Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter M. King is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter M. King.


The Clinical Journal of Pain | 2003

A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Amudha S. Poobalan; Julie Bruce; W. Cairns S. Smith; Peter M. King; Z. H. Krukowski; W Alastair Chambers

BackgroundChronic pain was believed to be a recognized but infrequent complication after inguinal hernia repair. Evidence suggests that patients with chronic pain place a considerable burden on health services. However, few scientific data on chronic pain after this common elective operation are available. ObjectivesTo review the frequency of chronic pain and to discuss etiological theories and current treatment options for patients with chronic post herniorrhaphy pain. Materials and MethodsAll studies of postoperative pain after inguinal hernia repair with a minimum follow-up period of 3 months, published between 1987 and 2000, were critically reviewed. Results and DiscussionThe frequency of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair was found to be as high as 54%, much more than previously reported. Quality of life of these patients is affected. Chronic pain is reported less often after laparoscopic and mesh repairs. Recurrent hernia repair, preoperative pain, day case surgery, delayed onset of symptoms, and high pain scores in the first week after surgery, however, were identified to be risk factors for the development of chronic pain. Definition of chronic pain was not explicit in the majority of the reviewed studies. Accurate evaluation of the frequency of chronic pain will require standardization of definition and methods of assessment. Prospective studies are required to define the role of risk factors identified in this review.


BMJ | 2008

Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis

Iain McCallum; Peter M. King; Julie Bruce

Objective To determine the relative effects of open healing compared with primary closure for pilonidal sinus and optimal closure method (midline v off-midline). Design Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Cochrane register of controlled trials, Cochrane Wounds Group specialised trials register, Medline (1950-2007), Embase, and CINAHL bibliographic databases, without language restrictions. Data extraction Primary outcomes were time (days) to healing, surgical site infection, and recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were time to return to work, other complications and morbidity, cost, length of hospital stay, and wound healing rate. Study selection Randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus in patients aged 14 years or more. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and assessed for quality. Meta-analyses used fixed and random effects models, dichotomous data were reported as relative risks or Peto odds ratios and continuous data are given as mean differences; all with 95% confidence intervals. Results 18 trials (n=1573) were included. 12 trials compared open healing with primary closure. Time to healing was quicker after primary closure although data were unsuitable for aggregation. Rates of surgical site infection did not differ; recurrence was less likely to occur after open healing (relative risk 0.42, 0.26 to 0.66). 14 patients would require their wound to heal by open healing to prevent one recurrence. Six trials compared surgical closure methods (midline v off-midline). Wounds took longer to heal after midline closure than after off-midline closure (mean difference 5.4 days, 95% confidence interval 2.3 to 8.5), rate of infection was higher (relative risk 4.70, 95% confidence interval 1.93 to 11.45), and risk of recurrence higher (Peto odds ratio 4.95, 95% confidence interval 2.18 to 11.24). Nine patients would need to be treated by an off-midline procedure to prevent one surgical site infection and 11 would need to be treated to prevent one recurrence. Conclusions Wounds heal more quickly after primary closure than after open healing but at the expense of increased risk of recurrence. Benefits were clearly shown with off-midline closure compared with midline closure. Off-midline closure should become standard management for pilonidal sinus when closure is the desired surgical option.


European Journal of Pain | 2012

Psychological risk factors for chronic post-surgical pain after inguinal hernia repair surgery: A prospective cohort study

Rachael Powell; Marie Johnston; W. C. Smith; Peter M. King; W.A. Chambers; Z. H. Krukowski; Lorna McKee; Julie Bruce

A significant proportion of patients experience chronic post‐surgical pain (CPSP) following inguinal hernia surgery. Psychological models are useful in predicting acute pain after surgery, and in predicting the transition from acute to chronic pain in non‐surgical contexts. This is a prospective cohort study to investigate psychological (cognitive and emotional) risk factors for CPSP after inguinal hernia surgery. Participants were asked to complete questionnaires before surgery and 1 week and 4 months after surgery. Data collected before surgery and 1 week after surgery were used to predict pain at 4 months. Psychological risk factors assessed included anxiety, depression, fear‐avoidance, activity avoidance, catastrophizing, worry about the operation, activity expectations, perceived pain control and optimism. The study included 135 participants; follow‐up questionnaires were returned by 119 (88.1%) and 115 (85.2%) participants at 1 week and 4 months after surgery respectively. The incidence of CPSP (pain at 4 months) was 39.5%. After controlling for age, body mass index and surgical variables (e.g. anaesthetic, type of surgery and mesh type used), lower pre‐operative optimism was an independent risk factor for CPSP at 4 months; lower pre‐operative optimism and lower perceived control over pain at 1 week after surgery predicted higher pain intensity at 4 months. No emotional variables were independently predictive of CPSP. Further research should target these cognitive variables in pre‐operative psychological preparation for surgery.


Rehabilitation Psychology | 2013

Rehabilitation following surgery: Clinical and psychological predictors of activity limitations

Rachael Powell; Marie Johnston; W. Cairns S. Smith; Peter M. King; W Alastair Chambers; Lorna McKee; Julie Bruce

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE Activity limitations following surgery are common, and patients may have an extended period of pain and rehabilitation. Inguinal hernia surgery is a common elective procedure. This study incorporated fear-avoidance models in investigating cognitive and emotional variables as potential risk factors for activity limitations 4 months after inguinal hernia surgery. METHOD This was a prospective cohort study, predicting activity limitations 4 months postoperatively (Time 3 [T3]) from measures taken before surgery (Time 1, [T1]) and 1 week after surgery (Time 2 [T2]). The sample size at T1 was 135; response rates were 89% and 84% at T2 and T3 respectively. Questionnaires included measures of catastrophizing, fear of movement, depression, anxiety, optimism, perceived control over pain, pain, and activity limitations. Biomedical and surgical variables were recorded. Predictors of T3 activity limitations from T1 and T2 were examined in hierarchical multiple regression equations. RESULTS Over half of participants (57.7%) reported activity limitations due to their hernia at 4 months post-surgery. Higher activity limitation levels were significantly predicted by older age, higher preoperative activity limitations, higher preoperative anxiety, and more severe postoperative pain and depression scores. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS Interventions to reduce preoperative anxiety and postoperative depression may lead to reduced 4-month activity limitations. However, the additional variance explained by psychological variables was low (ΔR² = 0.05). Our models, which included biomedical and surgical variables, accounted for less than 50% of the variance in activity limitations overall. Therefore, further investigation of psychological variables, particularly cognitions related specifically to activity behavior, would be merited.


Health Psychology Research | 2013

Post-surgical pain, physical activity and satisfaction with the decision to undergo hernia surgery: a prospective qualitative investigation

Rachael Powell; Lorna McKee; Peter M. King; Julie Bruce

Surgical repair is a common treatment for inguinal hernias but a substantial number of patients experience chronic pain after surgery. As some patients are pain-free on presentation, it is important to investigate whether patients perceive the treatment to be beneficial. The present study used qualitative methods to explore experiences of pain, activity limitations and satisfaction with treatment as people underwent surgery and recovery. Twenty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted. Seven participants were interviewed longitudinally: before surgery and two weeks and four months post-surgery. Ten further participants with residual pain four months post-surgery were interviewed once. Semi-structured interviews included experience and perception of pain; activity limitations; reasons for having surgery; satisfaction with the decision to undergo surgery. A thematic analysis was conducted. Pain did not cause concern when perceived as part of the usual surgery and recovery processes. Activity was limited to avoid damage to the hernia site rather than to avoid pain. None of the participants reported dissatisfaction with the decision to have surgery; reducing the risk of life-threatening complications associated with untreated hernias was considered important. These findings suggest that people regarded surgical treatment as worthwhile, despite chronic post-surgical pain. Further research should ascertain whether patients are aware of the actual risk of complications associated with conservative rather than surgical management of inguinal hernia.


International Journal of Surgery Case Reports | 2012

Preservation of small bowel with the selective use of heparin and second look laparotomy in acute mesenteric ischaemia: A case report

Dina Fouad; Shayanthan Nanthakumaran; Henry G. Watson; Colin Millar; Peter M. King

INTRODUCTION Acute mesenteric ischaemia may occur due to mesenteric arterial embolus, thrombosis, non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia or venous thrombosis resulting in ischaemia of the bowel wall. PRESENTATION OF CASE A 41year old woman presented with worsening abdominal pain, decreased appetite, nausea and vomiting. Examination revealed right lower quadrant tenderness. Investigations revealed elevation of her inflammatory markers. At laparotomy two separate segments of ischaemic but potentially viable small bowel were identified secondary to mesenteric venous thrombosis. Bowel salvage was attempted with the use of intravenous unfractionated heparin and this was confirmed following a second look laparotomy. DISCUSSION Despite a normal platelet count at presentation a diagnosis of JAK-2 positive essential thrombocythaemia was made thus explaining the acquired prothrombotic state underlying the venous thrombosis. The selective use of intravenous unfractionated heparin and second look laparotomy may provide a means for bowel preservation in these cases. CONCLUSION This case highlights the potential of bowel salvage can be achieved following an episode of acute mesenteric ischaemia with the use of intravenous unfractionated heparin and selective second look laparotomy and the importance of considering underlying myeloproliferative disease in such cases even in the absence of a thrombocytosis at presentation.


European Journal of Pain | 2013

Psychological risk factors for chronic post-surgical pain after inguinal hernia repair surgery: A prospective cohort study (vol 16, pg 600, 2012): corrigendum

Rachael Powell; Marie Johnston; W. C. Smith; Peter M. King; W.A. Chambers; Z. H. Krukowski; Lorna McKee; Julie Bruce

Reference numbers [36] and [37] were switched in the print and original online versions. The correct references are: [36] Y. L. Chiu, A. Ali, C. Y. Chu, H. Cao, T. M. Rana, Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 1165–1175. [37] J. Zhou, J. Wu, N. Hafdi, J.-P. Behr, P. Erbacher, L. Peng, Chem. Commun. (Cambridge) 2006, 2362–2364. We apologize for any inconvenience and thank Dr. Ling Peng for bringing this matter to our attention. H. Baigude, T. M. Rana


Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2010

Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.

Ahmed Alkhamis; Iain McCallum; Peter M. King; Julie Bruce


Surgery | 2006

A United Kingdom survey of surgical technique and handling practice of inguinal canal structures during hernia surgery.

Rajan Ravindran; Julie Bruce; Debasish Debnath; Amudha S. Poobalan; Peter M. King


Archive | 2008

review and meta-analysis after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic Healing by primary closure versus open healing

Iain McCallum; Peter M. King; Julie Bruce

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter M. King's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lorna McKee

University of Aberdeen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rachael Powell

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Iain McCallum

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W. C. Smith

University of Aberdeen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge