Peter G. Colman

Effect of fenofibrate on the need for laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy (FIELD study): a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND Laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy is often associated with visual field reduction and other ocular side-effects. Our aim was to assess whether long-term lipid-lowering therapy with fenofibrate could reduce the progression of retinopathy and the need for laser treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS The Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study was a multinational randomised trial of 9795 patients aged 50-75 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive fenofibrate 200 mg/day (n=4895) or matching placebo (n=4900). At each clinic visit, information concerning laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy-a prespecified tertiary endpoint of the main study-was gathered. Adjudication by ophthalmologists masked to treatment allocation defined instances of laser treatment for macular oedema, proliferative retinopathy, or other eye conditions. In a substudy of 1012 patients, standardised retinal photography was done and photographs graded with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) criteria to determine the cumulative incidence of diabetic retinopathy and its component lesions. Analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN64783481. FINDINGS Laser treatment was needed more frequently in participants with poorer glycaemic or blood pressure control than in those with good control of these factors, and in those with a greater burden of clinical microvascular disease, but the need for such treatment was not affected by plasma lipid concentrations. The requirement for first laser treatment for all retinopathy was significantly lower in the fenofibrate group than in the placebo group (164 [3.4%] patients on fenofibrate vs 238 [4.9%] on placebo; hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.84; p=0.0002; absolute risk reduction 1.5% [0.7-2.3]). In the ophthalmology substudy, the primary endpoint of 2-step progression of retinopathy grade did not differ significantly between the two groups overall (46 [9.6%] patients on fenofibrate vs 57 [12.3%] on placebo; p=0.19) or in the subset of patients without pre-existing retinopathy (43 [11.4%] vs 43 [11.7%]; p=0.87). By contrast, in patients with pre-existing retinopathy, significantly fewer patients on fenofibrate had a 2-step progression than did those on placebo (three [3.1%] patients vs 14 [14.6%]; p=0.004). An exploratory composite endpoint of 2-step progression of retinopathy grade, macular oedema, or laser treatments was significantly lower in the fenofibrate group than in the placebo group (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.94; p=0.022). INTERPRETATION Treatment with fenofibrate in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus reduces the need for laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy, although the mechanism of this effect does not seem to be related to plasma concentrations of lipids.

Persistent Poststroke Hyperglycemia Is Independently Associated With Infarct Expansion and Worse Clinical Outcome

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Hyperglycemia at the time of ischemic stroke is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Animal studies suggest that infarct expansion may be responsible. The influence of persisting hyperglycemia after stroke has not previously been examined. We measured the blood glucose profile after acute ischemic stroke and correlated it with infarct volume changes using T2- and diffusion-weighted MRI. METHODS We recruited 25 subjects within 24 hours of ischemic stroke symptoms. Continuous glucose monitoring was performed with a glucose monitoring device (CGMS), and 4-hour capillary glucose levels (BGL) were measured for 72 hours after admission. MRI and clinical assessments were performed at acute (median, 15 hours), subacute (median, 5 days), and outcome (median, 85 days) time points. RESULTS Mean CGMS glucose and mean BGL glucose correlated with infarct volume change between acute and subacute diffusion-weighted MRI (r>or=0.60, P<0.01), acute and outcome MRI (r=0.56, P=0.01), outcome National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS; r>or=0.53, P<0.02), and outcome modified Rankin Scale (mRS; r>or=0.53, P=0.02). Acute and final infarct volume change and outcome NIHSS and mRS were significantly higher in patients with mean CGMS or mean BGL glucose >or=7 mmol/L. Multiple regression analysis indicated that both mean CGMS and BGL glucose levels >or=7 mmol/L were independently associated with increased final infarct volume change. CONCLUSIONS Persistent hyperglycemia on serial glucose monitoring is an independent determinant of infarct expansion and is associated with worse functional outcome. There is an urgent need to study normalization of blood glucose after stroke.

Linkage disequilibrium of a type 1 diabetes susceptibility locus with a regulatory IL12B allele

Type 1 diabetes (T1D; or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, IDDM) is an autoimmune disease with both genetic and environmental components. In addition to the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex, the single major genetic contributor of susceptibility, an unknown number of other unidentified genes are required to mediate disease. Although many loci conferring susceptibility to T1D have been mapped, their identification has proven problematic due to the complex nature of this disease. Our strategy for finding T1D susceptibility genes has been to test for human homologues of loci implicated in diabetes-prone NOD (non-obese diabetic) mice, together with application of biologically relevant stratification methods. We report here a new susceptibility locus, IDDM18, located near the interleukin-12 (IL-12)p40 gene, IL12B. Significant bias in transmission of IL12B alleles was observed in affected sibpairs and was confirmed in an independent cohort of simplex families. A single base change in the 3′ UTR showed strong linkage disequilibrium with the T1D susceptibility locus. The IL12B 3′ UTR alleles showed different levels of expression in cell lines. Variation in IL-12p40 production may influence T-cell responses crucial for either mediating or protecting against this and other autoimmune diseases.

Inverse relation between humoral and cellular immunity to glutamic acid decarboxylase in subjects at risk of insulin-dependent diabetes

Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) in pancreatic beta cells is an autoantigen in insulin-dependent diabetes (IDD). We measured immunity to GAD in 31 first-degree relatives of IDD patients judged to be at risk of developing IDD themselves because of the presence of islet-cell antibodies. We found that in most of the subjects GAD autoimmunity was either predominantly humoral or predominantly cellular. High concentrations of circulating autoantibodies that precipitate native GAD activity were associated with low proliferation of peripheral-blood T cells to recombinant GAD; conversely, low concentrations of autoantibody to GAD were associated with high T-cell proliferation to GAD. Although T-cell proliferation was measured in the presence of autologous serum, GAD autoantibodies did not have a blocking effect in vitro. This dichotomy of the immune response to GAD defined heterogeneity within at-risk relatives and could have prognostic importance. We postulate that, if GAD is a pathogenetic autoantigen, sensitisation to beta-cell GAD is more likely to lead to IDD when the immune response deviates towards the expansion of autoreactive T cells rather than towards generation of autoantibodies. This idea is consistent with evidence that beta-cell destruction is mediated by T cells and that high concentrations of GAD antibodies are associated with slower progression to clinical disease.

Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) should be less latent.

Abstract‘Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults’ (LADA) is the term coined to describe adults who have a slowly progressive form of autoimmune or type 1 diabetes that can be treated initially without insulin injections. The diagnosis of LADA is currently based on three clinical criteria: (1) adult age at onset of diabetes; (2) the presence of circulating islet autoantibodies, which distinguishes LADA from type 2 diabetes; and (3) insulin independence at diagnosis, which distinguishes LADA from classic type 1 diabetes. The prevalence of LADA in adults presenting with non-insulin-requiring diabetes is approximately 10%. Recognition of LADA expands the concept and prevalence of autoimmune diabetes, but LADA remains poorly understood at both a clinical and research level. In this perspective, we review the nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, genetics, pathology and therapy of LADA, to arrive at recommendations that might advance knowledge and management of this form of diabetes.

Insulin resistance is a risk factor for progression to Type 1 diabetes

Aims/hypothesisGlucose homeostasis is determined by an interplay between insulin secretion and insulin action. In Type 1 diabetes, autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells leads to impaired insulin secretion. However, the contribution of impaired insulin action (insulin resistance) to the development of Type 1 diabetes has received little attention. We investigated whether insulin resistance was a risk factor for progression to Type 1 diabetes.MethodsIslet-antibody-positive first-degree relatives of Type 1 diabetes probands were followed for 4.0 years (median). Insulin secretion was measured as first-phase insulin response (FPIR) to intravenous glucose. Insulin resistance was estimated by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-R). We compared subjects who progressed (n=43) and subjects who did not progress (n=61) to diabetes, including 21 pairs matched for age, sex, islet antibodies and FPIR.ResultsProgressors had higher insulin resistance relative to insulin secretion at baseline (median HOMA-R : FPIR 0.033 vs 0.013, p<0.0001). According to Cox proportional hazards analysis, islet antibody number, FPIR, fasting plasma glucose, fasting serum insulin, HOMA-R and log(HOMA-R : FPIR) were each predictive of progression to diabetes. However, log(HOMA-R : FPIR) (hazard ratio 2.57 per doubling, p<0.001) was the only metabolic variable independently associated with progression. In the matched comparison, progressors had higher fasting glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-R and HOMA-R : FPIR, both at baseline and during the follow-up pre-clinical phase.Conclusions/interpretationRelatives positive for islet antibodies who progress most rapidly to diabetes have a subtle disturbance of insulin–glucose homeostasis years before the onset of symptoms, distinguished by greater insulin resistance for their level of insulin secretion. Taking steps to reduce this insulin resistance could therefore delay the development of Type 1 diabetes.

Responses against islet antigens in NOD mice are prevented by tolerance to proinsulin but not IGRP

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is characterized by immune responses against several autoantigens expressed in pancreatic beta cells. T cells specific for proinsulin and islet-specific glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit-related protein (IGRP) can induce T1D in NOD mice. However, whether immune responses to multiple autoantigens are caused by spreading from one to another or whether they develop independently of each other is unknown. As cytotoxic T cells specific for IGRP were not detected in transgenic NOD mice tolerant to proinsulin, we determined that immune responses against proinsulin are necessary for IGRP-specific T cells to develop. On the other hand, transgenic overexpression of IGRP resulted in loss of intra-islet IGRP-specific T cells but did not protect NOD mice from insulitis or T1D, providing direct evidence that the response against IGRP is downstream of the response to proinsulin. Our results suggest that pathogenic proinsulin-specific immunity in NOD mice subsequently spreads to other antigens such as IGRP.

The Rising Incidence of Type 1 Diabetes Is Accounted for by Cases With Lower-Risk Human Leukocyte Antigen Genotypes

OBJECTIVE—The rising incidence of type 1 diabetes has been attributed to environment, implying a lesser role for genetic susceptibility. However, the rise could be accounted for by either more cases with classic high-risk genes or by cases with other risk genes. Separately, for any degree of genetic susceptibility, age at presentation may decrease in a permissive environment. To examine these possibilities, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II DRB1 genes known to confer risk for type 1 diabetes were analyzed in relation to year of birth and age at diagnosis over the last five decades. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Caucasoid subjects (n = 462) diagnosed with type 1 diabetes before age 18 between 1950 and 2005 were DRB1 genotyped. RESULTS—Mean ± SD age at diagnosis, 8.5 ± 4.5 years, did not differ across decades. Recent diagnosis was associated with a lower proportion but unchanged incidence of the highest-risk DRB1 genotype DR3,4 (2000–2005, 28% vs. 1950–1969, 79%; P < 0.0001) and a higher proportion of lower-risk genotypes DR4,X and DR3,X (2000–2005, 48% vs. 1950–1969, 20%; P = 0.0002). The frequency of the DRX,X genotype was low (≤3%) across decades. Recent birth was associated with a lower age at diagnosis for lower risk DR3,3 and DR4,4 (P < 0.0001) and DR4,X (P < 0.0001) and DR3,X (P = 0.015) genotypes but not for DR3,4. CONCLUSIONS—The rising incidence and decreasing age at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes is accounted for by the impact of environment on children with lower-risk HLA class II genes, who previously would not have developed type 1 diabetes in childhood.

Increase in Remission Rate in Newly Diagnosed Type I Diabetic Subjects Treated with Azathioprine

Azathioprine (2 mg/kg) was given, in addition to routine insulin treatment, to alternate patients presenting with recent-onset type I diabetes. Treated (N = 13) and untreated (N = 11) patients did not differ significantly at diagnosis with respect to age, duration of symptoms, body weight, blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, or presence of ketosis. Eight patients were treated for 12 mo, three elected to stop treatment at 6 mo, and treatment was stopped in two because of side effects. Seven treated patients had a remission compared with one untreated patient. At 12 mo these seven patients were distinguished by significantly higher basal and glucagon-stimulated levels of C-peptide (1.98 ± 0.52 and 3.88 ± 0.34 μg/L, respectively) compared with the other six treated patients (0.93 ± 0.52 and 1.32 ± 0.85 μg/L, respectively), and by the persistence of islet cell cytoplasmic antibodies. Remissions were not sustained in the 1–2 yr after treatment, although relapsed patients required less insulin for control. These results corroborate those from nonrandomized trials using cyclosporine1,2 and suggest that protracted treatment with nonspecific immunosuppressive drugs may be necessary to avert insulin dependence.

The influence of diabetes mellitus and hyperglycaemia on stroke incidence and outcome.

Diabetes mellitus is a complex metabolic syndrome with significant effects on the systemic and cerebral vasculature. The incidence and severity of ischaemic stroke are increased by the presence of diabetes, and outcome from stroke is poorer. More than one third of patients admitted with acute stroke are hyperglycaemic at presentation. Reasons for the altered prognosis in diabetes associated stroke are multifactorial. A direct influence of hyperglycaemia at the time of ischaemia is likely to be important. The use of novel methods to delineate stroke topography and pathophysiology such as MR spectroscopy, diffusion and perfusion weighted MRI appear helpful in delineating the effects of hyperglycaemia on stroke pathophysiology. Randomised clinical trials to determine optimal management for patients with hyperglycaemia following stroke are ongoing. Such trials will determine if aggressive control of acute hyperglycaemia following stroke has similar benefits to that observed following acute myocardial infarction. Clinicians responsible for stroke patients should be aware of the importance of adequate glycaemic control in both primary and secondary prevention of stroke.