Peter Vavassis
Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Peter Vavassis.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2013
Lara Hathout; Tarek Hijal; Valérie Théberge; B. Fortin; Horia Vulpe; Jean-Charles Hogue; Christine Lambert; Houda Bahig; Louise Provencher; Peter Vavassis; M. Yassa
PURPOSE Conventional radiation therapy (RT) administered in 25 fractions after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the standard treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. Although accelerated hypofractionated regimens in 16 fractions have been shown to be equivalent to conventional RT for invasive breast cancer, few studies have reported results of using hypofractionated RT in DCIS. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this multicenter collaborative effort, we retrospectively reviewed the records of all women with DCIS at 3 institutions treated with BCS followed by hypofractionated whole-breast RT (WBRT) delivered in 16 fractions. RESULTS Between 2003 and 2010, 440 patients with DCIS underwent BCS followed by hypofractionated WBRT in 16 fractions for a total dose of 42.5 Gy (2.66 Gy per fraction). Boost RT to the surgical bed was given to 125 patients (28%) at a median dose of 10 Gy in 4 fractions (2.5 Gy per fraction). After a median follow-up time of 4.4 years, 14 patients had an ipsilateral local relapse, resulting in a local recurrence-free survival of 97% at 5 years. Positive surgical margins, high nuclear grade, age less than 50 years, and a premenopausal status were all statistically associated with an increased occurrence of local recurrence. Tumor hormone receptor status, use of adjuvant hormonal therapy, and administration of additional boost RT did not have an impact on local control in our cohort. On multivariate analysis, positive margins, premenopausal status, and nuclear grade 3 tumors had a statistically significant worse local control rate. CONCLUSIONS Hypofractionated RT using 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions provides excellent local control for patients with DCIS undergoing BCS.
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy | 2012
Peter Vavassis; D. Nguyen; Jean-Paul Bahary; M. Yassa
In regards to prostate cancer, the classic radiotherapy dose ranges from 70–80 Gy, administered in daily 2-Gy fractions. However, when taking into account the particular radiobiological model of prostate cancer cells, one realizes that there is a potential theoretical advantage to delivering a greater biological effective dose per treatment in a lower number of fractions. Both recent and older publications have attempted to explore this treatment option. This critical review comprehensively examines the current state of knowledge concerning hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer.
Practical radiation oncology | 2015
Houda Bahig; Étienne Roussin; M. Yassa; Peter Vavassis; Céline Lemaire; Laurie Archambault; David Nguyen
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare absorbed dose with the treated breast and organs at risks (OARs) with weekly image guidance using electronic portal imaging (EPI), complete kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kV CBCT), and partial kV CBCT. METHODS AND MATERIALS Using a thorax female phantom, we determined absorbed doses to treated and contralateral breast, ipsilateral and contralateral lung, heart, and skin for tangential EPI, complete kV CBCT, and partial kV CBCT. Doses were measured by use of ionization chambers and compared with treatment planning system calculations. With simulation of breast tangential irradiation to a standard dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, dose to each organ was measured for each image guidance technique. RESULTS Use of weekly EPI was associated with a significantly increased dose to the treated breast compared with weekly complete and partial kV CBCT (4.44 ± 0.04 vs 1.00 ± 0.07 vs 0.576 ± 0.003 cGy, respectively). Dose to the contralateral breast, ipsilateral and contralateral lung, heart, and contralateral skin was lower with EPI than with either complete or partial kV CBCT (0.042 ± 0.004 vs 0.36 ± 0.01 vs 0.23 ± 0.01 cGy, 0.06 ± 0.04 vs 0.42 ± 0.02 vs 0.31 ± 0.01 cGy, 0.004 ± 0.002 vs 0.29 ± 0.01 vs 0.22 ± 0.01 cGy, 0.03 ± 0.08 vs 0.36 ± 0.02 vs 0.25 ± 0.01 cGy, and 0.20 ± 0.02 vs 0.80 ± 0.06 vs 0.40 ± 0.03 cGy, respectively). Compared with complete CBCT, the use of partial CBCT allowed dose reductions of 42%, 37%, 27%, 24%, and 28% to the ipsilateral breast, contralateral breast, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung, and heart, respectively. Additional dose from weekly CBCT was significantly lower than treatment-related scatter dose for all OARs. CONCLUSIONS Use of CBCT was associated with decreased dose to ipsilateral breast and increased dose to all OARs compared with EPI. Significant dose reduction can be achieved with the use of partial CBCT, while generally maintaining image quality.
Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism | 2017
David Tiberi; Peter Vavassis; D. Nguyen; M. Yassa
ABSTRACT Introduction: Recent advances in image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) has prompted much interest in the use of high-dose-per-fraction regimens for prostate cancer. Furthermore, from a radiobiological standpoint, there is increasing evidence that prostate tumors have a relatively low ɑ/β ratio therefore, the use of hypofractionation may potentially offer acceptable tumor control while minimizing late toxicity to critical structures. Areas covered: This expert review explores the current evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. A particular emphasis was placed on large, randomized phase III trials as these are most likely to influence clinical practice. The authors discuss the use of both moderate and extreme hypofractionation. Expert commentary: The recent publication of 5-year outcomes from large prospective trials of moderate hypofractionation enhances our confidence that these techniques are both safe and effective. We recommend the fractionation scheme of 60 Gy in 20 fractions as this regimen was not associated with any notable increase in late toxicity. With respect to extreme hypofractionation, mature phase III trials are needed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of these techniques. For now, the use of radiosurgery should be limited to participation in prospective clinical trials.
Pathology & Oncology Research | 2016
Ferenc Lakosi; Akos Gulyban; Selma Ben-Mustapha Simoni; Paul Viet Nguyen; Séverine Cucchiaro; Laurence Seidel; L. Janvary; Sophie Nicolas; Peter Vavassis; Philippe Coucke
Pathology & Oncology Research | 2015
Ferenc Lakosi; Akos Gulyban; L. Janvary; Selma Ben-Mustapha Simoni; Nicolas Jansen; Laurence Seidel; Árpád Kovács; Peter Vavassis; Philippe Coucke
Archive | 2010
Philippe Coucke; Michel Wonner; Zsolt Levente Janvary; Peter Vavassis; Audrey Broens; W. de Neve; Johan Berte; Eric Lenaerts
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2014
M. Yassa; Z.S. Fawaz; D. Nguyen; B. Fortin; L. Sideris; Peter Vavassis
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2013
Z.S. Fawaz; M. Yassa; D. Nguyen; Peter Vavassis
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2013
M. Yassa; Peter Vavassis; T. Niazi