Peter Steinle
Bureau of Meteorology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Peter Steinle.
Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Journal | 2013
Ajay K Puri; G. Dietachmayer; Peter Steinle; Martin Dix; Lawrence Rikus; Flora J Logan-Klumpler; Matthew T. Naughton; Chris Tingwell; Yi Xiao; V. Barras; I. Bermous; Jennifer R. Bowen; Marjanne J L Deschamps; Richard C Franklin; James Fraser; T. Glowacki; B. Harris; J. Lee; T. Le; Gregory L. Roff; S A Sulaiman; Holly Sims; X. Sun; Zhian Sun; H. Zhu; M. Chattopadhyay; C. Engel
K. Puri, G. Dietachmayer, P. Steinle, M. Dix, L. Rikus, L. Logan, M. Naughton, C. Tingwell, Y Xiao, V. Barras, I. Bermous, R. Bowen, L. Deschamps, C. Franklin, J. Fraser, T. Glowacki, B. Harris, J. Lee, T. Le, G. Roff, A. Sulaiman, H. Sims, X. Sun, Z. Sun, H. Zhu, M. Chattopadhyay, C. Engel Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | 2013
Justin Peter; Alan Seed; Peter Steinle
AbstractA naive Bayes classifier (NBC) was developed to distinguish precipitation echoes from anomalous propagation (anaprop). The NBC is an application of Bayess theorem, which makes its classification decision based on the class with the maximum a posteriori probability. Several feature fields were input to the Bayes classifier: texture of reflectivity (TDBZ), a measure of the reflectivity fluctuations (SPIN), and vertical profile of reflectivity (VPDBZ). Prior conditional probability distribution functions (PDFs) of the feature fields were constructed from training sets for several meteorological scenarios and for anaprop. A Box–Cox transform was applied to transform these PDFs to approximate Gaussian distributions, which enabled efficient numerical computation as they could be specified completely by their mean and standard deviation. Combinations of the feature fields were tested on the training datasets to evaluate the best combination for discriminating anaprop and precipitation, which was found t...
Water Resources Research | 2017
Vinodkumar; I. Dharssi; J. Bally; Peter Steinle; David McJannet; Jeffrey P. Walker
The McArthur Forest Fire Danger Index used in Australia for operational fire warnings has a component representing fuel availability called the Drought Factor (DF). The DF is partly based on soil moisture deficit, calculated as either the Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI) or Mounts Soil Dryness Index (MSDI). The KBDI and MSDI are simplified water balance models driven by observation based daily rainfall and temperature. In this work, gridded KBDI and MSDI analyses are computed at a horizontal resolution of 5 km and are verified against in-situ soil moisture observations. Also verified is another simple model called the Antecedent Precipitation Index (API). Soil moisture analyses from the Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator (ACCESS) global Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) system as well as remotely sensed soil wetness retrievals from the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) are also verified. The verification shows that the NWP soil wetness analyses have greater skill and smaller biases than the KBDI, MSDI and API analyses. This is despite the NWP system having a coarse horizontal resolution and not using observed precipitation. The average temporal correlations (root mean square difference) between cosmic ray soil moisture monitoring facility observations and modeled or remotely sensed soil wetness are 0.82 (0.15 ±0.02), 0.66 (0.33 ±0.07), 0.77 (0.20 ±0.03), 0.74 (0.22 ±0.03) and 0.83 (0.18 ±0.04) for NWP, KBDI, MSDI, API and ASCAT. The results from this study suggests that analyses of soil moisture can be greatly improved by using physically based land surface models, remote sensing measurements and data assimilation.
Hydrological Sciences Journal-journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques | 2016
Mahshid Shahrban; Jeffrey P. Walker; Q. J. Wang; Alan Seed; Peter Steinle
ABSTRACT Assessment of forecast precipitation is required before it can be used as input to hydrological models. Using radar observations in southeastern Australia, forecast rainfall from the Australian Community Climate Earth-System Simulator (ACCESS) was evaluated for 2010 and 2011. Radar rain intensities were first calibrated to gauge rainfall data from four research rainfall stations at hourly time steps. It is shown that the Australian ACCESS model (ACCESS-A) overestimated rainfall in low precipitation areas and underestimated elevated accumulations in high rainfall areas. The forecast errors were found to be dependent on the rainfall magnitude. Since the cumulative rainfall observations varied across the area and through the year, the relative error (RE) in the forecasts varied considerably with space and time, such that there was no consistent bias across the study area. Moreover, further analysis indicated that both location and magnitude errors were the main sources of forecast uncertainties on hourly accumulations, while magnitude was the dominant error on the daily time scale. Consequently, the precipitation output from ACCESS-A may not be useful for direct application in hydrological modelling, and pre-processing approaches such as bias correction or exceedance probability correction will likely be necessary for application of the numerical weather prediction (NWP) outputs. EDITOR M.C. Acreman ASSOCIATE EDITOR A. Viglione
Advances in Meteorology | 2016
Xingbao Wang; Peter Steinle; Alan Seed; Yi Xiao
The Australian Community Climate and Earth-System Simulator (ACCESS) is used to test the sensitivity of heavy precipitation to various model configurations: horizontal resolution, domain size, rain rate assimilation, perturbed physics, and initial condition uncertainties, through a series of convection-permitting simulations of three heavy precipitation (greater than 200 mm day−1) cases in different synoptic backgrounds. The larger disparity of intensity histograms and rainfall fluctuation caused by different model configurations from their mean and/or control run indicates that heavier precipitation forecasts have larger uncertainty. A cross-verification exercise is used to quantify the impacts of different model parameters on heavy precipitation. The dispersion of skill scores with control run used as “truth” shows that the impacts of the model resolution and domain size on the quantitative precipitation forecast are not less than those of perturbed physics and initial field uncertainties in these not intentionally selected heavy precipitation cases. The result indicates that model resolution and domain size should be considered as part of probabilistic precipitation forecasts and ensemble prediction system design besides the model initial field uncertainty.
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | 2015
Susan Rennie; Mark Curtis; Justin Peter; Alan Seed; Peter Steinle; G. Wen
AbstractThe Australian Bureau of Meteorology’s operational weather radar network comprises a heterogeneous radar collection covering diverse geography and climate. A naive Bayes classifier has been developed to identify a range of common echo types observed with these radars. The success of the classifier has been evaluated against its training dataset and by routine monitoring. The training data indicate that more than 90% of precipitation may be identified correctly. The echo types most difficult to distinguish from rainfall are smoke, chaff, and anomalous propagation ground and sea clutter. Their impact depends on their climatological frequency. Small quantities of frequently misclassified persistent echo (like permanent ground clutter or insects) can also cause quality control issues. The Bayes classifier is demonstrated to perform better than a simple threshold method, particularly for reducing misclassification of clutter as precipitation. However, the result depends on finding a balance between exc...
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | 2018
Susan Rennie; Peter Steinle; Alan Seed; Mark Curtis; Yi Xiao
AbstractA new quality control system, primarily using a naive Bayesian classifier, has been developed to enable the assimilation of radial velocity observations from Doppler radar. The ultimate ass...
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2009
Clara S. Draper; Jeffrey P. Walker; Peter Steinle; Richard de Jeu; Thomas R. H. Holmes
SOIL Discussions | 2015
Imtiaz Dharssi; Brett Candy; Peter Steinle
Archive | 2012
Imtiaz Dharssi; Peter Steinle; Brett Candy
Collaboration
Dive into the Peter Steinle's collaboration.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputs