glucose load, no significant correlations were found with plasma lipoprotein levels. Finally, comparison of body fatness, of abdominal fat accumulation, and of the features of the insulin resistance syndrome across quintiles of CRP revealed major differences in body fatness and in indices of abdominal AT accumulation between the lowest and the highest CRP quintiles, whereas no significant differences were found for variables of the plasma lipoprotein-lipid profile. These results suggest that obesity and abdominal AT accumulation are the critical correlates of elevated plasma CRP levels found in men with atherogenic dyslipidemia of the insulin resistance syndrome.

Association Between Timeliness of Reperfusion Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

CONTEXT Guidelines emphasize the importance of rapid reperfusion of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and specify a maximum delay of 30 minutes for fibrinolysis and 90 minutes for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). However, randomized trials and selective registries are limited in their ability to assess the effect of timeliness of reperfusion on outcomes in real-world STEMI patients. OBJECTIVES To obtain a complete interregional portrait of contemporary STEMI care and to investigate timeliness of reperfusion and outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Systematic evaluation of STEMI care for 6 months during 2006-2007 in 80 hospitals that treated more than 95% of patients with acute myocardial infarction in the province of Quebec, Canada (population, 7.8 million). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Death at 30 days and at 1 year and the combined end point of death or hospital readmission for acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure at 1 year by linkage to Quebecs medicoadministrative databases. RESULTS Of 1832 patients treated with reperfusion, 392 (21.4%) received fibrinolysis and 1440 (78.6%) received PPCI. Fibrinolysis was untimely (>30 minutes) in 54% and PPCI was untimely (>90 minutes) in 68%. Death or readmission for acute myocardial infarction or heart failure at 1 year occurred in 13.5% of fibrinolysis patients and 13.6% of PPCI patients. When the 2 treatment groups were combined, patients treated outside of recommended delays had an adjusted higher risk of death at 30 days (6.6% vs 3.3%; odds ratio [OR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-3.93) and a statistically nonsignificant increase in risk of death at 1 year (9.3% vs 5.2%; OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.00-2.66) compared with patients who received timely treatment. Patients treated outside of recommended delays also had an adjusted higher risk for the combined outcome of death or hospital readmission for congestive heart failure or acute myocardial infarction at 1 year (15.0% vs 9.2%; OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.08-2.30). At the regional level, after adjustment, each 10% increase in patients treated within the recommended time was associated with a decrease in the region-level odds of overall 30-day mortality (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.98). CONCLUSION Among patients in Quebec with STEMI, reperfusion delivered outside guideline-recommend delays was associated with significantly increased 30-day mortality, a statistically nonsignificant increase in 1-year mortality, and significantly increased risk of the composite of mortality or readmission for acute myocardial infarction or heart failure at 1 year.

Nonrandomized Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Octogenarians

Background— The objective of the present study was to compare the midterm follow-up results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary bypass graft surgery (CABG) for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians. Methods and Results— A total of 249 consecutive patients ≥80 years of age diagnosed with left main coronary artery disease underwent coronary revascularization in our center between January 2002 and January 2008; 145 patients underwent CABG, and 104 patients had PCI. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE [cardiac death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event, revascularization]) were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 23±16 months. Patients who underwent PCI were older; had higher creatinine levels, lower ejection fraction, and higher EuroSCORE; and presented more frequently with an acute coronary syndrome. Drug-eluting stents were used in 48% of PCI patients. A propensity score analysis was performed to adjust for baseline differences between the 2 groups. Survival free of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (PCI, 65.4%; CABG, 69.7%) and MACCE-free survival (PCI, 56.7%; CABG, 64.8%) at follow-up were similar between the groups (adjusted hazard ratio for survival free of cardiac death or myocardial infarction, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.64 to 2.56; P=0.47; adjusted hazard ratio for MACCE-free survival, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.59 to 2.0; P=0.73). The EuroSCORE value was an independent predictor of MACCE regardless of the type of revascularization (hazard ratio, 1.17 for each EuroSCORE increase of 1 point; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.25; P<0.0001). Conclusions— In this single-center, nonrandomized study, there were no significant differences in cardiac death or myocardial infarction and MACCE between CABG and PCI for the treatment of left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians after a mean follow-up of 2 years. Baseline EuroSCORE was the most important predictor of MACCE regardless of the type of revascularization. Randomized studies comparing both revascularization strategies in this high-risk coronary population are warranted.

Impact of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction on maximal treadmill performance in normotensive subjects with well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Patients with type 2 diabetes often have impaired exercise capacity compared with nondiabetic subjects. Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction has been shown to limit exercise performance in nondiabetic subjects. Men with well-controlled type 2 diabetes were divided into 2 groups: normal LV diastolic function (group 1, n = 9) or LV diastolic dysfunction (group 2, n = 10) based on standard echocardiographic criteria using pulmonary veins and transmitral flow recordings. They were matched for age and had no evidence of systemic hypertension, macroalbuminuria, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, clinical diabetic complications, and thyroid disease. Good metabolic control was demonstrated by glycated hemoglobin levels of 6.7+/-1.6% and 6.6+/-2.5% (means +/- SD) in patients with LV diastolic dysfunction and in controls, respectively. Each subject performed a symptom-limited modified Bruce protocol treadmill exercise test. Maximal treadmill performance was higher in subjects with normal diastolic function compared with subjects with LV diastolic dysfunction when expressed in time (803+/-29 vs. 662+/-44 seconds, respectively, p<0.02) or in METs (11.4+/-1.2 vs. 9.5+/-1.9 METs, respectively, p<0.02). Moreover, there was a correlation between E/A ratio and exercise duration (r = 0.64, p = 0.004) or E/A ratio and METs (r = 0.658, p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in maximal heart rate, maximal systolic and diastolic blood pressure, or maximal rate-pressure product attained during the exercise test. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that LV diastolic dysfunction influences maximal treadmill performance and could explain lower maximal performance observed in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Biological Profiles in Subjects With Recurrent Acute Coronary Events Compared With Subjects With Long-Standing Stable Angina

Background—At one end of the clinical spectrum of coronary artery disease (CAD) are subjects who have had repeated acute ischemic events, and at the other end are those with long-standing angina who have never been unstable. This study tests the hypothesis that a specific biological profile can distinguish these 2 extreme groups and predict acute coronary events. Methods and Results—Blood levels of lipoprotein(a), homocysteine, tissue plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, and von Willebrand factor were compared in 3 groups of 50 subjects each: (1) those with previous multiple acute coronary events, (2) age-matched subjects with ≥3 years of stable angina and no prior acute coronary events, and (3) matched controls without evidence of atherosclerotic disease and a normal coronary angiogram. All subjects were followed for 4.0 years. Lipoprotein(a), homocysteine, tissue plasminogen activator, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 were similar in both CAD groups and significantly higher than in the control group. However, compared with subjects with long-standing stable angina, those with previous multiple coronary events had higher values of CRP (5.7±5.4 versus 3.0±5.2 mg/L, P =0.012), fibrinogen (3.38±0.75 versus 2.92±0.64 g/L, P =0.001), and von Willebrand factor (1.60±0.55 versus 1.25±0.36 U/mL, P =0.0003). On follow-up, myocardial infarction and unstable angina occurred in 42% of the group with multiple events, 4% of the stable angina group (P <0.0001), and none of the control subjects. In the 100 patients with CAD, CRP was 4.9 mg/L in those with and 1.8 mg/L in those without new instability (P <0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, only CRP distinguished those with follow-up acute coronary events (adjusted odds ratio 5.9, 95% CI 2.0 to 17.9;P =0.002). A baseline CRP >3.5 mg/L had a relative risk of 7.6 (2.6 to 21.7, P =0.0002) for subsequent acute events. Conclusions—An inflammatory biological profile distinguished patients with previous multiple acute coronary events from those with long-standing stable angina and predicted acute coronary instability.

Preclinical diabetic cardiomyopathy: relation of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction to cardiac autonomic neuropathy in men with uncomplicated well-controlled type 2 diabetes.

Diabetic cardiomyopathy is an ill-defined entity. This study was designed to explore the possible association between left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) independently from metabolic control. Three groups of 10 age-matched men each with well-controlled type 2 diabetes were studied: (1) subjects with normal diastolic function, (2) subjects with LVDD characterized by impaired LV relaxation, and (3) subjects with a more severe form of LVDD characterized by a pseudonormalized pattern of LV filling. No subject had evidence of clinical diabetic complications, coronary artery disease (CAD), hypertension, congestive heart failure, or thyroid or overt renal disease, and all had a negative maximal exercise test. LVDD was evaluated by Doppler echocardiographic and CAN was evaluated using spectral analysis of heart rate variability (HRV; time and frequency domains) from 24-hour Holter recordings. Findings showed that the high frequency power (HF: 0.15 to 0.4 Hz) tends to decrease with worsening diastolic function; 5.0 +/- 0.2 ms(2) (mean +/- SE) in group 1, 4.2 +/- 0.3 ms(2) in group 2, and 3.9 +/- 0.4 ms(2) (P =.03) in group 3, respectively, whereas the low frequency power (LF: 0.04 to 0.15 Hz) was similar between groups. In the time domain, the mean squared differences of the successive RR intervals (rMSDD) also showed the same pattern, ie, 31.0 +/- 2.8 ms, 23.8 +/- 1.6 ms, and 21.5 +/- 2.9 ms in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P =.03). The E/A ratio correlated significantly with indices of parasympathetic modulation (HF; r = 0.448, P =.013; rMSDD: r = 0.457, P =.011; pNN50: r = 0.425, P =.019). LVDD and CAN are associated in patients with otherwise uncomplicated well-controlled type 2 diabetes. The parameters defining these 2 abnormalities may serve to better define diabetic cardiomyopathy as a distinct entity and could eventually become useful prognostic indicators as it has been shown in nondiabetic populations.

Association of fibrinogen and lipoprotein(a) as a coronary heart disease risk factor in men (The Quebec Cardiovascular Study).

Fibrinogen has been prospectively found to correlate with coronary heart disease (CHD) but a similar association has not been well established for lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)). Plasma lipids, Lp(a), and fibrinogen levels were measured in 2,125 men (aged 47 to 76 years) who were free of clinical CHD. During a 5-year follow-up period, 116 first CHD events were documented. Men with CHD were older, smoked more, had a higher prevalence of diabetes, and higher levels of systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Lp(a), and fibrinogen, and lower plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Only fibrinogen levels in the upper tertile of the distribution compared with the lower tertiles were associated with a significant risk of CHD (adjusted risk ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4 to 4.2; p = 0.0010). Such an association was not observed with Lp(a). To assess a possible relation between fibrinogen and Lp(a) to the risk of CHD events, men were assigned to 1 of 4 groups according to fibrinogen median levels and a Lp(a) cut-off level of 300 mg/L: group 1: fibrinogen < 4.05 g/L and Lp(a) < 300 mg/L; group 2: fibrinogen < 4.05 g/L and Lp(a) > or =300 mg/L; group 3: fibrinogen > or =4.05 g/L and Lp(a) < 300 mg/L; and group 4: fibrinogen > or =4.05 g/L and Lp(a) > or =300 mg/L. Using group 1 as a reference, a significant risk ratio was only documented in group 4 (2.5; 95% CI 1.2 to 5.1; p = 0.0132). In this population, high fibrinogen levels associated with high Lp(a) levels significantly increased the risk of CHD.

Clinical Utility of C-Reactive Protein Measured at Admission, Hospital Discharge, and 1 Month Later to Predict Outcome in Patients With Acute Coronary Disease: The RISCA (Recurrence and Inflammation in the Acute Coronary Syndromes) Study

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to prospectively determine, in patients with an acute coronary syndrome, whether the inflammatory marker, C-reactive protein (CRP), measured at hospital admission, discharge, and 1 month later has incremental value to predict outcomes at 1 year. BACKGROUND The clinical utility of CRP measurements in patients with acute coronary syndromes remains uncertain. Limitations of previous studies have been retrospective design and incomplete adjustment for readily available clinical prognosticators. METHODS The CRP marker was measured at admission, hospital discharge, and 1 month later in consecutive patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes in 8 tertiary and secondary hospitals. The primary outcome was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and unstable angina (UA) with electrocardiogram (ECG) changes at 1 year. RESULTS A total of 1,210 patients, age 62 +/- 12 years, 64% with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and 36% with unstable angina (UA), were recruited. At 1 year, the primary outcome occurred in 142 patients (11.7%) and included 58 deaths (4.8%), 79 nonfatal MIs (6.5%), and 26 UA episodes with ECG changes (2.1%). The unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals) of CRP values at admission, hospital discharge, and 1 month later for the occurrence of the primary outcome were 1.20 (1.06 to 1.36), 0.98 (0.85 to 1.14), and 1.23 (1.00 to 1.50), respectively. After multivariate adjustment, ORs were 1.04 (0.91 to 1.20), 0.90 (0.77 to 1.06), and 1.12 (0.93 to 1.34), respectively. The individual components of the primary outcome were also not independently associated with any of the 3 CRP measurements. CONCLUSIONS The modest predictive ability of CRP following admission for an acute coronary syndrome disappeared after adjusting for common clinical variables. This large prospective study does not support the incremental value of measuring CRP in this clinical setting.

Atherogenic, hemostatic, and other potential risk markers in subjects with previous isolated myocardial infarction compared with long-standing uncomplicated stable angina

BACKGROUND Several atherogenic, hemostatic, inflammatory, and genetic parameters and markers have been implicated as risk factors in coronary artery disease, although whether they are risk factors for acute as opposed to chronic coronary disease is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS Fifty subjects with an isolated myocardial infarction >3 months previously were compared with 50 subjects with a minimum 3-year history of stable angina, documented coronary artery disease, normal electrocardiogram and normal ventricular wall motion, and no episode suggesting infarction or unstable angina. Biologic variables analyzed included apolipoprotein B (apo B), lipoprotein (a), C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, factor VII, tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) and inhibitor (PAI-1), thrombin-antithrombin (TAT), fragment 1+2 (F1+2), von Willebrand factor (vWF), activated protein C resistance, homocyst(e)ine, anticardiolipin antibodies, blood group, and the angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion (I/D) and angiotensin II receptor gene polymorphisms. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for any of the variables studied, although fibrinogen and F 1+2 tended to be slightly higher in the angina group (P = .09 for each). These significant correlations were present: age with fibrinogen, homocyst(e)ine, and vWF; factor VII with apo B, homocyst(e)ine, and TPA; apo B with TPA and CRP; CRP with fibrinogen, TPA, PAI-1, and factor VII; fibrinogen with vWF. CONCLUSIONS Examination of atherogenic, hemostatic, inflammation, and genetic variables in the clinically quiescent state permitted no distinction between subjects with a previous isolated myocardial infarction in contrast to those with long-standing uncomplicated stable angina, favoring the notion that acute coronary events occur at random on a varying background of atherosclerosis. The multiple correlations found among these variables also underscore their complex interaction in the atherosclerotic process.