Peter Kirk
University of Michigan
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Peter Kirk.
Investigative and Clinical Urology | 2016
Peter Kirk; Yooni Yi; Miriam Hadj-Moussa; Bahaa S. Malaeb
Purpose Lichen sclerosus (LS) in men is poorly understood. Though uncommon, it is often severe and leads to repeated surgical interventions and deterioration in quality of life. We highlight variability in disease presentation, diagnosis, and patient factors in male LS patients evaluated at a tertiary care center. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed charts of male patients presenting to our reconstructive urology clinic with clinical or pathologic diagnosis of LS between 2004 and 2014. Relevant clinical and demographic information was abstracted and descriptive statistics calculated. Subgroup comparisons were made based on body mass index (BMI), urethral stricture, and pathologic confirmation of disease. Results We identified 94 patients with clinical diagnosis of LS. Seventy percent (70%) of patients in this cohort had BMI >30 kg/m2, and average age was 51.5 years. Lower BMI patients were more likely to suffer from urethral stricture disease compared to overweight counterparts (p=0.037). Patients presenting with stricture disease were more likely to be younger (p=0.003). Thirty percent (30%) of this cohort had a pathologic diagnosis of LS. Conclusions Urethral stricture is the most common presentation for men with LS. Many patients endure skin scarring and have numerous comorbidities. Patient profile is diverse, raising the concern that not all patients with clinical diagnosis of LS are suffering from identical disease processes. The rate of pathologic confirmation at a tertiary care institution is alarmingly low. Our findings support a role for increased focus on pathologic confirmation and further delineation of the subtype of disease based on location and clinical manifestations.
Journal of Arthroplasty | 2018
Kenneth L. Urish; Yongmei Qin; Benjamin Y. Li; Tudor Borza; Michael Sessine; Peter Kirk; Brent K. Hollenbeck; Jonathan E. Helm; Mariel S. Lavieri; Ted A. Skolarus; Bruce L. Jacobs
BACKGROUND The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement bundle was created to decrease total knee arthroplasty (TKA) cost. To help accomplish this, there is a focus on reducing TKA readmissions. However, there is a lack of national representative sample of all-payer hospital admissions to direct strategy, identify risk factors for readmission, and understand actual readmission cost. METHODS We used the Nationwide Readmission Database to examine national readmission rates, predictors of readmission, and associated readmission costs for elective TKA procedures. We fit a multivariable logistic regression model to examine factors associated with readmission. Then, we determined mean readmission costs and calculated the readmission cost when distributed across the entire TKA population. RESULTS We identified 224,465 patients having TKA across all states participating in the Nationwide Readmission Database. The mean unadjusted 30-day TKA readmission rate was 4%. The greatest predictors of readmission were congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR] 2.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.62-2.80), renal disease (OR 2.19, 95% CI 2.03-2.37), and length of stay greater than 4 days (OR 2.4, 95% CI 2.25-2.61). The overall median cost for each readmission was
BJUI | 2018
Peter Kirk; Tudor Borza; Vahakn B. Shahinian; Megan Veresh Caram; Danil V. Makarov; Jeremy Shelton; John T. Leppert; Ryan M. Blake; Jennifer Davis; Brent K. Hollenbeck; Anne Sales; Ted A. Skolarus
6753 ± 175. Extrapolating the readmission cost for the entire TKA population resulted in the readmission cost being 2% of the overall 30-day procedure cost. CONCLUSIONS A major focus of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement bundle is improving cost and quality by limiting readmission rates. TKA readmissions are low and comprise a small percentage of total TKA cost, suggesting that they may not be the optimal measure of quality care or a significant driver of overall cost.
Urology Practice | 2017
Peter Kirk; Tudor Borza; James M. Dupree; John T. Wei; Chad Ellimoottil; Megan Veresh Caram; Mary Burkhardt; Joel J. Heidelbaugh; Brent K. Hollenbeck; Ted A. Skolarus
To assess bone‐density testing (BDT) use amongst prostate cancer survivors receiving androgen‐deprivation therapy (ADT), and downstream implications for osteoporosis and fracture diagnoses, as well as pharmacological osteoporosis treatment in a national integrated delivery system.
Urology | 2018
Cooper R. Benson; Robert Goldfarb; Peter Kirk; Yongmei Qin; Tudor Borza; Ted A. Skolarus; Steven Brandes
Introduction: Millions of patients take prescription medications each year for common urological conditions. Generic and brand‐name drugs have widely divergent pricing despite similar therapeutic benefit and side effect profiles. We examined prescribing patterns across provider types for generic and brand‐name drugs used to treat 3 common urological conditions, and estimated economic implications for Medicare Part D spending. Methods: We extracted 2014 prescription claims and payments from Medicare Part D and categorized oral medications used to treat 3 urological conditions, namely benign prostatic hyperplasia, erectile dysfunction and overactive bladder. We examined claims and payments for each medication among urologists and nonurologists. Lastly, we estimated potential savings by selecting a low cost or generic drug as a cost comparator for each class. Results: There were significant differences in prescribing patterns across these conditions, with urologists prescribing more brand‐name and expensive medications (p <0.001). The total potential savings related to prescriptions of more expensive and nongeneric drugs in 2014 was
Neurourology and Urodynamics | 2018
Peter Kirk; Yahir Santiago-Lastra; Yongmei Qin; John T. Stoffel; J. Quentin Clemens; Anne P. Cameron
1 billion (benign prostatic hyperplasia
BJUI | 2018
Peter Kirk; Tudor Borza; Megan Veresh Caram; Dean A. Shumway; Danil V. Makarov; Jennifer A Burns; Jeremy Shelton; John T. Leppert; Christina H. Chapman; Michael Chang; Brent K. Hollenbeck; Ted A. Skolarus
348,454,910, erectile dysfunction
Urology | 2017
Peter Kirk; Shail M. Govani; Tudor Borza; Brent K. Hollenbeck; Jennifer Davis; Dean A. Shumway; Akbar K. Waljee; Ted A. Skolarus
10,211,914 and overactive bladder
The Journal of Urology | 2017
Robert Goldfarb; Steven B. Brandes; Peter Kirk; Tudor Borza; Yongmei Qin; Ted A. Skolarus
698,130,833). These potential savings comprised 53% of the total spending for these medications in 2014. Conclusions: Within Medicare Part D the potential savings associated with generic substitution for higher cost and nongeneric drugs for 3 common urological conditions surpassed
The Journal of Urology | 2017
Robert Goldfarb; Steven B. Brandes; Peter Kirk; Tudor Borza; Yongmei Qin; Ted A. Skolarus
1 billion, with urologists more likely to prescribe brand‐name and more expensive drugs. Increasing low cost and generic drug use where available evidence of efficacy is equivocal represents a promising policy target to optimize prescription drug spending.