Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter Michaleas is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter Michaleas.


international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing | 2012

Dynamic distributed dimensional data model (D4M) database and computation system

Jeremy Kepner; William Bergeron; Nadya T. Bliss; Robert Bond; Chansup Byun; Gary R. Condon; Kenneth L. Gregson; Matthew Hubbell; Jonathan Kurz; Andrew McCabe; Peter Michaleas; Andrew Prout; Albert Reuther; Antonio Rosa; Charles Yee

A crucial element of large web companies is their ability to collect and analyze massive amounts of data. Tuple store databases are a key enabling technology employed by many of these companies (e.g., Google Big Table and Amazon Dynamo). Tuple stores are highly scalable and run on commodity clusters, but lack interfaces to support efficient development of mathematically based analytics. D4M (Dynamic Distributed Dimensional Data Model) has been developed to provide a mathematically rich interface to tuple stores (and structured query language “SQL” databases). D4M allows linear algebra to be readily applied to databases. Using D4M, it is possible to create composable analytics with significantly less effort than using traditional approaches. This work describes the D4M technology and its application and performance.


ieee high performance extreme computing conference | 2013

D4M 2.0 schema: A general purpose high performance schema for the Accumulo database

Jeremy Kepner; Christian Anderson; David Bestor; Bill Bergeron; Chansup Byun; Matthew Hubbell; Peter Michaleas; Julie Mullen; David O'Gwynn; Andrew Prout; Albert Reuther; Antonio Rosa; Charles Yee

Non-traditional, relaxed consistency, triple store databases are the backbone of many web companies (e.g., Google Big Table, Amazon Dynamo, and Facebook Cassandra). The Apache Accumulo database is a high performance open source relaxed consistency database that is widely used for government applications. Obtaining the full benefits of Accumulo requires using novel schemas. The Dynamic Distributed Dimensional Data Model (D4M)[http://www.mit.edu/~kepner/D4M] provides a uniform mathematical framework based on associative arrays that encompasses both traditional (i.e., SQL) and non-traditional databases. For non-traditional databases D4M naturally leads to a general purpose schema that can be used to fully index and rapidly query every unique string in a dataset. The D4M 2.0 Schema has been applied with little or no customization to cyber, bioinformatics, scientific citation, free text, and social media data. The D4M 2.0 Schema is simple, requires minimal parsing, and achieves the highest published Accumulo ingest rates. The benefits of the D4M 2.0 Schema are independent of the D4M interface. Any interface to Accumulo can achieve these benefits by using the D4M 2.0 Schema.


ieee high performance extreme computing conference | 2014

Computing on masked data: a high performance method for improving big data veracity

Jeremy Kepner; Vijay Gadepally; Peter Michaleas; Nabil Schear; Mayank Varia; Arkady Yerukhimovich; Robert K. Cunningham

The growing gap between data and users calls for innovative tools that address the challenges faced by big data volume, velocity and variety. Along with these standard three Vs of big data, an emerging fourth “V” is veracity, which addresses the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the data. Traditional cryptographic techniques that ensure the veracity of data can have overheads that are too large to apply to big data. This work introduces a new technique called Computing on Masked Data (CMD), which improves data veracity by allowing computations to be performed directly on masked data and ensuring that only authorized recipients can unmask the data. Using the sparse linear algebra of associative arrays, CMD can be performed with significantly less overhead than other approaches while still supporting a wide range of linear algebraic operations on the masked data. Databases with strong support of sparse operations, such as SciDB or Apache Accumulo, are ideally suited to this technique. Examples are shown for the application of CMD to a complex DNA matching algorithm and to database operations over social media data.


ieee high performance extreme computing conference | 2014

Achieving 100,000,000 database inserts per second using Accumulo and D4M

Jeremy Kepner; David Bestor; Bill Bergeron; Chansup Byun; Vijay Gadepally; Matthew Hubbell; Peter Michaleas; Julie Mullen; Andrew Prout; Albert Reuther; Antonio Rosa; Charles Yee

The Apache Accumulo database is an open source relaxed consistency database that is widely used for government applications. Accumulo is designed to deliver high performance on unstructured data such as graphs of network data. This paper tests the performance of Accumulo using data from the Graph500 benchmark. The Dynamic Distributed Dimensional Data Model (D4M) software is used to implement the benchmark on a 216-node cluster running the MIT SuperCloud software stack. A peak performance of over 100,000,000 database inserts per second was achieved which is 100× larger than the highest previously published value for any other database. The performance scales linearly with the number of ingest clients, number of database servers, and data size. The performance was achieved by adapting several supercomputing techniques to this application: distributed arrays, domain decomposition, adaptive load balancing, and single-program-multiple-data programming.


2012 IEEE Conference on High Performance Extreme Computing | 2012

Driving big data with big compute

Chansup Byun; David Bestor; Bill Bergeron; Matthew Hubbell; Jeremy Kepner; Andrew McCabe; Peter Michaleas; Julie Mullen; David O'Gwynn; Andrew Prout; Albert Reuther; Antonio Rosa; Charles Yee

Big Data (as embodied by Hadoop clusters) and Big Compute (as embodied by MPI clusters) provide unique capabilities for storing and processing large volumes of data. Hadoop clusters make distributed computing readily accessible to the Java community and MPI clusters provide high parallel efficiency for compute intensive workloads. Bringing the big data and big compute communities together is an active area of research. The LLGrid team has developed and deployed a number of technologies that aim to provide the best of both worlds. LLGrid MapReduce allows the map/reduce parallel programming model to be used quickly and efficiently in any language on any compute cluster. D4M (Dynamic Distributed Dimensional Data Model) provided a high level distributed arrays interface to the Apache Accumulo database. The accessibility of these technologies is assessed by measuring the effort to use these tools and is typically a few lines of code. The performance is assessed by measuring the insert rate into the Accumulo database. Using these tools a database insert rate of 4M inserts/second has been achieved on an 8 node cluster.


ieee high performance extreme computing conference | 2015

D4M: Bringing associative arrays to database engines

Vijay Gadepally; Jeremy Kepner; David Bestor; Bill Bergeron; Chansup Byun; Lauren Edwards; Matthew Hubbell; Peter Michaleas; Julie Mullen; Andrew Prout; Antonio Rosa; Charles Yee; Albert Reuther

The ability to collect and analyze large amounts of data is a growing problem within the scientific community. The growing gap between data and users calls for innovative tools that address the challenges faced by big data volume, velocity and variety. Numerous tools exist that allow users to store, query and index these massive quantities of data. Each storage or database engine comes with the promise of dealing with complex data. Scientists and engineers who wish to use these systems often quickly find that there is no single technology that offers a panacea to the complexity of information. When using multiple technologies, however, there is significant trouble in designing the movement of information between storage and database engines to support an end-to-end application along with a steep learning curve associated with learning the nuances of each underlying technology. In this article, we present the Dynamic Distributed Dimensional Data Model (D4M) as a potential tool to unify database and storage engine operations. Previous articles on D4M have showcased the ability of D4M to interact with the popular NoSQL Accumulo database. Recently however, D4M now operates on a variety of backend storage or database engines while providing a federated look to the end user through the use of associative arrays. In order to showcase how new databases may be supported by D4M, we describe the process of building the D4M-SciDB connector and present performance of this connection.


ieee high performance extreme computing conference | 2013

LLSuperCloud: Sharing HPC systems for diverse rapid prototyping

Albert Reuther; Jeremy Kepner; David Bestor; Bill Bergeron; Chansup Byun; Matthew Hubbell; Peter Michaleas; Julie Mullen; Andrew Prout; Antonio Rosa

The supercomputing and enterprise computing arenas come from very different lineages. However, the advent of commodity computing servers has brought the two arenas closer than they have ever been. Within enterprise computing, commodity computing servers have resulted in the development of a wide range of new cloud capabilities: elastic computing, virtualization, and data hosting. Similarly, the supercomputing community has developed new capabilities in heterogeneous, massively parallel hardware and software. Merging the benefits of enterprise clouds and supercomputing has been a challenging goal. Significant effort has been expended in trying to deploy supercomputing capabilities on cloud computing systems. These efforts have resulted in unreliable, low-performance solutions, which requires enormous expertise to maintain. LLSuperCloud provides a novel solution to the problem of merging enterprise cloud and supercomputing technology. More specifically LLSuperCloud reverses the traditional paradigm of attempting to deploy supercomputing capabilities on a cloud and instead deploys cloud capabilities on a supercomputer. The result is a system that can handle heterogeneous, massively parallel workloads while also providing high performance elastic computing, virtualization, and databases. The benefits of LLSuperCloud are highlighted using a mixed workload of C MPI, parallel MATLAB, Java, databases, and virtualized Web services.


hpcmp users group conference | 2005

Technology Requirements for Supporting On-Demand Interactive Grid Computing

Albert Reuther; Tim Currie; Jeremy Kepner; Hahn Kim; Andrew McCabe; Peter Michaleas; Nadya Travinin

It is increasingly being recognized that a large pool of High Performance Computing (HPC) users requires interactive, on-demand access to HPC resources. How to provide these resources is a significant technical challenge that can be addressed from two directions. The first approach is to adapt existing batch queue based HPC systems to make them more interactive. The second approach is to start with existing interactive desktop environments (e.g., MATLAB) and design a system from the ground up that allows interactive parallel computing. The Lincoln Laboratory Grid (LLGrid) project has taken the latter approach. The LLGrid system has been operational for over a year with a few hundred processors and roughly 70 users, having run over 13,000 interactive jobs and consumed approximately 10,000 processor days of computation. This paper compares the on-demand and interactive computing features of four prominent batch queuing systems: openPBS, Sun GridEngine, Condor, and LSF. It goes on to briefly describe the LLGrid system, and how interactive, on-demand computing was achieved on it by binding to a resource management system. Finally, usage characteristics of the LLGrid system are discussed.


2012 IEEE Conference on High Performance Extreme Computing | 2012

HPC-VMs: Virtual machines in high performance computing systems

Albert Reuther; Peter Michaleas; Andrew Prout; Jeremy Kepner

The concept of virtual machines dates back to the 1960s. Both IBM and MIT developed operating system features that enabled user and peripheral time sharing, the underpinnings of which were early virtual machines. Modern virtual machines present a translation layer of system devices between a guest operating system and the host operating system executing on a computer system, while isolating each of the guest operating systems from each other. 1 In the past several years, enterprise computing has embraced virtual machines to deploy a wide variety of capabilities from business management systems to email server farms. Those who have adopted virtual deployment environments have capitalized on a variety of advantages including server consolidation, service migration, and higher service reliability. But they have also ended up with some challenges including a sacrifice in performance and more complex system management. Some of these advantages and challenges also apply to HPC in virtualized environments. In this paper, we analyze the effectiveness of using virtual machines in a high performance computing (HPC) environment. We propose adding some virtual machine capability to already robust HPC environments for specific scenarios where the productivity gained outweighs the performance lost for using virtual machines. Finally, we discuss an implementation of augmenting virtual machines into the software stack of a HPC cluster, and we analyze the affect on job launch time of this implementation.


ieee international conference on technologies for homeland security | 2015

Computing on Masked Data to improve the security of big data

Vijay Gadepally; Braden Hancock; Benjamin Kaiser; Jeremy Kepner; Peter Michaleas; Mayank Varia; Arkady Yerukhimovich

Organizations that make use of large quantities of information require the ability to store and process data from central locations so that the product can be shared or distributed across a heterogeneous group of users. However, recent events underscore the need for improving the security of data stored in such untrusted servers or databases. Advances in cryptographic techniques and database technologies provide the necessary security functionality but rely on a computational model in which the cloud is used solely for storage and retrieval. Much of big data computation and analytics make use of signal processing fundamentals for computation. As the trend of moving data storage and computation to the cloud increases, homeland security missions should understand the impact of security on key signal processing kernels such as correlation or thresholding. In this article, we propose a tool called Computing on Masked Data (CMD), which combines advances in database technologies and cryptographic tools to provide a low overhead mechanism to offload certain mathematical operations securely to the cloud. This article describes the design and development of the CMD tool.

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter Michaleas's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeremy Kepner

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Albert Reuther

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew Hubbell

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew Prout

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Bestor

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vijay Gadepally

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antonio Rosa

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chansup Byun

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bill Bergeron

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julie Mullen

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge