Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter Mucha is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter Mucha.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1988

Severe hepatic trauma: a multi-center experience with 1,335 liver injuries.

Thomas H. Cogbill; Ernest E. Moore; Gregory J. Jurkovich; David V. Feliciano; John A. Morris; Peter Mucha

The experience of six regional trauma centers with severe hepatic trauma was reviewed to identify trends in management, mortality, and postoperative complications. During the 5-year period ending June 1987, 210 complex liver injuries were identified at laparotomy. There were 92 Class III, 59 Class IV, and 59 Class V injuries. Mechanism of injury was blunt in 101 (48%) patients and penetrating in 109 (52%). Shock was observed in 38%, 46%, and 85% of Class III, IV, and V patients, respectively. Emergency department thoracotomy was performed in 31 patients. There was only one (3%) survivor. Resuscitative operating room thoracotomy was performed in 34 patients with three (9%) survivors. Class III injuries were most frequently treated with hepatotomy and individual vessel ligation (41%) and deep liver suturing (25%). Class IV injuries were most often managed by resectional debridement (36%). Class V injuries required caval shunt placement in 38 (64%) patients. There were only four (10%) survivors after caval shunt placement. There were 20 (59%) survivors of 34 patients treated with packing placed as an adjunct after hepatic injury repair. There was no significant increase in the incidence of abscess formation after perihepatic packing. Routine peritoneal drainage was used in 94% of patients. Overall mortality rates for Class III, IV, and V injuries were 25%, 46%, and 80%, respectively (p less than 0.01). Death rates due to the liver injury in Class III, IV, and V patients were 7%, 30%, and 66%, respectively (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1989

Nonoperative Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma: A Multicenter Experience

Thomas H. Cogbill; Ernest E. Moore; Gregory J. Jurkovich; John A. Morris; Peter Mucha; Steven R. Shackford; Randel T. Stolee; Frederick A. Moore; Susan Pilcher; Richard Locicero; Michael B. Farnell; Melinda Molin

The experience of six referral trauma centers with 832 blunt splenic injuries was reviewed to determine the indications, methods, and outcome of nonoperative management. During this 5-year period, 112 splenic injuries were intentionally managed by observation. There were 40 (36%) patients less than 16 years old and 72 adults. The diagnosis was established by computed tomography in 89 (79%) patients, nuclear scan in 23 (21%), ultrasound in four (4%), and arteriography in two (2%). There were 28 Class I, 51 Class II, 31 Class III, two Class IV, and no Class V splenic injuries. Nonoperative management was unsuccessful in one (2%) child and 12 (17%) adults (p less than 0.05). Failure was due to ongoing hemorrhage in 12 patients and delayed recognition of pancreatic injury in one patient. Of the 12 patients ultimately requiring laparotomy for control of hemorrhage, seven (58%) were successfully treated with splenic salvage techniques. Overall mortality was 3%; none of the four deaths was due to splenic or associated abdominal injury. This contemporary multicenter experience suggests that patients with Class I, II, or III splenic injuries after blunt trauma are candidates for nonoperative management if there is: 1) no hemodynamic instability after initial fluid resuscitation; 2) no serious associated abdominal organ injury; and 3) no extra-abdominal condition which precludes assessment of the abdomen. Strict adherence to these principles yielded initial nonoperative success in 98% of children and 83% of adults. Application of standard splenic salvage techniques to treat the patients with persistent hemorrhage resulted in ultimate splenic preservation in 100% of children and 93% of adults.


Journal of Vascular Surgery | 1992

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: Repair should not be denied

Peter Gloviczki; Peter C. Pairolero; Peter Mucha; Michael B. Farnell; John W. Hallett; Duane M. Ilstrup; Barbara J. Toomey; Amy L. Weaver; Thomas C. Bower; Russell G. Bourchier; Kenneth J. Cherry

The records of 231 patients (189 men, 42 women) treated during the last decade for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm were reviewed to evaluate complications and mortality rates and to determine if preoperative factors would preclude attempt at surgical repair. Mean age was 73.7 years (range, 50 to 95 years). Fifty-seven patients (24.7%) were greater than or equal to 80 years of age. Sixty-eight patients (29.4%) had known abdominal aortic aneurysm before rupture. Preoperative systolic blood pressure was less than or equal to 90 mm Hg in 155 patients (67.1%). Fifty-six patients (24.2%) had cardiac arrest before operation. The overall mortality rate from admission until the end of the hospital stay was 49.4% (114 of 231). Seventeen patients (7.4%) died in the emergency department, 40 (17.3%) in the operating room, 27 (11.7%) during the first 48 postoperative hours, and 30 (13.0%) died later but during the same hospitalization. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 41.6%. Mean age of those who died was higher (75.3 years) than of those who survived (72.2 years) (p less than 0.02). Of patients greater than or equal to 80 years, 43.9% survived. Survival was lower among women (35.7%) than men (54.0%; p less than 0.04). A high APACHE II score, a low initial hematocrit, preoperative hypotension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were associated multivariately with increased mortality rates (p less than 0.02). However, 59 of the 155 patients (38.1%) with preoperative hypotension survived. Deaths were high (80.4%) among patients with cardiac arrest (45 of 56); still, 28.2% of patients (11 of 39) survived repair after cardiac arrest.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1991

Distal pancreatectomy for trauma: a multicenter experience.

Thomas H. Cogbill; Ernest E. Moore; John A. Morris; David B. Hoyt; Gregory J. Jurkovich; Peter Mucha; Steven E. Ross; David V. Feliciano; Steven R. Shackford; Jeffrey Landercasper; Frederick A. Moore; John A. Vanaalst; James W. Davis; Patrick J. Offner; Michael Rhodes; Keith F. O'malley; Mark J. Swierzewski; Joseph D. Schmoker; Pamela J. Strutt

During a 5-year period, 74 patients with pancreatic injuries were managed by distal pancreatic resection at nine referral trauma centers. Patient ages ranged from 4 to 72 years. Injury mechanism was blunt trauma in 34 (46%) patients, gunshot wound in 27 (36%), stab wound in 11 (15%), and shotgun blast in two (3%). There were 19 class II, 50 class III, and 5 class IV pancreatic injuries. The resection comprised up to 33% of the pancreas in 21 (28%) patients, from 34% to 66% in 45 (61%), and greater than 67% in eight (11%). The pancreatic resection margin was closed with staples in 44 (59%), silk sutures in 20 (27%), and polypropylene sutures in eight (11%). Of 32 patients in whom the spleen was uninjured, the spleen was left intact in 17 (53%). There were nine (12%) deaths. The cause of death was irreversible shock in three patients, multiple organ failure in five, and severe head injury in one. Pancreas-related complications occurred in 32 (45%) of 71 patients who survived the initial operation. Intra-abdominal abscess developed in 24 patients; 11 were managed by percutaneous drainage alone. Pancreatic fistula developed in 10 patients; eight closed spontaneously from 6 to 54 days. Other pancreas-related morbidity included pancreatitis (6), pseudocyst (2), and hemorrhage (2). Exocrine insufficiency was not evident in any patient and diet-controlled hyperglycemia occurred in one individual following 80% pancreatic resection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1990

Conservative management of duodenal trauma: a multicenter perspective.

Thomas H. Cogbill; Ernest E. Moore; David V. Feliciano; David B. Hoyt; Gregory J. Jurkovich; John A. Morris; Peter Mucha; Steven E. Ross; Pamela J. Strutt; Frederick A. Moore; Vicky Spjut-Patrinely; Mark G. Tellez; Patrick J. Offner; Wilcox Tr; Michael B. Farnell; Keith F. O'Malley

The experience of eight trauma centers with duodenal injuries was analyzed to identify trends in operative management, sources of duodenal-related morbidity, and causes of mortality. During the 5-year period ending December 1988, 164 duodenal injuries were identified. Patient ages ranged from 5 to 78 years. There were 38 Class I, 70 Class II, 48 Class III, four Class IV, and four Class V injuries. Injury mechanism was penetrating in 102 (62%) patients and blunt in 62. Primary repair of the duodenal injury was performed in 117 (71%) patients, including 27 patients also managed with pyloric exclusion and 12 with tube duodenostomy. Duodenal resection with primary anastomosis was used in six (4%) patients and pancreatoduodenectomy was necessary in five (3%). There were 30 (18%) deaths. The cause of death was uncontrolled hemorrhage from severe hepatic or vascular injuries in 22 (73%) patients. In only two (1%) patients could death be attributed to the duodenal injury; each as the result of duodenal repair dehiscence and subsequent sepsis. Duodenal-related morbidity was documented in 29 (18%) patients, including 22 patients with intra-abdominal abscess, six with duodenal fistula, and five with frank duodenal dehiscence. In summary, this analysis demonstrated: 1) the great majority of duodenal injuries can be managed by simple repair; 2) tube duodenostomy is not a mandatory component of operative treatment; 3) pyloric exclusion is a useful adjunct for more complex injuries; 4) pancreatoduodenectomy is rarely necessary for civilian duodenal trauma; 5) morbidity following duodenal trauma is more dependent on associated intra-abdominal injuries than the extent of duodenal trauma; and 6) mortality following duodenal injuries is primarily related to associated vascular and hepatic trauma.


Annals of Internal Medicine | 1992

Prevention of Infection in Critically Ill Patients by Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract

Franklin R. Cockerill; Sharon R. Muller; John P. Anhalt; H. Michael Marsh; Michael B. Farnell; Peter Mucha; Delmar J. Gillespie; Duane M. Ilstrup; Jeffrey J. Larson-Keller; Rodney L. Thompson

OBJECTIVE To determine whether selective decontamination of the digestive tract using oral and nonabsorbable antimicrobial agents and parenteral cefotaxime prevents infection in critically ill patients. DESIGN Randomized, controlled trial without blinding. SETTING Surgical trauma and medical intensive care units in a tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS One hundred fifty patients admitted to surgical trauma and medical intensive care units during a 3-year interval, whose condition suggested a prolonged stay (greater than 3 days). INTERVENTION Patients were randomly allocated to an experimental group (n = 75) that received cefotaxime, 1 g intravenously every 8 hours for the first 3 days only, and oral, nonabsorbable antibiotics (gentamicin, polymyxin, and nystatin by oral paste and oral liquid) for the entire stay in the intensive care unit. Control patients (n = 75) received usual care. MEASUREMENTS The number of infections, total hospital days, and deaths, as well as the number of days in intensive care unit, were recorded. RESULTS Control patients experienced more infections (36 compared with 12, P = 0.04), including bacteremias (14 compared with 4, P = 0.05) and pulmonary infections (14 compared with 4, P = 0.03). Although total hospital days, days in intensive care, and the overall death rate all were lower in the treatment group, these differences were not statistically significant. Clinically important complications of selective decontamination of the digestive tract were not encountered. CONCLUSIONS Selective decontamination of the digestive tract decreases subsequent infection rates, especially by gram-negative bacilli, in selected patients during long-term stays in the intensive care unit.


Surgical Clinics of North America | 1988

Hemorrhage in major pelvic fractures.

Peter Mucha; Timothy J. Welch

Significant hemorrhage following major pelvic fractures should always be expected. Early recognition of such fractures during the resuscitation of any multiply injured patient is essential before instituting measures that might combat blood loss. In the majority of patients, simple resuscitative measures, including employment of the pneumatic antishock garment, will suffice. With certain types of fracture geography, the early application of external fixation devices may also play an important role. Increasingly popular has been the technique of diagnostic angiography and therapeutic embolization, applicable to approximately 3 per cent of all pelvic fracture patients. With exsanguinating hemorrhage, even the best equipped and most sophisticated major trauma centers can be taxed. The decision whether a patient should be taken directly to the operating room or to the angiography suite remains one of the most difficult for even the most highly skilled trauma surgeon. Patients with rapidly expanding or free rupture of pelvic hematomas noted at the time of celiotomy, or those with large open wounds, usually leave no recourse but to attempt direct operative control, to include even the most morbid option of a life-saving hemipelvectomy or corpectomy. More often, however, once other sources of surgically correctable hemorrhage are controlled or ruled out, diagnostic angiography followed by therapeutic embolization is a mainstay in the modern-day management of pelvic fracture hemorrhage.


American Journal of Cardiology | 1982

Two-dimensional echocardiographic findings in cardiac trauma

Fletcher A. Miller; James B. Seward; Bernard J. Gersh; Abdul J. Tajik; Peter Mucha

Cardiac contusion is a potentially fatal complication of blunt chest trauma. The diagnosis is obscured because cardiac contusion usually occurs in a setting of multisystem trauma. Furthermore, the electrocardiographic changes are nonspecific. Experience with 2-dimensional echocardiography in evaluating cardiac trauma has not previously been emphasized. This report examines the results of 2-dimensional echocardiographic examinations in 7 patients after significant blunt chest trauma. Generalized right ventricular dilatation was identified in 4 cases; superimposed segmental areas of right ventricular dilatation occurred in 3. Three patients had localized myocardial thinning, and segmental wall motion abnormalities occurred in 2. Additional abnormalities identified included ventricular thrombi (4 right and 1 left ventricular), fibrinous pericardial effusion (1), ruptured tricuspid chordae with flail leaflet (1), and a small aneurysm of the sinus of Valsalva (1). It is concluded that 2-dimensional echocardiography is useful for diagnosing cardiac contusion, for estimating the extent of myocardial damage, and for identifying accompanying cardiac lesions such as thrombi, pericardial effusion, and valvular disruption.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1983

Cardiac Contusion: A New Diagnostic Approach Utilizing Two-dimensional Echocardiography

R. Michael King; Peter Mucha; James B. Seward; Bernard J. Gersh; Michael B. Farnell

In the past, myocardial contusions after blunt thoracic trauma have been frequently overlooked or missed unless hemodynamic instability or dramatic electrocardiographic findings were observed. We now know that this entity is more common than once believed. However, our understanding of cardiac contusions remains unclear and obscure because of the inability to diagnose the condition accurately. Chest roentgenograms, electrocardiograms, and radionuclide imaging have had less than optimal success. We believe that the serial determination of creatine phosphokinase-myocardial band isoenzymes and subsequent two-dimensional echocardiographic sector scanning are the most sensitive indicators of structural and functional cardiac injury presently available.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1986

Selective management of blunt splenic trauma.

Peter Mucha; Richard C. Daly; Michael B. Farnell

During a recent 8-year period, 235 patients with documented blunt splenic trauma were treated. After exclusion of 39 patients with early deaths (19 dead on arrival, nine died in emergency room, and 11 died in operating room), the 196 remaining patients were treated in accordance with an evolving selective management program. Definitive management included splenectomy in 117 patients (59.7%), repair in 32 (16.3%), and nonoperative treatment in 47 (24%). A spectrum of blunt splenic trauma, as manifested by the degree of associated injuries (Injury Severity Scores), hemodynamic status, and blood transfusion requirements, was identified and permitted application of a rational selective management program that proved safe and effective for all age groups. Comparative analysis of the three methods of treatment demonstrated differences that were more a reflection of the overall magnitude of total bodily injury sustained rather than the specific manner in which any injured spleen was managed. Retrospective analysis of 19 nonoperative management failures enabled establishment of the following selection criteria for nonoperative management: absolute hemodynamic stability; minimal or lack of peritoneal findings; and maximal transfusion requirement of 2 units for the splenic injury. With operative management, splenorrhaphy is preferred, but it was often precluded by associated life-threatening injuries or by technical limitations. Of 42 attempted splenic repairs, ten (24%) were abandoned intraoperatively. There were no late failures of repair. In many cases of blunt splenic trauma, splenectomy still remains the most appropriate course of action.

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter Mucha's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ernest E. Moore

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John A. Morris

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David B. Hoyt

American College of Surgeons

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge