Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Peter W. Kaplan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Peter W. Kaplan.


Neurology | 2009

Practice Parameter update: Management issues for women with epilepsy—Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): Teratogenesis and perinatal outcomes Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and American Epilepsy Society

Cynthia L. Harden; Kimford J. Meador; Page B. Pennell; W. A. Hauser; Gary S. Gronseth; Jacqueline A. French; Samuel Wiebe; David J. Thurman; Barbara S. Koppel; Peter W. Kaplan; Julian N. Robinson; Jennifer L. Hopp; Tricia Y. Ting; Barry E. Gidal; Collin A. Hovinga; Andrew Wilner; Blanca Vazquez; Lewis B. Holmes; Allan Krumholz; Richard H. Finnell; Deborah Hirtz; C. Le Guen

Objective: To reassess the evidence for management issues related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy. Methods: Systematic review of relevant articles published between January 1985 and June 2007. Results: It is highly probable that intrauterine first-trimester valproate (VPA) exposure has higher risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) compared to carbamazepine and possible compared to phenytoin or lamotrigine. Compared to untreated WWE, it is probable that VPA as part of polytherapy and possible that VPA as monotherapy contribute to the development of MCMs. It is probable that antiepileptic drug (AED) polytherapy as compared to monotherapy regimens contributes to the development of MCMs and to reduced cognitive outcomes. For monotherapy, intrauterine exposure to VPA probably reduces cognitive outcomes. Further, monotherapy exposure to phenytoin or phenobarbital possibly reduces cognitive outcomes. Neonates of WWE taking AEDs probably have an increased risk of being small for gestational age and possibly have an increased risk of a 1-minute Apgar score of <7. Recommendations: If possible, avoidance of valproate (VPA) and antiepileptic drug (AED) polytherapy during the first trimester of pregnancy should be considered to decrease the risk of major congenital malformations (Level B). If possible, avoidance of VPA and AED polytherapy throughout pregnancy should be considered to prevent reduced cognitive outcomes (Level B). If possible, avoidance of phenytoin and phenobarbital during pregnancy may be considered to prevent reduced cognitive outcomes (Level C). Pregnancy risk stratification should reflect that the offspring of women with epilepsy taking AEDs are probably at increased risk for being small for gestational age (Level B) and possibly at increased risk of 1-minute Apgar scores of <7 (Level C).


Epilepsia | 2009

Management issues for women with epilepsy—Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): II. Teratogenesis and perinatal outcomes Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society

Cynthia L. Harden; Kimford J. Meador; Page B. Pennell; W. Allen Hauser; Gary S. Gronseth; Jacqueline A. French; Samuel Wiebe; David J. Thurman; Barbara S. Koppel; Peter W. Kaplan; Julian N. Robinson; Jennifer L. Hopp; Tricia Y. Ting; Barry E. Gidal; Collin A. Hovinga; Andrew Wilner; Blanca Vazquez; Lewis B. Holmes; Allan Krumholz; Richard H. Finnell; Deborah Hirtz; Claire L. Le Guen

A committee assembled by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) reassessed the evidence related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy, including antiepileptic drug (AED) teratogenicity and adverse perinatal outcomes. It is highly probable that intrauterine first‐trimester valproate (VPA) exposure has higher risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) compared to carbamazepine (CBZ), and possibly compared to phenytoin (PHT) or lamotrigine (LTG). It is probable that VPA as part of polytherapy and possible that VPA as monotherapy contribute to the development of MCMs. AED polytherapy probably contributes to the development of MCMs and reduced cognitive outcomes compared to monotherapy. Intrauterine exposure to VPA monotherapy probably reduces cognitive outcomes and monotherapy exposure to PHT or phenobarbital (PB) possibly reduces cognitive outcomes. Neonates of WWE taking AEDs probably have an increased risk of being small for gestational age and possibly have an increased risk of a 1‐minute Apgar score of <7. If possible, avoidance of VPA and AED polytherapy during the first trimester of pregnancy should be considered to decrease the risk of MCMs. If possible, avoidance of VPA and AED polytherapy throughout pregnancy should be considered and avoidance of PHT and PB throughout pregnancy may be considered to prevent reduced cognitive outcomes.


Neurology | 2009

Practice Parameter update: Management issues for women with epilepsy—Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): Obstetrical complications and change in seizure frequency Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and American Epilepsy Society

Cynthia L. Harden; Jennifer L. Hopp; Tricia Y. Ting; Page B. Pennell; Jacqueline A. French; W. A. Hauser; Samuel Wiebe; Gary S. Gronseth; David J. Thurman; Kimford J. Meador; Barbara S. Koppel; Peter W. Kaplan; Julian N. Robinson; Barry E. Gidal; Collin A. Hovinga; Andrew Wilner; Blanca Vazquez; Lewis B. Holmes; Allan Krumholz; Richard H. Finnell; C. Le Guen

Objective: To reassess the evidence for management issues related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy, including the risk of pregnancy complications or other medical problems during pregnancy in WWE compared to other women, change in seizure frequency, the risk of status epilepticus, and the rate of remaining seizure-free during pregnancy. Methods: A 20-member committee including general neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review and classification of relevant articles published between 1985 and February 2008. Results: For WWE taking antiepileptic drugs, there is probably no substantially increased risk (greater than two times expected) of cesarean delivery or late pregnancy bleeding, and probably no moderately increased risk (greater than 1.5 times expected) of premature contractions or premature labor and delivery. There is possibly a substantially increased risk of premature contractions and premature labor and delivery during pregnancy for WWE who smoke. Seizure freedom for at least 9 months prior to pregnancy is probably associated with a high likelihood (84%–92%) of remaining seizure-free during pregnancy. Recommendations: Women with epilepsy (WWE) should be counseled that seizure freedom for at least 9 months prior to pregnancy is probably associated with a high rate (84%–92%) of remaining seizure-free during pregnancy (Level B). However, WWE who smoke should be counseled that they possibly have a substantially increased risk of premature contractions and premature labor and delivery during pregnancy (Level C).


Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology | 2005

The ACNS subcommittee on research terminology for continuous EEG monitoring: proposed standardized terminology for rhythmic and periodic EEG patterns encountered in critically ill patients.

Lawrence J. Hirsch; Richard P. Brenner; Frank W. Drislane; Elson L. So; Peter W. Kaplan; Kenneth G. Jordan; Susan T. Herman; Suzette M. LaRoche; Bryan Young; Thomas P. Bleck; Mark L. Scheuer; Ronald G. Emerson

Continuous EEG monitoring is becoming a commonly usedtool in the assessment of brain function in critically illpatients. However, there is no uniformly accepted nomencla-ture for the EEG patterns frequently encountered in thesepatients, such as periodic discharges, fluctuating rhythmicpatterns, and combinations thereof. Similarly, there is noconsensus regarding which patterns are associated with on-going neuronal injury, which needs to be treated, or howaggressively to treat them. The first step in addressing theseissues is to standardize terminology to allow multicenterresearch projects and to facilitate communication. To thisend, we gathered a group of electroencephalographers withparticular expertise or interest in this area to develop stan-dardized terminology to be used primarily in the researchsetting. One of the main goals was to eliminate terms withclinical connotations, intended or not, such as “triphasicwaves,” a term that implies a metabolic encephalopathy withno relationship to seizures. We also decided to avoid the useof “ictal,” “interictal,” and “epileptiform” for the equivocalpatterns that are the primary focus of this report.A standardized method of quantifying interictal dis-charges is also included for the same reasons, with no attemptto alter the existing definition of epileptiform discharges(sharpwavesandspikes Noachtaretal.,1999 .Similarly,weare not necessarily suggesting abandonment of prior termssuch as periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges (PLEDs)and triphasic waves for clinical use.This is a proposal subject to future modifications basedon use and feedback from others.


Neurology | 2009

Practice Parameter update: Management issues for women with epilepsy—Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): Vitamin K, folic acid, blood levels, and breastfeeding Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and American Epilepsy Society

Cynthia L. Harden; Page B. Pennell; Barbara S. Koppel; Collin A. Hovinga; Barry E. Gidal; Kimford J. Meador; Jennifer L. Hopp; Tricia Y. Ting; W. A. Hauser; David J. Thurman; Peter W. Kaplan; Julian N. Robinson; Jacqueline A. French; Samuel Wiebe; Andrew Wilner; Blanca Vazquez; Lewis B. Holmes; Allan Krumholz; Richard H. Finnell; Patricia Osborne Shafer; C. Le Guen

Objective: To reassess the evidence for management issues related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy, including preconceptional folic acid use, prenatal vitamin K use, risk of hemorrhagic disease of the newborn, clinical implications of placental and breast milk transfer of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), risks of breastfeeding, and change in AED levels during pregnancy. Methods: A 20-member committee evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review and classification of relevant articles published between 1985 and October 2007. Results: Preconceptional folic acid supplementation is possibly effective in preventing major congenital malformations in the newborns of WWE taking AEDs. There is inadequate evidence to determine if the newborns of WWE taking AEDs have a substantially increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. Primidone and levetiracetam probably transfer into breast milk in amounts that may be clinically important. Valproate, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine probably are not transferred into breast milk in clinically important amounts. Pregnancy probably causes an increase in the clearance and a decrease in the concentration of lamotrigine, phenytoin, and to a lesser extent carbamazepine, and possibly decreases the level of levetiracetam and the active oxcarbazepine metabolite, the monohydroxy derivative. Recommendations: Supplementing women with epilepsy with at least 0.4 mg of folic acid before they become pregnant may be considered (Level C). Monitoring of lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and phenytoin levels during pregnancy should be considered (Level B) and monitoring of levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine (as monohydroxy derivative) levels may be considered (Level C). A paucity of evidence limited the strength of many recommendations.


Epilepsia | 2009

Management issues for women with epilepsy—Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): III. Vitamin K, folic acid, blood levels, and breast-feeding Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society

Cynthia L. Harden; Page B. Pennell; Barbara S. Koppel; Collin A. Hovinga; Barry E. Gidal; Kimford J. Meador; Jennifer L. Hopp; Tricia Y. Ting; W. A. Hauser; David J. Thurman; Peter W. Kaplan; Julian N. Robinson; Jacqueline A. French; Samuel Wiebe; Andrew Wilner; Blanca Vazquez; Lewis B. Holmes; Allan Krumholz; Richard H. Finnell; Patricia Osborne Shafer; Claire L. Le Guen

A committee assembled by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) reassessed the evidence related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy, including preconceptional folic acid and prenatal vitamin K use and the clinical implications of placental and breast‐milk transfer of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The committee evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review and classification of relevant articles. Preconceptional folic acid supplementation is possibly effective in preventing major congenital malformations in the newborns of WWE taking AEDs. There is inadequate evidence to determine if the newborns of WWE taking AEDs have a substantially increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. Primidone and levetiracetam probably transfer into breast milk in clinically important amounts. Valproate, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine probably are not transferred into breast milk in clinically important amounts. Pregnancy probably causes an increase in the clearance and a decrease in the concentrations of lamotrigine, phenytoin, and, to a lesser extent carbamazepine, and possibly decreases the level of levetiracetam and the active oxcarbazepine metabolite, the monohydroxy derivative (MHD). Supplementing WWE with at least 0.4u2003mg of folic acid before pregnancy may be considered. Monitoring of lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and phenytoin levels during pregnancy should be considered, and monitoring of levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine (as MHD) levels may be considered. A paucity of evidence limited the strength of many recommendations.


Lancet Neurology | 2010

Blantyre Malaria Project Epilepsy Study (BMPES) of neurological outcomes in retinopathy-positive paediatric cerebral malaria survivors: a prospective cohort study

Gretchen L. Birbeck; Malcolm E. Molyneux; Peter W. Kaplan; Karl B. Seydel; Yamikani Chimalizeni; Kondwani Kawaza; Terrie E. Taylor

Summary Background Cerebral malaria, a disorder characterised by coma, parasitaemia, and no other evident cause of coma, is challenging to diagnose definitively in endemic regions that have high rates of asymptomatic parasitaemia and limited neurodiagnostic facilities. A recently described malaria retinopathy improves diagnostic specificity. We aimed to establish whether retinopathy-positive cerebral malaria is a risk factor for epilepsy or other neurodisabilities. Methods Between 2005 and 2007, we did a prospective cohort study of survivors of cerebral malaria with malaria retinopathy in Blantyre, Malawi. Children with cerebral malaria were identified at the time of their index admission and age-matched to concurrently admitted children without coma or nervous system infection. Initially matching of cases to controls was 1:1 but, in 2006, enrolment criteria for cerebral malaria survivors were revised to limit inclusion to children with cerebral malaria and retinopathy on the basis of indirect ophthalmoscopic examination; matching was then changed to 1:2 and the revised inclusion criteria were applied retrospectively for children enrolled previously. Clinical assessments at discharge and standardised nurse-led follow-up every 3 months thereafter were done to identify children with new seizure disorders or other neurodisabilities. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was done for incident epilepsy. Findings 132 children with retinopathy-positive cerebral malaria and 264 age-matched, non-comatose controls were followed up for a median of 495 days (IQR 195–819). 12 of 132 cerebral malaria survivors developed epilepsy versus none of 264 controls (odds ratio [OR] undefined; p<0·0001). 28 of 121 cerebral malaria survivors developed new neurodisabilities, characterised by gross motor, sensory, or language deficits, compared with two of 253 controls (OR 37·8, 95% CI 8·8–161·8; p<0·0001). The risk factors for epilepsy in children with cerebral malaria were a higher maximum temperature (39·4°C [SD 1·2] vs 38·5°C [1·1]; p=0·01) and acute seizures (11/12 vs 76/120; OR 6·37, 95% CI 1·02–141·2), and male sex was a risk factor for new neurodisabilities (20/28 vs 38/93; OR 3·62, 1·44–9·06). Interpretation Almost a third of retinopathy-positive cerebral malaria survivors developed epilepsy or other neurobehavioural sequelae. Neuroprotective clinical trials aimed at managing hyperpyrexia and optimising seizure control are warranted. Funding US National Institutes of Health and Wellcome Trust.


Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology | 2015

Consensus Statement on Continuous EEG in Critically Ill Adults and Children, Part I: Indications

Susan T. Herman; Nicholas S. Abend; Thomas P. Bleck; Kevin E. Chapman; Frank W. Drislane; Ronald G. Emerson; Elizabeth E. Gerard; Cecil D. Hahn; Aatif M. Husain; Peter W. Kaplan; Suzette M. LaRoche; Marc R. Nuwer; Mark Quigg; James J. Riviello; Sarah E. Schmitt; Liberty A. Simmons; Tammy N. Tsuchida; Lawrence J. Hirsch

Introduction: Critical Care Continuous EEG (CCEEG) is a common procedure to monitor brain function in patients with altered mental status in intensive care units. There is significant variability in patient populations undergoing CCEEG and in technical specifications for CCEEG performance. Methods: The Critical Care Continuous EEG Task Force of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society developed expert consensus recommendations on the use of CCEEG in critically ill adults and children. Recommendations: The consensus panel recommends CCEEG for diagnosis of nonconvulsive seizures, nonconvulsive status epilepticus, and other paroxysmal events, and for assessment of the efficacy of therapy for seizures and status epilepticus. The consensus panel suggests CCEEG for identification of ischemia in patients at high risk for cerebral ischemia; for assessment of level of consciousness in patients receiving intravenous sedation or pharmacologically induced coma; and for prognostication in patients after cardiac arrest. For each indication, the consensus panel describes the patient populations for which CCEEG is indicated, evidence supporting use of CCEEG, utility of video and quantitative EEG trends, suggested timing and duration of CCEEG, and suggested frequency of review and interpretation. Conclusion: CCEEG has an important role in detection of secondary injuries such as seizures and ischemia in critically ill adults and children with altered mental status.


Neurology | 2008

Pregnancy registries in epilepsy. A consensus statement on health outcomes

Kimford J. Meador; Page B. Pennell; Cynthia L. Harden; Jacki Gordon; Torbjörn Tomson; Peter W. Kaplan; Gregory L. Holmes; Jacqueline A. French; W. A. Hauser; P. G. Wells; Joyce A. Cramer

Most pregnant women with epilepsy require antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy. Present guidelines recommend optimizing treatment prior to conception, choosing the most effective AED for seizure type and syndrome, using monotherapy and lowest effective dose, and supplementing with folate. The Epilepsy Therapy Project established the international Health Outcomes in Pregnancy and Epilepsy (HOPE) forum to learn more about the impact of AEDs on the developing fetus, particularly the role of pregnancy registries in studying AED teratogenicity. The primary outcome of interest in these registries is the occurrence of major congenital malformations, with some data collected on minor malformations. Cognitive and behavioral outcomes are often beyond the timeframe for follow-up of these registries and require independent study. The HOPE consensus report describes the current state of knowledge and the limitations to interpretations of information from the various sources. Data regarding specific risks for both older and newer AEDs need to be analyzed carefully, considering study designs and confounding factors. There is a critical need for investigations to delineate the underlying mechanisms and explain the variance seen in outcomes across AEDs and within a single AED.


Neurology | 2015

New-onset refractory status epilepticus Etiology, clinical features, and outcome

Nicolas Gaspard; Brandon Foreman; Vincent Alvarez; Christian Cabrera Kang; John C. Probasco; Amy C. Jongeling; Emma Meyers; Alyssa R. Espinera; Kevin F. Haas; Sarah E. Schmitt; Elizabeth E. Gerard; Teneille Gofton; Peter W. Kaplan; Jong W. Lee; Benjamin Legros; Jerzy P. Szaflarski; Brandon M. Westover; Suzette M. LaRoche; Lawrence J. Hirsch

Objectives: The aims of this study were to determine the etiology, clinical features, and predictors of outcome of new-onset refractory status epilepticus. Methods: Retrospective review of patients with refractory status epilepticus without etiology identified within 48 hours of admission between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2013, in 13 academic medical centers. The primary outcome measure was poor functional outcome at discharge (defined as a score >3 on the modified Rankin Scale). Results: Of 130 cases, 67 (52%) remained cryptogenic. The most common identified etiologies were autoimmune (19%) and paraneoplastic (18%) encephalitis. Full data were available in 125 cases (62 cryptogenic). Poor outcome occurred in 77 of 125 cases (62%), and 28 (22%) died. Predictors of poor outcome included duration of status epilepticus, use of anesthetics, and medical complications. Among the 63 patients with available follow-up data (median 9 months), functional status improved in 36 (57%); 79% had good or fair outcome at last follow-up, but epilepsy developed in 37% with most survivors (92%) remaining on antiseizure medications. Immune therapies were used less frequently in cryptogenic cases, despite a comparable prevalence of inflammatory CSF changes. Conclusions: Autoimmune encephalitis is the most commonly identified cause of new-onset refractory status epilepticus, but half remain cryptogenic. Outcome at discharge is poor but improves during follow-up. Epilepsy develops in most cases. The role of anesthetics and immune therapies warrants further investigation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Peter W. Kaplan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Page B. Pennell

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barry E. Gidal

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Collin A. Hovinga

University of Tennessee Health Science Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge