Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Petr Havlik is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Petr Havlik.


Science | 2009

Fixing a critical climate accounting error

Timothy D. Searchinger; Steven P. Hamburg; Jerry M. Melillo; W. L. Chameides; Petr Havlik; Daniel M. Kammen; Gene E. Likens; Ruben N. Lubowski; Michael Obersteiner; Michael Oppenheimer; G. Philip Robertson; William H. Schlesinger; G. David Tilman

Rules for applying the Kyoto Protocol and national cap-and-trade laws contain a major, but fixable, carbon accounting flaw in assessing bioenergy. The accounting now used for assessing compliance with carbon limits in the Kyoto Protocol and in climate legislation contains a far-reaching but fixable flaw that will severely undermine greenhouse gas reduction goals (1). It does not count CO2 emitted from tailpipes and smokestacks when bioenergy is being used, but it also does not count changes in emissions from land use when biomass for energy is harvested or grown. This accounting erroneously treats all bioenergy as carbon neutral regardless of the source of the biomass, which may cause large differences in net emissions. For example, the clearing of long-established forests to burn wood or to grow energy crops is counted as a 100% reduction in energy emissions despite causing large releases of carbon.


Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B | 2010

Competition for land.

Pete Smith; Peter J. Gregory; Detlef P. van Vuuren; Michael Obersteiner; Petr Havlik; Mark Rounsevell; Jeremy Woods; Elke Stehfest; Jessica Bellarby

A key challenge for humanity is how a future global population of 9 billion can all be fed healthily and sustainably. Here, we review how competition for land is influenced by other drivers and pressures, examine land-use change over the past 20 years and consider future changes over the next 40 years. Competition for land, in itself, is not a driver affecting food and farming in the future, but is an emergent property of other drivers and pressures. Modelling studies suggest that future policy decisions in the agriculture, forestry, energy and conservation sectors could have profound effects, with different demands for land to supply multiple ecosystem services usually intensifying competition for land in the future. In addition to policies addressing agriculture and food production, further policies addressing the primary drivers of competition for land (population growth, dietary preference, protected areas, forest policy) could have significant impacts in reducing competition for land. Technologies for increasing per-area productivity of agricultural land will also be necessary. Key uncertainties in our projections of competition for land in the future relate predominantly to uncertainties in the drivers and pressures within the scenarios, in the models and data used in the projections and in the policy interventions assumed to affect the drivers and pressures in the future.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2013

Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems

Mario Herrero; Petr Havlik; Hugo Valin; An Maria Omer Notenbaert; Mariana C. Rufino; Philip K. Thornton; Michael Blümmel; F. Weiss; Delia Grace; Michael Obersteiner

Significance This report is unique in presenting a high-resolution dataset of biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions by global livestock. This information will allow the global-change research community in enhancing our understanding of the sustainability of livestock systems and their role in food security, livelihoods and environmental sustainability. We present a unique, biologically consistent, spatially disaggregated global livestock dataset containing information on biomass use, production, feed efficiency, excretion, and greenhouse gas emissions for 28 regions, 8 livestock production systems, 4 animal species (cattle, small ruminants, pigs, and poultry), and 3 livestock products (milk, meat, and eggs). The dataset contains over 50 new global maps containing high-resolution information for understanding the multiple roles (biophysical, economic, social) that livestock can play in different parts of the world. The dataset highlights: (i) feed efficiency as a key driver of productivity, resource use, and greenhouse gas emission intensities, with vast differences between production systems and animal products; (ii) the importance of grasslands as a global resource, supplying almost 50% of biomass for animals while continuing to be at the epicentre of land conversion processes; and (iii) the importance of mixed crop–livestock systems, producing the greater part of animal production (over 60%) in both the developed and the developing world. These data provide critical information for developing targeted, sustainable solutions for the livestock sector and its widely ranging contribution to the global food system.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Climate change effects on agriculture: Economic responses to biophysical shocks

Gerald C. Nelson; Hugo Valin; Ronald D. Sands; Petr Havlik; Helal Ahammad; Delphine Deryng; Joshua Elliott; Shinichiro Fujimori; Tomoko Hasegawa; Edwina Heyhoe; Page Kyle; Martin von Lampe; Hermann Lotze-Campen; Daniel Mason-D’Croz; Hans van Meijl; Dominique van der Mensbrugghe; Christoph Müller; Alexander Popp; Richard Robertson; Sherman Robinson; Erwin Schmid; Christoph Schmitz; A.A. Tabeau; Dirk Willenbockel

Significance Plausible estimates of climate change impacts on agriculture require integrated use of climate, crop, and economic models. We investigate the contribution of economic models to uncertainty in this impact chain. In the nine economic models included, the direction of management intensity, area, consumption, and international trade responses to harmonized crop yield shocks from climate change are similar. However, the magnitudes differ significantly. The differences depend on model structure, in particular the specification of endogenous yield effects, land use change, and propensity to trade. These results highlight where future research on modeling climate change impacts on agriculture should focus. Agricultural production is sensitive to weather and thus directly affected by climate change. Plausible estimates of these climate change impacts require combined use of climate, crop, and economic models. Results from previous studies vary substantially due to differences in models, scenarios, and data. This paper is part of a collective effort to systematically integrate these three types of models. We focus on the economic component of the assessment, investigating how nine global economic models of agriculture represent endogenous responses to seven standardized climate change scenarios produced by two climate and five crop models. These responses include adjustments in yields, area, consumption, and international trade. We apply biophysical shocks derived from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s representative concentration pathway with end-of-century radiative forcing of 8.5 W/m2. The mean biophysical yield effect with no incremental CO2 fertilization is a 17% reduction globally by 2050 relative to a scenario with unchanging climate. Endogenous economic responses reduce yield loss to 11%, increase area of major crops by 11%, and reduce consumption by 3%. Agricultural production, cropland area, trade, and prices show the greatest degree of variability in response to climate change, and consumption the lowest. The sources of these differences include model structure and specification; in particular, model assumptions about ease of land use conversion, intensification, and trade. This study identifies where models disagree on the relative responses to climate shocks and highlights research activities needed to improve the representation of agricultural adaptation responses to climate change.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions.

Petr Havlik; Hugo Valin; Mario Herrero; Michael Obersteiner; Erwin Schmid; Mariana C. Rufino; A. Mosnier; Philip K. Thornton; Hannes Böttcher; Richard T. Conant; Stefan Frank; Steffen Fritz; Sabine Fuss; F. Kraxner; An Maria Omer Notenbaert

Significance The livestock sector contributes significantly to global warming through greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. At the same time, livestock is an invaluable source of nutrition and livelihood for millions of poor people. Therefore, climate mitigation policies involving livestock must be designed with extreme care. Here we demonstrate the large mitigation potential inherent in the heterogeneity of livestock production systems. We find that even within existing systems, autonomous transitions from extensive to more productive systems would decrease GHG emissions and improve food availability. Most effective climate policies involving livestock would be those targeting emissions from land-use change. To minimize the economic and social cost, policies should target emissions at their source—on the supply side—rather than on the demand side. Livestock are responsible for 12% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainable intensification of livestock production systems might become a key climate mitigation technology. However, livestock production systems vary substantially, making the implementation of climate mitigation policies a formidable challenge. Here, we provide results from an economic model using a detailed and high-resolution representation of livestock production systems. We project that by 2030 autonomous transitions toward more efficient systems would decrease emissions by 736 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year (MtCO2e⋅y−1), mainly through avoided emissions from the conversion of 162 Mha of natural land. A moderate mitigation policy targeting emissions from both the agricultural and land-use change sectors with a carbon price of US


Global Change Biology | 2015

Mapping global cropland and field size

Steffen Fritz; Linda See; Ian McCallum; Liangzhi You; Andriy Bun; Elena Moltchanova; Martina Duerauer; Fransizka Albrecht; C. Schill; Christoph Perger; Petr Havlik; A. Mosnier; Philip K. Thornton; Ulrike Wood-Sichra; Mario Herrero; Inbal Becker-Reshef; Christopher O. Justice; Matthew C. Hansen; Peng Gong; Sheta Abdel Aziz; Anna Cipriani; Renato Cumani; Giuliano Cecchi; Giulia Conchedda; Stefanus Ferreira; Adriana Gomez; Myriam Haffani; François Kayitakire; Jaiteh Malanding; Rick Mueller

10 per tCO2e could lead to an abatement of 3,223 MtCO2e⋅y−1. Livestock system transitions would contribute 21% of the total abatement, intra- and interregional relocation of livestock production another 40%, and all other mechanisms would add 39%. A comparable abatement of 3,068 MtCO2e⋅y−1 could be achieved also with a policy targeting only emissions from land-use change. Stringent climate policies might lead to reductions in food availability of up to 200 kcal per capita per day globally. We find that mitigation policies targeting emissions from land-use change are 5 to 10 times more efficient—measured in “total abatement calorie cost”—than policies targeting emissions from livestock only. Thus, fostering transitions toward more productive livestock production systems in combination with climate policies targeting the land-use change appears to be the most efficient lever to deliver desirable climate and food availability outcomes.


Archive | 2013

EU Energy, Transport and GHG Emissions: Trends to 2050, Reference Scenario 2013

Pantelis Capros; A. De Vita; Nikos Tasios; D. Papadopoulos; Pelopidas Siskos; E Apostolaki; M. Zampara; Leonidas Paroussos; K. Fragiadakis; Nikos Kouvaritakis; Lena Höglund-Isaksson; Wilfried Winiwarter; Pallav Purohit; Hannes Böttcher; Stefan Frank; Petr Havlik; M. Gusti; H.P. Witzke

A new 1 km global IIASA-IFPRI cropland percentage map for the baseline year 2005 has been developed which integrates a number of individual cropland maps at global to regional to national scales. The individual map products include existing global land cover maps such as GlobCover 2005 and MODIS v.5, regional maps such as AFRICOVER and national maps from mapping agencies and other organizations. The different products are ranked at the national level using crowdsourced data from Geo-Wiki to create a map that reflects the likelihood of cropland. Calibration with national and subnational crop statistics was then undertaken to distribute the cropland within each country and subnational unit. The new IIASA-IFPRI cropland product has been validated using very high-resolution satellite imagery via Geo-Wiki and has an overall accuracy of 82.4%. It has also been compared with the EarthStat cropland product and shows a lower root mean square error on an independent data set collected from Geo-Wiki. The first ever global field size map was produced at the same resolution as the IIASA-IFPRI cropland map based on interpolation of field size data collected via a Geo-Wiki crowdsourcing campaign. A validation exercise of the global field size map revealed satisfactory agreement with control data, particularly given the relatively modest size of the field size data set used to create the map. Both are critical inputs to global agricultural monitoring in the frame of GEOGLAM and will serve the global land modelling and integrated assessment community, in particular for improving land use models that require baseline cropland information. These products are freely available for downloading from the http://cropland.geo-wiki.org website.


Environmental Research Letters | 2011

Highlighting continued uncertainty in global land cover maps for the user community

Steffen Fritz; Linda See; Ian McCallum; C. Schill; Michael Obersteiner; Marijn van der Velde; Hannes Boettcher; Petr Havlik; Frédéric Achard

This report is an update and extension of the previous trend scenarios for development of energy systems taking account of transport and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions developments. The purpose of this publication is to present the new European Union (EU) Reference scenario 2013. It focuses on energy, transport and climate dimensions of EU developments and the various interactions among policies, including specific sections on emission trends not related to energy. The Reference scenario was elaborated by a consortium led by the National Technical University of Athens (E3MLab) using the PRIMES model for energy and CO2 emission projections, the GAINS model for non-CO2 emission projections and the GLOBIOM-G4M models for LULUCF emission and removal projections. The scenarios are available for the EU and each of its 28 Member States simulating the energy balances and GHG emission trends for future years under current trends and policies as adopted in the Member States by spring 2012.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Cattle ranching intensification in Brazil can reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by sparing land from deforestation

Avery Cohn; A. Mosnier; Petr Havlik; Hugo Valin; Mario Herrero; Erwin Schmid; M. O'Hare; Michael Obersteiner

In the last 10 years a number of new global datasets have been created and new, more sophisticated algorithms have been designed to classify land cover. GlobCover and MODIS v.5 are the most recent global land cover products available, where GlobCover (300 m) has the finest spatial resolution of other comparable products such as MODIS v.5 (500 m) and GLC-2000 (1 km). This letter shows that the thematic accuracy in the cropland domain has decreased when comparing these two latest products. This disagreement is also evident spatially when examining maps of cropland and forest disagreement between GLC-2000, MODIS and GlobCover. The analysis highlights the continued uncertainty surrounding these products, with a combined forest and cropland disagreement of 893 Mha (GlobCover versus MODIS v.5). This letter suggests that data sharing efforts and the provision of more in situ data for training, calibration and validation are very important conditions for improving future global land cover products.


Water Resources Research | 2010

Agriculture and resource availability in a changing world: The role of irrigation

Timm Sauer; Petr Havlik; Uwe A. Schneider; Erwin Schmid; Georg Kindermann; Michael Obersteiner

Significance Could the intensification of pasture-based cattle ranching allow Brazil to protect its forests and reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while increasing its agricultural production? Would these benefits be substantially undermined by increased deforestation and GHGs triggered abroad? We model two policies for increasing cattle ranching productivity in Brazil: a tax on conventional pasture and a subsidy for semi-intensive pasture. Either policy could considerably mitigate global GHGs by limiting future deforestation in Brazil. The GHG benefits would be roughly ten times greater than the emissions triggered by policies stemming from (i) increased cattle production abroad (under the tax) and (ii) increased beef consumption (under the subsidy). Agricultural intensification policies may help emerging economies to balance agricultural development and forest protection. This study examines whether policies to encourage cattle ranching intensification in Brazil can abate global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by sparing land from deforestation. We use an economic model of global land use to investigate, from 2010 to 2030, the global agricultural outcomes, land use changes, and GHG abatement resulting from two potential Brazilian policies: a tax on cattle from conventional pasture and a subsidy for cattle from semi-intensive pasture. We find that under either policy, Brazil could achieve considerable sparing of forests and abatement of GHGs, in line with its national policy targets. The land spared, particularly under the tax, is far less than proportional to the productivity increased. However, the tax, despite prompting less adoption of semi-intensive ranching, delivers slightly more forest sparing and GHG abatement than the subsidy. This difference is explained by increased deforestation associated with increased beef consumption under the subsidy and reduced deforestation associated with reduced beef consumption under the tax. Complementary policies to directly limit deforestation could help limit these effects. GHG abatement from either the tax or subsidy appears inexpensive but, over time, the tax would become cheaper than the subsidy. A revenue-neutral combination of the policies could be an element of a sustainable development strategy for Brazil and other emerging economies seeking to balance agricultural development and forest protection.

Collaboration


Dive into the Petr Havlik's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Obersteiner

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hugo Valin

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Mosnier

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mario Herrero

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

F. Kraxner

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Gusti

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hannes Böttcher

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steffen Fritz

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stefan Frank

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tomoko Hasegawa

National Institute for Environmental Studies

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge