Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter McKavanagh is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter McKavanagh.


European Journal of Echocardiography | 2015

A comparison of cardiac computerized tomography and exercise stress electrocardiogram test for the investigation of stable chest pain: the clinical results of the CAPP randomized prospective trial.

Peter McKavanagh; Lisa Lusk; P.A. Ball; R.M. Verghis; A.M. Agus; Tom Trinick; Ellie Duly; G Walls; M. Stevenson; B. James; A. Hamilton; Mark Harbinson; Patrick Donnelly

AIMS To determine the symptomatic and prognostic differences resulting from a novel diagnostic pathway based on cardiac computerized tomography (CT) compared with the traditional exercise stress electrocardiography test (EST) in stable chest pain patients. METHODS AND RESULTS A prospective randomized controlled trial compared selected patient outcomes in EST and cardiac CT coronary angiography groups. Five hundred patients with troponin-negative stable chest pain and without known coronary artery disease were recruited. Patients completed the Seattle Angina Questionnaires (SAQ) at baseline, 3, and 12 months to assess angina symptoms. Patients were also followed for management strategies and clinical events. Over the year 12 patients withdrew, resulting in 245 in the EST cohort and 243 in the CT cohort. There was no significant difference in baseline demographics. The CT arm had a statistical difference in angina stability and quality-of-life domains of the SAQ at 3 and12 months, suggesting less angina compared with the EST arm. In the CT arm, there was more significant disease identified and more revascularizations. Significantly, more inconclusive results were seen in the EST arm with a higher number of additional investigations ordered. There was also a longer mean time to management. There were no differences in major adverse cardiac events between the cohorts. At 1 year in the EST arm, there were more Accident and Emergency (A&E) attendances and cardiac admission. CONCLUSION Cardiac CT as an index investigation for stable chest pain improved angina symptoms and resulted in fewer investigations and re-hospitalizations compared with EST. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN52480460.


Cardiology and Therapy | 2015

A Review of Current Diagnosis, Investigation, and Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Elderly Patients

Claire McCune; Peter McKavanagh; Ian B. A. Menown

The elderly constitute a sizeable proportion of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population, and this population is continually increasing in number. Guideline-directed therapy is frequently underutilized in the elderly due to concerns about patient safety. However, studies suggest that this subgroup could benefit from many of the conventional and newer therapies available. This paper reviews current literature in the context of contemporary American and European guidance.


Heart | 2016

The cost-effectiveness of cardiac computed tomography for patients with stable chest pain

A M Agus; Peter McKavanagh; Lisa Lusk; R M Verghis; G Walls; P.A. Ball; Tom Trinick; Mark Harbinson; Patrick Donnelly

Objective To assess the cost-effectiveness of cardiac CT compared with exercise stress testing (EST) in improving the health-related quality of life of patients with stable chest pain. Methods A cost–utility analysis alongside a single-centre randomised controlled trial carried out in Northern Ireland. Patients with stable chest pain were randomised to undergo either cardiac CT assessment or EST (standard care). The main outcome measure was cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 1 year. Results Of the 500 patients recruited, 250 were randomised to cardiac CT and 250 were randomised to EST. Cardiac CT was the dominant strategy as it was both less costly (incremental total costs −£50.45; 95% CI −£672.26 to £571.36) and more effective (incremental QALYs 0.02; 95% CI −0.02 to 0.05) than EST. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY the probability of cardiac CT being cost-effective was 83%. Subgroup analyses indicated that cardiac CT appears to be most cost-effective in patients with a likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) of <30%, followed by 30%–60% and then >60%. Conclusions Cardiac CT is cost-effective compared with EST and cost-effectiveness was observed to vary with likelihood of CAD. This finding could have major implications for how patients with chest pain in the UK are assessed, however it would need to be validated in other healthcare systems. Trial registration number (ISRCTN52480460); results.


Cardiology and Therapy | 2016

A Review of the Key Clinical Trials of 2015: Results and Implications

Claire McCune; Peter McKavanagh; Ian B. A. Menown

IntroductionMultiple significant, potentially practice changing clinical trials in cardiology have been conducted and subsequently presented throughout the past year.MethodsIn this paper, the authors have reviewed and contextualized significant cardiovascular clinical trials presented at major international conferences of 2015 including American College of Cardiology, European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, American Diabetes Association, European Society of Cardiology, Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Heart Rhythm Congress, and the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.ResultsThe authors describe new trial data for heart failure (including eplerenone, finerenone, patiromer, sacubitril/valsartan, the beta 3 agonist mirabegron, sitagliptin, empagliflozin, alginate-hydrogel LV epicardial implant), anticoagulation (idarucizumab and andexanet alfa reversal agents, adherence programmes, practice in ablation), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (long-term data, valve-in-valve use, the TriGuard embolic deflecting device), patent foramen ovale closure, cardiovascular prevention (PCSK9 inhibitors, hypertension treatment) and antiplatelets strategies (extended duration therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor). Trial data are also described for contemporary technologies including the Biofreedom polymer-free drug coated stent, bioabsorbable stents, PCI strategies, left main treatment, atrial fibrillation ablation techniques, leadless pacemakers and the role of coronary computed tomographic angiography.ConclusionsThis paper summarizes and contextualizes multiple pertinent 2015 clinical trials and will be of interest to both clinicians and cardiology researchers.


Atherosclerosis | 2016

Serum- and HDL3-serum amyloid A and HDL3-LCAT activity are influenced by increased CVD-burden

Jane McEneny; Peter McKavanagh; Edmund York; N. Nadeem; Mark Harbinson; Michael Stevenson; P.A. Ball; Lisa Lusk; Thomas Trinick; Ian S. Young; Gareth J. McKay; Patrick Donnelly

BACKGROUND High density lipoproteins (HDL) protect against cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, increased serum amyloid-A (SAA) related inflammation may negate this property. This study investigated if SAA was related to CVD-burden. METHODS Subjects referred to the rapid chest pain clinic (n = 240) had atherosclerotic burden assessed by cardiac computerised tomography angiography. Subjects were classified as: no-CVD (n = 106), non-obstructive-CVD, stenosis<50% (n = 58) or moderate/significant-CVD, stenosis ≥50% (n = 76). HDL was subfractionated into HDL2 and HDL3 by rapid-ultracentrifugation. SAA-concentration was measured by ELISA and lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) activity measured by a fluorimetric assay. RESULTS We illustrated that serum-SAA and HDL3-SAA-concentration were higher and HDL3-LCAT-activity lower in the moderate/significant-CVD-group, compared to the no-CVD and non-obstructive-CVD-groups (percent differences: serum-SAA, +33% & +30%: HDL3-SAA, +65% and +39%: HDL3-LCAT, -6% & -3%; p < 0.05 for all comparisons). We also identified a positive correlation between serum-SAA and HDL3-SAA (r = 0.698; p < 0.001) and a negative correlation between HDL3-SAA and HDL3-LCAT-activity (r = -0.295; p = 0.003), while CVD-burden positively correlated with serum-SAA (r = 0.150; p < 0.05) and HDL3-SAA (r = 0.252; p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with HDL3-LCAT-activity (r = -0.182; p = 0.006). Additionally, multivariate regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, CRP and serum-SAA illustrated that HDL3-SAA was significantly associated with modifying CVD-risk of moderate/significant CVD-risk (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION This study has demonstrated increased SAA-related inflammation in subjects with moderate/significant CVD-burden, which appeared to impact on the antiatherogenic potential of HDL. We suggest that SAA may be a useful biomarker to illustrate increased CVD-burden, although this requires further investigation.


Heart | 2012

096 A comparative study of standard filtered back projection with novel iterative reconstruction techniques in cardiac CT

Peter McKavanagh; Lisa Lusk; P.A. Ball; Mark Harbinson; T Trinnick; E Duly; G Walls; S McCusker; C L McQuillan; S Shevlin; M Alkhalil; Patrick Donnelly

Background Iterative reconstruction (IR) is a novel but significant development in CT image acquisition. There have been a number of studies that have reported on the potential of IR in cardiac CT. These retrospectively applied IR in the image domain to images acquired with standard filtered back projection (FBP) techniques. This study was part of an ongoing randomised control trial [ISRCTN52480460] evaluating the cost effectiveness of cardiac CT. Methods 250 patients were prospectively enrolled to have a cardiac CT for the investigation of stable chest pain. Written and informed consent was obtained. Data acquisition were performed on a Philips Brilliance 64. The patients were divided into two groups. Cohort A underwent standard FBP imaging, and Cohort B underwent IR with Idose® (Philips, Cleveland, Ohio, USA). Within each cohort the scan parameters (kv, mAs, pitch) and reconstruction protocols (prospective or retrospective) were determined by patient characteristics. Images were assessed for noise and signal quality within regions of interest (ROI) on axial images, and subjectively for image quality by two experienced readers. Noise was defined as the SD of the measured HU, and signal as the HU mean attenuation value. The ROIs were in the ascending aorta, interventricular septum and left ventricular cavity. Subjective image quality was rated blindly using a 5-point Likert scale. Effective radiation dose (ED) of each CTCA was estimated by multiplying the dose-length product by a chest-specific conversion coefficient (κ=0.014 mSv×mGy−1×cm−1). Results Of the 250 patients enrolled 3 withdrew. 146 of the 247 subjects were male with a mean age of 57.93 (SD 9.93). Cohort A consisted of 124 patients, and cohort B 123, with no significant difference in baseline demographics. The mean dose of all FBP was 6.09 mSv, (SD 3.16) compared to an IR mean of 4.23 mSv, (SD 2.01) which was a dose saving of 1.86 mSv (30.54%). This was a significant dose reduction (p value <0.0001.) Mean image quality score obtained from the IR images was 3.67 (SD 1.04) compared to the FBP images of 3.29 (SD 1.17) p value of 0.0067. There was good agreement between the readers—κ coefficient 0.83. Cohort A consisted of 74 retrospective images and 50 prospective. Cohort B had 116 with retrospective and 7 with prospective. The mean ED for a prospective FBP was 3.50 mSv (SD 1.15), with the IR equivalent being 2.00 mSv (0.72), giving a mean dose saving of 1.50 mSv (42.86%). The mean ED for FBP retrospective studies was 7.85 mSv (SD 2.87), with the IR equivalent being 4.36 mSv (SD 1.99), with a mean dose saving of 3.49 mSv (44.46%). There was no statistical difference in noise or mean attenuation between the IR and FBP images in all three areas of interest Abstract 096 table 1.Abstract 096 Table 1 Region of interest Image noise Attenuation FBP IR p Value FBP IR p Value Ascending aorta 29.76±32.00 27.33±10.10 0.42 505.85±95.64 520.72±103.07 0.24 Interventricular septum 28.96±9.63 28.27±7.53 0.53 154.76±35.28 153.63±32.41 0.79 Left ventricle 29.78±9.36 28.55±12.39 0.38 464.27±92.50 484.07±99.38 0.11 Conclusions To our knowledge this is the first study to prospectively compare FBP with IR. It suggests that cardiac IR protocols confer a substantial radiation dose reduction without a compromise in diagnostic quality.


Archive | 2018

Utilization of PCI After Fibrinolysis

Peter McKavanagh; George Zawadowski; Warren J. Cantor

It is estimated that there are 1.5 million hospitalizations with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) per year in the United States, with 30–45% being a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presentation [2]. STEMI occurs due to an acute occlusion of an infarct-related artery (IRA) that can cause irreversible ischemia-induced myocardial necrosis within 20–60 min of onset. Untreated STEMI patients have higher mortality and poor clinical outcomes compared to those who receive a reperfusion strategy [3–10]. The mainstay of STEMI management is rapid intervention aimed at relieving the IRA thrombotic obstruction and thus reducing infarct size, preserving left ventricular function, and decreasing morbidity and mortality. In the 1980s, fibrinolysis became the standard means to achieve reperfusion. Subsequently, a number of randomized trials and meta-analyses showed that primary PCI (PPCI), when performed rapidly, was associated with improved clinical outcomes compared to fibrinolytic therapy [11–18]. However, the mortality benefit of primary PCI is reduced with treatment delays, with no benefit observed when the difference between time of fibrinolysis and time of PCI exceeds 115 min [19, 20]. Current guidelines recommend the use of fibrinolytic therapy when the time from first medical contact to PCI is anticipated to be greater than 120 min [17, 18]. Despite these recommendations, data from the US National Cardiovascular Data Registry showed that only 51% of STEMI patients transferred for primary PCI achieved the recommended first door-to-balloon time of 120 min, which was associated with increased mortality [22].


Cardiology and Therapy | 2015

The Essentials of Cardiac Computerized Tomography.

Peter McKavanagh; Gerard Walls; Claire McCune; Jonathon Malloy; Mark T. Harbinson; P.A. Ball; Patrick Donnelly

Cardiac computerized tomography (CT) has evolved from a research tool to an important diagnostic investigation in cardiology, and is now recommended in European, US, and UK guidelines. This review is designed to give the reader an overview of the current state of cardiac CT. The role of cardiac CT is multifaceted, and includes risk stratification, disease detection, coronary plaque quantification, defining congenital heart disease, planning for structural intervention, and, more recently, assessment of ischemia. This paper addresses basic principles as well as newer evidence.


Ulster Medical Journal | 2012

Evaluation of a final year work-shadowing attachment.

Peter McKavanagh; Mairead Boohan; Maurice Savage; David McCluskey; Pascal McKeown


International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2013

A comparison of Diamond Forrester and coronary calcium scores as gatekeepers for investigations of stable chest pain.

Peter McKavanagh; Lisa Lusk; P.A. Ball; Tom Trinick; Ellie Duly; Gerard Walls; Clare Orr; Mark Harbinson; Patrick Donnelly

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter McKavanagh's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Harbinson

Queen's University Belfast

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David McCluskey

Queen's University Belfast

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge