Peter G. DeCelles

Geological records of the Lhasa-Qiangtang and Indo-Asian collisions in the Nima area of central Tibet

A geological and geochronologic investigation of the Nima area along the Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Bangong suture of central Tibet (∼32°N, ∼87°E) provides well-dated records of contractional deformation and sedimentation during mid-Cretaceous and mid-Tertiary time. Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous (≤125 Ma) marine sedimentary rocks were transposed, intruded by granitoids, and uplifted above sea level by ca. 118 Ma, the age of the oldest nonmarine strata documented. Younger nonmarine Cretaceous rocks include ca. 110–106 Ma volcanic-bearing strata and Cenomanian red beds and conglomerates. The Jurassic–Cretaceous rocks are unconformably overlain by up to 4000 m of Upper Oligocene to Lower Miocene lacustrine, nearshore lacustrine, and fluvial red-bed deposits. Paleocurrent directions, growth stratal relationships, and a structural restoration of the basin show that Cretaceous–Tertiary nonmarine deposition was coeval with mainly S-directed thrusting in the northern part of the Nima area and N-directed thrusting along the southern margin of the basin. The structural restoration suggests >58 km (>47%) of N–S shortening following Early Cretaceous ocean closure and ∼25 km shortening (∼28%) of Nima basin strata since 26 Ma. Cretaceous magmatism and syncontractional basin development are attributed to northward low-angle subduction of the Neotethyan oceanic lithosphere and Lhasa-Qiangtang continental collision, respectively. Tertiary syncontractional basin development in the Nima area was coeval with that along the Bangong suture in westernmost Tibet and the Indus-Yarlung suture in southern Tibet, suggesting simultaneous, renewed contraction along these sutures during the Oligocene-Miocene. This suture-zone reactivation immediately predated major displacement within the Himalayan Main Central thrust system shear zone, raising the possibility that Tertiary shortening in Tibet and the Himalayas may be interpretable in the context of a mechanically linked, composite orogenic system.

Stratigraphy, structure, and tectonic evolution of the Himalayan fold‐thrust belt in western Nepal

Regional mapping, stratigraphic study, and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology provide the basis for an incremental restoration of the Himalayan fold-thrust belt in western Nepal. Tectonostratigraphic zonation developed in other regions of the Himalaya is applicable, with minor modifications, in western Nepal. From south to north the major structural features are (1) the Main Frontal thrust system, comprising the Main Frontal thrust and two to three thrust sheets of Neogene foreland basin deposits; (2) the Main Boundary thrust sheet, which consists of Proterozoic to early Miocene, Lesser Himalayan metasedimentary rocks; (3) the Ramgarh thrust sheet, composed of Paleoproterozoic low-grade metasedimentary rocks; (4) the Dadeldhura thrust sheet, which consists of medium-grade metamorphic rocks, Cambrian-Ordovician granite and granitic mylonite, and early Paleozoic Tethyan rocks; (5) the Lesser Himalayan duplex, which is a large composite antiformal stack and hinterland dipping duplex; and (6) the Main Central thrust zone, a broad ductile shear zone. The major structures formed in a general southward progression beginning with the Main Central thrust in late early Miocene time. Eocene-Oligocene thrusting in the Tibetan Himalaya, north of the study area, is inferred from the detrital unroofing record. On the basis of 40Ar/39Ar cooling ages and provenance data from synorogenic sediments, emplacement of the Dadeldhura thrust sheet took place in early Miocene time. The Ramgarh thrust sheet was emplaced between ∼15 and ∼10 Ma. The Lesser Himalayan duplex began to grow by ∼10 Ma, simultaneously folding the north limb of the Dadeldhura synform. The Main Boundary thrust became active in latest Miocene-Pliocene time; transport of its hanging wall rocks over an ∼8-km-high footwall ramp folded the south limb of the Dadeldhura synform. Thrusts in the Subhimalayan zone became active in Pliocene time. The minimum total shortening in this portion of the Himalayan fold-thrust belt since early Miocene time (excluding the Tibetan zone) is ∼418–493 km, the variation depending on the actual amounts of shortening accommodated by the Main Central and Dadeldhura thrusts. The rate of shortening ranges between 19 and 22 mm/yr for this period of time. When previous estimates of shortening in the Tibetan Himalaya are included, the minimum total amount of shortening in the foldthrust belt amounts to 628–667 km. This estimate neglects shortening accommodated by small-scale structures and internal strain and is therefore likely to fall significantly below the actual amount of total shortening.

Neogene foreland basin deposits, erosional unroofing, and the kinematic history of the Himalayan fold-thrust belt, western Nepal

Sedimentological and provenance data from the lower Miocene–Pliocene Dumri Formation and Siwalik Group in western Nepal provide new information about the timing of thrust faulting and the links between erosional unroofing of the Himalaya and the Cenozoic 87 Sr/ 86 Sr record of the ocean. In western Nepal, the Dumri Formation is an ∼750–1300-m-thick fluvial sandstone and overbank mudstone unit. The Siwalik Group is >4200 m thick and consists of a lower member (>850 m) of 2–12-m-thick fluvial channel sandstones and oxidized calcareous paleosols, a middle member (>2400 m) of very thick (>20 m) channel sandstones and mainly organic-rich Histosols, and an upper member (>1000 m) composed of gravelly braided river deposits. Paleocurrent data indicate that middle Miocene–Pliocene rivers in western Nepal flowed southward, transverse to the thrust belt, throughout deposition of the Siwalik Group. No evidence was found for an axial fluvial trunk system (i.e., the paleo-Ganges River) in Siwalik Group sandstones. A major increase in fluvial channel size is recorded by the transition from lower to middle Siwalik members at ∼10.8 Ma, probably in response to an increase in seasonal discharge. Modal petrographic data from sandstones in the Dumri Formation and the Siwalik Group manifest an upsection enrichment in potassium feldspar, carbonate lithic fragments, and high-grade metamorphic minerals. Modal petrographic analyses of modern river sands provide some control on potential source terranes for the Miocene–Pliocene sandstones. The Dumri Formation was most likely derived from erosion of sedimentary and low-grade metasedimentary rocks in the Tibetan (Tethyan) Himalayan zone during early Miocene emplacement of the Main Central thrust. The presence in Dumri sandstones of plagioclase grains suggests exposure of crystalline rocks of the Greater Himalayan zone, perhaps in response to tectonic unroofing by extensional detachment faults of the South Tibetan detachment system. During deposition of the lower Siwalik Group (∼15–11 Ma), emplacement of the Dadeldhura thrust sheet (one of the synformal crystalline thrust sheets of the southern Himalaya) on top of the Dumri Formation supplied abundant metasedimentary lithic fragments to the foreland basin. A steady supply of plagioclase grains and high-grade minerals was maintained by deeper erosion into the Main Central thrust sheet. From ∼11 Ma to the present, K-feldspar sand increased steadily, suggesting that granitic source rocks became widely exposed during deposition of the upper part of the lower Siwalik Group. This provenance change was caused by erosion of passively uplifted granites and granitic orthogneisses in the Dadeldhura thrust sheet above a large duplex in the Lesser Himalayan rocks. Since the onset of deposition of the conglomeratic upper Siwalik Group (∼4–5 Ma), fault slip in this duplex has been fed updip and southward into the Main Boundary and Main Frontal thrust systems. We obtained 113 U-Pb ages on detrital zircons from modern rivers and Siwalik Group sandstones that cluster at 460–530 Ma, ∼850–1200 Ma, ∼1.8–2.0 Ga, and ∼2.5 Ga. An abundance of Cambrian–Ordovician grains in the Siwalik Group suggests sources of Siwalik detritus in the granites of the Dadeldhura thrust sheet and possibly the Greater Himalayan orthogneisses. The older ages are consistent with sources in the Greater and Lesser Himalayan zones. An overall upsection increase in zircons older than 1.7 Ga suggests increasing aerial exposure of Lesser Himalayan rocks. None of the detrital zircons (even in the modern river samples) yielded a Cenozoic age that might suggest derivation from the Cenozoic Greater Himalayan leucogranites, but this may be attributable to the inheritance problems that characterize the U-Pb geochronology of the leucogranites. When compared with recent studies of the 87 Sr/ 86 Sr composition of paleosol carbonate nodules and detrital carbonate in paleosols from the Siwalik Group, the provenance data suggest that erosion and weathering of metamorphosed carbonate rocks in the Lesser Himalayan zone and Cambrian–Ordovician granitic rocks of the crystalline thrust sheets in central and eastern Nepal may have played a significant role in elevating the 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratio of middle Miocene synorogenic sediments in the Indo-Gangetic foreland basin and the Bengal fan, as well as global seawater.

Detrital zircon geochronology of pre-Tertiary strata in the Tibetan-Himalayan orogen

Detrital zircon data have recently become available from many different portions of the Tibetan-Himalayan orogen. This study uses 13,441 new or existing U-Pb ages of zircon crystals from strata in the Lesser Himalayan, Greater Himalayan, and Tethyan sequences in the Himalaya, the Lhasa, Qiangtang, and Nan Shan-Qilian Shan-Altun Shan terranes in Tibet, and platformal strata of the Tarim craton to constrain changes in provenance through time. These constraints provide information about the paleogeographic and tectonic evolution of the Tibet-Himalaya region during Neoproterozoic to Mesozoic time. First-order conclusions are as follows: (1) Most ages from these crustal fragments are <1.4 Ga, which suggests formation in accretionary orogens involving little pre-mid-Proterozoic cratonal material; (2) all fragments south of the Jinsa suture evolved along the northern margin of India as part of a circum-Gondwana convergent margin system; (3) these Gondwana-margin assemblages were blanketed by glaciogenic sediment during Carboniferous-Permian time; (4) terranes north of the Jinsa suture formed along the southern margin of the Tarim-North China craton; (5) the northern (Tarim-North China) terranes and Gondwana-margin assemblages may have been juxtaposed during mid-Paleozoic time, followed by rifting that formed the Paleo-Tethys and Meso-Tethys ocean basins; (6) the abundance of Permian-Triassic arc-derived detritus in the Lhasa and Qiangtang terranes is interpreted to record their northward migration across the Paleo- and Meso-Tethys ocean basins; and (7) the arrival of India juxtaposed the Tethyan assemblage on its northern margin against the Lhasa terrane, and is the latest in a long history of collisional tectonism. Copyright 2011 by the American Geophysical Union.

High times on the Tibetan Plateau: Paleoelevation of the Thakkhola graben, Nepal

East-west extension in the Tibetan Plateau is generally assumed to have resulted from gravitational collapse following thickening and uplift. On the basis of this assumption, several studies have dated east-west extensional structures to determine when the plateau attained its current high elevation. However, independent estimates of elevation are needed to determine whether extension occurred before, during, or after the plateau achieved its current elevation. Because the isotopic composition of meteoric water decreases with increasing elevation, significant change in local elevation throughout the Thakkhola graben depositional history should be recorded by change in δ 18 O values of fluvial and lacustrine carbonates. The δ 18 O values of ‐16‰ to ‐23‰ of Thakkhola graben carbonates reflect meteoric water values similar to modern values and suggest that the southern Tibetan Plateau attained its current elevation prior to eastwest extension. Initiation of Thakkhola graben extension is constrained between 10 and 11 Ma, based on magnetostratigraphy of the older Tetang Formation. The δ 13 C values of soil carbonates suggest an age younger than 8 Ma for the base of the Thakkhola Formation.

The kinematic evolution of the Nepalese Himalaya interpreted from Nd isotopes

Neodymium (Nd) isotopes from the Himalayan fold-thrust belt and its associated foreland basin deposits are useful for distinguishing between Himalayan tectonostratigraphic zones and revealing the erosional unroofing history as controlled by the kinematic development of the orogen. Neodymium isotopic data from the Himalayan fold-thrust belt in Nepal (n=35) reveal that the Lesser Himalayan zone consistently has a more negative ϵNd(0) value than the Greater and Tibetan Himalayan zones. Our data show the average ϵNd(0) value in the Lesser Himalayan zone is −21.5, whereas the Greater and Tibetan Himalayan zones have an average ϵNd(0) value of −16. These consistently distinct values throughout Nepal enable the use of Nd isotopes as a technique for distinguishing between Lesser Himalayan zone and Greater Himalayan zone rock. The less negative ϵNd(0) values of the Greater Himalayan rocks support the idea that the Greater Himalayan zone is not Indian basement, but rather a terrane that accreted onto India during Early Paleozoic time. Neodymium isotopic data from Eocene through Pliocene foreland basin deposits (n=34) show that sediment provenance has been dominated by Greater and Tibetan Himalayan detritus across Nepal. The ϵNd(T) values in the synorogenic rocks in western and central Nepal generally show an up-section shift toward more negative values and record the progressive unroofing of the different tectonostratigraphic zones. At ∼10 Ma in Khutia Khola and ∼11 Ma in Surai Khola, a shift in ϵNd(T) values from −16 to −18 marks the erosional breaching of a large duplex in the northern part of the Lesser Himalayan zone. This shift is not seen in eastern Nepal, where the ϵNd(T) values remain close to −16 throughout Miocene time because there has been less erosional unroofing in this region.

Initiation of the Himalayan Orogen as an Early Paleozoic Thin-skinned Thrust Belt

Research by many workers in various regions of the Himalaya, combined with our recent geologic and geochronologic studies in Nepal, indicate that fundamental aspects of the Himalayan orogen originated in an early Paleozoic thrust belt and are unrelated to Tertiary IndiaAsia collision. Manifestations of early Paleozoic tectonism include ductile deformation, regional moderate- to highgrade metamorphism, large-scale southvergent thrusting, crustal thickening and the generation of granitic crustal melts, uplift and erosion of garnet-grade rocks, and accumulation of thick sequences of synorogenic strata. Determining the relative contributions of early Paleozoic versus Tertiary tectonism constitutes a significant challenge in understanding the Himalayan orogen.

Eocene‐early Miocene foreland basin development and the history of Himalayan thrusting, western and central Nepal

Sedimentologic, petrographic, and U-Pb detrital zircon ages from middle Eocene through early Miocene sedimentary rocks in the Lesser Himalayan zone of western and central Nepal indicate that a peripheral foreland basin system had developed in the eastern Himalayan collision zone by middle Eocene time. The shallow-marine, Eocene Bhainskati Formation accumulated in a back-bulge depozone between a southward migrating forebulge and the Indian craton. Migration of the forebulge through this region during Eocene-Oligocene time produced a regional unconformity that spans ∼15–20 Myr. By early Miocene time, the forebulge unconformity was onlapped by the distal fringes of the southward migrating foredeep depozone, represented by fluvial deposits of the Dumri Formation. Continued southward migration of the foredeep during the Neogene accommodated the fluvial Siwalik Group. Light mineral provenance data and U-Pb detrital zircon ages suggest that the Bhainskati was derived partly from Tethyan sedimentary rocks of the Tibetan Himalayan zone during initial growth of the Himalayan fold-thrust belt. The Dumri was derived from metasedimentary and crystalline rocks of the Greater Himalayan zone during emplacement of the Main Central thrust and contemporaneous tectonic unroofing by normal faulting along the South Tibetan detachment system. The Lesser Himalayan crystalline thrust sheets were emplaced soon after deposition of the Dumri Formation, ∼15–10 Ma. Paleocurrent and lithofacies data from the Dumri Formation indicate deposition by west-southwestward flowing rivers that drained into the Indus portion of the Himalayan foreland basin system during the early Miocene. Thick channel sandstones in the lower Dumri may represent the early Miocene counterpart of the modern Ganges River. Eastward diversion of the Ganges drainage system to near its present location had occurred by ∼15 Ma, as the high-standing Aravalli Range on the northern Indian shield approached the front of the fold-thrust belt. Assuming reasonable values for the flexural rigidity of Indian lithosphere, the time span of the forebulge unconformity yields a velocity of ∼14–33 mm/yr for the southward migration of the fold-thrust belt relative to India. This range of values is consistent with Neogene and present-day estimates and suggests that only one third to one half of India-Eurasia convergence has been accommodated by shortening in the Himalayan fold-thrust belt since the onset of collision.

Predicting paleoelevation of Tibet and the Himalaya from δ18O vs. altitude gradients in meteoric water across the Nepal Himalaya

The δ18O value of meteoric water varies with elevation, providing a means to reconstruct paleoelevation if the δ18O values of paleowater are known. In this study, we determined the δ18O values of water (δ18Omw) from small tributaries along the Seti River and Kali Gandaki in the Nepal Himalaya. We found that δ18Omw values decrease with increasing altitude for both transects. δ18Omw vs. altitude along the Kali Gandaki in west-central Nepal fit a second order polynomial curve, consistent with increasing depletion of 18O with increasing elevation, as predicted by a Rayleigh-type fractionation process. This modern δ18Omw vs. altitude relationship can be used to constrain paleoelevation from the δ18O values of Miocene–Pliocene carbonate (δ18Oc) deposited in the Thakkhola graben in the southern Tibetan Plateau. Paleoelevations of 3800±480 m to 5900±350 are predicted for the older Tetang Formation and 4500±430 m to 6300±330 m for the younger Thakkhola Formation. These paleoelevation estimates suggest that by ∼11 Ma the southern Tibetan Plateau was at a similar elevation to modern.

The modern foreland basin system adjacent to the Central Andes

Regional variations in sediment thickness, internal structures, average elevation, and Bouguer gravity define a four-component foreland basin system adjacent to the Central Andes. In the most proximal part of the foreland basin system, the eastern Subandean zone and westernmost Chaco Plain, 1–3 km of Cenozoic deposits overlies active folds and thrusts of the frontal Andean orogenic wedge. These wedge-top deposits pass cratonward into a foredeep depozone containing a 3–4-km-thick sedimentary prism that tapers toward (and locally pinches out against) a broad-wavelength forebulge in the central-eastern Chaco Plain. The forebulge is underlain by Precambrian–Mesozoic rocks and is largely covered by a thin veneer of Quaternary alluvium. East of the forebulge, a thin (0.5 km) saucer-shaped accumulation of sediment beneath the Pantanal Wetland represents a back-bulge depozone. Ancient counterparts of these four depozones can be identified in the Central Andes, suggesting that modern basin architecture is the result of continuous, eastward migration of the coupled orogenic wedge and foreland basin system since the Late Cretaceous–Paleocene.