Peter Vuylsteke

Olaparib combined with chemotherapy for recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib has shown antitumour activity in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent, high-grade serous ovarian cancer with or without BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of olaparib in combination with chemotherapy, followed by olaparib maintenance monotherapy, versus chemotherapy alone in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent, high-grade serous ovarian cancer. METHODS In this randomised, open-label, phase 2 study, adult patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent, high-grade serous ovarian cancer who had received up to three previous courses of platinum-based chemotherapy and who were progression free for at least 6 months before randomisation received either olaparib (200 mg capsules twice daily, administered orally on days 1-10 of each 21-day cycle) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2), administered intravenously on day 1) and carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 4 mg/mL per min, according to the Calvert formula, administered intravenously on day 1), then olaparib monotherapy (400 mg capsules twice daily, given continuously) until progression (the olaparib plus chemotherapy group), or paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) on day 1) and carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/mL per min on day 1) then no further treatment (the chemotherapy alone group). Randomisation was done by an interactive voice response system, stratified by number of previous platinum-containing regimens received and time to disease progression after the previous platinum regimen. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, analysed by intention to treat. Prespecified exploratory analyses included efficacy by BRCA mutation status, assessed retrospectively. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01081951, and has been completed. FINDINGS Between Feb 12 and July 30, 2010, 173 patients at 43 investigational sites in 12 countries were enrolled into the study, of whom 162 were eligible and were randomly assigned to the two treatment groups (81 to the olaparib plus chemotherapy group and 81 to the chemotherapy alone group). Of these randomised patients, 156 were treated in the combination phase (81 in the olaparib plus chemotherapy group and 75 in the chemotherapy alone group) and 121 continued to the maintenance or no further treatment phase (66 in the olaparib plus chemotherapy group and 55 in the chemotherapy alone group). BRCA mutation status was known for 107 patients (either at baseline or determined retrospectively): 41 (38%) of 107 had a BRCA mutation (20 in the olaparib plus chemotherapy group and 21 in the chemotherapy alone group). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the olaparib plus chemotherapy group (median 12.2 months [95% CI 9.7-15.0]) than in the chemotherapy alone group (median 9.6 months [95% CI 9.1-9.7) (HR 0.51 [95% CI 0.34-0.77]; p=0.0012), especially in patients with BRCA mutations (HR 0.21 [0.08-0.55]; p=0.0015). In the combination phase, adverse events that were reported at least 10% more frequently with olaparib plus chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone were alopecia (60 [74%] of 81 vs 44 [59%] of 75), nausea (56 [69%] vs 43 [57%]), neutropenia (40 [49%] vs 29 [39%]), diarrhoea (34 [42%] vs 20 [27%]), headache (27 [33%] vs seven [9%]), peripheral neuropathy (25 [31%] vs 14 [19%]), and dyspepsia (21 [26%] vs 9 [12%]); most were of mild-to-moderate intensity. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events during the combination phase were neutropenia (in 35 [43%] of 81 patients in the olaparib plus chemotherapy group vs 26 [35%] of 75 in the chemotherapy alone group) and anaemia (seven [9%] vs five [7%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 12 (15%) of 81 patients in the olaparib plus chemotherapy group and 16 of 75 (21%) patients in the chemotherapy alone group. INTERPRETATION Olaparib plus paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by maintenance monotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin alone, with the greatest clinical benefit in BRCA-mutated patients, and had an acceptable and manageable tolerability profile. FUNDING AstraZeneca.

Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): survival outcomes of a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial and their association with pathological complete response

BACKGROUND Findings from the randomised phase 3 NeoALTTO trial in women with HER2-positive early breast cancer showed that the combination of lapatinib and trastuzumab significantly improved rates of pathological complete response compared with either drug alone. Here, we report data for the prespecified secondary endpoints of event-free and overall survival, and assess the association between these outcomes and pathological complete response. METHODS We enrolled women with HER2-positive early breast cancer and randomly assigned them to receive oral lapatinib (1500 mg), intravenous trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose followed by 2 mg/kg), or lapatinib (1000 mg) plus trastuzumab (same dose as for single agent) in combination for 6 weeks, followed by an additional 12 weeks of the assigned anti-HER2 therapy in combination with weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)). Definitive surgery was done 4 weeks after the last dose of paclitaxel. After surgery, women received three cycles of FEC (fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) plus epirubicin 100 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2)) given intravenously every 3 weeks, followed by 34 weeks of the same assigned neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response. Secondary endpoints included event-free and overall survival (intention-to-treat analysis), and the association between pathological complete response and event-free or overall survival (analysed by landmark analysis at 30 weeks after randomisation). Follow-up is ongoing, and the trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00553358. FINDINGS 455 patients were enrolled: 154 (34%) were assigned to the lapatinib group, 149 (33%) to the trastuzumab group, and 152 (33%) to the lapatinib plus trastuzumab group. At an event follow-up of 3·77 years (IQR 3·50-4·22), 3-year event-free survival was 78% (95% CI 70-84) in the lapatinib group, 76% (68-82) in the trastuzumab group, and 84% (77-89) in the combination group. Event-free survival did not differ between the lapatinib and trastuzumab groups (HR 1·06, 95% CI 0·66-1·69, p=0·81), nor between the combination and trastuzumab groups (0·78, 0·47-1·28, p=0·33). Median survival follow-up was 3·84 years (IQR 3·60-4·24), and 3-year overall survival was 93% (95% CI 87-96) for lapatinib, 90% (84-94) for trastuzumab, and 95% (90-98) for combination therapy. Overall survival did not significantly differ between the lapatinib and trastuzumab groups (HR 0·86, 95% CI 0·45-1·63, p=0·65), nor between the combination and trastuzumab groups (0·62, 0·30-1·25, p=0·19). Landmark analyses showed that 3-year event-free survival was significantly improved for women who achieved pathological complete response compared with those who did not (HR 0·38, 95% CI 0·22-0·63, p=0·0003), as was 3-year overall survival (0·35, 0·15-0·70, p=0·005). Adverse events occurred in 149 (99%) patients receiving lapatinib, 142 (96%) patients receiving trastuzumab, and 147 (99%) patients receiving combination therapy. The most common adverse events were diarrhoea, rash or erythema, hepatic adverse events, and neutropenia (not related to FEC administration), and were consistent with known safety profiles of lapatinib and trastuzumab. Three primary and eight secondary cardiac events occurred, with no significant difference in incidence between treatment groups for primary or any cardiac events. INTERPRETATION Although event-free survival or overall survival did not differ between treatment groups, findings from our study confirm that patients who achieve pathological complete response after neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy have longer event-free and overall survival than do patients without pathological complete response. FUNDING GlaxoSmithKline.

Phase II study of afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, in demographically and genotypically defined lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES Afatinib, an oral irreversible ErbB family blocker, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Other potential biomarkers predicting response to afatinib, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) mutations and EGFR gene amplification, have not been validated yet. This phase II study investigated whether afatinib conferred clinical benefit in cohorts of adenocarcinoma patients with: (1) EGFR mutation and failing on erlotinib/gefitinib; or (2) increased copy number of EGFR by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); or (3) HER2 mutation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients started daily afatinib 50mg monotherapy. Upon disease progression, patients could continue, at the investigators discretion, afatinib (40mg) with the addition of paclitaxel (80mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks/4-week cycle). Endpoints included confirmed objective response (OR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control, and safety. RESULTS Of 41 patients treated (cohort 1: n=32; cohort 2: n=2; cohort 3: n=7), 33 received afatinib monotherapy; eight subsequently received afatinib plus paclitaxel. With afatinib monotherapy, one patient achieved a confirmed OR (partial response [PR]; cohort 2). Two further patients achieved unconfirmed PRs (one each in cohort 1 and cohort 3). Disease control was achieved by 17/32 (53%), 2/2 (100%) and 5/7 (71%) patients in cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In patients receiving combination therapy (median PFS: 6.7 weeks), one (cohort 3) had confirmed PR of 41.9 weeks. The most common afatinib-related adverse events were diarrhea (95%) and rash/acne (80%). CONCLUSION Afatinib demonstrated signs of clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients with activating HER2 or EGFR mutations or EGFR FISH-positive tumors.

Genomic Grade Index (GGI): feasibility in routine practice and impact on treatment decisions in early breast cancer.

Purpose Genomic Grade Index (GGI) is a 97-gene signature that improves histologic grade (HG) classification in invasive breast carcinoma. In this prospective study we sought to evaluate the feasibility of performing GGI in routine clinical practice and its impact on treatment recommendations. Methods Patients with pT1pT2 or operable pT3, N0-3 invasive breast carcinoma were recruited from 8 centers in Belgium. Fresh surgical samples were sent at room temperature in the MapQuant Dx™ PathKit for centralized genomic analysis. Genomic profiles were determined using Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 and GGI calculated using the MapQuant Dx® protocol, which defines tumors as low or high Genomic Grade (GG-1 and GG-3 respectively). Results 180 pts were recruited and 155 were eligible. The MapQuant test was performed in 142 cases and GGI was obtained in 78% of cases (n=111). Reasons for failures were 15 samples with <30% of invasive tumor cells (11%), 15 with insufficient RNA quality (10%), and 1 failed hybridization (<1%). For tumors with an available representative sample (≥ 30% inv. tumor cells) (n=127), the success rate was 87.5%. GGI reclassified 69% of the 54 HG2 tumors as GG-1 (54%) or GG-3 (46%). Changes in treatment recommendations occurred mainly in the subset of HG2 tumors reclassified into GG-3, with increased use of chemotherapy in this subset. Conclusion The use of GGI is feasible in routine clinical practice and impacts treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01916837, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01916837

Prognostic and predictive effects of primary versus secondary platinum resistance for bevacizumab treatment for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in the AURELIA trial

BACKGROUND Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were significantly improved by adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) in the phase III AURELIA trial. We explored treatment outcomes according to primary platinum resistance (PPR) versus secondary platinum resistance (SPR). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were categorized as PPR (disease progression <6 months after completing first-line platinum therapy) or SPR (progression ≥6 months after first platinum but <6 months after second). The exploratory Cox and logistic regression analyses correlated PFS, ORR, overall survival (OS), and PROs with the time to development of platinum resistance. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar in patients with PPR (n = 262; 73%) and SPR (n = 99; 27%), although ascites were more common in the PPR subgroup. In bevacizumab-treated patients (n = 179), SPR was associated with improved PFS (median 10.2 versus 5.6 months in PPR patients; P < 0.001) and OS (median 22.2 versus 13.7 months, respectively; P < 0.001) but not PROs (22% versus 22% with improved abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms at week 8/9). In multivariate analyses, SPR remained an independent prognostic factor for better PFS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.67; P < 0.001] and OS (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.80; P = 0.005) in bevacizumab-treated patients, but was not statistically significant for either end point in the chemotherapy-alone subgroup. The magnitude of PFS benefit from bevacizumab appeared greater in SPR than PPR patients (HR 0.30 versus 0.55, respectively; interaction P = 0.07) with a similar direction of effect for OS (interaction P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS In bevacizumab-treated patients, PFS and OS were more favorable in SPR than PPR patients with equally improved PROs. The PFS and OS benefit from combining bevacizumab with chemotherapy was more pronounced in SPR than PPR PROC. PPR versus SPR should be a stratification factor in future trials evaluating anti-angiogenic therapy for PROC.

Prospective Evaluation of First-Line Erlotinib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Carrying an Activating EGFR Mutation: A Multicenter Academic Phase II Study in Caucasian Patients (FIELT)

Introduction Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibition is the preferred first-line treatment of advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung that harbors EGFR activating tyrosine kinase domain mutations. Most data available pertain to Asian populations in which such mutations are more prevalent. We report on the long-term results of first-line treatment with erlotinib in Caucasian patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung that have a somatic EGFR mutation in their tumor. Methods Multicenter academic prospective phase II study with erlotinib in patients with an activating EGFR tyrosine kinase (TK) domain somatic mutation (any exon encoding the kinase domain) in the tumor and no prior treatment for their advanced disease. Results Phenotypic preselecting of 229 patients led to a high EGFR mutation detection rate of 24% of which 46 patients were included in the phase II study. With a progression free survival (PFS) of 81% at three months the study met its primary endpoint for presumed superiority over chemotherapy. With an overall median PFS of 11 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 23 months, the results compare favorably with results obtained in randomized studies using TKI in first line in EGFR mutation positive adenocarcinoma of the lung. Conclusion The present study reinforces the use of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition (TKI) as a first line treatment of choice for advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung carrying an activating EGFR mutation. The mutation rate in preselected Caucasian patients is higher than previously reported. Issues relevant for clinical practice are discussed. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00339586

SUCON Trial (SUnitinib CONsolidation Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer): A Belgian Multicenter Phase II Randomized Trial in Her2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Evaluating Consolidation Antiangiogenic Therapy with Sunitinib after Objective Response to Taxane Chemotherapy.

Under the auspices of the Belgian Society of Medical Oncology (BSMO).Background: New drugs are generally tested in patients with metastatic disease where bulky tumor mass is present. However, antiangiogenic compounds are probably more beneficial in the prevention of regrowth from tumors with small tumor load than in bulky tumors. This study wants to test the hypothesis that antiangiogenic compounds such as sunitinib are able to delay tumor progression after tumor mass reduction by taxanes, i.e. an objective response (PR or CR).Materials and methods: This is a dual-arm open-label randomized multicenter phase II clinical trial with 2:1 randomization evaluating the efficacy of sunitinib (study arm) versus no therapy (control arm, only for descriptive purposes) in patients with metastatic breast cancer after objective response to taxane chemotherapy. Eligible patients had metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer, had received 10 to 20 weeks of first- or second line taxane containing chemotherapy resulting in an objective response (RECIST). Patients received sunitinib (arm A) 50 mg/d po 4w/6 (amended to 37.5 mg continuously in 1-2008) or no therapy (arm B). Patients were stratified for disease free interval and dominant site of disease. Patients randomized to arm B were offered the opportunity to receive open-label sunitinib treatment upon development of disease progression. Treatment was pursued until disease progression or major intolerance or patients refusal. All patients who received at least day 1 of study treatment were evaluated for efficacy, toxicity and safety. The duration of response after taxane treatment in previous studies with metastatic breast cancer is around 7 months. Based on this, the median time interval between the end of chemotherapy and tumor progression was expected to be about 5 months in our study population. The primary endpoint was to determine the proportion of patients alive and without disease progression (PFS) at 5 months after study entry in arm A. If ≤ 18/36 patients are progression-free and alive at 5 months, sunitinib will be declared insufficiently active (beta 0.05); if ≥ 22 patients are progression-free and alive at 5 months, sunitinib will be declared active (alpha 0.05) and it will be recommended to continue the trial as a phase III design.Results: 10/36 patients (28%) reached 5 months PFS in arm A and 4/19 in arm B (21%). Median PFS was 3.4 months in Arm A and 3.1 months in Arm B. Toxicity and overall survival data will be reported at the meeting.Discussion: This study does not confirm the hypothesis that sunitinib can lead to a significant proportion of patients with PFS of ≥ 5 months after objective response to taxanes. This proof-of-principle study suggests that also the role of consolidation therapy with other (already approved) antiangiogenic treatments should be evaluated carefully in prospective clinical trials (high economic cost). Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 203.

Desmoid tumour of the breast: case report and review of the literature.

Abstract Fibromatosis or desmoid tumour of the breast is an extremely rare, locally aggressive tumour with a tendency to relapse. Nevertheless these tumours do not have metastatic potential. Early recognition and wide local excision of the tumour is the treatment of choice. We present a case of a desmoid tumour of the breast in a 67-year-old woman and provide a review of the literature.

Perforated Jejunal Diverticulitis: a Rare Presentation of Acute Abdomen

Abstract Jejunal diverticulosis is a rare clinical finding with possible serious complications. A case of acute abdomen due to a perforated jejunal diverticulum is discussed, followed by a literature review concerning aetiology, symptoms, complications, diagnosis and treatment is provided.

Abstract P5-16-06: Neoadjuvant weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by dose dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in triple negative breast cancer patients: A single arm phase II study from the Belgian Society of Medical Oncology

Introduction: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a challenging disease with dismal prognosis. Platinum analogs have not yet shown to improve long term outcome in this setting, but are associated with increased pathological complete response rate (pCR) at the cost of higher toxicity. Aim: To further increase or maintain the high pCR rate with platinum containing schedules while decreasing toxicity by administering low dose weekly carboplatin instead of high-dose 3 weekly carboplatin as in CALGB 40603.(1) Patients and methods: We evaluated the tolerability and the impact of the addition of weekly carboplatin (CP) to paclitaxel (P) and dose dense epirubicin-cyclofosfamide (EC) on pCR in an open-label multicenter phase II study in stage II/III TNBC patients (pts). Sixty three pts received dose dense paclitaxel (P:80mg/m2/wk) concurrent with carboplatin (CP: AUC=2) for 12 wks, followed by two-weekly epirubicin (E:90mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (C:600mg/m2) for 4 cycles. The primary endpoint is pCR in the breast and axilla. Additionally treatment deliveryand adverse events are recorded. A correlative assessment of germline mutations in homologous recombination (HR) genes is planned. Pts are monitored for response by magnetic resonance and mammography and also for relapse free survival and time to treatment failure. The study size sample has been calculated according to the optimal Simon9s two-stage design method. The target sample size was 63 patients with 80% power to detect a pCR rate of ≥47% (α= 0.05). Results: Accrual to the study is completed with 63 eligible pts with operable, noninflammatory stage II and III TNBC included. Most patients were between 40 and 60 yrs old and were clinical stageT2 tumors. Half of the pts were clinically node + and 70% were G3. Sixty six percent had breast conserving surgery. Sixteen out of 26 (61.5%) of the currently evaluable pts achieved a pCR rate in the breast and axilla. The other ongoing patients have not yet reached this endpoint. Four out of 21 evaluable pts that completed the chemotherapy missed two or more doses of CP due to neutropenia(NP) G3/4(2), general deterioration G3(1) and polyneuropathy(PNP) G3(1) and seven pts needed one dose reduction of P and/or CP due to NP G3-4 (3-2) and PNP G2(1) and one abdominal infection. Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that the addition of weekly carboplatinum to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and EC is feasible and has a promising pCR rate in the breast and axilla as high as 61.5% in early TNBC pts. More mature toxicity and outcome data and correlation with genome analysis will be presented. (1) Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once per week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603(Alliance) Sikov WM et al. J Clin Oncol 33:13-21; 2014. Citation Format: Fontaine C, Cappoen N, Renard V, Vuylsteke P, Van Den Bulck H, Glorieux P, t9Kint de Roodenbeke D, Dopchie C, Decoster L, Vanacker L, De Greve J, Awada A, Wildiers H. Neoadjuvant weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by dose dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in triple negative breast cancer patients: A single arm phase II study from the Belgian Society of Medical Oncology [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-06.