Peter C Williams

The design and performance characteristics of a multileaf collimator

A multileaf collimator, which has been in routine clinical use for both conventional and conformal radiotherapy for over four years, is described in detail. The collimator replaces the conventional treatment head of a Philips SL series linear accelerator and comprises 80 tungsten leaves and two orthogonal pairs of back-up collimators. Each leaf projects a width of 1 cm in the isocentric plane, allowing shaped photon treatment beams of up to 40 cm square. The performance of the prototype and first production model have been thoroughly tested against the design specifications and the requirements of IEC standards. Radiation attenuation by the collimator components has been measured and substantially exceeds those requirements. The irregular portion of a field (shielded by the leaves only) receives, on average, a dose of less than 2% of the tumour dose. The effect on the penumbra of using leaves which translate linearly and have curved faces has been assessed and found not to degrade the sharpness of the beam fall-off significantly. The reproducibility of the video system used in positioning the leaves has been measured and gave a root mean square deviation of less than 0.3 mm in repeat setting of a 10 cm square field, and an accuracy always within 1 mm. The rationale for clinical use of the device is discussed and its effect on treatment quality control and reliability, is considered.

The use of an electronic portal imaging device for exit dosimetry and quality control measurements

PURPOSE To determine ways in which electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) could be used to (a) measure exit doses for external beam radiotherapy and (b) perform quality control checks on linear accelerators. METHODS AND MATERIALS When imaging, our fluoroscopic EPID adjusts the gain, offset, and frame acquisition time of the charge coupled device (CCD) camera automatically, to allow for the range of photon transmissions through the patient, and to optimize the signal-to-noise ratio. However, our EPID can be programmed to act as an integrating dosemeter. EPID dosemeter measurements were made for 20 MV photons, for different field sizes and thicknesses of unit density phantom material placed at varying exit surface to detector distances. These were compared with simultaneous Silicon diode exit dose measurements. Our exit dosimetry technique was verified using an anthropomorphic type phantom, and some initial measurements have been made for patients treated with irregularly shaped 20 MV x-ray fields. In this dosimetry mode, our EPID was also used to measure certain quality control parameters, x-ray field flatness, and the verification of segmented intensity modulated field prescriptions. RESULTS Configured for dosimetry, our EPID exhibited a highly linear response, capable of resolving individual monitor units. Exit doses could be measured to within about 3% of that measured using Silicon diodes. Field flatness was determined to within 1.5% of Farmer dosemeter measurements. Segmented intensity modulated fields can be easily verified. CONCLUSIONS Our EPID has the versatility to assess a range of parameters pertinent to the delivery of high quality, high precision radiotherapy. When configured appropriately, it can measure exit doses in vivo, with reasonable accuracy, perform certain quick quality control checks, and analyze segmented intensity modulated treatment fields.

Verification of dynamic multileaf collimation using an electronic portal imaging device

High standards of treatment verification are necessary where complex new delivery techniques, such as intensity modulated radiation therapy using dynamic multileaf collimation, are being developed. This paper describes the use of a fluoroscopic electronic portal imaging device (EPID) to provide real-time qualitative verification of leaf position during delivery of a dynamic MLC prescription in addition to off-line quantitative verification. A custom-built circuit triggers the EPID to capture a series of snap-shot images at equally spaced dose points during a dynamic MLC prescription. Real-time verification is achieved by overlaying a template of expected leaf positions onto the images as they are acquired. Quantitative off-line verification is achieved using a maximum gradient edge detection algorithm to measure individual leaf positions for comparison with required leaf positions. Investigations have been undertaken to optimize image acquisition and assess the edge detection algorithm for variations in machine dose rate, leaf velocity and beam attenuation. On-line verification enables the operator to monitor the progress of a dynamic delivery and has been used for independent confirmation of accurate dynamic delivery during intensity modulated treatments. Off-line verification allows measurement of leaf position with a precision of 1 mm although image acquisition times must be less than or equal to 140 ms to ensure coincidence of the maximum gradient in the image with the 50% dose level.

Quality assurance of the dose delivered by small radiation segments

The use of intensity modulation with multiple static fields has been suggested by many authors as a way to achieve highly conformal fields in radiotherapy. However, quality assurance of linear accelerators is generally done only for beam segments of 100 MU or higher, and by measuring beam profiles once the beam has stabilized. We propose a set of measurements to check the stability of dose delivery in small segments, and present measured data from three radiotherapy centres. The dose delivered per monitor unit, MU, was measured for various numbers of MU segments. The field flatness and symmetry were measured using either photographic films that are subsequently scanned by a densitometer, or by using a diode array. We performed the set of measurements at the three radiotherapy centres on a set of five different Philips SL accelerators with energies of 6 MV, 8 MV, 10 MV and 18 MV. The dose per monitor unit over the range of 1 to 100 MU was found to be accurate to within +/-5% of the nominal dose per monitor unit as defined for the delivery of 100 MU for all the energies. For four out of the five accelerators the dose per monitor unit over the same range was even found to be accurate to within +/-2%. The flatness and symmetry were in some cases found to be larger for small segments by a maximum of 9% of the flatness/symmetry for large segments. The result of this study provides the dosimetric evidence that the delivery of small segment doses as top-up fields for beam intensity modulation is feasible. However, it should be stressed that linear accelerators have different characteristics for the delivery of small segments, hence this type of measurement should be performed for each machine before the delivery of small dose segments is approved. In some cases it may be advisable to use a low pulse repetition frequency (PRF) to obtain more accurate dose delivery of small segments.

Measurement possibilities using an electronic portal imaging device

A vital role in the quality control of radiotherapy is the use of portal imaging for verifying field size, shape, orientation and patient set-up. Coincidence of treated volume and target volume is imperative. Electronic portal imaging devices are effective at providing this verification. However, these devices are versatile enough to be used in other ways pertinent to the delivery of high quality, high precision radiotherapy. This paper examines two such ways: in assessing the reproducibility of a multileaf collimator system, and in determining exit doses in vivo. Configured as a dosimeter, the system shows a linear response with good dynamic range. Its high spatial resolution was used to show that leaf positioning was reproducible to within 0.5 mm for all tested gantry and collimator angles. Our preliminary results from this exit dosimetry technique demonstrate that, under specific conditions, doses can be determined to within 2.5% of that measured using silicon diodes or ion chambers.

A dosimetric intercomparison of megavoltage photon beams in UK radiotherapy centres

A dosimetry intercomparison has been carried out for all 64 radiotherapy centres in the UK. Doses were measured with an ionization chamber in an epoxy resin water-substitute phantom of relatively simple geometry. Reference-point measurements were made for all MV photon beams. For 61 Co-60 beams, a mean ratio of measured-to-stated dose of 1.002 was observed with a standard deviation of 0.014, whilst for 100 MV x-ray beams, the corresponding figures were 1.003 and 0.015. 97% of beams lay within a +/- 3% deviation. One measurement was instrumental in discovering a large discrepancy. Doses were also investigated in two planned three-field distributions at one beam quality in each centre. One of these was in a homogeneous phantom, whilst the second included a lung-equivalent insert. Doses were measured at the central point and at four other points in the high dose volume. In both situations, the mean ratio of measured-to-calculated doses for all points was 1.008, with standard deviations of 0.027 and 0.035 for the uniform and non-uniform phantoms, respectively. Discrepancies over 5% were followed up. The work must be viewed in the context of other international intercomparisons and is an essential part of wider radiotherapy audit processes.

Requirements for leaf position accuracy for dynamic multileaf collimation.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy can be achieved by driving the leaves of a multileaf collimator (MLC) across an x-ray therapy beam. Algorithms to generate the required leaf trajectories assume that the leaf positions are exactly known to the MLC controller. In practice, leaf positions depend upon calibration accuracy and stability and may vary within set tolerances. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of potential leaf position inaccuracies on intensity modulated beams. Equations are derived which quantify the absolute error in delivered monitor units given a known error in leaf position. The equations have been verified by ionization chamber measurements in dynamically delivered flat fields, comparing deliveries in which known displacements have been applied to the defined leaf positions with deliveries without displacements applied. The equations are then applied to two clinical intensity modulations: an inverse planned prostate field and a breast compensating field. It is shown that leaf position accuracy is more critical for a highly modulated low-dose intensity profile than a moderately modulated high-dose intensity profile. Suggestions are given regarding the implications for quality control of dynamic MLC treatments.

Prediction of the benefits from dose-escalated hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE To estimate the benefits of dose escalation in hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer, using radiobiologic modeling and incorporating positional uncertainties of organs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Biologically based mathematical models for describing the relationships between tumor control probability (TCP) and normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) vs. dose were used to describe some of the results available in the literature. The values of the model parameters were then used together with the value of 1.5 Gy for the prostate cancer alpha/beta ratio to predict the responses in a hypofractionated 3 Gy/fraction IMRT trial at the Christie Hospital, taking into account patient movement characteristics between dose fractions. RESULTS Compared with the current three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique (total dose of 50 Gy to the planning target volume in 16 fractions), the use of IMRT to escalate the dose to the prostate was predicted to increase the TCP by 5%, 16%, and 22% for the three dose levels, respectively, of 54, 57, and 60 Gy delivered using 3 Gy per fraction while keeping the late rectal complications (>/=Grade 2 RTOG scale) at about the same level of 5%. Further increases in TCP could be achieved by reducing the uncertainty in daily target position, especially for the last stage of the trial, where up to 6% further increase in TCP should be gained. CONCLUSIONS Dose escalation to the prostate using IMRT to deliver daily doses of 3 Gy was predicted to significantly increase tumor control without increasing late rectal complications, and currently this prediction is being tested in a clinical trial.

Shading correction algorithm for improvement of cone-beam CT images in radiotherapy

Cone-beam CT (CBCT) images have recently become an established modality for treatment verification in radiotherapy. However, identification of soft-tissue structures and the calculation of dose distributions based on CBCT images is often obstructed by image artefacts and poor consistency of density calibration. A robust method for voxel-by-voxel enhancement of CBCT images using a priori knowledge from the planning CT scan has been developed and implemented. CBCT scans were enhanced using a low spatial frequency grey scale shading function generated with the aid of a planning CT scan from the same patient. This circumvents the need for exact correspondence between CBCT and CT and the process is robust to the appearance of unshared features such as gas pockets. Enhancement was validated using patient CBCT images. CT numbers in regions of fat and muscle tissue in the processed CBCT were both within 1% of the values in the planning CT, as opposed to 10-20% different for the original CBCT. Visual assessment of processed CBCT images showed improvement in soft-tissue visibility, although some cases of artefact introduction were observed.

A national dosimetric audit of IMRT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A dosimetric audit of IMRT has been carried out within the UK between June 2009 and March 2010 in order to provide an independent check of safe implementation and to identify problems in the modelling and delivery of IMRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS A mail based audit involving film and alanine dosimeters was utilized. Measurements were made for each individual field in an IMRT plan isocentrically in a flat water-equivalent phantom at a depth of 5cm. The films and alanine dosimeters were processed and analysed centrally; additional ion chamber measurements were made by each participating centre. RESULTS 57 of 62 centres participated, with a total of 78 plans submitted. For the film measurements, all 176 fields from the less complex IMRT plans (including prostate and breast plans) achieved over 95% pixels passing a gamma criterion of 3%/3mm within the 20% isodose. For the more complex IMRT plans (mainly head and neck) 8/245 fields (3.3%) achieved less than 95% pixels passing a 4%/4mm gamma criterion. Of the alanine measurements, 4/78 (5.1%) of the measurements differed by >5% from the dose predicted by the treatment planning system. Three of these were large deviations of -77.1%, -29.1% and 14.1% respectively. Excluding the three measurements outside 10%, the mean difference was 0.05% with a standard deviation of 1.5%. The out of tolerance results have been subjected to further investigations. CONCLUSIONS A dosimetric audit has been successfully carried out of IMRT implementation by over 90% of UK radiotherapy departments. The audit shows that modelling and delivery of IMRT is accurate, suggesting that the implementation of IMRT has been carried out safely.