Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter Van den Bergh is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter Van den Bergh.


Annals of Neurology | 2001

Randomized controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin versus oral prednisolone in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Richard Hughes; Peter Van den Bergh; S Bensa; Hugh J. Willison; Giancarlo Comi; I. Illa; Eduardo Nobile-Orazio; P. A. van Doorn; Marinos C. Dalakas; Martin Bojar; Anthony V Swan

This multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, crossover trial compared a 6 week course of oral prednisolone tapering from 60 mg to 10 mg daily with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) 2.0 g/kg given over 1 to 2 days for treating chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Twenty‐four of the thirty‐two randomized patients completed both treatment periods. Both treatments produced significant improvements in the primary outcome measure, change in an 11‐point disability scale 2 weeks after randomization. There was slightly, but not significantly, more improvement after IVIg than with prednisolone, the mean difference between the groups in change in disability grade being 0.16 (95% CI = –0.35 to 0.66). There were also slightly, but not significantly, greater improvements favoring IVIg in the secondary outcome measures: time to walk 10 meters after 2 weeks and improvement in disability grade after 6 weeks. Results may have been biased against IVIg by the 8 patients who did not complete the second arm of the trial. A serious adverse event (psychosis) attributable to treatment occurred in 1 patient while on prednisolone and in none with IVIg.


Journal of The Peripheral Nervous System | 2010

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on management of multifocal motor neuropathy. Report of a Joint Task Force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society - first revision

Ivo N. van Schaik; Jean Marc Léger; Eduardo Nobile-Orazio; David R. Cornblath; Robert D.M. Hadden; Carol Lee Koski; John D. Pollard; Claudia Sommer; Isabel Illa; Peter Van den Bergh; Pieter A. van Doorn

A European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society consensus guideline on the definition, investigation, and treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) was published in 2006. The aim is to revise this guideline. Disease experts considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and Cochrane Systematic Reviews published between August 2004 and July 2009 and prepared statements that were agreed to in an iterative fashion. The Task Force agreed on Good Practice Points to define clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for MMN, investigations to be considered, and principal recommendations for treatment.


Journal of The Peripheral Nervous System | 2010

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society - First Revision

Peter Van den Bergh; Robert D.M. Hadden; Pierre Bouche; David R. Cornblath; Angelika Hahn; I. Illa; Carol Lee Koski; Jean Marc Léger; Eduardo Nobile-Orazio; John D. Pollard; Claudia Sommer; Pieter A. van Doorn; Ivo N. van Schaik

Background: Consensus guidelines on the definition, investigation, and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) have been published (J Peripher Nerv Syst 2005; 10: 220–228, Eur J Neurol 2006; 13: 326–332). Objectives: To revise these guidelines. Methods: Disease experts, including a representative of patients, considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and Cochrane Systematic Reviews published between August 2004 and July 2009 and prepared statements that were agreed in an iterative fashion.


Muscle & Nerve | 2004

Electrodiagnostic criteria for acute and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Peter Van den Bergh; Françoise Piéret

Electrodiagnosis plays an important role in the early detection and characterization of inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathies, because timely treatment reduces morbidity and disability. The challenge consists of defining electrodiagnostic criteria that are highly specific for primary demyelination but sufficiently sensitive to be useful in clinical practice. We compared 10 published sets of criteria in 53 patients with demyelinating Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) and 28 with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Specificity of criteria sets was tested in 40 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and 32 with diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN). Sensitivity ranged from 24 to 83% (mean, 54.3%) in GBS and 39 to 89% (mean, 64.9%) in CIDP. With regard to ALS, specificity was 100% for nine sets but was 97% in one. In contrast, 3–66% of DPN patients fulfilled criteria in eight of ten sets. We propose a set of criteria with 72% and 75% sensitivity in our GBS and CIDP patient series, respectively, and 100% specificity with regard to ALS and DPN. Our data illustrate that most, but not all, patients can be electrodiagnostically ascertained. Muscle Nerve 29: 565–574, 2004


Cell | 1992

Temperature-sensitive mutations in the III–IV cytoplasmic loop region of the skeletal muscle sodium channel gene in paramyotonia congenita

Andrea I. McClatchey; Peter Van den Bergh; Margaret A. Pericak-Vance; Wendy H. Raskind; Christine Verellen; Diane McKenna-Yasek; Keshav Rao; Jonathan L. Haines; Bird Td; Robert H. Brown; James F. Gusella

Paramyotonia congenita (PMC), a dominant disorder featuring cold-induced myotonia (muscle stiffness), has recently been genetically linked to a candidate gene, the skeletal muscle sodium channel gene SCN4A. We have now established that SCN4A is the disease gene in PMC by identifying two different single-base coding sequence alterations in PMC families. Both mutations affect highly conserved residues in the III-IV cytoplasmic loop, a portion of the sodium channel thought to pivot in response to membrane depolarization, thereby blocking and inactivating the channel. Abnormal function of this cytoplasmic loop therefore appears to produce the Na+ current abnormality and the unique temperature-sensitive clinical phenotype in this disorder.


Journal of Neurology | 2002

A randomised controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin in IgM paraprotein associated demyelinating neuropathy

Giancarlo Comi; Luisa Roveri; Antony Swan; Hugh J. Willison; Martin Bojar; Isabel Illa; Clementine Karageorgiou; Eduardo Nobile-Orazio; Peter Van den Bergh; Tony Swan; Richard Hughes

Abstract. This multicentre randomised double blind crossover trial tested the short term efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) 2.0 g/kg given over 24 or 48 hours in patients with paraproteinaemic demyelinating neuropathy (PDN). Twenty-two patients were randomised and completed the trial. After 2 weeks, the overall disability grade decreased during both IVIg treatment and placebo but neither change was significant nor was the mean difference between the treatment effects. After 4 weeks the overall disability decreased by a mean of 0.55 [0.67] grades during the IVIg period (p = 0.001) while it was substantially unmodified during the placebo period. The mean difference between the treatment effects was significant (p = 0.05). Overall during the IVIg period 10 patients improved and 11 were stable and one got worse. During the placebo period 4 patients improved, 4 deteriorated and 14 were stable. Many secondary outcome measures, including Rankin scale, time to walk 10 metres, grip strength, sensory symptoms score were significantly better during IVIg treatment. Two serious adverse events occurred during the trial, both during placebo treatment. In conclusion the trial showed some short-term benefit of IVIg in about half of the patients confirming previous observation.


Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2014

Leiomodin-3 dysfunction results in thin filament disorganization and nemaline myopathy

Michaela Yuen; Sarah A. Sandaradura; James J. Dowling; Alla S. Kostyukova; Natalia Moroz; Kate G. R. Quinlan; Vilma-Lotta Lehtokari; Gianina Ravenscroft; Emily J. Todd; Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy; David S. Gokhin; Jérome Maluenda; Monkol Lek; Flora Nolent; Christopher T. Pappas; Stefanie M. Novak; Adele D’Amico; Edoardo Malfatti; Brett Thomas; Stacey Gabriel; Namrata Gupta; Mark J. Daly; Biljana Ilkovski; Peter J. Houweling; Ann E. Davidson; Lindsay C. Swanson; Catherine A. Brownstein; Vandana Gupta; Livija Medne; Patrick Shannon

Nemaline myopathy (NM) is a genetic muscle disorder characterized by muscle dysfunction and electron-dense protein accumulations (nemaline bodies) in myofibers. Pathogenic mutations have been described in 9 genes to date, but the genetic basis remains unknown in many cases. Here, using an approach that combined whole-exome sequencing (WES) and Sanger sequencing, we identified homozygous or compound heterozygous variants in LMOD3 in 21 patients from 14 families with severe, usually lethal, NM. LMOD3 encodes leiomodin-3 (LMOD3), a 65-kDa protein expressed in skeletal and cardiac muscle. LMOD3 was expressed from early stages of muscle differentiation; localized to actin thin filaments, with enrichment near the pointed ends; and had strong actin filament-nucleating activity. Loss of LMOD3 in patient muscle resulted in shortening and disorganization of thin filaments. Knockdown of lmod3 in zebrafish replicated NM-associated functional and pathological phenotypes. Together, these findings indicate that mutations in the gene encoding LMOD3 underlie congenital myopathy and demonstrate that LMOD3 is essential for the organization of sarcomeric thin filaments in skeletal muscle.


Brain | 2007

Relative contribution of mutations in genes for autosomal dominant distal hereditary motor neuropathies: a genotype–phenotype correlation study

Ines Dierick; Jonathan Baets; Joy Irobi; Anne-Marie Jacobs; Els De Vriendt; Tine Deconinck; Luciano Merlini; Peter Van den Bergh; Vedrana Milic Rasic; Wim Robberecht; Dirk Fischer; Raul Juntas Morales; Zoran Mitrović; Pavel Seeman; Radim Mazanec; Andrzej Kochański; Albena Jordanova; Michaela Auer-Grumbach; A. T. J. M. Helderman-van den Enden; John H. J. Wokke; Eva Nelis; Vincent Timmerman

Distal hereditary motor neuropathy (HMN) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders affecting spinal alpha-motor neurons. Since 2001, mutations in six different genes have been identified for autosomal dominant distal HMN; glycyl-tRNA synthetase (GARS), dynactin 1 (DCTN1), small heat shock 27 kDa protein 1 (HSPB1), small heat shock 22 kDa protein 8 (HSPB8), Berardinelli-Seip congenital lipodystrophy (BSCL2) and senataxin (SETX). In addition a mutation in the (VAMP)-associated protein B and C (VAPB) was found in several Brazilian families with complex and atypical forms of autosomal dominantly inherited motor neuron disease. We have investigated the distribution of mutations in these seven genes in a cohort of 112 familial and isolated patients with a diagnosis of distal motor neuropathy and found nine different disease-causing mutations in HSPB8, HSPB1, BSCL2 and SETX in 17 patients of whom 10 have been previously reported. No mutations were found in GARS, DCTN1 and VAPB. The phenotypic features of patients with mutations in HSPB8, HSPB1, BSCL2 and SETX fit within the distal HMN classification, with only one exception; a C-terminal HSPB1-mutation was associated with upper motor neuron signs. Furthermore, we provide evidence for a genetic mosaicism in transmitting an HSPB1 mutation. This study, performed in a large cohort of familial and isolated distal HMN patients, clearly confirms the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of distal HMN and provides a basis for the development of algorithms for diagnostic mutation screening in this group of disorders.


Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry | 2009

Validity of diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a multicentre European study

Yusuf A. Rajabally; Guillaume Nicolas; Françoise Piéret; Pierre Bouche; Peter Van den Bergh

Background: Diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) have variable sensitivity and specificity. Newly published criteria by Koski et al combine clinical and electrophysiological components, either of which suffices to establish the diagnosis. European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) criteria require mandatory electrophysiology, as do other sets of criteria. Methods: The value of the two above-mentioned sets of criteria, on 151 patients with CIDP, and 162 controls with axonal neuropathy, from four European centres was assessed. Results were compared with Van den Bergh and Piéret’s criteria and those of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN). The utility of more extensive nerve-conduction studies was ascertained. Results: Koski et al’s criteria had a sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 99.3%. With unilateral, right-sided, forearm/foreleg, four-nerve studies, EFNS/PNS criteria offered a sensitivity of 81.3% and specificity of 96.2% for “definite/probable” CIDP. Van den Bergh and Piéret’s criteria had a sensitivity of 79.5% and specificity of 96.9%. AAN criteria were poorly sensitive (45.7%) but highly specific (100%). “Possible” electrophysiological CIDP as per EFNS/PNS criteria were poorly specific (69.2%). More extensive studies increased the diagnostic sensitivity of EFNS/PNS criteria (96.7%) but reduced the specificity (79.3%). Conclusions: In our patient populations, the EFNS/PNS criteria were the most sensitive and allowed identification of a highly significantly greater number of patients than Koski et al’s criteria. The latter were comparable in specificity with the “definite/probable” EFNS/PNS electrodiagnostic subcategories. More extensive nerve-conduction studies improved diagnostic yield but resulted in loss of specificity.


European Journal of Neurology | 2003

Cost-utility analysis of intravenous immunoglobulin and prednisolone for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Paul McCrone; Dan Chisholm; Martin Knapp; Richard Hughes; Giancarlo Comi; Marinos C. Dalakas; Isabel Illa; Costas Kilindireas; Eduardo Nobile-Orazio; Anthony V. Swan; Peter Van den Bergh; Hugh J. Willison

The aim of this study was to provide an incremental cost‐effectiveness analysis comparing intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and prednisolone treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Patients were recruited to a double‐blind randomized crossover trial from nine European centres and received either prednisolone or IVIg during the first 6‐week treatment period on which the economic evaluation was based. A societal perspective was adopted in measuring service use and costs, although the costs of lost employment were not included. The main outcome measure in the economic evaluation was the number of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, with change in a 11‐point disability scale used to measure clinical outcomes. Service use and quality of life data were available for 25 patients. Baseline costs were controlled for using a bootstrapped multiple regression model. The cost difference between the two treatments was estimated to be €3754 over the 6‐week period. Health‐related quality of life, as measured by the EuroQol EQ‐5D instrument, increased more in the IVIg group but the difference was not statistically significant. Using a net‐benefit approach it was shown that the probability of IVIg being cost‐effective in comparison with prednisolone was 0.5 or above (i.e. was more likely to be cost‐effective than cost‐ineffective) only if one QALY was valued at over €250 000. The cost‐effectiveness of IVIg is greatly affected by the price of IVIg and the amount administered. The impact of later side‐effects of prednisolone on long‐term costs and quality of life are likely to reduce the cost per QALY of IVIg treatment.

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter Van den Bergh's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jean-Louis Thonnard

Université catholique de Louvain

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael P. Lunn

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Françoise Piéret

Université catholique de Louvain

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vinciane Van Parijs

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard Hughes

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge