Peter J. Kaboli

Polypharmacy and Prescribing Quality in Older People

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between inappropriate prescribing, medication underuse, and the total number of medications used by patients.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Medicare patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, 1991-2008.

CONTEXT Total hip arthroplasty is a common surgical procedure but little is known about longitudinal trends. OBJECTIVE To examine demographics and outcomes of patients undergoing primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Observational cohort of 1,453,493 Medicare Part A beneficiaries who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty and 348,596 who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty. Participants were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty between 1991 and 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Changes in patient demographics and comorbidity, hospital length of stay (LOS), mortality, discharge disposition, and all-cause readmission rates. RESULTS Between 1991 and 2008, the mean age for patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty increased from 74.1 to 75.1 years and for revision total hip arthroplasty from 75.8 to 77.3 years (P < .001). The mean number of comorbid illnesses per patient increased from 1.0 to 2.0 for primary total hip arthroplasty and 1.1 to 2.3 for revision (P < .001). For primary total hip arthroplasty, mean hospital LOS decreased from 9.1 days in 1991-1992 to 3.7 days in 2007-2008 (P = .002); unadjusted in-hospital and 30-day mortality decreased from 0.5% to 0.2% and from 0.7% to 0.4%, respectively (P < .001). The proportion of primary total hip arthroplasty patients discharged home declined from 68.0% to 48.2%; the proportion discharged to skilled care increased from 17.8% to 34.3%; and 30-day all-cause readmission increased from 5.9% to 8.5% (P < .001). For revision total hip arthroplasty, similar trends were observed in hospital LOS, in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, and hospital readmission rates. CONCLUSION Among Medicare beneficiaries who underwent primary and revision hip arthroplasty between 1991 and 2008, there was a decrease in hospital LOS but an increase in the rates of discharge to postacute care and readmission.

Associations Between Reduced Hospital Length of Stay and 30-Day Readmission Rate and Mortality: 14-Year Experience in 129 Veterans Affairs Hospitals

BACKGROUND Reducing length of stay (LOS) has been a priority for hospitals and health care systems. However, there is concern that this reduction may result in increased hospital readmissions. OBJECTIVE To determine trends in hospital LOS and 30-day readmission rates for all medical diagnoses combined and 5 specific common diagnoses in the Veterans Health Administration. DESIGN Observational study from 1997 to 2010. SETTING All 129 acute care Veterans Affairs hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS 4,124,907 medical admissions with subsamples of 2 chronic diagnoses (heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and 3 acute diagnoses (acute myocardial infarction, community-acquired pneumonia, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage). MEASUREMENTS Unadjusted LOS and 30-day readmission rates with multivariable regression analyses to adjust for patient demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and admitting hospitals. RESULTS For all medical diagnoses combined, risk-adjusted mean hospital LOS decreased by 1.46 days from 5.44 to 3.98 days, or 2% annually (P < 0.001). Reductions in LOS were also observed for the 5 specific common diagnoses, with greatest reductions for acute myocardial infarction (2.85 days) and community-acquired pneumonia (2.22 days). Over the 14 years, risk-adjusted 30-day readmission rates for all medical diagnoses combined decreased from 16.5% to 13.8% (P < 0.001). Reductions in readmissions were also observed for the 5 specific common diagnoses, with greatest reductions for acute myocardial infarction (22.6% to 19.8%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (17.9% to 14.6%). All-cause mortality 90 days after admission was reduced by 3% annually. Of note, hospitals with mean risk-adjusted LOS that was lower than expected had a higher readmission rate, suggesting a modest tradeoff between hospital LOS and readmission (6% increase for each day lower than expected). LIMITATIONS This study is limited to the Veterans Health Administration system; non-Veterans Affairs admissions were not available. No measure of readmission preventability was used. CONCLUSION Veterans Affairs hospitals demonstrated simultaneous improvements in hospital LOS and readmissions over 14 years, suggesting that as LOS improved, hospital readmission did not increase. This is important because hospital readmission is being used as a quality indicator and may result in payment incentives. Future work should explore these relationships to see whether a tipping point exists for LOS reduction and hospital readmission. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Office of Rural Health and the Health Services Research & Development Service, Veterans Health Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

Day of the week of intensive care admission and patient outcomes: a multisite regional evaluation.

Background. Relationships between day of the week of admission to hospitals and hospital outcomes have been poorly studied. Intensive care units (ICUs) appear to be uniquely suited to examine such a question given the unpredictability of ICU admissions and the clinical instability of their patient populations. Methods. This retrospective cohort study included 156,136 patients admitted to 38 ICUs in 28 hospitals in a large Midwestern metropolitan area during 1991 to 1997. Demographic and clinical data were collected from patients’ medical records and used in multivariable risk-adjustment models that examined the risk for in-hospital death and ICU length of stay. Results. The adjusted odds of in-hospital death were 9% higher (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04–1.15;P <0.001) for weekend admissions (Saturday or Sunday) than in patients admitted midweek (Tuesday through Thursday). However, the adjusted odds of death were also higher (P <0.001) for patients admitted on Monday (OR 1.09) or Friday (OR 1.08). Findings were generally similar in analyses stratified by admission type (medical vs. surgical), hospital teaching status, and illness severity. Adjusted ICU length of stay was 4% longer (P <0.001) for weekend or Friday admissions, compared with midweek admissions. Conclusions. Patients admitted to an ICU on the weekend have a modestly higher risk for death and ICU length of stay. However, the similar risk for death in patients admitted on Friday and Monday suggests that “weekend effects” may be more related to unmeasured severity of illness and/or selection bias than to differences in quality of care.

Inappropriate Prescribing Predicts Adverse Drug Events in Older Adults

BACKGROUND Explicit measures of potentially inappropriate prescribing, such as the Beers criteria, have been associated with risk for adverse drug events (ADEs). However, no such link has been established for actual inappropriate prescribing using implicit measures. OBJECTIVE To determine whether an implicit measure of inappropriate prescribing can predict ADE risk. METHODS Patients were veterans aged 65 years and older who were seen in primary care clinics and participated in a randomized controlled trial of a pharmacist-physician collaborative intervention. Inappropriate prescribing was determined at baseline, using the 2003 Beers criteria as an explicit measure and the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) as an implicit measure. A modified MAI scoring approach was designed to target ADE risk and was used in addition to standard scoring. ADEs that occurred during the 3 months following baseline were assessed by patient interview and plausibility verification by blinded pharmacist review. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether inappropriate prescribing predicted risk for an ADE, controlling for potential confounding factors. RESULTS Of 236 patients, 34 (14.4%) experienced an ADE. Inappropriate prescribing was common at baseline, with 48.7% of patients receiving a Beers criteria drug and 98.7% of patients having an inappropriate rating on at least 1 MAI criterion. Modified MAI scoring, but not other measures of inappropriate prescribing, significantly predicted ADE risk. For every unit increase in modified MAI score (3.1 +/- 3.5; mean +/- SD), the adjusted 3-month odds of an ADE increased 13% (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.26). For example, patients with a modified MAI score of 3, near the precise mean score of 3.1, were at a nearly 40% greater risk for an ADE compared with patients with a score of zero. CONCLUSIONS Implicit measurement of actual inappropriate prescribing predicted ADE risk, an important clinical outcome. This finding helps confirm the validity of prior studies that have relied on explicit measures to link potentially inappropriate prescribing to adverse health outcomes.

A Re-conceptualization of Access for 21st Century Healthcare

Many e-health technologies are available to promote virtual patient–provider communication outside the context of face-to-face clinical encounters. Current digital communication modalities include cell phones, smartphones, interactive voice response, text messages, e-mails, clinic-based interactive video, home-based web-cams, mobile smartphone two-way cameras, personal monitoring devices, kiosks, dashboards, personal health records, web-based portals, social networking sites, secure chat rooms, and on-line forums. Improvements in digital access could drastically diminish the geographical, temporal, and cultural access problems faced by many patients. Conversely, a growing digital divide could create greater access disparities for some populations. As the paradigm of healthcare delivery evolves towards greater reliance on non-encounter-based digital communications between patients and their care teams, it is critical that our theoretical conceptualization of access undergoes a concurrent paradigm shift to make it more relevant for the digital age. The traditional conceptualizations and indicators of access are not well adapted to measure access to health services that are delivered digitally outside the context of face-to-face encounters with providers. This paper provides an overview of digital “encounterless” utilization, discusses the weaknesses of traditional conceptual frameworks of access, presents a new access framework, provides recommendations for how to measure access in the new framework, and discusses future directions for research on access.

Effect of antibiotic stewardship programmes on Clostridium difficile incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES Despite vigorous infection control measures, Clostridium difficile continues to cause significant disease burden. Antibiotic stewardship programmes (ASPs) may prevent C. difficile infections by limiting exposure to certain antibiotics. Our objective was to perform a meta-analysis of published studies to assess the effect of ASPs on the risk of C. difficile infection in hospitalized adult patients. METHODS Searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and two Cochrane databases were conducted to find all published studies on interventions related to antibiotic stewardship and C. difficile. Two investigators independently assessed study eligibility and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black tool. Risk ratios were pooled using random effects models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I(2) statistic. RESULTS The final search yielded 891 articles; 78 full articles were reviewed and 16 articles were identified for inclusion. Included articles used quasi-experimental (interrupted time series or before-after) or observational (case-control) study designs. When the results of all studies were pooled in a random effects model, a significant protective effect (pooled risk ratio 0.48; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.62) was observed between ASPs and C. difficile incidence. When stratified by intervention type, a significant effect was found for restrictive ASPs (complete removal of drug or prior approval requirement). Furthermore, ASPs were particularly effective in geriatric settings. CONCLUSIONS Restrictive ASPs can be used to reduce the risk of C. difficile infection.

Guiding inpatient quality improvement: a systematic review of Lean and Six Sigma.

BACKGROUND Two popular quality improvement (QI) approaches in health care are Lean and Six Sigma. Hospitals continue to adopt these QI approaches-or the hybrid Lean Sigma approach-with little knowledge on how well they produce sustainable improvements. A systematic literature review was conducted to determine whether Lean, Six Sigma, or Lean Sigma have been effectively used to create and sustain improvements in the acute care setting. METHODS Databases were searched for articles published in the health care, business, and engineering literatures. Study inclusion criteria required identification of a Six Sigma, Lean, or Lean Sigma project; QI efforts focused on hospitalized patients; descriptions of project improvements; and reported results. Depending on the quality of data reported, articles were classified as summary reports, pre-post observational studies, or time-series reports. RESULTS Database searches identified 539 potential articles. After review of titles, abstracts, and full text, 47 articles met inclusion criteria--10 articles summarized multiple projects, 12 reported Lean projects, 20 reported Six Sigma projects, and 5 reported Lean Sigma projects. Generally, the studies provided limited data, with only 15 articles providing any sort of follow-up data; of the 15, only 3 report a follow-up period greater than two years. CONCLUSION Lean, Six Sigma, and Lean Sigma as QI approaches can aid institutions in tackling a wide variety of problems encountered in acute care. However, the true impact of these approaches is difficult to judge, given that the lack of rigorous evaluation or clearly sustained improvements provides little evidence supporting broad adoption. There is still a need for future work that will improve the evidence base for understanding more about QI approaches and how to achieve sustainable improvement.

Leaving Against Medical Advice (AMA): Risk of 30-Day Mortality and Hospital Readmission

BackgroundWith 1–2% of patients leaving the hospital against medical advice (AMA), the potential for these patients to suffer adverse health outcomes is of major concern.ObjectiveTo examine 30-day hospital readmission and mortality rates for medical patients who left the hospital AMA and identify independent risk factors associated with these outcomes.DesignA 5-year retrospective cohort of all patients discharged from a Veterans Administration (VA) hospital.SubjectsThe final study sample included 1,930,947 medical admissions to 129 VA hospitals from 2004 to 2008; 32,819 patients (1.70%) were discharged AMA.MeasurementsPrimary outcomes of interest were 30-day mortality and 30-day all-cause hospital readmission.ResultsCompared to discharges home, AMA patients were more likely to be black, have low income, and have co-morbid alcohol abuse (for all, Χ2 df = 1, p < 0.001). AMA patients had a higher 30-day readmission rate (17.7% vs. 11.0%, p < 0.001) and higher 30-day mortality rate (0.75% vs. 0.61%, p = 0.001). In Cox proportional hazard modeling controlling for demographics and co-morbidity, the largest hazard for patients having a 30-day readmission is leaving AMA (HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.32–1.39). Similar modeling for 30-day mortality reveals a nearly significant increased hazard rate for patients discharged AMA (HR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.98–1.24).ConclusionsDue to the higher risk of adverse outcomes, hospitals should target AMA patients for post-discharge interventions, such as phone follow-up, home visits, or mental health counseling to improve outcomes.

Use of complementary and alternative medicine by older patients with arthritis: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and to identify factors associated with its use in older patients with arthritis. METHODS A population-based telephone survey of 480 elderly patients with arthritis was conducted to determine demographics, comorbidities, health status, arthritis symptoms, and the use of CAM and traditional providers and treatments for arthritis. RESULTS CAM provider use was reported by 28% of respondents, and 66% reported using one or more CAM treatments. Factors independently related to CAM provider use (P < 0.05) included podiatrist or orthotist use, physician visits for arthritis, and fair or poor self-reported health. For CAM treatments, independent associations were found with physical or occupational therapist use, physician visits for arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and alcohol abstinence. Rural residence, age, income, education, and health insurance type were unrelated to CAM use. CONCLUSION Many older patients with arthritis reported seeing CAM providers, and most used CAM treatments. The use of CAM for arthritis was most common among those with poorer self-assessed health and higher use of traditional health care resources.