Peter D. Neuhaus

A Controller for the LittleDog Quadruped Walking on Rough Terrain

We present a controller for a quadrupedal robot statically walking on known rough terrain. The controller has both deliberative and reactive components for task specific control issues, such as impassable terrain and unmodeled foot slippage. The controller architecture supports multiple gaits, and we present both a stable omnidirectional gait and a faster directional gait. The robot successfully negotiates obstacles up to 7.5 cm (ap40% leg length) tall and navigates over rocky terrain.

Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge Trials

This article is a summary of the experiences of the Florida Institute for Human & Machine Cognition IHMC team during the DARPA Robotics Challenge DRC Trials. The primary goal of the DRC is to develop robots capable of assisting humans in responding to natural and manmade disasters. The robots are expected to use standard tools and equipment to accomplish the mission. The DRC Trials consisted of eight different challenges that tested robot mobility, manipulation, and control under degraded communications and time constraints. Team IHMC competed using the Atlas humanoid robot made by Boston Dynamics. We competed against 16 international teams and placed second in the competition. This article discusses the challenges we faced in transitioning from simulation to hardware. It also discusses the lessons learned both during the competition and in the months of preparation leading up to it. The lessons address the value of reliable hardware and solid software practices. They also cover effective approaches to bipedal walking and designing for human-robot teamwork. Lastly, the lessons present a philosophical discussion about choices related to designing robotic systems.

Design and evaluation of Mina: A robotic orthosis for paraplegics

Mobility options for persons suffering from paraplegia or paraparesis are limited to mainly wheeled devices. There are significant health, psychological, and social consequences related to being confined to a wheelchair. We present the Mina, a robotic orthosis for assisting mobility, which offers a legged mobility option for these persons. Mina is an overground robotic device that is worn on the back and around the legs to provide mobility assistance for people suffering from paraplegia or paraparesis. Mina uses compliant actuation to power the hip and knee joints. For paralyzed users, balance is provided with the assistance of forearm crutches. This paper presents the evaluation of Mina with two paraplegics (SCI ASIA-A). We confirmed that with a few hours of training and practice, Mina is currently able to provide paraplegics walking mobility at speeds of up to 0.20 m/s. We further confirmed that using Mina is not physically taxing and requires little cognitive effort, allowing the user to converse and maintain eye contact while walking.1

Development of the IHMC Mobility Assist Exoskeleton

The IHMC Mobility Assist Exoskeleton is a robotic suit that a user can wear for strength augmentation or gait generation. This first generation exoskeleton prototype focuses on providing walking assistance to persons with lower extremity paralysis. The main goal is to successfully enable a person that cannot walk without assistance to walk in a straight line a distance of 15 feet. When in disable assist mode this prototype will rely on the user to provide balance control, and thus an external means for balancing will be required, such as crutches or a walker. Power and control is off board and supplied to the Exoskeleton by means of a tether. Rotary Series Elastic Actuators (RSEAs), which have high force fidelity and low impedance were designed to power the joints. This paper describes the design, test results, future work and potential applications of the exoskeleton.

Mina: A Sensorimotor Robotic Orthosis for Mobility Assistance

While most mobility options for persons with paraplegia or paraparesis employ wheeled solutions, significant adverse health, psychological, and social consequences result from wheelchair confinement. Modern robotic exoskeleton devices for gait assistance and rehabilitation, however, can support legged locomotion systems for those with lower extremity weakness or paralysis. The Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC) has developed the Mina, a prototype sensorimotor robotic orthosis for mobility assistance that provides mobility capability for paraplegic and paraparetic users. This paper describes the initial concept, design goals, and methods of this wearable overground robotic mobility device, which uses compliant actuation to power the hip and knee joints. Paralyzed users can balance and walk using the device over level terrain with the assistance of forearm crutches employing a quadrupedal gait. We have initiated sensory substitution feedback mechanisms to augment user sensory perception of his or her lower extremities. Using this sensory feedback, we hypothesize that users will ambulate with a more natural, upright gait and will be able to directly control the gait parameters and respond to perturbations. This may allow bipedal (with minimal support) gait in future prototypes.

Comprehensive summary of the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition's experience with LittleDog

We discuss the main issues and challenges with quadrupedal locomotion over rough terrain in the context of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s Learning Locomotion program. We present our controller for the LittleDog platform, which allows for continuous transition between a static crawl gait and a dynamic trot gait depending on the roughness of the terrain. We provide detailed descriptions for some of our key algorithm components, such as a fast footstep planner for rough terrain, a body pose finder for a given support polygon, and a new type of parameterized gait. We present the results of our algorithm, which proved successful in the program, crossing all 10 terrain boards on the final test at an average speed of 11.2 cm/s. We conclude with a discussion on the applicability of this work for platforms other than LittleDog and in environments other than the Learning Locomotion designed tests.

Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge: Finding Data in the Rubble

This article presents a retrospective analysis of Team IHMCs experience throughout the DARPA Robotics Challenge DRC, where we took first or second place overall in each of the three phases. As an extremely demanding challenge typical of DARPA, the DRC required rapid research and development to push the boundaries of robotics and set a new benchmark for complex robotic behavior. We present how we addressed each of the eight tasks of the DRC and review our performance in the Finals. While the ambitious competition schedule limited extensive experimentation, we will review the data we collected during the approximately three years of our participation. We discuss some of the significant lessons learned that contributed to our success in the DRC. These include hardware lessons, software lessons, and human-robot integration lessons. We describe refinements to the coactive design methodology that helped our designers connect human-machine interaction theory to both implementation and empirical data. This approach helped our team focus our limited resources on the issues most critical to success. In addition to helping readers understand our experiences in developing on a Boston Dynamics Atlas robot for the DRC, we hope this article will provide insights that apply more widely to robotics development and design of human-machine systems.

Stepping Forward with Exoskeletons: Team IHMC?s Design and Approach in the 2016 Cybathlon

Exoskeletons are a promising technology for enabling individuals with mobility limitations to walk again. As the 2016 Cybathlon illustrated, however, we have a considerable way to go before exoskeletons have the necessary capabilities to be incorporated into daily life. Most exoskeletons, power only the hip and knee flexion, whereas we present a new exoskeleton, Mina v2, that includes a powered dorsi/plantar flexion. As our entry to the 2016 Cybathlon Powered Exoskeleton Competition, Mina v2s powered ankle allowed us to explore its effectiveness on powered exoskeletons for pilots with paraplegia. We designed our gaits around the incorporation of powered ankle plantar flexion to help improve mobility. Using this approach, our pilot was able to navigate the tasks quickly, especially those that required ascending, and reliably achieve average, conservative walking speeds of 0.29 m/s. This enabled our team to place 2nd overall in the Powered Exoskeleton Competition in the 2016 Cybathlon.Exoskeletons are a promising technology that enables individuals with mobility limitations to walk again. As the 2016 Cybathlon illustrated, however, the community has a considerable way to go before exoskeletons have the necessary capabilities to be incorporated into daily life. While most exoskeletons power only hip and knee flexion, Team Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC) presents a new exoskeleton, Mina v2, which includes a powered ankle dorsi/plantar flexion (Figure 1). As our entry to the 2016 Cybathlon Powered Exoskeleton Competition, Mina v2s performance allowed us to explore the effectiveness of its powered ankle compared to other powered exoskeletons for pilots with paraplegia. We designed our gaits to incorporate powered ankle plantar flexion to help improve mobility, which allowed our pilot to navigate the given Cybathlon tasks quickly, including those that required ascending movements, and reliably achieve average, conservative walking speeds of 1.04 km/h (0.29 m/s). This enabled our team to place second overall in the Powered Exoskeleton Competition in the 2016 Cybathlon.

Demonstration of quadrupedal locomotion over rough terrain using the littledog robot

This video presents work by researchers at The Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC) on the DARPA funded Learning Locomotion program. This program started in 2005 and finished in 2009.

IHMC’s experience competing in the Cybathlon compared to the DARPA robotics challenge

BackgroundAs a research scientist, my work tends to focus on scientific investigations. Our group occasionally makes discoveries or has a successful demonstration, and sometimes we can even repeatedly demonstrate something working on the hardware. This mode of operation works for research, but not for competitions. In the past few years, I have participated in two international robotics competitions, the DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC) and the Cybathlon; the research and development process for these competitions is significantly different from our typical research work. This commentary discusses our experience preparing for the Cybathlon, and contrasts it with our experience with the DRC.Main bodyThe human in the loop for the Cybathlon was the biggest differentiator between the DRC and the Cybathlon. Having the human at the center of the competition not only changed the way we developed, but changed how we viewed the impact of our work. For the DRC, a physics based dynamic simulation was a powerful, and invaluable, tool for not only the algorithm developers, but the robot operator as well. For the Cybathlon, simulation was of little use because the all of closed-loop control was performed by the pilot. In the software development cycle for the Cybathlon, the push was to just come up with something that works and “lock it down” and do not change it, so that the pilot could train with a given set of motions that would not change and make up for any deficiencies with his own abilities. The Cybathlon was more of an athletic challenge for the human who was assisted by technology. The DRC was the opposite, it was a robotics challenge assisted by a human. This commentary focuses on describing the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition’s (IHMC) experience leading up to and at the Cybathlon, with some comparisons to the DRC experience.ConclusionThe Cybathlon was a very worthwhile experience me, my team, and of course our pilot. Knowing that our development could improve the quality of life and health for a group of people was very motivating and rewarding. Engineering competitions accelerate development, engage the public, and in the case of the Cybathlon, increase public awareness of issues for people with disabilities. The Cybathlon also revealed that the powered exoskeleton technology is still nascent in its ability to be a viable alternative to the wheelchair. But with continued developments toward the 2020 Cybathlon, we hope the capabilities of these devices can offer will be significantly improved.