Peter Klijn

Aerobic exercise in adolescents with obesity: preliminary evaluation of a modular training program and the modified shuttle test

BackgroundIncreasing activity levels in adolescents with obesity requires the development of exercise programs that are both attractive to adolescents and easily reproducible. The aim of this study was to develop a modular aerobic training program for adolescents with severe obesity, with a focus on variety, individual targets and acquiring physical skills. We report here the effects on aerobic fitness from a pilot study. Furthermore, we examined the feasibility of the modified shuttle test (MST) as an outcome parameter for aerobic fitness in adolescents with severe obesity.MethodsFifteen adolescents from an inpatient body weight management program participated in the aerobic training study (age 14.7 ± 2.1 yrs, body mass index 37.4 ± 3.5). The subjects trained three days per week for 12 weeks, with each session lasting 30–60 minutes. The modular training program consisted of indoor, outdoor and swimming activities. Feasibility of the MST was studied by assessing construct validity, test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change.ResultsComparing pretraining and end of training period showed large clinically relevant and significant improvements for all aerobic indices: e.g. VO2 peak 17.5%, effect size (ES) 2.4; Wmax 8%, ES 0.8. In addition, a significant improvement was found for the efficiency of the cardiovascular system as assessed by the oxygen pulse (15.8%, ES 1.6).Construct validity, test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change of the MST were very good. MST was significantly correlated with VO2 peak (r = 0.79) and Wmax (r = 0.84) but not with anthropometric measures. The MST walking distance improved significantly by 32.5%, ES 2.5. The attendance rate at the exercise sessions was excellent.ConclusionThis modular, varied aerobic training program has clinically relevant effects on aerobic performance in adolescents with severe obesity. The added value of our aerobic training program for body weight management programs for adolescents with severe obesity should be studied with a randomized trial. This study further demonstrated that the MST is a reliable, sensitive and easy to administer outcome measure for aerobic fitness in adolescent body weight management trials.

Nonlinear exercise training in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is superior to traditional exercise training. A randomized trial.

RATIONALE The optimal exercise training intensity and strategy for individualized exercise training in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is not clear. OBJECTIVES This study compares the effects of nonlinear periodized exercise (NLPE) training used in athletes to traditional endurance and progressive resistance (EPR) training in patients with severe COPD. METHODS A total of 110 patients with severe COPD (FEV1 32% predicted) were randomized to EPR or NLPE. Exercise training was performed three times per week for 10 weeks. The primary outcomes were cycling endurance time and health-related quality of life using the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire. The difference in change between EPR and NLPE was assessed using linear mixed-effects modeling. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS NLPE resulted in significantly greater improvements in cycling endurance time compared with EPR. The difference in change was +300.6 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI] = 197.2-404.2 s; P < 0.001). NLPE also resulted in significantly greater improvements in all domains of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire compared with EPR, ranging from +0.48 (95% CI = 0.19-0.78) for the domain, emotions, to +0.96 (95% CI = 0.57-1.35) for dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS NLPE results in greater improvements in cycle endurance and health-related quality of life in patients with severe COPD than traditional training methods. Clinical trial registered with www.trialregister.nl (The Netherlands Trial Register; NTR 1045).

Exercise Training in Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Exercise training remains a cornerstone of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with chronic respiratory disease. The choice of type of exercise training depends on the physiologic requirements and goals of the individual patient as well as the available equipment at the PR center. Current evidence suggests that, at ground walking exercise training, Nordic walking exercise training, resistance training, water-based exercise training, tai chi, and nonlinear periodized exercise are all feasible and effective in (subgroups) of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In turn, these exercise training modalities can be considered as part of a comprehensive, interdisciplinary PR program.

Inaccuracy of Estimating Peak Work Rate from Six-Minute Walk Distance in Patients with COPD

Abstract Introduction. The cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) are used to prescribe the appropriate training load for cycling and walking exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The primary aims were: (i) to compare estimated peak work rate (Wpeakestimated) derived from six existing Wpeak regression equations with actual peak work rate (Wpeakactual); and (ii) to derive a new Wpeak regression equation using six-minute walk distance (6MWD) and conventional outcome measures in COPD patients. Methods. In 2906 patients with COPD, existing Wpeak regression equations were used to estimate Wpeak using 6MWD and a new equation was derived after a stepwise multiple regression analysis. Results. The 6 existing Wpeak regression equations were inaccurate to predict Wpeakactual in 82% of the COPD patients. The new Wpeak regression equation differed less between Wpeakestimated and Wpeakactual compared to existing models. Still, in 74% of COPD patients Wpeakestimated and Wpeakactual differed more than (±) 5 watts. Conclusion. In conclusion, estimating peak work load from 6MWD in COPD is inaccurate. We recommend assessment of Wpeak using CPET during pre-rehabilitation assessment in addition to 6MWT.

Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the Dutch Version of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale in Patients With Severe COPD

AbstractThis study assesses the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale (LCADL).The English LCADL version was translated into Dutch and then back-translated to English to check if the translation was conceptually equivalent to the original LCADL.Measurement properties were evaluated in191 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (70 males; age 62 ± 9 years; FEV1 33 ± 10% pred). Construct validity was assessed using disease-specific health status, generic functional status, and functional and peak exercise capacity (Wmax). LCADL was completed twice to assess test–retest reliability. Responsiveness was assessed after 8 to 12 weeks inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.LCADL correlated significantly with the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (r = 0.24 to 0.64), functional status (r = 0.45 to 0.82), walking distance (r = −0.3 to −0.58), and Wmax (−0.27 to −0.38) and Wmax % pred (−0.26 to −0.43). Test–retest reliability was high (ICC 0.87 to 0.98). The smallest detectable change for the LCADL total and domain score self-care, domestic, physical, and leisure was 4.5, 2.9, 3.3, 4.9, and 2.2, respectively. Improvement in LCADL after PR correlated significantly with improvement in Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (−0.43; P < 0.001).The Dutch LCADL is a reliable, valid, and responsive instrument to assess limitations in performing activities of daily living in patients with severe COPD.

The Use of Regression Equations to Estimate Peak Work Rate in People with COPD - Reply from the Authors

1. Program Development Centre; CIRO+, centre of expertise for chronic organ failure; Horn, the Netherlands2. Department of Medical Psychology; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Nijmegen, the Netherlands3. Department of Pulmonary Diseases; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Nijmegen, the Netherlands4. Rehabilitation Centre Breda; Revant Rehabilitation Centre; Breda, the Netherlands5. Department of pulmonary diseases, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands6. Asthma Centre Heideheuvel; Merem Behandelcentra; Hilversum, the Netherlands7. Director; CIRO+, centre of expertise for chronic organ failure; Horn, the Netherlands8. Department of Respiratory Medicine; Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+); Maastricht, the Netherlands9. Department of Respiratory Medicine; Erasmus Medical Center; Rotterdam, the Netherlands10. Sports Training; CIRO+, centre of expertise for chronic organ failure; Horn, the Netherlands