Peter D. Donofrio

Double‐blind randomized trial of tramadol for the treatment of the pain of diabetic neuropathy

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tramadol in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy. Background The pain of diabetic neuropathy is a major cause of morbidity among these patients and treatment, as with other small-fiber neuropathies, is often unsatisfactory. Tramadol is a centrally acting analgesic for use in treating moderate to moderately severe pain. Methods This multicenter, outpatient, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study consisted of a washoutlscreening phase, during which all analgesics were discontinued, and a 42-day double-blind treatment phase. A total of 131 patients with painful diabetic neuropathy were treated with tramadol (n = 65) or placebo (n = 66) tramadol, which were administered as identical capsules in divided doses four times daily. The primary efficacy analysis compared the mean pain intensity scores in the tramadol and placebo groups obtained at day 42 of the study or at the time of discontinuation. Secondary efficacy assessments were the pain relief rating scores and a quality of life evaluation based on daily activities and sleep characteristics. Results Tramadol, at an average dosage of 210 mg/day, was significantly (p < 0.001) more effective than placebo for treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy. Patients in the tramadol group scored significantly better in physical (p = 0.02) and social functioning (p = 0.04) ratings than patients in the placebo group. No statistically significant treatment effects on sleep were identified. The most frequently occurring adverse events with tramadol were nausea, constipation, headache, and somnolence. Conclusions The results of this placebo-controlled trial showed that tramadol was effective and safe in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy.

Randomized controlled trial of IVIg in untreated chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Objective: To determine the efficacy of IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) given patients with untreated chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Methods: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, investigator-initiated study compared IVIg (Aventis Behring LLC, King of Prussia, PA) with placebo (5% albumin). On days 1, 2, and 21, IVIg (1 g/kg) or placebo was given. The primary outcome measure was the change in muscle strength from baseline to day 42, using the average muscle score (AMS). Secondary outcome measures included change from baseline AMS at days 10 and 21, the Hughes’ functional disability scale, forced vital capacity (FVC), and nerve conduction studies (NCS) of four motor nerves (median, ulnar, peroneal, and tibial). Results: The patients (n = 33) were randomized. Of these, 30 (14 women, 16 men, aged 54 ± 20 years, range 13 to 82) received IVIg and 23 were given placebo (12 women, 11 men, aged 50 ± 18 years, range 23 to 73). Baseline AMS values of the groups were similar (IVIg 7.06 ± 1.31 versus placebo 7.28 ± 1.18, p = 0.53). There were two dropouts in placebo group and one in the IVIg group. Mean AMS improved at day 42 comparing IVIg with placebo (0.63 versus −0.1, p = 0.006). Improved strength was seen by day 10. The placebo group lost strength over this same interval. In the IVIg, 11 subjects improved by the functional disability scale; none worsened. This differed (p = 0.019) from those in the placebo-treated group (two improved, two got worse, remainder unchanged). Forced vital capacity did not improve with IVIg treatment. IVIg improved ulnar motor distal latency (p = 0.005), tibial distal compound muscle amplitude (p = 0.003), and peroneal nerve conduction velocity (p = 0.03). Conclusions: IVIg improves strength in patients with untreated CIDP by day 10 with continued benefit through day 42; more than one third improve by at least a functional grade on a disability scale. This study provides data supporting IVIg as the initial treatment for CIDP.

A clinical trial of creatine in ALS

Background: Mitochondrial dysfunction occurs early in the course of ALS, and the mitochondria may be an important site for therapeutic intervention. Creatine stabilizes the mitochondrial transition pore, and is important in mitochondrial ATP production. In a transgenic mouse model of ALS, administration of creatine prolongs survival and preserves motor function and motor neurons. Methods: The authors conducted a randomized double-blind, placebo controlled trial on 104 patients with ALS from 14 sites to evaluate the efficacy of creatine supplementation in ALS. The primary outcome measure was maximum voluntary isometric contraction of eight upper extremity muscles, with secondary outcomes including grip strength, ALS Functional Rating Scale–Revised, and motor unit number estimates. Patients were treated for 6 months, and evaluated monthly. Results: Creatine was tolerated well, but no benefit of creatine could be demonstrated in any outcome measure. CI analysis showed that the study, although powered to detect a 50% or greater change in rate of decline of muscle strength, actually made an effect size of greater than 23% unlikely. It was also demonstrated that motor unit number estimation was performed with acceptable reproducibility and tolerability, and may be a useful outcome measure in future clinical trials. Conclusion: Any beneficial effect of creatine at 5 g per day in ALS must be small. Other agents should be considered in future studies of therapeutic agents to address mitochondrial dysfunction in ALS. In addition, motor unit number estimation may be a useful outcome measure for future clinical trials in ALS.

Topiramate vs placebo in painful diabetic neuropathy Analgesic and metabolic effects

Background: Using identical methods, three simultaneous placebo-controlled trials of topiramate for painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) did not reach significance. This independent yet concurrent placebo-controlled trial used different methods to assess topiramate efficacy and tolerability in PDN. Methods: This 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial included 323 subjects with PDN and pain visual analog (PVA) score of at least 40 on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain). Topiramate (n = 214) or placebo (n = 109) was titrated to 400 mg daily or maximum tolerated dose. Short-acting rescue analgesics were permitted only during the first 6 weeks. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups except for mean body weight (topiramate, 101.4 kg; placebo, 95.7 kg; p = 0.028). Twelve weeks of topiramate treatment reduced PVA scale score (from 68.0 to 46.2 mm) more effectively than placebo (from 69.1 to 54.0 mm; p = 0.038). Fifty percent of topiramate-treated subjects and 34% of placebo-treated subjects responded to treatment, defined as >30% reduction in PVA scale score (p = 0.004). Topiramate monotherapy also reduced worst pain intensity (p = 0.003 vs placebo) and sleep disruption (p = 0.020 vs placebo). Diarrhea, loss of appetite, and somnolence were the most commonly reported adverse events in the topiramate group. Topiramate reduced body weight (−2.6 vs +0.2 kg for placebo; p < 0.001) without disrupting glycemic control. Conclusions: Topiramate monotherapy reduced pain and body weight more effectively than placebo in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.

Gangliosides GM1 and GD1b are antigens for IgM M-protein in a patient with motor neuron disease

We studied a patient with an IgM M-protein and lower motor neuron disease to identify the antigens to which the M-protein bound. Gangliosides from peripheral nerve and spinal cord were separated by high-performance thin-layer chromatography and immunostained with the patients serum. The serum IgM immunostained two gangliosides identified as GM1 and GD1b, and immunostaining was specific for the M- protein light chain type. IgM-binding to the two gangliosides was detectable by ELISA at serum dilutions of greater than 1:10,000, and the M-protein was selectively immunoabsorbed by liposomes containing GM1 or GD1b. The IgM M-protein also bound to asialo-GM1, indicating reactivity to the galactosyl(beta 1-3)N-acetylgalactosaminyl moiety shared by GM1, GD1b, and asialo-GM1.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of topiramate in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Objective: To determine if long-term topiramate therapy is safe and slows disease progression in patients with ALS. Methods: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted. Participants with ALS (n = 296) were randomized (2:1) to receive topiramate (maximum tolerated dose up to 800 mg/day) or placebo for 12 months. The primary outcome measure was the rate of change in upper extremity motor function as measured by the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) strength of eight arm muscle groups. Secondary endpoints included safety and the rate of decline of forced vital capacity (FVC), grip strength, ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS), and survival. Results: Patients treated with topiramate showed a faster decrease in arm strength (33.3%) during 12 months (0.0997 vs 0.0748 unit decline/month, p = 0.012). Topiramate did not significantly alter the decline in FVC and ALSFRS or affect survival. Topiramate was associated with an increased frequency of anorexia, depression, diarrhea, ecchymosis, nausea, kidney calculus, paresthesia, taste perversion, thinking abnormalities, weight loss, and abnormal blood clotting (pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis). Conclusions: At the dose studied, topiramate did not have a beneficial effect for patients with ALS. High-dose topiramate treatment was associated with a faster rate of decline in muscle strength as measured by MVIC and with an increased risk for several adverse events in patients with ALS. Given the lack of efficacy and large number of adverse effects, further studies of topiramate at a dose of 800 mg or maximum tolerated dose up to 800 mg/day are not warranted.

Monoclonal IgM with unique specificity to gangliosides GM1 and GD1b and to lacto‐N ‐tetraose associated with human motor neuron disease

IgM lambda monoclonal antibodies in two patients with motor neuron disease showed the same unique antigenic specificity. They bound to gangliosides GM1 and GD1b and to lacto-N-tetraose-BSA. By immunofluorescence microscopy they bound to central and peripheral nerve tissue and to motor end-plates at the neuromuscular junction. Sera from control subjects did not contain antibodies of similar specificity. Monoclonal IgMs with the same unique specificity could be responsible for motor neuron disease in some patients with monoclonal gammopathies.

Maintenance of the long-term effectiveness of tramadol in treatment of the pain of diabetic neuropathy

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tramadol in a 6-month open extension following a 6-week double-blind randomized trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with painful diabetic neuropathy who completed the double-blind study were eligible for enrollment in an open extension of up to 6 months. All patients received tramadol 50-400 mg/day. Self-administered pain intensity scores (scale 0-4; none to extreme pain) and pain relief scores (scale -1-4; worse to complete relief) were recorded the first day of the open extension (last day of the double-blind phase) and at 30, 90, and 180 days. RESULTS A total of 117 patients (56 former tramadol and 61 former placebo) entered the study. On the first day of the study, patients formerly treated with placebo had a significantly higher mean pain intensity score (2. 2+/-1.02 vs. 1.4+/-0.93, P<0.001) and a lower pain relief score (0. 9+/-1.43 vs. 2.2+/-1.27, P<0.001) than former tramadol patients. By Day 90, both groups had mean pain intensity scores of 1.4, which were maintained throughout the study. Mean pain relief scores (2. 4+/-1.09 vs. 2.2+/-1.14) were similar after 30 days in the former placebo and former tramadol groups, respectively and were maintained for the duration of the study. Four patients discontinued therapy due to ineffective pain relief; 13 patients discontinued due to adverse events. The most common adverse events were constipation, nausea, and headache. CONCLUSIONS Tramadol provides long-term relief of the pain of diabetic neuropathy.

Pilot study of zonisamide (1, 2-benzisoxazole-3-methanesulfonamide) in patients with refractory partial seizures

Summary: A new anticonvulsant compound, zonisamide (1,2 benzioxazole‐methanesulfonamide), was studied in 10 adults with medically refractory partial seizures. Following a single oral dose of 400 mg, peak plasma levels occurred an average of 2.8 h after dosing, and the mean clearance from plasma was 2.34 L/h. Whole blood concentrations were high than plasma concentrations because of red blood cell binding. steady‐state plasma concentrations were high than predicted from a linear kinetic model. In most patients, seizure frequency was reduced after zonisamide was substituted for a standard antiepileptic drug. Dose‐related reversible side effects in the central nervous and gastrointestinal system were observed. Most patients tolerated doses between 5.2 and 12.5 mg/kg/day.

Supply and demand analysis of the current and future US neurology workforce

Objective: This study estimates current and projects future neurologist supply and demand under alternative scenarios nationally and by state from 2012 through 2025. Methods: A microsimulation supply model simulates likely career choices of individual neurologists, taking into account the number of new neurologists trained each year and changing demographics of the neurology workforce. A microsimulation demand model simulates utilization of neurology services for each individual in a representative sample of the population in each state and for the United States as a whole. Demand projections reflect increased prevalence of neurologic conditions associated with population growth and aging, and expanded coverage under health care reform. Results: The estimated active supply of 16,366 neurologists in 2012 is projected to increase to 18,060 by 2025. Long wait times for patients to see a neurologist, difficulty hiring new neurologists, and large numbers of neurologists who do not accept new Medicaid patients are consistent with a current national shortfall of neurologists. Demand for neurologists is projected to increase from ∼18,180 in 2012 (11% shortfall) to 21,440 by 2025 (19% shortfall). This includes an increased demand of 520 full-time equivalent neurologists starting in 2014 from expanded medical insurance coverage associated with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Conclusions: In the absence of efforts to increase the number of neurology professionals and retain the existing workforce, current national and geographic shortfalls of neurologists are likely to worsen, exacerbating long wait times and reducing access to care for Medicaid beneficiaries. Current geographic differences in adequacy of supply likely will persist into the future.