Peter J. Knight

Dynein structure and power stroke

Dynein ATPases are microtubule motors that are critical to diverse processes such as vesicle transport and the beating of sperm tails; however, their mechanism of force generation is unknown. Each dynein comprises a head, from which a stalk and a stem emerge. Here we use electron microscopy and image processing to reveal new structural details of dynein c, an isoform from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii flagella, at the start and end of its power stroke. Both stem and stalk are flexible, and the stem connects to the head by means of a linker approximately 10 nm long that we propose lies across the head. With both ADP and vanadate bound, the stem and stalk emerge from the head 10 nm apart. However, without nucleotide they emerge much closer together owing to a change in linker orientation, and the coiled-coil stalk becomes stiffer. The net result is a shortening of the molecule coupled to an approximately 15-nm displacement of the tip of the stalk. These changes indicate a mechanism for the dynein power stroke.

Functions and mechanics of dynein motor proteins

Fuelled by ATP hydrolysis, dyneins generate force and movement on microtubules in a wealth of biological processes, including ciliary beating, cell division and intracellular transport. The large mass and complexity of dynein motors have made elucidating their mechanisms a sizable task. Yet, through a combination of approaches, including X-ray crystallography, cryo-electron microscopy, single-molecule assays and biochemical experiments, important progress has been made towards understanding how these giant motor proteins work. From these studies, a model for the mechanochemical cycle of dynein is emerging, in which nucleotide-driven flexing motions within the AAA+ ring of dynein alter the affinity of its microtubule-binding stalk and reshape its mechanical element to generate movement.

AAA+ Ring and linker swing mechanism in the dynein motor.

Summary Dynein ATPases power diverse microtubule-based motilities. Each dynein motor domain comprises a ring-like head containing six AAA+ modules and N- and C-terminal regions, together with a stalk that binds microtubules. How these subdomains are arranged and generate force remains poorly understood. Here, using electron microscopy and image processing of tagged and truncated Dictyostelium cytoplasmic dynein constructs, we show that the heart of the motor is a hexameric ring of AAA+ modules, with the stalk emerging opposite the primary ATPase site (AAA1). The C-terminal region is not an integral part of the ring but spans between AAA6 and near the stalk base. The N-terminal region includes a lever-like linker whose N terminus swings by ∼17 nm during the ATPase cycle between AAA2 and the stalk base. Together with evidence of stalk tilting, which may communicate changes in microtubule binding affinity, these findings suggest a model for dyneins structure and mechanism.

Load-dependent mechanism of nonmuscle myosin 2

Loads on molecular motors regulate and coordinate their function. In a study that directly measures properties of internally strained myosin 2 heads bound to actin, we find that human nonmuscle myosins 2A and 2B show marked load-dependent changes in kinetics of ADP release but not in nucleotide binding. We show that the ADP release rate constant is increased 4-fold by the assisting load on one head and decreased 5-fold (for 2A) or 12-fold (for 2B) by the resisting load on the other. Thus these myosins, especially 2B, have marked mechanosensitivity of product release. By regulating the actin attachment of myosin heads, this provides a basis for energy-efficient tension maintenance without obstructing cellular contractility driven by other motors such as smooth muscle myosin. Whereas forward load accelerates the cycle of interaction with actin, resistive load increases duty ratio to favor tension maintenance by two-headed attachment.

The cargo-binding domain regulates structure and activity of myosin 5

Myosin 5 is a two-headed motor protein that moves cargoes along actin filaments. Its tail ends in paired globular tail domains (GTDs) thought to bind cargo. At nanomolar calcium levels, actin-activated ATPase is low and the molecule is folded. Micromolar calcium concentrations activate ATPase and the molecule unfolds. Here we describe the structure of folded myosin and the GTDs role in regulating activity. Electron microscopy shows that the two heads lie either side of the tail, contacting the GTDs at a lobe of the motor domain (∼Pro 117–Pro 137) that contains conserved acidic side chains, suggesting ionic interactions between motor domain and GTD. Myosin 5 heavy meromyosin, a constitutively active fragment lacking the GTDs, is inhibited and folded by a dimeric GST–GTD fusion protein. Motility assays reveal that at nanomolar calcium levels heavy meromyosin moves robustly on actin filaments whereas few myosins bind or move. These results combine to show that with no cargo, the GTDs bind in an intramolecular manner to the motor domains, producing an inhibited and compact structure that binds weakly to actin and allows the molecule to recycle towards new cargoes.

Helix sliding in the stalk coiled coil of dynein couples ATPase and microtubule binding

Coupling between ATPase and track binding sites is essential for molecular motors to move along cytoskeletal tracks. In dynein, these sites are separated by a long coiled coil stalk that must mediate communication between them, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here we show that changes in registration between the two helices of the coiled coil can perform this function. We locked the coiled coil at three specific registrations using oxidation to disulfides of paired cysteine residues introduced into the two helices. These trapped ATPase activity either in a microtubule-independent high or low state, and microtubule binding activity either in an ATP-insensitive strong or weak state, depending on the registry of the coiled coil. Our results provide direct evidence that dynein uses sliding between the two helices of the stalk to couple ATPase and microtubule binding activities during its mechanochemical cycle.

The prepower stroke conformation of myosin V

eW have used electron microscopy and single-particle image processing to study head conformation in myosin V molecules. We find that in the presence of ATP, many heads have a sharply angled conformation that is rare in its absence. The sharply angled conformation is similar to a myosin II atomic structure proposed to mimic the prepower stroke state. The leading head in molecules attached to actin by both heads has a similar conformation, but is also sharply angled in a second plane by tethering through the trail head. The lead head lever joins the motor domain ∼5 nm axially from where it joins the trail motor. These positions locate the converter subdomain and show the lead motor is in the prepower stroke conformation. Tethering by the trail head places the lead head motor domain at the correct axial position along the actin for binding, but at the wrong orientation. Attachment is achieved either by bending the lead head lever throughout its length or at the pliant point. The microscopy shows that most of the walking stride is produced by changes in lever angle brought about by converter movement, but is augmented by distortion produced by thermal energy.

Negative staining of myosin molecules

A reproducible method has been developed for the negative staining of myosin molecules. The dimensions of stained molecules are in close agreement with those obtained by metal shadowing. Sharp bends in the tail, indicative of hinge regions, were observed at two positions 44 nm and 76 nm from the head-tail junction. The tail was often ill-defined at the position of the first (44 nm) bend. The bend positions may be sites of proteolytic cleavage that result in the production of long and short myosin subfragment S2. About half the molecules exhibited bending to various degrees at one or both of these positions, but cases where the tail folded back on itself in a 180 degrees bend were comparatively rare (approximately equal to 10%). However, in the absence of EGTA, a large fraction of the molecules (approximately equal to 80%) exhibited 180 degrees bends. A small region, approximately 20 nm long, at the tip of the tail often appears to be significantly different from the rest. The heads are about 19 nm long and roughly pear-shaped. Although sometimes straight, more often they show a pronounced curvature. Both senses of curvature were observed, but those curved in a clockwise manner were the most common, indicating preferential binding of one side of the head to the carbon substrate. An analysis of the different combinations of head shapes in individual molecules indicates that each head can rotate independently around its long axis. No preferred angle of orientation between the two heads in a molecule, or between either head and the tail could be found. Substructure has been observed within the heads.

[2] Preparation of myofibrils

Publisher Summary A variety of procedures are available for the preparation of myofibrils, and this chapter presents four of these that include myofibrils from fresh rabbit psoas muscle, myofibrils from glycerinated psoas muscle, myofibrils in bulk from fresh muscle, and myofibrils in bulk from stored muscle.. Their applicability depends on such considerations as the type and quantity of myofibrils needed, how accurately sarcomere length is to be controlled, and whether the preparation is to be carried through to completion or stored until a later date. The methods that offer the greatest control over the myofibrils during their preparation are better suited to production of small (

Non-muscle myosins 2A and 2B drive changes in cell morphology that occur as myoblasts align and fuse

The interaction of non-muscle myosins 2A and 2B with actin may drive changes in cell movement, shape and adhesion. To investigate this, we used cultured myoblasts as a model system. These cells characteristically change shape from triangular to bipolar when they form groups of aligned cells. Antisense oligonucleotide knockdown of non-muscle myosin 2A, but not non-muscle myosin 2B, inhibited this shape change, interfered with cell-cell adhesion, had a minor effect on tail retraction and prevented myoblast fusion. By contrast, non-muscle myosin 2B knockdown markedly inhibited tail retraction, increasing cell length by over 200% by 72 hours compared with controls. In addition it interfered with nuclei redistribution in myotubes. Non-muscle myosin 2C is not involved as western analysis showed that it is not expressed in myoblasts, but only in myotubes. To understand why non-muscle myosins 2A and 2B have such different roles, we analysed their distributions by immuno-electron microscopy, and found that non-muscle myosin 2A was more tightly associated with the plasma membrane than non-muscle myosin 2B. This suggests that non-muscle myosin 2A is more important for bipolar shape formation and adhesion owing to its preferential interaction with membrane-associated actin, whereas the role of non-muscle myosin 2B in retraction prevents over-elongation of myoblasts.