Peter M. Fitzpatrick
Mayo Clinic
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Peter M. Fitzpatrick.
American Journal of Kidney Diseases | 1990
Peter M. Fitzpatrick; Vicente E. Torres; J. William Charboneau; Kenneth P. Offord; Keith E. Holley; Horst Zincke
This study was performed to determine the long-term outcome of renal transplantation in 54 patients with end-stage renal failure secondary to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and in 107 patients with renal diseases other than ADPKD or diabetes mellitus matched by gender, age, year of transplantation, and source of the allograft. The overall patient survival and patient survival with a functioning first renal allograft were similar in both groups. Infection and cardiovascular accidents were the leading causes of early and late death in both groups. No cause of death was greatly overrepresented in the ADPKD group. Serious complications from extrarenal manifestations of ADPKD following renal transplantation included a ruptured intracranial aneurysm in one patient, a dissection of the ascending thoracic aorta in one patient, and infected hepatic cysts in two patients. Neoplasia (other than skin or cervical) occurred in four ADPKD patients and in one control patient and included one lymphoma in each group. Two ADPKD and one control patient had monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance. No complications related to the retention of native kidneys were detected in 12 ADPKD patients with a mean follow-up of 3 years. Cysts were observed in the renal allografts of some patients in both groups at autopsy and in a prospective computed tomography (CT) study of the allograft. However, we failed to detect a significant difference in the occurrence and number of the cysts between ADPKD and control patients.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings | 2004
A. Ahsan Ejaz; William E. Haley; Andrew Wasiluk; James F. Meschia; Peter M. Fitzpatrick
OBJECTIVE To elucidate the demographic and clinical characteristics of a consecutive series of patients who presented for evaluation of orthostatic hypotension. PATIENTS AND METHODS From January 1, 1997, through September 30, 2001, we assessed retrospectively the demographic and clinical characteristics, antihypertensive medication use, and blood pressure variability in 100 consecutive patients with orthostatic hypotension who underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (OH group) and in a convenience sample of 100 age-matched patients who underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for evaluation of hypertension (HTN group). RESULTS The OH group had a mean +/- SD age of 71.6 +/- 9.4 years, and 42% were women. The most common symptoms were light-headedness and weakness. Comorbid conditions included neurologic diseases (38%), preexisting hypertension (36%), hyperlipidemia (31%), cardiac arrhythmias and coronary artery disease (45%), and neoplasm (28%). During ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, postprandial decreases in blood pressure were noted in 83% of the OH group, supine or sleep hypertension in 84%, and noncompensatory heart rate variability in 75%. Findings on autonomic testing were abnormal in 99% of patients, serum creatinine value was increased in 30%, proteinuria was present in 27%, and left ventricular hypertrophy was present in 20%. CONCLUSIONS Orthostatic hypotension is present in a heterogeneous group of disease states, is usually symptomatic, and is often associated with an abnormal blood pressure profile of reversal of circadian pattern, postprandial hypotension, and noncompensatory heart rate variability. Consequent target organ (kidney) damage can be as frequent as in patients who undergo 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for evaluation of hypertension.
American Journal of Roentgenology | 2009
Mellena D. Bridges; Brandon S. St. Amant; Rebecca B. McNeil; Joseph G. Cernigliaro; Jamie P. Dwyer; Peter M. Fitzpatrick
OBJECTIVE The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) and nephrotoxicity among patients with differing degrees of renal dysfunction who are exposed to high doses of gadodiamide. MATERIALS AND METHODS A search of medical records identified patients who received high-dose IV gadodiamide for catheter angiography or CT between January 2002 and December 2005. The cohort was limited to patients who had received a dose of at least 40 mL of gadodiamide during a single imaging session, who underwent at least 1 year of clinical follow-up, and who had moderate to end-stage renal disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate [GFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) established within the previous 48 hours. Any observation suggestive of NSF was recorded, as were all estimated GFR values obtained during the 2 weeks before and the 5 days after gadodiamide administration. RESULTS Sixty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. The median estimated GFR was 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (range, 3-57 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). The median gadodiamide exposure was 80 mL (range, 40-200 mL). NSF eventually developed in one of the 61 patients, yielding a prevalence of 1.6%. Among the 33 patients not undergoing dialysis with estimated GFR documented within 5 days after contrast injection, the change in estimated GFR ranged from -8.8 to 42.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2), with a statistically significant median improvement of 2.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION Although gadolinium exposure appears to be a necessary precondition for NSF, gadolinium-based contrast agents alone are not sufficient to cause the disorder, even in very high doses. Clinically relevant nephrotoxicity of gadolinium-based contrast agents was not found.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2017
Dan R. Berlowitz; Capri G. Foy; Lewis E. Kazis; Linda P. Bolin; Molly B. Conroy; Peter M. Fitzpatrick; Tanya R. Gure; Paul L. Kimmel; Kent Kirchner; Jill Newman; Christine Olney; Suzanne Oparil; Nicholas M. Pajewski; James R. Powell; Thomas Ramsey; Debra L. Simmons; Joni K. Snyder; Mark A. Supiano; Daniel E. Weiner; Jeff Whittle
BACKGROUND The previously published results of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial showed that among participants with hypertension and an increased cardiovascular risk, but without diabetes, the rates of cardiovascular events were lower among those who were assigned to a target systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) than among those who were assigned to a target of less than 140 mm Hg (standard treatment). Whether such intensive treatment affected patient‐reported outcomes was uncertain; those results from the trial are reported here. METHODS We randomly assigned 9361 participants with hypertension to a systolic blood‐pressure target of less than 120 mm Hg or a target of less than 140 mm Hg. Patient‐reported outcome measures included the scores on the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the Veterans RAND 12‐Item Health Survey, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9‐item depression scale (PHQ‐9), patient‐reported satisfaction with their blood‐pressure care and blood‐pressure medications, and adherence to blood‐pressure medications. We compared the scores in the intensive‐treatment group with those in the standard‐treatment group among all participants and among participants stratified according to physical and cognitive function. RESULTS Participants who received intensive treatment received an average of one additional antihypertensive medication, and the systolic blood pressure was 14.8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 14.3 to 15.4) lower in the group that received intensive treatment than in the group that received standard treatment. Mean PCS, MCS, and PHQ‐9 scores were relatively stable over a median of 3 years of follow‐up, with no significant differences between the two treatment groups. No significant differences between the treatment groups were noted when participants were stratified according to baseline measures of physical or cognitive function. Satisfaction with blood‐pressure care was high in both treatment groups, and we found no significant difference in adherence to blood‐pressure medications. CONCLUSIONS Patient‐reported outcomes among participants who received intensive treatment, which targeted a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, were similar to those among participants who received standard treatment, including among participants with decreased physical or cognitive function. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; SPRINT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01206062.)
Nephron | 2000
A. Ahsan Ejaz; Peter M. Fitzpatrick; William E. Haley; Andrzej Wasiluk; Alan J. Durkin; Prince K. Zachariah
Adverse effects of amlodipine besylate, a widely used antihypertensive medication, include peripheral edema, flushing, headache, pruritus, and rash. An adverse renal effect attributable to the medication has hitherto not been reported in the literature. We herein report a case of amlodipine besylate induced acute interstitial nephritis.
Clinical and Experimental Hypertension | 2013
Matthew R. Elliott; Jose M. Soto Soto; William E. Haley; Peter M. Fitzpatrick; Jamie P. Dwyer
From 88 subjects with labile high blood pressure (LHBP), we collected blood pressure variability (BPV) and assessed relationships with age, medications, and nocturnal pattern via ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The average age of the subjects was 64 ± 13 years and they were on 1.5 ± 1.3 antihypertensives. BPV did not differ diurnally and was not influenced by medication. Aging associates with increasing daytime systolic but not diastolic BPV, with increasing nighttime systolic BP, and decreasing diastolic BP diurnally. Subjects had widened pulse pressure and abnormal diurnal pattern with age. Further studies are needed to stratify an individuals risk associated with LHBP.
Case Reports | 2018
Tatiana Thom; Deanne Leonard; Peter M. Fitzpatrick; Nabeel Aslam
Acute appendicitis in peritoneal dialysis patients generally presents as abdominal pain and cloudy dialysate. We report a case of acute appendicitis in a peritoneal dialysis patient that presented as poor dialysate fluid drainage and an abnormal abdominal X-ray showing breakage in the continuity of the catheter. Catheter dysfunction in this case was caused by acute appendicitis leading to the formation of adhesions with peritoneal dialysis catheter trapped in it. This resulted in radiological appearance of catheter breakage, although catheter itself was intact. Clinicians should be aware of this rare presentation of acute appendicitis—poor drain alarm and radiological appearance of catheter discontinuity.
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2004
Fernando C. Fervenza; Peter M. Fitzpatrick; J. I. Mertz; Stephen B. Erickson; Scott P. Liggett; Sandy Popham; Daniel N. Wochos; Arkady Synhavsky; Steven Hippler; Timothy S. Larson; Stephanie M. Bagniewski; Jorge A. Velosa
Nephron | 1999
A. Ahsan Ejaz; Peter M. Fitzpatrick; Alan J. Durkin; Andrzej Wasiluk; William E. Haley; Melissa J. Goalen; Todd S. Ing; Prince K. Zachariah
The American Journal of Medicine | 1989
Peter M. Fitzpatrick; Stephen J. Swensen