Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter M. Jokich is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter M. Jokich.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2013

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening

Martha B. Mainiero; Ana P. Lourenco; Mary C. Mahoney; Mary S. Newell; Lisa Bailey; Lora D. Barke; Carl J. D'Orsi; Jennifer A. Harvey; Mary Katherine Hayes; Phan Tuong Huynh; Peter M. Jokich; Su-Ju Lee; Constance D. Lehman; David A. Mankoff; Joshua Nepute; Samir B. Patel; Handel E. Reynolds; M. Linda Sutherland; Bruce G. Haffty

Mammography is the recommended method for breast cancer screening of women in the general population. However, mammography alone does not perform as well as mammography plus supplemental screening in high-risk women. Therefore, supplemental screening with MRI or ultrasound is recommended in selected high-risk populations. Screening breast MRI is recommended in women at high risk for breast cancer on the basis of family history or genetic predisposition. Ultrasound is an option for those high-risk women who cannot undergo MRI. Recent literature also supports the use of breast MRI in some women of intermediate risk, and ultrasound may be an option for intermediate-risk women with dense breasts. There is insufficient evidence to support the use of other imaging modalities, such as thermography, breast-specific gamma imaging, positron emission mammography, and optical imaging, for breast cancer screening. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review includes an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2013

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Palpable Breast Masses

Jennifer A. Harvey; Mary C. Mahoney; Mary S. Newell; Lisa Bailey; Lora D. Barke; Carl D’Orsi; Mary Katherine Hayes; Peter M. Jokich; Su-Ju Lee; Constance D. Lehman; Martha B. Mainiero; David A. Mankoff; Samir B. Patel; Handel E. Reynolds; M. Linda Sutherland; Bruce G. Haffty

A palpable breast mass is one of the most common presenting features of breast carcinoma. However, the clinical features are frequently nonspecific. Imaging performed before biopsy is helpful in characterizing the nature of the mass. For women with clinically detected breast masses, the vast majority will require evaluation with ultrasound. Diagnostic mammography is the initial imaging modality of choice for women aged ≥ 40 years; ultrasound is typically necessary unless a definitively benign mass is identified as the etiology of the clinical finding. For evaluating women aged <30 years and women who are pregnant or lactating, ultrasound is used for initial evaluation. For women aged 30 to 39 years, either ultrasound or diagnostic mammography may be used for initial evaluation. MRI is rarely indicated to evaluate a clinically detected finding. Biopsy is indicated for masses with suspicious features. Short-term follow-up is a reasonable alternative to biopsy for solid masses with probably benign features suggesting fibroadenoma. Correlation between imaging and the clinical finding is essential. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2014

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Stage I Breast Cancer: Initial Workup and Surveillance for Local Recurrence and Distant Metastases in Asymptomatic Women

Linda Moy; Mary S. Newell; Mary C. Mahoney; Lisa Bailey; Lora D. Barke; Selin Carkaci; Carl D’Orsi; Sharad Goyal; Bruce G. Haffty; Jennifer A. Harvey; Mary Katherine Hayes; Peter M. Jokich; Su-Ju Lee; Martha B. Mainiero; David A. Mankoff; Samir B. Patel; Monica M. Yepes

Women newly diagnosed with stage 1 breast cancer have an early-stage disease that can be effectively treated. Evidence provides little justification for performing imaging to exclude metastasis in asymptomatic women with stage I breast cancer. No differences have been found in survival or quality of life in women regardless of whether they underwent initial workup for metastatic disease. These women generally prefer intensive follow-up to detect an early recurrence. However, survival rates do not differ between women who obtain intensive screening and surveillance, with imaging and laboratory studies, and women who undergo testing only as a result of development of symptoms or findings on clinical examinations. In addition, quality of life is similar for women who undergo intensive surveillance compared with those who do not. American Society of Clinical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines state that annual mammography is the only imaging examination that should be performed to detect a localized breast recurrence in asymptomatic patients. Additional imaging may be needed if the patient has locoregional symptoms. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review by the panel include extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures. When evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2016

Original articleACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening

Martha B. Mainiero; Ana P. Lourenco; Mary C. Mahoney; Mary S. Newell; Lisa Bailey; Lora D. Barke; Carl J. D’Orsi; Jennifer A. Harvey; Mary Katherine Hayes; Phan Tuong Huynh; Peter M. Jokich; Su-Ju Lee; Constance D. Lehman; David A. Mankoff; Joshua Nepute; Samir B. Patel; Handel E. Reynolds; M. Linda Sutherland; Bruce G. Haffty

Mammography is the recommended method for breast cancer screening of women in the general population. However, mammography alone does not perform as well as mammography plus supplemental screening in high-risk women. Therefore, supplemental screening with MRI or ultrasound is recommended in selected high-risk populations. Screening breast MRI is recommended in women at high risk for breast cancer on the basis of family history or genetic predisposition. Ultrasound is an option for those high-risk women who cannot undergo MRI. Recent literature also supports the use of breast MRI in some women of intermediate risk, and ultrasound may be an option for intermediate-risk women with dense breasts. There is insufficient evidence to support the use of other imaging modalities, such as thermography, breast-specific gamma imaging, positron emission mammography, and optical imaging, for breast cancer screening. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review includes an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2015

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Evaluation of the Symptomatic Male Breast.

Martha B. Mainiero; Ana P. Lourenco; Lora D. Barke; Amy Argus; Lisa Bailey; Selin Carkaci; Carl D’Orsi; Edward D. Green; Susan O. Holley; Peter M. Jokich; Su-Ju Lee; Mary C. Mahoney; Linda Moy; Priscilla J. Slanetz; Sunita Trikha; Monica M. Yepes; Mary S. Newell

Most male breast problems are benign, and men with typical symptoms of gynecomastia or pseudogynecomastia do not usually need imaging. When a differentiation between benign disease and breast cancer cannot be made on the basis of clinical findings or when the clinical findings are suspicious for breast cancer, imaging is indicated. Mammography is useful in both identifying cancer and obviating the need for biopsy in patients for whom a benign mammographic impression confirms the clinical impression. However, because of the relationship of breast cancer to increasing age, age-based protocols that do not include mammography have been developed. For men with an indeterminate palpable mass, begin with ultrasound if the patient is <25 years of age, because breast cancer is highly unlikely. Mammography should be performed if ultrasound is suspicious. For men ≥25 years of age or having a highly concerning physical examination, usually begin with mammography; ultrasound is useful if mammography is inconclusive or suspicious. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals, and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2012

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Stage I Breast Carcinoma

Phan Tuong Huynh; Sergy Lemeshko; Mary C. Mahoney; Mary S. Newell; Lisa Bailey; Lora D. Barke; Carl J. D'Orsi; Jennifer A. Harvey; Mary Katherine Hayes; Peter M. Jokich; Su-Ju Lee; Constance D. Lehman; Martha B. Mainiero; David A. Mankoff; Samir B. Patel; Handel E. Reynolds; M. Linda Sutherland; Bruce G. Haffty

Stage I breast carcinoma is classified when an invasive breast carcinoma is ≤2 cm in diameter (T1), with no regional (axillary) lymph node metastases (N0) and no distant metastases (M0). The most common sites for metastases from breast cancer are the skeleton, lung, liver, and brain. In general, women and health care professionals prefer intensive screening and surveillance after a diagnosis of breast cancer. Screening protocols include conventional imaging such as chest radiography, bone scan, ultrasound of the liver, and MRI of brain. It is uncertain whether PET/CT will serve as a replacement for current imaging technologies. However, there are no survival or quality-of-life differences for women who undergo intensive screening and surveillance after a diagnosis of stage I breast carcinoma compared with those who do not. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2007

Patterns of failure after MammoSite brachytherapy partial breast irradiation : A detailed analysis

Sea Chen; Adam Dickler; Michael C. Kirk; Anand P. Shah; Peter M. Jokich; Gene Solmos; Jonathan B. Strauss; Kambiz Dowlatshahi; Cam Nguyen; Katherine L. Griem


Archives of Surgery | 1987

Cytologic diagnosis of occult breast lesions using stereotaxic needle aspiration. A preliminary report.

Kambiz Dowlatshahi; Peter M. Jokich; Robert Schmidt; Marluce Bibbo; Peter J. Dawson


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2015

Breast Imaging Second Opinions Impact Surgical Management

Tara Spivey; Kjirsten Carlson; Imke Janssen; Thomas R. Witt; Peter M. Jokich; Andrea Madrigrano


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2017

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Pain

Peter M. Jokich; Lisa Bailey; Carl D’Orsi; Edward D. Green; Anna I. Holbrook; Su-Ju Lee; Ana P. Lourenco; Martha B. Mainiero; Linda Moy; Karla A. Sepulveda; Priscilla J. Slanetz; Sunita Trikha; Monica M. Yepes; Mary S. Newell

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter M. Jokich's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisa Bailey

American College of Surgeons

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Su-Ju Lee

University of Cincinnati

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Samir B. Patel

Memorial Hospital of South Bend

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge