Peter F. Roberts

Factors associated with false-positive staging of lung cancer by positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND Positron emission tomography imaging is gaining popularity as a noninvasive staging tool in non-small cell lung cancer. Nonmalignant processes can also affect radio-tracer uptake. This study seeks to identify factors associated with false-positive staging of mediastinal metastases. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of 100 patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer referred for positron emission tomography scan evaluation. All had pathologic confirmation of their disease. Positron emission tomography scans, radiology records, operative reports, and pathology results were reviewed. Patients with positron emission tomography scans interpreted as positive for mediastinal involvement and negative pathology at operation were selected. RESULTS Seven patients were found to have a false-positive positron emission tomography evaluation for mediastinal metastases. All but 1 patient had a concurrent inflammatory process or an anatomic factor associated with the false positive. The sensitivity and specificity in detecting involved mediastinal nodes was 87.5% and 90.7%, respectively. The negative predictive value was 95.8%. CONCLUSIONS Although positron emission tomography has been established as an accurate modality to stage non-small cell lung cancer, false-positive evaluation of mediastinal metastases can occur in the setting of concurrent inflammatory lung diseases or for centrally located tumors. Pathologic evaluation of mediastinal disease should be pursued whenever suggested by a positive positron emission tomography scan especially in the face of those factors described.

Resection of multifocal non–small cell lung cancer when the bronchioloalveolar subtype is involved

OBJECTIVE Bronchioloalveolar lung cancer is commonly multifocal and can also present with other non-small cell types. The staging and treatment of multifocal non-small cell cancer are controversial. We evaluated the current staging of multifocal bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and the therapeutic effectiveness of resection when this tumor type is involved. METHODS We reviewed our experience between 1992 and 2000 with complete pulmonary resections for bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated from the dates of pulmonary resection. RESULTS Among 73 patients with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma, 14 patients, 7 male and 7 female with a mean age of 65 years (51-87 years), had multifocal lesions without lymph node metastases. Follow-up was 100% for a median of 5 years (range 2.6-8.5 years). Tumor distribution was unilateral in 9 patients and bilateral in 5 patients. The multifocal nature of the disease was discovered intraoperatively in 4 patients. Nine patients had 2 lesions, 4 patients had 3 lesions, and 1 patient had innumerable discrete foci in a single lobe. Operative mortality was 0. Postoperatively, 10 patients were staged pIIIB or pIV on the basis of multiple foci of similar morphology; 4 patients had some differences in histology (implying multiple stage 1 primaries). The median survival time to death from cancer was 14 months (141 days-5.6 years). The overall 5-year survival after resection of multifocal bronchioloalveolar carcinoma was 64%. Unilateral or bilateral distribution had no impact on survival. CONCLUSIONS The current staging system is not prognostic for multifocal bronchioloalveolar carcinoma without lymph node metastases. Complete resection of multifocal non-small cell lung cancer when bronchioloalveolar carcinoma is a component may achieve survivals similar to that of stage I and II unifocal non-small cell lung cancer. When bronchioloalveolar carcinoma is believed to be one of the cell types in multifocal disease without lymph node metastases, consideration should be given to surgical resection.

Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

Ivor Lewis esophagectomy consists of a laparotomy and right thoracotomy for resection of the intrathoracic esophagus. Recent advances in minimally invasive surgical technology have allowed surgeons to apply laparoscopy and thoracoscopy to perform esophagectomy. However, there have been few reports that describe a totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. We present a case of combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic resection of the distal third esophagus with an intrathoracic esophagogastric reconstruction for esophageal carcinoma.

Evaluation of minimally invasive surgical staging for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND Conventional imaging studies (computed tomography and endoscopic esophageal ultrasonography) used for preoperative evaluation of patients with esophageal cancer can be inaccurate for detection of small metastatic deposits. We evaluated the efficacy of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) staging as an additional modality for evaluation of patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS Between December 1998 and February 2001, 33 patients with esophageal cancer were evaluated for surgical resection. Conventional imaging studies demonstrated operable disease in 31 patients and equivocal findings in 2 patients. All patients then underwent MIS staging (laparoscopy, bronchoscopy, and ultrasonography of the liver). We compared the results from surgical resection and MIS staging with those from conventional imaging. RESULTS MIS staging altered the treatment plan in 12 (36%) of 33 patients; MIS staging upstaged 10 patients with operable disease and downstaged 2 patients with equivocal findings. MIS staging accurately determined resectability in 97% of patients compared with 61% of patients staged by conventional imaging. The specificity and negative predictive value for detection of unsuspected metastatic disease in MIS staging were 100% and 96%, respectively, compared with 91% and 65%, respectively, for conventional imaging studies. CONCLUSION In addition to conventional imaging studies, MIS staging should be included routinely in the preoperative work-up of patients with esophageal cancer.

Current and future therapeutic approaches in locally advanced (stage III) non-small cell lung cancer

In the treatment of locally advanced (stage III) non-small cell lung cancer, randomized clinical trials have shown that sequential administration of platinum-based chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy improves outcome compared with radiotherapy alone. More recently, concurrent chemoradiotherapy has been shown to be superior to sequential therapy. Incorporating full-dose chemotherapy into induction or consolidation phases is aimed at the eradication of distant micrometastases. These approaches are currently being examined in clinical trials. The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in resectable stage IIIA patients remains controversial. Integration of newer cytotoxic agents (paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and irinotecan) and molecularly targeted agents into the treatment of stage-III patients may result in improved long-term outcomes and is currently under study.

Re-Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma Tumor Thrombus Extension by Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography

T RANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY (TEE) is well accepted and extensively used by cardiologists, anesthesiologists, and cardiothoracic surgeons perioperatively to monitor cardiac function and great vessel anatomy.’ TEE remains underused in noncardiac surgical procedures, however. This oversight may be due, in part, to inadequate resources or the specialized training and qualifications necessary to perform TEE.* Alternatively, other physicians may be unfamiliar with its diagnostic capabilities. This case report describes a patient whose treatment was dramatically altered by perioperative TEE. He was brought to the operating room with a diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma and his preoperative diagnostic evaluation revealed extension of the tumor thrombus into the inferior vena cava and intrahepatic vessels. There was no tumor thrombus extension visualized above the level of the diaphragm by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or transthoracic echocardiography. The patient was brought to the operating room for a planned surgical resection of the tumor and subdiaphragmatic tumor thrombus.