Peter Fessenden

Stanford University institutional report. Phase I evaluation of equipment for hyperthermia treatment of cancer

From September 16, 1981, through April 4, 1986, a total of 21 radiative electromagnetic (microwave and radiofrequency), ultrasound and interstitial radio-frequency hyperthermia applicators and three types of thermometry systems underwent extensive phantom and clinical testing at Stanford University. A total of 996 treatment sessions involving 268 separate treatment fields in 131 patients was performed. Thermal profiles were obtained in 847 of these treatment sessions by multipoint and/or mapping techniques involving mechanical translation. The ability of these devices to heat superficial, eccentrically located and deep-seated tumours at the major anatomical locations is evaluated and the temperature distributions, acute and subacute toxicities, and chronic complications compared. Average measured tumour temperatures between 42 degrees C and 43 degrees C were obtained with many of the devices used for superficial heating; average tumour temperatures of 39.6 degrees C to 42.1 degrees C were achieved with the three deep-heating devices. When compared to the goal of obtaining minimum tumour temperatures of 43.0 degrees C, all devices performed poorly. Only 14 per cent (118/847) of treatments with measured thermal profiles achieved minimum intratumoural temperatures of 41 degrees C. Fifty-six per cent of all treatments had associated acute toxicity; 14 per cent of all treatments necessitated power reduction resulting in maximum steady-state temperatures of less than 42.5 degrees C. Direct comparisons between two or more devices utilized to treat the same field were made in 67 instances, including 19 treatment fields in which two or more devices were compared at the same treatment session. The analyses from direct comparisons consistently showed that the static spiral and larger area scanning spiral applicators resulted in more favourable temperature distributions. Three fibreoptic thermometry systems (Luxtron single channel, four channel and eight channel multiple [four] probe array), the BSD Bowman thermistor system and a thermocouple system were evaluated with respect to accuracy, stability and artifacts. The clinical reliability, durability, and patient tolerance of the thermometry systems were investigated. The BSD Bowman and third generation Luxtron systems were found clinically useful, with the former meeting all of our established criteria.

Experience with a Multitransducer Ultrasound System for Localized Hyperthermia of Deep Tissues

A system employing six planar ultrasound transducers has been utilized for preclinical and pilot clinical studies with the aim of producing therapeutic heating preferentially at depth. The array consists of six 7 cm diameter PZT-4 disks mounted on a spherical shell section with a 26 cm radius of curvature. The crystals operate at different frequencies a few kilohertz above their fundamental frequencies of approximately 350 kHz for near-field peak suppression, and each has a few percent modulation to minimize standing wave effects. In water, the system can be focused to produce a high intensity region near the isocenter with a full width half maximum of approximately 1.5 cm in all directions. In attenuating tissue, the high intensity region is closer to the array of transducers by a few centimeters. For heating of realistic tumors at depth, small wedges are used to rotate the transducer axes a few degrees away from the radial direction, yielding a waist rather than a single point where the individual beam central axes come closest to each other. The waist is 3-6 cm in diameter, producing, ideally, ellipsoidal shaped temperature distributions centered deep in perfused tissue. Quantitative power deposition profile mapping, as well as qualitative studies using liquid crystal sheets, have been performed in water phantoms to characterize the system for different transducer orientations.

Two or six hyperthermia treatments as an adjunct to radiation therapy yield similar tumor responses: results of a randomized trial.

From March 1984 to February 1988, 70 patients with 179 separate treatment fields containing superficially located (less than 3 cm from surface) recurrent or metastatic malignancies were stratified based on tumor size, histology, and prior radiation therapy and enrolled in prospective randomized trials comparing two versus six hyperthermia treatments as an adjunct to standardized courses of radiation therapy. A total of 165 fields completed the combined hyperthermia-radiation therapy protocols and were evaluable for response. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two treatment arms with respect to tumor location; histology; initial tumor volume; patient age and pretreatment performance status; extent of prior radiation therapy, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or immunotherapy; or concurrent radiation therapy. The means for all fields of the averaged minimum, maximum, and average measured intratumoral temperatures were 40.2 degrees C, 44.8 degrees C, 42.5 degrees C, respectively, and did not differ significantly between the fields randomized to two or six hyperthermia treatments. The treatment was well tolerated with an acceptable level of complications. At 3 weeks after completion of therapy, complete disappearance of all measurable tumor was noted in 52% of the fields, greater than or equal to 50% tumor reduction was noted in 7% of the fields, less than 50% tumor reduction was noted in 21% of the fields, and continuing regression (monotonic regression to less than 50% of initial volume) was noted in 20% of the fields. No significant differences were noted in tumor responses at 3 weeks for fields randomized to two versus six hyperthermia treatments (p = 0.89). Cox regression analyses were performed to identify pretreatment or treatment parameters that correlated with duration of local control. Tumor histology, concurrent radiation doses, and tumor volume all correlated with duration of local control. The mean of the minimum intratumoral temperatures (less than 41 degrees C vs. greater than or equal to 41 degrees C) was of borderline prognostic significance in the univariate analysis, and added to the power of the best three covariate model. Neither the actual number of hyperthermia treatments administered nor the hyperthermia protocol group (two versus six treatments) correlated with duration of local control. The development of thermotolerance is postulated to be, at least in part, responsible for limiting the effectiveness of multiple closely spaced hyperthermia treatments.

Body conformable 915 MHz microstrip array applicators for large surface area hyperthermia

The optimal treatment with hyperthermia of superficially located tumors which involve large surface areas requires applicators which can physically conform to body contours, and locally alter their power deposition patterns to adjust for nonuniform temperature caused by tissue inhomogeneities and blood flow variations. A series of 915-MHz microstrip array applicators satisfying these criteria have been developed and clinically tested. Clinical and engineering design tradeoffs for practical devices are discussed. Measurements taken in tissue equivalent phantoms and a summary of clinical experiences with these microstrip arrays are presented.<<ETX>>

Spiral microstrip hyperthermia applicators : technical design and clinical performance

Spiral microstrip microwave (MW) antennas have been developed and adapted for use as clinical hyperthermia applicators. The design has been configured in a variety of forms including single fixed antenna applicators, multi-element arrays, and mechanically scanned single or paired antennas. The latter three configurations have been used to allow an expansion of the effective heating area. Specific absorption rate (SAR) distributions measured in phantom have been used to estimate the depth and volume of effective heating. The estimates are made using the bioheat equation assuming uniformly perfused tissue. In excess of 500 treatments of patients with advanced or recurrent localized superficial tumors have been performed using this applicator technology. Data from clinical treatments have been analyzed to quantify the heating performance and verify the suitability of these applicators for clinical use. Good microwave coupling efficiency together with the compact applicator size have proved to be valuable clinical assets.

Hyperthermia and radiation therapy of local-regional recurrent breast cancer: Prognostic factors for response and local control of diffuse or nodular tumors

Over the past decade, hyperthermia has been extensively studied as an adjuvant to radiation therapy in the management of local-regional metastases from adenocarcinoma of the breast. A retrospective review of our experience from July 1982 to January 1990 identified 241 fields in 89 patients which satisfied the following criteria: biopsy confirmation of recurrent or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the breast; involvement of the chest wall and/or regional lymph nodes with diffuse or nodular metastases; treatment which included radiation therapy and externally administered hyperthermia during which mechanically-mapped and/or multipoint normal tissue and intratumoral temperatures were monitored; and at least one follow-up evaluation at 3 weeks or more after completion of treatment. The majority of fields were in patients who had extensive prior treatment including radiation therapy (68%), chemotherapy (86%), and hormonal therapy (58%). Treatment consisted of radiation therapy (average dose: 39.88 Gy) and hyperthermia (1-12 treatments; average 3.12); concurrent chemotherapy or hormonal therapy were also administered in 3% and 32% of the fields, respectively. Parameters characterizing the initial breast cancer, the patient and tumor at the time of hyperthermia, and the treatment were studied in univariate and multivariate analyses with complete response rate at the time of maximum tumor regression and duration of local control as endpoints. The treatments were well tolerated with no life-threatening complications noted. The means for all fields of the mean minimum, mean maximum, and mean average measured intratumoral temperatures were 40.3 degrees C, 44.6 degrees C, and 42.4 degrees C, respectively. At 3 weeks following completion of radiation therapy, response rates were: complete response (52%), partial response (8%), no response (17%), and continuing regression (monotonic regression to less than 50% of initial volume) was noted in 22% of the fields. At the time of maximum tumor regression local control was noted in 72% of the fields. Five parameters correlated with higher complete response in univariate and multivariate analysis: lower T-stage of the initial breast cancer; at the time of hyperthermia age less than 50 years, Karnofsky status greater than 95%, and the absence of distant metastases; and the use of concurrent hormonal therapy. The absence of a family history of breast cancer and concurrent radiation dose greater than or equal to 25 Gy significantly correlated with higher complete response in the univariate but not in the best multivariate models.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

HEATING DEEP SEATED ECCENTRICALLY LOCATED TUMORS WITH AN ANNULAR PHASED ARRAY SYSTEM: A COMPARATIVE CLINICAL STUDY USING TWO ANNULAR ARRAY OPERATING CONFIGURATIONS

Regional heating administered with an annular array to 12 patients with deep-seated advanced malignant disease eccentrically located in the lower abdomen and pelvis is compared based on the annular array operating configuration. One configuration (4 quadrants active) delivers radiofrequency power with relative uniformity throughout the patient cross-section. The other (2 quadrants active) allows the radiofrequency power deposition to be shifted preferentially into the eccentrically located treatment volume. Phantom measurements have been made to demonstrate the redistribution of radiofrequency power that results when the annular array is operated in these respective configurations. Systemic responses (i.e. oral temperature rise, changes in blood pressure, and heart rate) to these regional hyperthermia applications are compared and are not significantly different with respect to these heating configurations. Temperature data obtained during treatment sessions using these two annular array operating configurations are analyzed based on the fraction of measured tumor and normal tissue temperatures exceeding or equal to a given index temperature. Although the two quadrant configuration is more efficient in delivering power to the treatment volume, this analysis does not indicate a significant gain in therapeutic heating as a result of this preferential power deposition. Treatment tolerance and heterogeneity with respect to tissue type and blood flow remained the dominant limiting factors with regard to temperatures achieved.

THERMOMETRY OF INTERSTITIAL HYPERTHERMIA GIVEN AS AN ADJUVANT TO BRACHYTHERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE

PURPOSE Recurrence in the prostatic gland remains a significant problem in the management of locally advanced prostatic cancer. Transperineal thermobrachytherapy has been utilized in an attempt to improve local tumor control. The purpose of this study was to quantitate the temperature distributions obtained in carcinoma of the prostate treated with interstitial radiofrequency-induced hyperthermia given in conjunction with 192Ir brachytherapy in a Phase I study. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 1987 until 1992, 36 patients (5 with locally recurrent, 15 with Stage B, and 16 Stage C prostate cancers) were treated with interstitial brachytherapy implants supplemented with radiofrequency-induced hyperthermia. An array of 7-32 stainless steel trocar electrodes (outer diameter = 1.5 mm, interelectrode spacing = 8 mm) were implanted into the prostate gland through a perineal approach utilizing a specially designed template. Each trocar was electrically insulated along the length which traversed surrounding normal tissues. One to three additional plastic catheters were implanted for automated temperature mapping. Thirty-four of these procedures were performed following lymph node sampling. However, the last two removable interstitial hyperthermic prostate implants were done by the transperineal route under ultrasound guidance. A hyperthermia treatment (goal of 43 degrees C for 45 minutes) was given immediately prior to the insertion and immediately following the removal of the 192Ir. A computer-controlled radiofrequency-based generator (freq. 0.5 MHz) implementing electrode multiplexing was used to induce and maintain elevated temperatures. RESULTS Transient local pain was the most common treatment limiting factor. The average values of the measured minimum, mean, and maximum temperatures were 38.9 degrees C, 41.9 degrees C, and 45.7 degrees C in tumor, and 37.7 degrees C, 39.8 degrees C, and 42.9 degrees C in surrounding normal tissue, respectively. The percentages of mapped temperatures exceeding 41 degrees C, 42 degrees C, and 43 degrees C were 67%, 46%, and 27% in tumor, and 26%, 11%, and 4% in normal surrounding tissue, respectively. CONCLUSION From this study we conclude that heterogeneous temperature distributions were induced in the prostate; significant normal tissue protection was realized in part through the selective insulation of sections of each electrode; and interstitial radiofrequency-induced hyperthermia of the prostate is feasible and well tolerated, with further technical developments warranted.

Parameters predictive for complications of treatment with combined hyperthermia and radiation therapy

Pretreatment and treatment related factors were reviewed for 996 hyperthermia sessions involving 268 separate treatment fields in 131 patients managed with hyperthermia for biopsy confirmed local-regionally advanced or recurrent malignancies to ascertain parameters associated with the development of complications. A subset of 249 fields were identified in which multipoint or mapped temperature data were available for at least one treatment session per field. A total of 198 fields involved superficially located tumors (less than or equal to 3 cm from the surface), whereas 51 fields involved more deeply located tumors. Most of these patients had received extensive prior therapy: 77% had surgery, 75% chemotherapy, 65% radiation therapy and 28% hormonal therapy. They were treated with hyperthermia in conjunction with radiation therapy (244 fields) or hyperthermia alone (5 fields). The hyperthermia treatment objectives were to elevate intratumoral temperatures to a minimum of 43.0 degrees C for 45 minutes while maintaining maximum normal tissue temperatures to less than or equal to 43 degrees C and maximum intratumoral temperatures to less than or equal to 50 degrees C. The hyperthermia was given within 30 to 60 minutes following radiation therapy without the administration of additional analgesics. Hyperthermia treatment regimens using radiative electromagnetic, ultrasound, or radiofrequency interstitial techniques were individualized, with 3 to 4 days between hyperthermia treatments and an average of 3.6 treatments (range 1-14; standard deviation 2.2) utilized per field. A total of 38 complications in 33 treatment fields were noted; an incidence of 27/198 (13.6%) for fields with superficially located tumors, and 6/51 (11.8%) in fields with more deeply located tumors. Univariate analyses demonstrated statistically significant correlations between the maximum tumor temperature (p = 0.0005), average of the maximum tumor temperatures (p = 0.0006), the average of the % tumor temperatures greater than 43.5 degrees C (p = 0.0071), and the average number of hyperthermia treatments (p = 0.033), with the development of complications. The average of the maximum measured tumor temperature for fields without complications was 44.6 degrees C compared with 45.9 degrees C for fields with complications. The complication rate increased from 7.5% (9/120) in fields that received one or two hyperthermia treatments to 18.6% (24/129) in fields that received greater than two hyperthermia treatments. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed the best bivariate model predictive of the development of complications included average of the maximum tumor temperature and the number of treatments per field (p = 0.00012 for the bivariate model).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The PIOTRON: initial performance, preparation and experience with pion therapy.

The PIOTRON is a large solid angle superconducting channel built for the use of negative pi-mesons in radiotherapy. The pions are produced by protons of 590 MeV striking a target of molybdenum or beryllium. The pions are divided into 60 channels and deflected twice to enter the treatment volume radially. The momentum and the momentum band for all 60 channels can be chosen and the beam spot of Bragg peak pions at the isocenter of the applicator is a few centimeters in each direction. Dynamic scanning can thus achieve 3-dimensionally shaped treatment volumes. Two different methods are available: the ring scan, using changes of pion range; and the spot scan, involving translation of the patient through the fixed beam spot. Dose distributions of individual and multiple beams were plotted in a cylindrical water phantom. Radiobiological experiments with mammalian cells in gel and with mouse feet were performed. A special beam geometry using a sector of 15 beams was selected for the first treatments of patients with metastatic skin nodules. Six patients were treated. Acute skin reactions were scored and compared with those from orthovoltage therapy with comparable beam geometry. The RBE for 10 fractions is between 1.4 and 1.5. The next step involved treatment of patients inside water-bolus rings in preparation for dynamic therapy. Patients were then treated with the spot scan dynamic mode in the water bolus. The initial responses and reactions are favorable and confirm the feasibility and accuracy of dynamic pion therapy.