Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter J. Zehler is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter J. Zehler.


ACM Standardview | 1998

Interoperability testing for the Internet printing protocol

Peter J. Zehler

■ Background: What is TES? The Printer Working Group (PWG) is an open consortium of organizations interested in making printing work better. These organizations represent various aspects of the printing industry. There are representatives of operating systems vendors, print services solution providers, and printer manufacturers. The PWG has a number of projects. One of them is the Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) is organized into a number of subgroups to manage various tasks in the development of the IPP specification. Among these groups are those that oversee the IPP Protocol and IPP Object Model. Another group facilitates IPP prototyping and testing. The designation for this IPP group is TES. TES GOALS he objective of TES is to help anyone implementing IPP; it acts as a central resource for implementers. One goal of IPP TES is to get independent implementations of IPP together. TES uses the IPP mailing list to allow implementers to find each other. Private lists of implementers are maintained. A balance must be maintained between the privacy needs of IPP implementers and the need for implementers to find each other. Another goal is to make IPP tools available to the IPP implementers’ community. Various individuals have donated tools useful for implementing and testing IPP implementation. The benefit gained by such donors is having their tools exercised and debugged by a larger population. TES also takes on the organization of interoperability tests for implementers of IPP. These tests, called “bake-offs,” are not competitive events, but gatherings of IPP implementers and their implementations. The primary goal of TES is to help the development of IPP by putting the specification words to the test. One thing has become quite clear: when the same code base is used for an IPP printer and an IPP client, interoperability is high. There is also agreement on the meaning of ambiguity in the IPP specification. When different code bases are used, misunderstandings are revealed.


Archive | 1997

Printer configuration system

John T. Roberts; Lawrence W. Meyer; Michael H. Wang; Peter J. Zehler


Archive | 2003

Hosted method and system for automated proxy creation of device resident services

Peter J. Zehler


Archive | 2008

Automatic educational assessment service

Dennis C. DeYoung; Charles A. Baxter; Michael R. Campanelli; Kristine A. German; Steven J. Harrington; Robert M. Lofthus; Rajinderjeet Singh Minhas; Gavan Leonard Tredoux; Dennis L. Venable; Peter J. Zehler


Archive | 2007

METROPOLITAN NAVIGATION SYSTEM

Peter J. Zehler


Archive | 2012

ESTABLISHING COMMUNICATION BETWEEN DEVICES USING CLOSE PROXIMITY PROTOCOL

Premkumar Rajendran; Gavan Leonard Tredoux; Peter J. Zehler


Archive | 2008

SYSTEM FOR AUTHORING EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENTS

Robert M. Lofthus; Kristine A. German; Dennis C. DeYoung; Dennis L. Venable; Michael R. Campanelli; Steven J. Harrington; Charles A. Baxter; Gavan Leonard Tredoux; Peter J. Zehler; Rajinderjeet Singh Minhas


Archive | 2013

Method and system for establishing secure communications between a multifunction device and a mobile communications device

Gavan Leonard Tredoux; Phillip J. Emmett; Premkumar Rajendran; Peter J. Zehler


Archive | 2013

METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR TRANSPARENTLY EXTENDING A MULTIFUNCTION DEVICE TO A MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE

Gavan Leonard Tredoux; Phillip J. Emmett; Premkumar Rajendran; Peter J. Zehler


Archive | 2014

Method for Enforcing Document Privacy Through Third Party Systems

Peter J. Zehler

Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge