Peter M. DiBattiste

Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban.

BACKGROUND There is continued debate as to whether a routine, early invasive strategy is superior to a conservative strategy for the management of unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation. METHODS We enrolled 2220 patients with unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation who had electrocardiographic evidence of changes in the ST segment or T wave, elevated levels of cardiac markers, a history of coronary artery disease, or all three findings. All patients were treated with aspirin, heparin, and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. They were randomly assigned to an early invasive strategy, which included routine catheterization within 4 to 48 hours and revascularization as appropriate, or to a more conservative (selectively invasive) strategy, in which catheterization was performed only if the patient had objective evidence of recurrent ischemia or an abnormal stress test. The primary end point was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome at six months. RESULTS At six months, the rate of the primary end point was 15.9 percent with use of the early invasive strategy and 19.4 percent with use of the conservative strategy (odds ratio, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 0.97; P=0.025). The rate of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction at six months was similarly reduced (7.3 percent vs. 9.5 percent; odds ratio, 0.74; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.54 to 1.00; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS In patients with unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation who were treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban, the use of an early invasive strategy significantly reduced the incidence of major cardiac events. These data support a policy involving broader use of the early inhibition of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in combination with an early invasive strategy in such patients.

Comparison of two platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, tirofiban and abciximab, for the prevention of ischemic events with percutaneous coronary revascularization.

BACKGROUND In the setting of percutaneous coronary revascularization, agents in the class known as platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have significantly reduced the incidence of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction at 30 days. We assessed whether there are differences in safety or efficacy between two such inhibitors, tirofiban and abciximab. METHODS Using a double-blind, double-dummy design at 149 hospitals in 18 countries, we randomly assigned patients to receive either tirofiban or abciximab before undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization with the intent to perform stenting. The primary end point was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or urgent target-vessel revascularization at 30 days. The trial was designed and statistically powered to demonstrate the noninferiority of tirofiban as compared with abciximab. RESULTS The primary end point occurred more frequently among the 2398 patients in the tirofiban group than among the 2411 patients in the abciximab group (7.6 percent vs. 6.0 percent; hazard ratio, 1.26; one-sided 95 percent confidence interval of 1.51, demonstrating lack of equivalence, and two-sided 95 percent confidence interval of 1.01 to 1.57, demonstrating the superiority of abciximab over tirofiban; P=0.038). The magnitude and the direction of the effect were similar for each component of the composite end point (hazard ratio for death, 1.21; hazard ratio for myocardial infarction, 1.27; and hazard ratio for urgent target-vessel revascularization, 1.26), and the difference in the incidence of myocardial infarction between the tirofiban group and the abciximab group was significant (6.9 percent and 5.4 percent, respectively; P=0.04). The relative benefit of abciximab was consistent regardless of age, sex, the presence or absence of diabetes, or the presence or absence of pretreatment with clopidogrel. There were no significant differences in the rates of major bleeding complications or transfusions, but tirofiban was associated with a lower rate of minor bleeding episodes and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS Although the trial was intended to assess the noninferiority of tirofiban as compared with abciximab, the findings demonstrated that tirofiban offered less protection from major ischemic events than did abciximab.

Evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide for risk assessment in unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: B-type natriuretic peptide and prognosis in TACTICS-TIMI 18.

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to evaluate B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) for risk assessment and clinical decision making over a range of cut points, alone and with cardiac troponin I (cTnI), in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND B-type natriuretic peptide holds promise for risk stratification. Additional evidence regarding optimal decision limits, use in combination with troponin, and use in targeting therapy is needed before acceptance into clinical use for ACS. METHODS We evaluated BNP at baseline in 1,676 patients with non-ST-elevation ACS randomized to early invasive versus conservative management. RESULTS Patients with elevated BNP (>80 pg/ml; n = 320) were at higher risk of death at seven days (2.5% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.006) and six months (8.4% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.0001). The association between BNP and mortality at six months (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 6.3) was independent of important clinical predictors, including cTnI and congestive heart failure (CHF). Patients with elevated BNP had a fivefold higher risk of developing new CHF by 30 days (5.9% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.0001). B-type natriuretic peptide added prognostic information to cTnI, discriminating patients at higher mortality risk among those with negative (OR 6.9; 95% CI 1.9 to 25.8) and positive (OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.9 to 9.0) baseline cTnI results. No difference was observed in the effect of invasive versus conservative management when stratified by baseline levels of BNP (p(interaction) > or = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS Elevated BNP (>80 pg/ml) at presentation identifies patients with non-ST-elevation ACS who are at higher risk of death and CHF and adds incremental information to cTnI. Additional work is needed to identify therapies that may reduce the risk associated with increased BNP.

Differential Expression of Cardiac Biomarkers by Gender in Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A TACTICS-TIMI 18 (Treat Angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 18) Substudy

Background—Diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women is more difficult because of lower specificity of symptoms and diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive testing. We sought to examine the relationship between gender and cardiac biomarkers in patients with unstable angina (UA)/non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Methods and Results—In the TACTICS-TIMI 18, OPUS-TIMI 16, and TIMI 11 studies, baseline samples were analyzed in the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) biomarker core laboratory. We examined the relationship between gender and elevated biomarkers. Of 1865 patients from TACTICS-TIMI 18, 34% were women. Fewer women had elevated creatine kinase-MB or troponins, whereas more had elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein or brain natriuretic peptide. Presence of ST-segment deviation and TIMI risk scores were not significantly different. This pattern was confirmed in TIMI 11 and OPUS-TIMI 16. The prognostic value of the markers in TACTICS-TIMI 18 was similar in women and men. When a multimarker approach was examined, a greater proportion of high-risk women were identified. Marker-positive patients of both genders had improved outcome with an invasive strategy; however, marker-negative women appeared to have improved outcomes with a conservative strategy. Conclusions—In patients with UA/NSTEMI, there was a different pattern of presenting biomarkers. Men were more likely to have elevated creatine kinase-MB and troponins, whereas women were more likely to have elevated C-reactive protein and brain natriuretic peptide. This suggests that a multimarker approach may aid the initial risk assessment of UA/NSTEMI, especially in women. Further research is necessary to elucidate whether gender-related pathophysiological differences exist in presentation with acute coronary syndromes.

Elevations in Troponin T and I Are Associated With Abnormal Tissue Level Perfusion A TACTICS-TIMI 18 Substudy

Background—Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and I elevations are associated with a higher risk of adverse events, a higher incidence of multivessel disease, complex lesions, and visible thrombus in the setting of non-ST elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Other pathophysiological mechanisms underlying troponin elevation remain unclear. Methods and Results—We evaluated the relationship between troponin elevation and tissue level perfusion using the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) in 310 patients with NSTE-ACS in the Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TACTICS-TIMI) 18 trial. TMPG 0/1 (“closed” microvasculature) was observed more frequently in cTnT-positive patients both before (58.1% versus 42.1%;P =0.007) and after percutaneous coronary intervention (55.4% versus 35.6%;P =0.004). cTnT levels were higher among patients with TMPG 0/1 versus patients with TMPG 2/3 (0.50 versus 0.31 ng/mL;P =0.006). cTnT-positive patients were more likely to have thrombus (42.5% versus 29.3%), tighter stenoses (72.0% versus 64.8%), and higher rates of TIMI flow grade 0/1 (15.6% versus 7.0%; all P <0.05). TMPG 0/1 remained independently associated with cTnT elevation (odds ratio, 1.81;P =0.02), even after adjusting for epicardial TIMI flow grade, presence of thrombus, and prior myocardial infarction. TMPG 0/1 flow both before and after intervention was associated with increased risk of death or myocardial infarction at 6 months. Conclusions—Similar to what has been observed in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, abnormal tissue level perfusion is also associated with adverse outcomes in the NSTE-ACS setting. Independent of the presence of thrombus and abnormal flow in the epicardial artery, impaired tissue level perfusion is associated with a 1.8-fold increased risk of cTnT elevation.

Effects of Renal Insufficiency on Early Invasive Management in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes (The TACTICS-TIMI 18 Trial)

Patel KK, Frederick B, Nakada MT, Topol EJ. Abciximab suppresses the rise in levels of circulating inflammatory markers after percutaneous coronary revascularization. Circulation 2001;104:163–167. 15. Neumann FJ, Blasini R, Schmitt C, Alt E, Dirschinger J, Gawaz M, Kastrati A, Schomig A. Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade on recovery of coronary flow and left ventricular function after the placement of coronary-artery stents in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;98:2695–2701.

Randomized COMparison of Platelet Inhibition With Abciximab, TiRofiban and Eptifibatide During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes The COMPARE Trial

Background—The relative anti-aggregatory effects of currently prescribed platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists during and after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes have not been established. Methods and Results—We randomized 70 acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to receive abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban at doses used in the Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for STENTing (EPISTENT), Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT), and Platelet Receptor Inhibition in ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and symptoms (PRISM-PLUS)/Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and Restenosis (RESTORE) trials, respectively. Platelet aggregation (PA) in response to 20 &mgr;mol/L of adenosine diphosphate was measured with turbidimetric aggregometry in both D-phenylalanyl-l-prolyl-l-arginine chloromethylketone and citrate-anticoagulated blood early (15 and 30 minutes) and late (4, 12, and 18 to 24 hours) after drug initiation. At 15 and 30 minutes, PA was significantly less inhibited by the tirofiban-RESTORE regimen compared with abciximab (P =0.028) and eptifibatide regimens (P =0.0001). The abciximab regimen, however, showed increasingly varied anti-aggregatory effects during continued infusion for ≥4 hours. Citrate exaggerated ex vivo platelet inhibition after eptifibatide and tirofiban, but had the opposite effect on abciximab. Of all regimens evaluated, the eptifibatide regimen inhibited PA most consistently throughout both the early and late periods. Conclusions—Currently recommended drug regimens to inhibit the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor have distinct pharmacodynamic profiles that might affect their relative efficacy in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Triple antiplatelet therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention is associated withimproved outcomes including one-year survival: Results from the do tirofiban and reoprogive similar efficacy outcome trial (TARGET)

Abstract Objectives We sought to examine if clopidogrel treatment initiated before coronary stenting improved clinical outcomes among patients receiving aspirin and a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Background Antiplatelet therapy plays a pivotal role in contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Methods Outcomes among 4,809 patients randomized to tirofiban or abciximab during PCI with stent placement were compared according to whether they received 300 mg of clopidogrel before PCI (93.1%) versus immediately after the procedure. Results The 30-day primary composite end point (death, myocardial infarction [MI], or urgent target vessel revascularization [TVR]) was lower among clopidogrel-pretreated patients (6.6% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.009), mainly because of reduction of MI (6.0% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.012). The benefit of clopidogrel pretreatment was sustained at six months (death, MI, any TVR: 14.6% vs. 19.8%, HR = 0.71, p = 0.010), and this was due mainly to lowering of death and MI (7.8% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.001). At one year, clopidogrel pretreatment was associated with a lower mortality rate (1.7% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.011). Because clopidogrel pretreatment was not randomized, multivariable and propensity analyses were performed. After adjusting for baseline heterogeneity, clopidogrel pretreatment was an independent predictor for death or MI at 30 days (HR = 0.63, p = 0.012) and at six months (HR = 0.61, p = 0.003), and survival at one year (HR = 0.53, p = 0.044). No excess in 30-day bleeding events was noted with clopidogrel pretreatment. Conclusions Among patients undergoing coronary stent placement with aspirin and a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, clopidogrel pretreatment is associated with a reduction of death and MI irrespective of the type of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor used.OBJECTIVE We sought to examine if clopidogrel treatment initiated before coronary stenting improved clinical outcomes among patients receiving aspirin and a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor. BACKGROUND Antiplatelet therapy plays a pivotal role in contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). METHODS Outcomes among 4,809 patients randomized to tirofiban or abciximab during PCI with stent placement were compared according to whether they received 300 mg of clopidogrel before PCI (93.1%) versus immediately after the procedure. RESULTS The 30-day primary composite end point (death, myocardial infarction [MI], or urgent target vessel revascularization [TVR]) was lower among clopidogrel-pretreated patients (6.6% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.009), mainly because of reduction of MI (6.0% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.012). The benefit of clopidogrel pretreatment was sustained at six months (death, MI, any TVR: 14.6% vs. 19.8%, HR = 0.71, p = 0.010), and this was due mainly to lowering of death and MI (7.8% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.001). At one year, clopidogrel pretreatment was associated with a lower mortality rate (1.7% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.011). Because clopidogrel pretreatment was not randomized, multivariable and propensity analyses were performed. After adjusting for baseline heterogeneity, clopidogrel pretreatment was an independent predictor for death or MI at 30 days (HR = 0.63, p = 0.012) and at six months (HR = 0.61, p = 0.003), and survival at one year (HR = 0.53, p = 0.044). No excess in 30-day bleeding events was noted with clopidogrel pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing coronary stent placement with aspirin and a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, clopidogrel pretreatment is associated with a reduction of death and MI irrespective of the type of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor used.

Adjunctive Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibition With Tirofiban Before Primary Angioplasty Improves Angiographic Outcomes

Background—Previous work has suggested that platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade may confer benefit in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. The TIGER-PA pilot trial was a single-center randomized study to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and utility of early tirofiban administration before planned primary angioplasty in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results—A total of 100 patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction were randomized to either early administration of tirofiban in the emergency room or later administration in the catheterization laboratory. The primary outcome measures were initial TIMI grade flow, corrected TIMI frame counts, and TIMI grade myocardial perfusion (“blush”). Thirty-day major adverse cardiac events were also assessed. Angiographic outcomes demonstrate a significant improvement in initial TIMI grade flow, corrected TIMI frame counts, and TIMI grade myocardial perfusion when patients are given tirofiban in the emergency room before primary angioplasty. The rate of 30-day major adverse cardiac events suggests that early administration may be beneficial. Conclusions—This pilot study suggests that early administration of tirofiban improves angiographic outcomes and is safe and feasible in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Suboptimal early inhibition of platelets by treatment with Tirofiban and implications for coronary interventions

Inhibition of aggregation of platelets from 15 to 60 minutes after onset of treatment with tirofiban is less than that after onset of treatment with abciximab. The suboptimal inhibition occurs during a critical interval, immediately after iatrogenic vessel injury. Further, the suboptimal inhibition is likely to be responsible, at least in part, for the greater incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction seen in the TARGET trial after treatment with tirofiban compared with abciximab. The difference observed is a reflection of the intrinsic pharmacologic characteristics of the 2 agents. Altering pharmacodynamics by dosage adjustment leading to higher concentrations in blood of tirofiban during the first hour after treatment onset requires further study.