Peter M. Wehmeier

Effect of atomoxetine on quality of life and family burden: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in children and adolescents with ADHD and comorbid oppositional defiant or conduct disorder

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of atomoxetine on quality of life (QoL) and family burden in children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and comorbid oppositional defiant (ODD) or conduct disorder (CD).MethodsThis secondary analysis was based on a randomized, double-blind, 9-week study of atomoxetine (target dose 1.2xa0mg/kg body weight) versus placebo. The study included 180 patients (atomoxetine 121, placebo 59), aged 6–17xa0years. QoL was measured using the KINDL-R questionnaire. The total score encompasses six dimensions (or subscales) measuring QoL in terms of “physical well-being”, “emotional well-being”, “self-esteem”, “friends”, “family”, and “school”. Family burden of illness was measured using the FaBel questionnaire.ResultsWith atomoxetine, the KINDL-R total score improved significantly (Pxa0=xa00.021) more than with placebo. This improvement also applied to the subscales except for “physical well-being” (opposite effect) and “school” (no effect). No significant treatment group differences were seen on the FaBel questionnaire. No differences were found between the fast and slow titration groups in terms of ADHD, ODD, and disruptive behavior severity. Furthermore, no such differences were observed for QoL and family burden.ConclusionsThis study suggests positive effects of atomoxetine on quality of life, as measured by the KINDL-R scores on emotional well-being, self-esteem, friends and family, in children and adolescents with ADHD and comorbid ODD/CD. No significant treatment effects were seen on family burden, as measured by FaBel total score.

Differences between children and adolescents in treatment response to atomoxetine and the correlation between health-related quality of life and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder core symptoms: Meta-analysis of five atomoxetine trials

ObjectivesTo explore the influence of age on treatment responses to atomoxetine and to assess the relationship between core symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) outcomes.Data SourcesData from five similar clinical trials of atomoxetine in the treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD were included in this meta-analysis.Study SelectionAtomoxetine studies that used the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) and the Child Health and Illness Profile Child Edition (CHIP-CE) as outcome measures were selected.InterventionsTreatment with atomoxetine.Main Outcome MeasuresTreatment group differences (atomoxetine vs placebo) in terms of total score, domains, and subdomains of the CHIP-CE were compared across age groups, and correlations between ADHD-RS scores and CHIP-CE scores were calculated by age.ResultsData of 794 subjects (611 children, 183 adolescents) were pooled. At baseline, adolescents showed significantly (p < 0.05) greater impairment compared with children in the Family Involvement, Satisfaction with Self, and Academic Performance subdomains of the CHIP-CE. Treatment effect of atomoxetine was significant in both age groups for the Risk Avoidance domain and its subdomains. There was a significant age-treatment interaction with greater efficacy seen in adolescents in both the Risk Avoidance domain and the Threats to Achievement subdomain. Correlations between ADHD-RS and CHIP-CE scores were generally low at baseline and moderate in change from baseline and were overall similar in adolescents and children.ConclusionsAtomoxetine was effective in improving some aspects of HR-QoL in both age groups. Correlations between core symptoms of ADHD and HR-QoL were low to moderate.

Olanzapine and clozapine differently affect sleep in patients with schizophrenia: Results from a double-blind, polysomnographic study and review of the literature

Schizophrenia is associated with impaired sleep continuity. The second generation antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine have been reported to improve sleep continuity but also to rarely induce restless legs syndrome (RLS). The aims of this randomized double-blind study were to compare the effects of clozapine and olanzapine on sleep and the occurrence of RLS. Therefore, polysomnographies were recorded and RLS symptoms were assessed in 30 patients with schizophrenia before and after 2, 4 and 6 weeks of treatment with either clozapine or olanzapine. Treatment with both antipsychotics increased total sleep time, sleep period time and sleep efficiency and decreased sleep onset latency. These changes were similar in both groups, occurred during the first 2 treatment weeks and were sustained. For example, sleep efficiency increased from 83% (olanzapine) and 82% (clozapine) at baseline to 95% at week 2 and 97% at week 6 in both treatment groups. Sleep architecture was differently affected: clozapine caused a significantly stronger increase of stage 2 sleep (44%) than olanzapine (11%) but olanzapine a significantly stronger increase of REM-sleep. Olanzapine caused an 80% increase of slow wave sleep whereas clozapine caused a 6% decrease. No patient reported any of 4 RLS defining symptoms at baseline. During treatment, 1 patient of each group reported at one visit all 4 symptoms, i.e. met the diagnosis of an RLS. In conclusion, sleep continuity similarly improved and sleep architecture changed more physiologically with olanzapine. Neither of the antipsychotics induced RLS symptoms that were clinically relevant.

Sleep propensity at daytime as assessed by Multiple Sleep Latency Tests (MSLT) in patients with schizophrenia increases with clozapine and olanzapine

Sleep propensity at daytime has not been investigated in untreated patients with schizophrenia. Furthermore, while the antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine are considered to frequently cause sleepiness or sedation, this has not been objectified yet. Therefore, 30 patients with schizophrenia were included in this randomized, double-blind study. Sleep propensity was assessed before and after 2, 4 and 6 weeks of treatment with either clozapine or olanzapine using a Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT); in the MSLT, sleep latencies of 5 nap opportunities of 20 min during daytime are averaged. In addition, the number of sleep onsets was recorded. Mean sleep latency in untreated schizophrenic patients was 16.2 ± 0.8 min at baseline. Both antipsychotics induced an increase of sleep propensity as indicated by a shortened sleep latency and more sleep onsets during the treatment period as compared to baseline. These effects were strongest in the morning. Four patients receiving clozapine and 3 patients receiving olanzapine reported subjective sleepiness, in all but one commencing in the first treatment week and persisting until study end. While the mean sleep latency during treatment was significantly shorter in these patients (12.3 ± 0.8 min) than in those without subjective sleepiness (14.9 ± 0.7 min), a short sleep latency was not necessarily associated with subjective sleepiness. In conclusion, mean sleep latency was >36% longer (i.e. sleep propensity was lower) in untreated patients with schizophrenia than in healthy subjects previously consistently reported. Furthermore, clozapine and olanzapine increased sleep propensity in schizophrenic patients. A minority of patients reported subjective sleepiness.

Treatment compliance or medication adherence in children and adolescents on ADHD medication in clinical practice: results from the COMPLY observational study.

Although the efficacy and tolerability of ADHD medications have been investigated fairly extensively, there are very few data comparing the different types of medication (e.g. psychostimulants, non-stimulants) in terms of medication adherence. The primary research objective of the COMPLY observational study was to evaluate medication adherence (i.e. compliance) over 1xa0year in children and adolescents with ADHD in a routine clinical setting. COMPLY was a prospective 12-month, observational, open-label study that included children and adolescents, aged 6–17xa0years, with ADHD. Medication adherence (i.e. compliance) was measured using the Pediatric Compliance Self-Rating (PCSR) instrument and using items 1–4 of the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS). A total of 504 patients were enrolled. At baseline, 252 patients (50.0xa0%) were prescribed non-stimulant (atomoxetine) medication and 247 patients (49.0xa0%) were prescribed psychostimulant medication. Both types of medication were prescribed concomitantly in five patients (1.0xa0%). After 12xa0months, 123 patients (48.8xa0%) were taking atomoxetine and 176 patients (71.3xa0%) were taking psychostimulants. Adherence (PCSR score ≥5) was present in both groups (atomoxetine: 67.5xa0%; psychostimulant: 74.2xa0%) throughout the observation period. MARS scores declined over time in both groups (atomoxetine: from 3.7 to 2.9; psychostimulant: from 3.6 to 3.1), indicating a deterioration in adherence. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of medication adherence between the two groups.

Psychometric properties of the quality of life scale Child Health and Illness Profile-Child Edition in a combined analysis of five atomoxetine trials.

Our aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the generic quality of life (QoL) scale Child Health and Illness Profile-Child Edition (CHIP-CE) by means of a combined analysis of atomoxetine clinical trials in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Individual patient-level data from five clinical trials were included in the combined analysis. Psychometric properties of the CHIP-CE were explored in terms of internal consistency and structure. Patients (nxa0=xa0794) aged between 6 and 15xa0years (mean 9.7) with mean baseline ADHD Rating Scale of 41.8xa0±xa08.04 were included. On average, 0.7 (SD 2.23) items were missing for the whole CHIP-CE. The internal consistency of the CHIP-CE assessed by Cronbach’s alpha was good for all sub-domains at baseline and at endpoint. Considerable ceiling effects were only observed for the “restricted activity” sub-domain. No considerable floor effects were seen. The factor analysis supported the 12-factor solution for the sub-domains, but not the 5-factor solution for the domains. Our analyses were based on a large sample of non-US patients which allowed the measurement of clear changes in QoL over time. The results support that the CHIP-CE scale is psychometrically robust over time in terms of internal consistency and structure.

Does Stimulant Pretreatment Modify Atomoxetine Effects on Core Symptoms of ADHD in Children Assessed by Quantitative Measurement Technology

Objective: To compare the reduction of ADHD symptoms under atomoxetine (ATX) in patients with and without pretreatment with a stimulant medication using a computer-based Continuous Performance Test (cb-CPT) combined with an infrared motion tracking (MT) device. Method: Double-blind, placebo-controlled study in ADHD patients (6-12 years) treated with ATX (target dose = 1.2 mg/kg per day). The cb-CPT/MT scores were analyzed using ANCOVA (last observation carried forward). Results: Patient data (n = 125) suggested a differential ATX treatment effect between pretreated and stimulant-naïve patients in terms of three cb-CPT/MT parameters. Conclusion: This secondary analysis provided evidence that ATX reduced ADHD symptom severity measured by cb-CPT/MT parameters regardless of stimulant pretreatment. A few differential effects were seen based on the cb-CPT/MT. However, no clear pattern could be identified and, overall, the observed differences have no larger clinical relevance. The ATX effect in this study seemed to be largely independent of any previous exposure to stimulants.

Health-related quality of life in ADHD: a pooled analysis of gender differences in five atomoxetine trials

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with considerable impairment in health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Atomoxetine has been found to improve HR-QoL in both children and adolescents. However, there is scarcity of data on gender differences in treatment responses to ADHD medications. This pooled analysis of five atomoxetine trials aimed to evaluate treatment differences with respect to HR-QoL and ADHD symptoms across genders. Data from 5 clinical atomoxetine trials (4 from Europe and 1 from Canada) with similar inclusion and exclusion criteria and similar durations (8- to 12-week follow-up) were included in the pooled analysis. All studies included the Child Health and Illness Profile—Child Edition (CHIP-CE) Parent Report Form. In addition, correlations between HR-QoL and ADHD core symptoms were compared between girls and boys. Data from 136 girls and 658 boys (mean age: 9.6 and 9.7xa0years, respectively) were pooled. Boys and girls were similarly impaired at baseline with minor differences in some of the subdomains. Treatment effect of atomoxetine was significant in both groups for the Risk Avoidance domain and its subdomains. No gender effect with both clinical and statistical significance was found for treatment outcome. Correlations between ADHD Rating Scale and CHIP-CE scores were similar in both genders and were generally low at baseline and moderate at endpoint and for the change from baseline to endpoint. Atomoxetine was effective in improving some aspects of HR-QoL in both genders without any significant differences across genders. Correlations between core symptoms of ADHD and HR-QoL were low to moderate in both boys and girls.

Minor differences in ADHD-related difficulties between boys and girls treated with atomoxetine for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Atomoxetine may improve ADHD-related difficulties and hence the quality of life (QoL) in children and adolescents. Perception of these difficulties may differ with the rater perspective (patient, parent, physician) or patients’ sex. The objective of this study was to investigate QoL as reflected by perceived ADHD-related difficulties perceived from these three perspectives and compare boys and girls. Patients aged 6–17 with ADHD were treated with atomoxetine (target dose 0.5–1.2xa0mg/kg/day) in two studies. In both studies, ADHD-related difficulties were assessed after 8 and 24xa0weeks using the Global Impression of Perceived Difficulties (GIPD) instrument, which can be taken to reflect the patient’s QoL from the three perspectives. Data from the two studies were combined and analyzed together in order to compare boys and girls. Four hundred and twenty-one patients were treated with atomoxetine, 338 boys and 83 girls. Three hundred and fifty-five patients completed the 8-week study period. QoL, as reflected by perceived ADHD-related difficulties (measured with GIPD), improved over time. Mean GIPD total scores showed a similar course over time for all rater groups, although the patients rated the degree of difficulties significantly lower than parents and physicians. The sexes did not differ significantly in mean GIPD total scores. The GIPD scores over time suggest that patients’ QoL, as reflected by perceived ADHD-related difficulties, improved with time on atomoxetine. However, improvement did not differ significantly between boys and girls. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers NCT00191516 and NCT00191737.

Findings from the observational COMPLY study in children and adolescents with ADHD: core symptoms, ADHD-related difficulties, and patients’ emotional expression during psychostimulant or nonstimulant ADHD treatment

AbstractnThe aim of this study was to explore the course of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) core symptoms, ADHD-related difficulties, and emotional expression during ADHD pharmacotherapy and associations between them. This prospective, observational study examines pediatric patients with ADHD who newly initiated stimulant, atomoxetine or a combination of both treatments. Data were collected at baseline; weeks 1, 2, and 4; and months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Physicians rated ADHD core symptoms using the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS); patients, parents, and physicians rated ADHD-related difficulties using the Global Impression of Perceived Difficulties (GIPD) Scale; and patients and parents rated emotional expression using the Expression of Emotion Scale for Children (EESC). Results were analyzed using mixed model repeated measures. Associations are presented by Spearman’s correlations. Overall, 504 patients, mean age 9.6xa0years, 72.6xa0% males, were analyzed. Fifty percent of patients started atomoxetine, 49.0xa0% stimulant and 1xa0% a combination of both. ADHD-RS, GIPD, and EESC scores decreased significantly in both monotherapy groups. Correlations between ADHD-RS and parent- or physician-rated GIPD scores were at-best moderate and increased over time but remained low to moderate for patient-rated GIPD [patient, rxa0=xa00.43 (95xa0% CI 0.34, 0.51); parent, rxa0=xa00.58 (0.50, 0.64); physician, rxa0=xa00.55 (0.48, 0.62)]. Correlations between ADHD-RS and patient- or parent-rated EESC scores were low at baseline (rxa0<xa00.2) and increased over time mostly for parent ratings [patient, rxa0=xa00.35 (0.26, 0.44); parent, rxa0=xa00.41 (0.32, 0.50)]. These data support the effectiveness of ADHD pharmacotherapy. The at-best moderate correlations between ADHD core symptoms and ADHD-related difficulties or emotional expression assessed by different raters indicate potentially important patient outcomes beyond core symptoms.