Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter Nieboer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter Nieboer.


The Lancet | 2015

Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group

Lieke H. J. Simkens; Harm van Tinteren; Anne May; Albert J. ten Tije; Geert-Jan Creemers; Olaf Loosveld; Felix E. de Jongh; Frans Erdkamp; Zoran Erjavec; Adelheid Me van der Torren; Jolien Tol; Hans J Braun; Peter Nieboer; Jacobus J. M. van der Hoeven; Janny G. Haasjes; Rob L. Jansen; Jaap Wals; Annemieke Cats; Veerle A. Derleyn; Aafk e H Honkoop; Linda Mol; Cornelis J. A. Punt; Miriam Koopman

BACKGROUND The optimum duration of first-line treatment with chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is unknown. The CAIRO3 study was designed to determine the efficacy of maintenance treatment with capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus observation. METHODS In this open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial, we recruited patients in 64 hospitals in the Netherlands. We included patients older than 18 years with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer, with stable disease or better after induction treatment with six 3-weekly cycles of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab (CAPOX-B), WHO performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab (maintenance group) or observation (observation group). Randomisation was done centrally by minimisation, with stratification according to previous adjuvant chemotherapy, response to induction treatment, WHO performance status, serum lactate dehydrogenase concentration, and treatment centre. Both patients and investigators were aware of treatment assignment. We assessed disease status every 9 weeks. On first progression (defined as PFS1), patients in both groups were to receive the induction regimen of CAPOX-B until second progression (PFS2), which was the studys primary endpoint. All endpoints were calculated from the time of randomisation. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00442637. FINDINGS Between May 30, 2007, and Oct 15, 2012, we randomly assigned 558 patients to either the maintenance group (n=279) or the observation group (n=279). Median follow-up was 48 months (IQR 36-57). The primary endpoint of median PFS2 was significantly improved in patients on maintenance treatment, and was 8·5 months in the observation group and 11·7 months in the maintenance group (HR 0·67, 95% CI 0·56-0·81, p<0·0001). This difference remained significant when any treatment after PFS1 was considered. Maintenance treatment was well tolerated, although the incidence of hand-foot syndrome was increased (64 [23%] patients with hand-foot skin reaction during maintenance). The global quality of life did not deteriorate during maintenance treatment and was clinically not different between treatment groups. INTERPRETATION Maintenance treatment with capecitabine plus bevacizumab after six cycles of CAPOX-B in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is effective and does not compromise quality of life. FUNDING Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG). The DCCG received financial support for the study from the Commissie Klinische Studies (CKS) of the Dutch Cancer Foundation (KWF), Roche, and Sanofi-Aventis.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005

Fatigue and Relating Factors in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Adjuvant Standard or High-Dose Chemotherapy: A Longitudinal Study

Peter Nieboer; Ciska Buijs; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Caroline Seynaeve; Louk V.A.M. Beex; Elsken van der Wall; Dick J. Richel; Marianne A. Nooij; Emile E. Voest; P. Hupperets; Nanno Mulder; Winette T. A. van der Graaf; Els M. TenVergert; Harm van Tinteren; Elisabeth G.E. de Vries

PURPOSE Determine whether standard or high-dose chemotherapy leads to changes in fatigue, hemoglobin (Hb), mental health, muscle and joint pain, and menopausal status from pre- to post-treatment and to evaluate whether fatigue is associated with these factors in disease-free breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eight hundred eighty-five patients were randomly assigned between two chemotherapy regimens both followed by radiotherapy and tamoxifen. Fatigue was assessed using vitality scale (score < or = 46 defined as fatigue), poor mental health using mental health scale (score < or = 56 defined as poor mental health) both of Short-Form 36, muscle and joint pain with Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, and Hb levels were assessed before and 1, 2, and 3 years after chemotherapy. RESULTS Fatigue was reported in 20% of 430 assessable patients (202 standard-dose, 228 high-dose) with at least a 3-year follow-up, without change over time or difference between treatment arms. Mean Hb levels were lower following high-dose chemotherapy. Only 5% of patients experienced fatigue and anemia. Mental health score was the strongest fatigue predictor at all assessment moments. Menopausal status had no effect on fatigue. Linear mixed effect models showed that the higher the Hb level (P = .0006) and mental health score (P < .0001), the less fatigue was experienced. Joint (P < .0001) and muscle pain (P = .0283) were associated with more fatigue. CONCLUSION In 3 years after treatment, no significant differences in fatigue were found between standard and high-dose chemotherapy. Fatigue did not change over time. The strongest fatigue predictor was poor mental health.


JAMA Oncology | 2016

Angiotensin II-Receptor Inhibition With Candesartan to Prevent Trastuzumab-Related Cardiotoxic Effects in Patients With Early Breast Cancer : A Randomized Clinical Trial

Annelies H. Boekhout; Jourik A. Gietema; Bojana Milojkovic Kerklaan; Erik van Werkhoven; Renske Altena; Aafke Honkoop; Maartje Los; Willem M. Smit; Peter Nieboer; Carolien H. Smorenburg; Caroline M. Mandigers; Agnes J. van der Wouw; Lonneke Kessels; Annette W. G. van der Velden; P.B. Ottevanger; Tineke J. Smilde; Jaap de Boer; Dirk J. van Veldhuisen; Ido P. Kema; Elisabeth G.E. de Vries; Jan H. M. Schellens

IMPORTANCE This is the first randomized placebo-controlled evaluation of a medical intervention for the prevention of trastuzumab-related cardiotoxic effects. OBJECTIVE To determine as the primary end point whether angiotensin II antagonist treatment with candesartan can prevent or ameliorate trastuzumab-related cardiotoxic effects, defined as a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of more than 15% or a decrease below the absolute value 45%. DESIGN This randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study was conducted between October 2007 and October 2011 in 19 hospitals in the Netherlands, enrolling 210 women with early breast cancer testing positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) who were being considered for adjuvant systemic treatment with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy followed by trastuzumab. INTERVENTIONS A total of 78 weeks of candesartan (32 mg/d) or placebo treatment; study treatment started at the same day as the first trastuzumab administration and continued until 26 weeks after completion of trastuzumab treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was LVEF. Secondary end points included whether the N-terminal of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) can be used as surrogate markers and whether genetic variability in germline ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu) correlates with trastuzumab-related cardiotoxic effects. RESULTS A total of 206 participants were evaluable (mean age, 49 years; age range, 25-69 years) 103 in the candesartan group (mean age, 50 years; age range, 25-69 years) and 103 in the placebo group (mean age, 50 years; age range, 30-67 years). Of these, 36 manifested at least 1 of the 2 primary cardiac end points. There were 3.8% more cardiac events in the candesartan group than in the placebo group (95% CI, -7% to 15%; P = .58): 20 events (19%) and 16 events (16%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of cardiac events was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.13-0.40) in the candesartan group and 0.16 (95% CI, 0.08-0.22) in the placebo group (P = .56). Candesartan did not affect changes in NT-proBNP and hs-TnT values, and these biomarkers were not associated with significant changes in LVEF. The Ala1170Pro homozygous ERBB2 genotype was associated with a lower likelihood of the occurrence of a cardiac event compared with Pro/Pro + Ala/Pro genotypes in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02-0.45; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings do not support the hypothesis that concomitant use of candesartan protects against a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction during or shortly after trastuzumab treatment in early breast cancer. The ERBB2 germline Ala1170Pro single nucleotide polymorphism may be used to identify patients who are at increased risk of trastuzumab-related cardiotoxic effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00459771.


International Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2006

The therapeutic challenge of a nonresectable solitary fibrous tumor in a hypoglycemic patient

Jaap de Boer; Pieter L. Jager; Theo Wiggers; Peter Nieboer; A.N. Machteld Wymenga; Elisabeth Pras; Klaas Hoogenberg; Dirk Sleijfer; Albert J. H. Suurmeijer; Winette T. A. van der Graaf

We report a patient with a nonresectable histologically benign solitary fibrous tumor who suffered from paraneoplastic non-islet cell tumor hypoglycemia (NICTH). Diagnostic workup revealed malignant characteristics in which the tumor showed up as, presumably, false-negative on fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), while being positive on tyrosine-PET. Neoadjuvant treatment, which consisted of combined chemo-radiation and consecutive selective embolization of the tumor feeding vessels, caused such a therapeutic effect, on both NICTH and reduction in tumor volume, that a secondary resection, with the patient in a normoglycemic status, was possible. Our report highlights several important issues in the management of the patient with a nonresectable solitary fibrous tumor with severe episodes of hypoglycemia due to NICTH.


Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2001

Long-term haematological recovery following high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation or peripheral stem cell transplantation in patients with solid tumours

Peter Nieboer; Ege de Vries; Nh Mulder; Dt Sleijfer; Phb Willemse; Gap Hospers; J. A. Gietema; Wj Sluiter; Wta van der Graaf

Long-term peripheral blood counts and factors influencing long-term trilineage haematological recovery of consecutive patients in a single institution treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and ABMT or PSCT for solid tumours were examined. Patients with a relapse-free survival of <1 year were included in the analysis (n = 131). Peripheral blood counts were examined 6 months and yearly following transplantation. Median follow-up was 4.1 years (range 1–10+ years). Three years after transplantation 91% of patients had normal white blood counts (WBC), 94% normal haemoglobin (Hb) and 75% normal platelets. Trilineage recovery was complete in 70% (n = 83) at 3 years and 85% (n = 50) at 5 years. Recovery of Hb occurred before WBC and platelet recovery. Approximately 25% of patients displayed an elevated MCV throughout the follow-up period. These long-term results were independent of age, high-dose regimen, number of reinfused stem cells and stem cell source. Double (n = 12) vs single (n = 119) transplantations showed significantly slower trilineage recovery and higher MCV. No secondary graft failure, myelodysplasia or leukaemia was encountered. In conclusion, complete trilineage recovery after HDC followed by ABMT or PSCT occurs slowly. PSCT and ABMT are capable of maintaining long-term haematopoiesis. Slower recovery is seen after double transplantations. The results suggest lasting implications for bone marrow function after autologous transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2001) 27, 959–966.


Lancet Oncology | 2018

DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation of fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with cancer: a prospective safety analysis

Linda M. Henricks; Carin A.T.C. Lunenburg; Femke M de Man; Didier Meulendijks; Gw Frederix; Emma Kienhuis; Geert-Jan Creemers; Arnold Baars; V. O. Dezentje; Alexander L T Imholz; Frank Jeurissen; Johanna Elisabeth A. Portielje; Rob L. Jansen; Paul Hamberg; Albert J. ten Tije; Helga J Droogendijk; Miriam Koopman; Peter Nieboer; Marlène H W van de Poel; Caroline M. Mandigers; Hilde Rosing; Jos H. Beijnen; Erik van Werkhoven; André B.P. van Kuilenburg; Ron H.N. van Schaik; Ron H.J. Mathijssen; Jesse J. Swen; Hans Gelderblom; Annemieke Cats; Henk-Jan Guchelaar

BACKGROUND Fluoropyrimidine treatment can result in severe toxicity in up to 30% of patients and is often the result of reduced activity of the key metabolic enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), mostly caused by genetic variants in the gene encoding DPD (DPYD). We assessed the effect of prospective screening for the four most relevant DPYD variants (DPYD*2A [rs3918290, c.1905+1G>A, IVS14+1G>A], c.2846A>T [rs67376798, D949V], c.1679T>G [rs55886062, DPYD*13, I560S], and c.1236G>A [rs56038477, E412E, in haplotype B3]) on patient safety and subsequent DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation in daily clinical care. METHODS In this prospective, multicentre, safety analysis in 17 hospitals in the Netherlands, the study population consisted of adult patients (≥18 years) with cancer who were intended to start on a fluoropyrimidine-based anticancer therapy (capecitabine or fluorouracil as single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents or radiotherapy). Patients with all tumour types for which fluoropyrimidine-based therapy was considered in their best interest were eligible. We did prospective genotyping for DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, and c.1236G>A. Heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers received an initial dose reduction of 25% (c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A) or 50% (DPYD*2A and c.1679T>G), and DPYD wild-type patients were treated according to the current standard of care. The primary endpoint of the study was the frequency of severe (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 grade ≥3) overall fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity across the entire treatment duration. We compared toxicity incidence between DPYD variant allele carriers and DPYD wild-type patients on an intention-to-treat basis, and relative risks (RRs) for severe toxicity were compared between the current study and a historical cohort of DPYD variant allele carriers treated with full dose fluoropyrimidine-based therapy (derived from a previously published meta-analysis). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02324452, and is complete. FINDINGS Between April 30, 2015, and Dec 21, 2017, we enrolled 1181 patients. 78 patients were considered non-evaluable, because they were retrospectively identified as not meeting inclusion criteria, did not start fluoropyrimidine-based treatment, or were homozygous or compound heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers. Of 1103 evaluable patients, 85 (8%) were heterozygous DPYD variant allele carriers, and 1018 (92%) were DPYD wild-type patients. Overall, fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity was higher in DPYD variant carriers (33 [39%] of 85 patients) than in wild-type patients (231 [23%] of 1018 patients; p=0·0013). The RR for severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity was 1·31 (95% CI 0·63-2·73) for genotype-guided dosing compared with 2·87 (2·14-3·86) in the historical cohort for DPYD*2A carriers, no toxicity compared with 4·30 (2·10-8·80) in c.1679T>G carriers, 2·00 (1·19-3·34) compared with 3·11 (2·25-4·28) for c.2846A>T carriers, and 1·69 (1·18-2·42) compared with 1·72 (1·22-2·42) for c.1236G>A carriers. INTERPRETATION Prospective DPYD genotyping was feasible in routine clinical practice, and DPYD genotype-based dose reductions improved patient safety of fluoropyrimidine treatment. For DPYD*2A and c.1679T>G carriers, a 50% initial dose reduction was adequate. For c.1236G>A and c.2846A>T carriers, a larger dose reduction of 50% (instead of 25%) requires investigation. Since fluoropyrimidines are among the most commonly used anticancer agents, these findings suggest that implementation of DPYD genotype-guided individualised dosing should be a new standard of care. FUNDING Dutch Cancer Society.


Systematic Reviews | 2018

Effects of oncological care pathways in primary and secondary care on patient, professional, and health systems outcomes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jolanda C. van Middelkoop-van Hoeve; Robin W.M. Vernooij; Adegboyega K. Lawal; Michelle Fiander; Peter Nieboer; Sabine Siesling; Thomas Rotter

BackgroundThe high impact of a cancer diagnosis on patients and their families and the increasing costs of cancer treatment call for optimal and efficient oncological care. To improve the quality of care and to minimize healthcare costs and its economic burden, many healthcare organizations introduce care pathways to improve efficiency across the continuum of cancer care. However, there is limited research on the effects of cancer care pathways in different settings.MethodsThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis described in this protocol is to synthesize existing literature on the effects of oncological care pathways. We will conduct a systematic search strategy to identify all relevant literature in several biomedical databases, including Cochrane library, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. We will follow the methodology of Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC), and we will include randomized trials, non-randomized trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time series studies. In addition, we will include full economic evaluations (cost-effectiveness analyses, cost-utility analyses, and cost-benefit analyses), cost analyses, and comparative resource utilization studies, if available. Two reviewers will independently screen all studies and evaluate those included for risk of bias. From these studies, we will extract data regarding patient, professional, and health systems outcomes. Our systematic review will follow the PRISMA set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.DiscussionFollowing the protocol outlined in this article, we aim to identify, assess, and synthesize all available evidence in order to provide an evidence base on the effects of oncological care pathways as reported in the literature.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42017057592.


Genes | 2018

Conventional Pathology Versus Gene Signatures for Assessing Luminal A and B Type Breast Cancers: Results of a Prospective Cohort Study

Julia E.C. van Steenhoven; A. Kuijer; Paul J. van Diest; Joost van Gorp; Marieke E. Straver; Sjoerd G. Elias; Jelle Wesseling; Emiel J. Th. Rutgers; Johanna N. H. Timmer-Bonte; Peter Nieboer; Tineke J. Smilde; Alex L.T. Imholz; Charlotte F.J.M. Blanken; Sabine Siesling; Thijs van Dalen

In this study, in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) early stage breast cancer patients who were considered candidates for 70-gene signature (70-GS, “MammaPrint”) use, we compared molecular subtyping (MS) based on the previously validated 80-gene signature (80-GS, “BluePrint”) versus surrogate pathological subtyping (PS). Between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2015, 595 clinical intermediate risk ER+ early stage breast cancer patients were enrolled. Hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 receptor status were determined by conventional pathology using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Ki67 was assessed in a subset of patients. The overall concordance between PS and MS for luminal type cancers (A and B together) was 98%. The concordance between PS and MS for luminal A and luminal B type cancers based on the Bloom Richardson histological grade (BR) (n = 586) or Ki67 (n = 185) was low: 64% (Kappa 0.20 [95% CI 0.11–0.28]) and 65% (Kappa 0.22 [95% CI 0.062–0.37]), respectively. In this prospective study (NCT02209857) of a selection of ER+ and predominantly HER2− early-stage breast cancer patients, the additional ability of the 80-GS to distinguish between luminal, HER2-type and basal-like cancers was inherently very limited. The distinction of luminal-type tumors into A and B according to Ki67 status or BR grade versus the 70-GS revealed poor concordance.


Netherlands Journal of Medicine | 1999

An unusual presentation of sepsis caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci

Peter Nieboer; J. A. Gietema; H.G. de Vries-Hospers; W.T.A. van der Graaf

We describe a 25-year-old male presenting with fever during the non-neutropenic phase of chemotherapy. The presentation was that of a viral infection. The cause of the fever turned out to be a bacteremia with coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS) originating from a totally implanted venous access port (VAP). We briefly discuss the different types of VAP-related infections and treatment modalities.


Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2009

Venlafaxine versus clonidine for the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer patients: a double-blind, randomized cross-over study

Ciska Buijs; Constantijne H. Mom; Pax H.B. Willemse; H. Marike Boezen; J. Marina Maurer; A. N. Machteld Wymenga; Robert de Jong; Peter Nieboer; Elisabeth G.E. de Vries; Marian J.E. Mourits

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter Nieboer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nh Mulder

University of Groningen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Albert J. ten Tije

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Annemieke Cats

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elisabeth G.E. de Vries

University Medical Center Groningen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Harm van Tinteren

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W.T.A. van der Graaf

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge