Petina Musara
University of California, San Francisco
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Petina Musara.
Aids and Behavior | 2012
Cynthia Woodsong; Patty Alleman; Petina Musara; Adlight Chandipwisa; Mike Chirenje; Francis Martinson; Irving Hoffman
This paper presents empirical data on motivation to join an HIV prevention trial of vaginal microbicide gels in Malawi and Zimbabwe, and participant assumption of a preventive misconception. Interviews were conducted with women participating in the trial and their male partners. Most of the female participants were able to adequately describe basic aspects of the trial design. HIV counseling and testing were primary reasons motivating women’s participation, and male partners’ support of the trial. 29% of women and 20% of men also provided indications of a preventive misconception, attributing gel use and trial participation to avoiding HIV infection.
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes | 2013
Barbra A. Richardson; Cliff Kelly; Gita Ramjee; Thomas R. Fleming; Bonus Makanani; Sarah Roberts; Petina Musara; Nkhafwire Mkandawire; Thomas R. Moench; Anne Coletti; Lydia Soto-Torres; Salim Safurdeen. Abdool Karim
Objective:To compare the 2 control arms of HPTN 035 [a hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) gel control arm and a no-gel control arm] to assess the behavioral effects associated with gel use and direct causal effects of the HEC gel on sexually transmitted infections (STIs), pregnancy, and genital safety. Design:Randomized trial with 1 blinded (HEC gel) and 1 open-label (no-gel) control arms. Methods:HIV-uninfected, sexually active women were randomized into the HEC gel arm (n = 771) and into the no-gel arm (n = 772) in 5 countries. Participants in the HEC gel arm were instructed to insert the study gel intravaginally <1 hour before each vaginal sex act. Data on sexual behavior, adherence, safety, pregnancy, and STIs were collected quarterly for 12–30 months of follow-up. Results:During follow-up, mean reported condom use in the past week was significantly higher in the no-gel arm (81% versus 70%, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences, after adjusting for this differential condom use, between the 2 arms in the rates of genital safety events, pregnancy outcomes, or STIs, including HIV-1. Conclusions:In this large randomized trial, we found no significant differences between the no-gel and HEC gel arms in the rates of genital safety events, pregnancy outcomes, or STIs. These results aid interpretation of the results of previous vaginal microbicide trials that used the HEC gel as a control. The HEC gel is suitable as a control for ongoing and future vaginal microbicide studies.
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2014
Cynthia Woodsong; Petina Musara; A Chandipwisa; Elizabeth T. Montgomery; P Alleman; M Chirenje; Tsungai Chipato; Francis Martinson; I Hoffman
The pipeline of vaginal microbicides for HIV prevention has expanded to include products for multipurpose prevention, but the interests of potential users and those advising on use have not been sufficiently investigated. Rather, assumptions about interest in multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) are inferred from what is known about acceptability and use of microbicides or contraceptives.
Aids and Behavior | 2018
Petina Musara; Elizabeth T. Montgomery; Nyaradzo Mgodi; Kubashni Woeber; Carolyne Akello; Miriam Hartmann; Helen Cheng; Lisa Levy; Ariana Katz; Cynthia I. Grossman; Z. Mike Chirenje; Ariane van der Straten; Barbara S. Mensch
Accurate estimates of study product use are critical to understanding and addressing adherence challenges in HIV prevention trials. The VOICE trial exposed a significant gap between self-reported adherence and drug detection. The VOICE-D qualitative study was designed to better understand non-adherence during VOICE, and was conducted in 2 stages: before (stage 1) and after (stage 2) drug detection results were provided to participants. Transcripts from 44 women who participated in both stages were analysed to understand the effect of presenting drug detection data on narratives of product use. Thirty-six women reported high adherence in stage 1, yet admitted non-use in stage 2, three reported high adherence in both stages (contrary to their drug detection results) and five had consistent responses across both stages and drug results. Presenting objective measures of use may facilitate more accurate product use reporting and should be evaluated in future prevention trials.
Contraception | 2009
Sarah Averbach; Nuriye Sahin-Hodoglugil; Petina Musara; Tsungai Chipato; Ariane van der Straten
Journal of the International AIDS Society | 2010
Elizabeth T. Montgomery; Cynthia Woodsong; Petina Musara; Helen Cheng; Tsungai Chipato; Thomas R. Moench; Freya Spielberg; Ariane van der Straten
Aids and Behavior | 2017
Elizabeth T. Montgomery; Barbara S. Mensch; Petina Musara; Miriam Hartmann; K. Woeber; Juliane Etima; A. van der Straten
Aids and Behavior | 2012
Ariane van der Straten; Elizabeth T. Montgomery; Susan Napierala Mavedzenge; Petina Musara; Helen Cheng; Alexandra Lutnick; Cynthia Woodsong
Contraception | 2016
Sharon L. Achilles; Felix Mhlanga; Petina Musara; Samuel M. Poloyac; Zvavahera M. Chirenje; Sharon L. Hillier
Aids and Behavior | 2014
Pamina M. Gorbach; Clifton W. Kelly; Joleen A. Borgerding; Gita Ramjee; Tchangani Tembo; Newton Kumwenda; Petina Musara; Sarah T. Roberts; Lisa Maslankowski