Peter Kornprat

Actual 10-Year Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases Defines Cure

PURPOSE Resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) in selected patients has evolved as the standard of care during the last 20 years. In the absence of prospective randomized clinical trials, a survival benefit has been deduced relative to historical controls based on actuarial data. There is now sufficient follow-up on a significant number of patients to address the curative intent of resecting CLM. METHODS Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed on patients who underwent resection of CLM from 1985 to 1994. Postoperative deaths were excluded. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was calculated from the time of hepatectomy using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS There were 612 consecutive patients identified with 10-year follow-up. Median DSS was 44 months. There were 102 actual 10-year survivors. Ninety-nine (97%) of the 102 were disease free at last follow-up. Only one patient experienced a disease-specific death after 10 years of survival. In contrast, 34% of the 5-year survivors suffered a cancer-related death. Previously identified poor prognostic factors found among the 102 actual 10-year survivors included 7% synchronous disease, 36% disease-free interval less than 12 months, 25% bilobar metastases, 50% node-positive primary, 39% more than one metastasis, and 35% tumor size more than 5 cm. CONCLUSION Patients who survive 10 years appear to be cured of their disease, whereas approximately one third of actual 5-year survivors succumb to a cancer-related death. In well-selected patients, there is at least a one in six chance of cure after hepatectomy for CLM. The presence of poor prognostic factors does not preclude the possibility of long-term survival and cure.

Lack of Evidence for Increased Operative Morbidity After Hepatectomy with Perioperative Use of Bevacizumab: A Matched Case-Control Study

BackgroundBevacizumab (bev) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Perioperative bev is now commonly used in patients undergoing hepatic resection. Little is known, however, about the safety of perioperative bev use in the setting of hepatic resection.MethodsComputerized pharmacy records were used to identify all patients who received bev between January 2004 and June 2005. Patients who underwent hepatectomy for colorectal metastases and received bev within 12 weeks of surgery were identified and compared with a group of matched historical controls.ResultsThirty-two patients underwent hepatic resection of colorectal cancer metastases and received bev within the specified perioperative period. Sixteen patients received bev before surgery and 24 received bev after surgery. A subset of eight patients received bev both before and after surgery. The median time between bev administration and surgery was 6.9 weeks before (range, 3–15 weeks) and 7.4 weeks after (range, 5–15 weeks). Perioperative complications occurred in 13 patients (40.6%), two of which were considered major complications. There was no statistically significant difference in perioperative morbidity and severity of complications when compared with a set of matched controls.ConclusionsClinical experience thus far does not indicate a statistically significantly increased risk of perioperative complications with the incorporation of bev into pre- and/or postoperative treatment paradigms. Given the long half-life of bev and the potential for anti-VEGF therapy to impede wound healing and/or liver regeneration, we continue to favor a window of 6 to 8 weeks between bev administration and surgery.

Increased Use of Parenchymal-Sparing Surgery for Bilateral Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer Is Associated With Improved Mortality Without Change in Oncologic Outcome : Trends in Treatment Over Time in 440 Patients

Objective:The aim of this study was to determine the results of liver resection for patients with bilateral hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. We aimed to assess the evolution of the technical approach over time and correlations with morbidity, mortality, and oncologic outcome. Summary Background Data:Although hepatic resection for isolated colorectal metastases to the liver is thought to be beneficial when feasible, resection of bilateral liver metastases carries unique technical issues and is often associated with more aggressive tumor biology. Little has been written specifically about the results achieved in this subset of patients. Methods:Data from a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing hepatic resection at a single institution over an 11-year time period were reviewed. Results:Resection of bilateral liver metastases from colorectal cancer was accomplished in 443 cases (440 patients) with a 29% incidence of major complications and a 5.4% 90-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year disease-specific survival was 30% and 5-year recurrence-free survival was 18%. Operative technique changed over time toward a parenchymal-sparing approach as evidenced by the greater use of multiple simultaneous liver resections, wedge resections, and ablations. Similarly, there was a decrease in the use of major hepatectomies. This correlated with decreased mortality without change in disease-specific survival or liver recurrence. Conclusions:Resection of bilateral colorectal liver metastases can be accomplished with acceptable morbidity, mortality, and oncologic results. Increased use of a parenchymal-sparing approach is associated with decreased mortality without compromise in cancer-related outcome.

Outcome After Hepatectomy for Multiple (Four or More) Colorectal Metastases in the Era of Effective Chemotherapy

BackgroundHepatic resection is generally accepted as the only potential for long-term survival in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver. Despite an unknown benefit, hepatic resection is playing an increasing role in patients with extensive disease.MethodsA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary surgical database was carried out. Outcome after hepatectomy for four or more colorectal hepatic metastases was reviewed.ResultsBetween 1998 and 2002, out of a total of 584 patients, 98 (17%) with four or more colorectal hepatic metastases were resected. Actuarial 5-year survival was 33% for the entire group, with seven actual 5-year survivors. There were no perioperative deaths, and the perioperative morbidity was 28%. Positive margins and extrahepatic disease resection were independently associated with poor outcome. The median disease-free survival was 12 months, with no actuarial disease-free survivors at 5 years. Recurrence pattern, response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, time to recurrence, and resection of recurrent disease were also associated with outcome.ConclusionsLong-term survival can be achieved after resection of multiple colorectal metastases; however, because most patients will experience recurrence of disease, effective adjuvant therapy and close follow-up is necessary.

Tumor necrosis is a new promising prognostic factor in colorectal cancer

The prognostic significance of tumor necrosis in colorectal cancer is unclear. Our study aimed to analyze the prognostic value of tumor necrosis with respect to progression-free and cancer-specific survival and to relate findings to expression of proteins involved in the control of cancer cell death, such as p53 and bcl-2. A total of 381 colorectal cancer specimens were retrospectively reevaluated. The extent of tumor necrosis was semiquantitatively assessed and recorded as either absent, focal (≤10% of the tumor area), moderate (10%-30%), or extensive (≥30%). Expression of p53 and bcl-2 was assessed immunohistochemically and recorded as either positive (using a cutoff value of 10%) or negative. In addition, mismatch repair protein status was assessed by immunohistochemistry using antibodies directed against hMLH1, hMSH2, and hMSH6. Tumor necrosis was observed in 365 (96%) cases, with 180 (47%) tumors showing focal necrosis, 119 (31%) moderate necrosis, and 66 (17%) extensive necrosis, respectively. Extent of necrosis was significantly associated with high T classification (P < .001), high N classification (P = .005), high International Union Against Cancer stage (P < .001), poor tumor differentiation (P < .001), large tumor size (P < .001), and blood vessel invasion (P = .01). No association of tumor necrosis with expression of p53, bcl-2, and mismatch repair protein status was observed. Tumor necrosis proved to be an independent prognostic variable with respect to progression-free and cancer-specific survival. In conclusion, tumor necrosis showed significant impact on prognosis of colorectal cancer patients. Its presence is readily assessable in hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections and should therefore routinely be commented upon in the pathology report.

Peritumoral eosinophils predict recurrence in colorectal cancer.

In colorectal cancer, the presence and extent of eosinophil granulocyte infiltration may render important prognostic information. However, it remains unclear whether an increasing number of eosinophils might simply be linked to the overall inflammatory cell reaction or represent a self-contained, antitumoral mechanism that needs to be documented and promoted therapeutically. Peri- and intratumoral eosinophil counts were retrospectively assessed in 381 primary colorectal cancers from randomly selected patients. Tumors were diagnosed in American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) stage I in 21%, stage II in 32%, stage III in 33%, and stage IV in 14%. Presence and extent of eosinophils was related to various histopathological parameters as well as patients’ outcome. Overall, peri- and intratumoral eosinophils were observed in 86 and 75% cancer specimens. The peritumoral eosinophil count correlated strongly with the intratumoral eosinophil count (R=0.69; P<0.001) and with the intensity of the overall inflammatory cell reaction (R=0.318; P<0.001). Both increasing peri- and intratumoral eosinophil counts were significantly associated with lower T and N classification, better tumor differentiation, absence of vascular invasion, as well as improved progression-free and cancer-specific survival. However, only peritumoral eosinophils, but not intratumoral, were an independent prognosticator of favorable progression-free (hazard ratio 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.58–0.98; P=0.04) and cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio 0.7; 95% confidence interval 0.52–0.93; P=0.01)—independent of the intensity of overall inflammatory cell reaction. This was also found for patients with AJCC/UICC stage II disease, wherein the presence of peritumoral eosinophils was significantly associated with favorable outcome. In conclusion, the number of peritumoral eosinophils had a significant favorable impact on prognosis of colorectal cancer patients independent of the overall tumor-associated inflammatory response. Evaluation of peritumoral eosinophils represents a promising readily assessable tool and should therefore routinely be commented on in the pathology report.

Tumour budding with and without admixed inflammation: two different sides of the same coin?

Background:Tumour budding is an adverse prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer (CRC). Marked overall peritumoural inflammation has been associated with favourable outcome and may lead to the presence of isolated cancer cells due to destruction of invading cancer cell islets.Methods:We assessed the prognostic significance of tumour budding and peritumoural inflammation in a cohort of 381 patients with CRC applying univariate and multivariate analyses.Results:Patients with high-grade budding and marked inflammation had a significantly better outcome compared with patients with high-grade budding and only mild inflammation. Outcome in these cases, however, was still worse compared with cases with low-grade budding, in which the extent of peritumoural inflammation had no further prognostic effect.Conclusions:Tumour budding proved to be a powerful prognostic variable in patients with CRC. Scattering of invading cancer cell islets by marked overall peritumoural inflammation seems to have a minor role.

Perineural invasion is a strong and independent predictor of lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer.

To the Editor—With great interest we read the study by Kajiwara et al, who identified lymphovascular invasion (LVI) as a hallmark for predicting nodal involvement in T2 colorectal cancer (CRC), in addition to poor tumor differentiation and myxoid cancer stroma. We compliment Kajiwara and colleagues on their contribution, which highlights that histopathology is well able to stratify patients for optimal treatment, eg, local excision, radical resection, or adjuvant therapy, and we would like to add our personal experience to this study. We have previously shown that perineural invasion (PNI) is significantly associated with lymph node metastasis in CRC, suggesting a possible independent effect. Prompted by the study by Kajiwara et al, we now looked for risk factors of nodal disease by performing multiple variable logistic regression analysis, focusing on the possible prognostic significance of PNI. In the subgroup of T2 tumors (n 70), we did not detect PNI, and only LVI independently predicted lymph node metastasis (Table 1). Other groups similarly failed to detect PNI in T1/T2 disease, whereas Huh et al recently observed PNI in 4% of T1/T2 tumors and identified both LVI and PNI as independent predictors of lymph node involvement. In the subgroup of T3 tumors (n 218), we detected PNI in 14% of cases and identified PNI as the most important independent predictor of lymph node metastasis (Table 1). This strong association may well explain the significant association of PNI with local tumor relapse presented in our previous report. In conclusion, PNI is a strong and independent predictor of regional lymph node involvement in CRC and deserves special attention in the histopathological workup of cancer specimens.