Peter Glick

Better Obstetrics in Rural Nigeria study: evaluating the Nigerian Midwives Service Scheme

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RANDs publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. iii Preface Limited availability of skilled providers, particularly in rural areas, is thought to be an important constraint to increasing rates of use of maternal and child health services in low-and middle-income countries. There are, however, few well-identified studies of the relationship between the supply of skilled workers and outcomes. In this project, we studied the effects of a government program in Nigeria that sought to alleviate supply-side constraints by deploying skilled midwives to primary health facilities in rural communities to provide round-the-clock access to skilled care. The contents of this report will be of interest to policymakers and public health professionals interested in improving maternal and child health. Summary We evaluate the impact of the Midwives Service Scheme (MSS), a government program introduced in 2009 to increase access to skilled care in rural underserved areas in Nigeria. At rollout, the MSS deployed nearly 2,500 midwives to 652 primary health care centers across 36 states. To evaluate the impact of the program, we surveyed 7,104 women with a birth within the preceding five years in 386 communities across 12 states. The intervention group consisted of communities that participated in the initial rollout; the comparison group consisted of communities that would later receive the program (approximately three years later). To understand implementation challenges and contextualize the quantitative results, we carried out a nested qualitative study in three states, consisting of in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with policymakers, providers, childbearing women, and community stakeholder groups. Overall, we find that the programs effects are smaller than anticipated. The main effect is a 7.3-percentage-point increase in antenatal …