Petra Eichler

Evaluation of pretest clinical score (4 T's) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in two clinical settings.

Summary.  Background: Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic adverse drug reaction caused by heparin. As thrombocytopenia is common in hospitalized patients receiving heparin, it would be useful to have a clinical scoring system that could differentiate patients with HIT from those with other reasons for thrombocytopenia. Aim: To compare prospectively the diagnostic utility of a clinical score for HIT in two different clinical settings. Methods: The pretest clinical scoring system, the ‘4 Ts’, was used to classify 100 consecutive patients referred for possible HIT in one hospital (Hamilton General Hospital, HGH) into high, intermediate, and low probability groups. This system was also used to classify likewise 236 patients by clinicians in Germany referring blood for diagnostic testing for HIT in Greifswald (GW). The clinical scores were correlated with the results of laboratory testing for HIT antibodies using the serologic criteria for HIT with high diagnostic specificity. Results: In both centers, patients with low scores were unlikely to test positive for HIT antibodies [HGH: 1/64 (1.6%), GW: 0/55 (0%)]. Patients with intermediate [HGH: 8/28 (28.6%), GW: 11/139 (7.9%)] or high scores [HGH: 8/8 (100%), GW: 9/42 (21.4%)] were more likely to test positive for clinically significant HIT antibodies. The positive predictive value of an intermediate or high clinical score for clinically significant HIT antibodies was higher at one center (HGH). Conclusions: A low pretest clinical score for HIT seems to be suitable for ruling out HIT in most situations (high‐negative predictive value). The implications of an intermediate or high score vary in different clinical settings.

Recombinant Hirudin (Lepirudin) Provides Safe and Effective Anticoagulation in Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND The immunological type of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the most frequent drug-induced thrombocytopenia. This study evaluated the efficacy of recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin or lepirudin), a potent thrombin inhibitor, for anticoagulation in patients with confirmed HIT. METHODS AND RESULTS Eighty-two patients in this prospective, multicenter study received 1 of 4 intravenous r-hirudin regimens: A1, HIT patients with thrombosis (n=51), 0.4-mg/kg bolus and then 0.15 mg. kg-1. h-1; A2, HIT patients with thrombosis receiving thrombolysis (n=5), 0. 2-mg/kg bolus and then 0.1 mg. kg-1. h-1; B, HIT patients without thrombosis (n=18), 0.1 mg. kg-1. h-1; and C, during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (n=8), 0.25-mg/kg bolus and then 5-mg boluses as needed. Response criteria were increase in platelet count by >/=30% to >10(9)/L and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values 1.5 to 3.0 times baseline values achieved with a maximum of 2 dose increases. No placebo control was used for ethical reasons. Outcomes of a subset of r-hirudin-treated patients who met predefined inclusion criteria (n=71) were compared with those of a historical control group (n=120) for combined and individual incidences of death, amputations, new thromboembolic complications, and incidences of bleeding. Platelet counts increased rapidly in 88.7% of r-hirudin-treated patients with acute HIT. In regimens A1 and A2, the 25% and 75% quartiles of the aPTT were within the target range at all but 1 time point. The incidence of the combined end point (death, amputation, new thromboembolic complications) was significantly reduced in r-hirudin patients compared with historical control patients (P=0.014). During first selected treatment, the adjusted hazard ratio for r-hirudin patients versus historical control was 0.279 (95% CI, 0.112 to 0.699; P=0.003). Bleeding rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS r-Hirudin treatment is associated with a rapid and sustained recovery of platelet counts, sufficient aPTT prolongations, and true clinical benefits for patients with HIT.

Lepirudin (Recombinant Hirudin) for Parenteral Anticoagulation in Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND We prospectively investigated lepirudin for further parenteral anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with confirmed HIT (n=112) received lepirudin according to need for 2 to 10 days (longer if necessary): A1, treatment: 0.4 mg/kg IV bolus, followed by 0.15 mg. kg(-1). h(-1) intravenous infusion, n=65; A2, treatment in conjunction with thrombolysis: 0.2 mg/kg, followed by 0.10 mg. kg(-1). h(-1), n=4; and B, prophylaxis: 0.10 mg. kg(-1). h(-1), n=43. Outcomes from 95 eligible lepirudin-treated patients were compared with those of historical control patients (n=120). Complete laboratory response (activated partial thromboplastin time ratio >1.5 with </=2 dose increases and platelet count normalization by day 10) was achieved in 65 lepirudin-treated patients (69.1%; 95% CI, 59. 3% to 78.3%). At 2 weeks after cessation of lepirudin, 11 patients died (9.8%), 10 underwent limb amputation (8.9%), and 20 suffered a new thromboembolic complication (17.9%). The average combined event rate per patient-day decreased from 5.1% in the pretreatment period to 1.5% in the treatment period. Thirty-five days after HIT confirmation, fewer lepirudin-treated patients than historical control patients had experienced >/=1 outcome (cumulative incidence 30.9% versus 52.1%; relative risk [RR] 0.71; P=0.12, log-rank test). Bleeding events were more frequent in the lepirudin group than the historical control group (cumulative incidence at 35 days, 44.6% versus 27.2%; RR 2.57; P=0.0001, log-rank test). No difference was observed in bleeding events requiring transfusion (cumulative incidence at 35 days, 12.9% versus 9.1%; RR 1.66; P=0.23, log-rank test); no intracranial bleeding was observed in the lepirudin group. CONCLUSIONS Lepirudin effectively prevents death, limb amputations, and new thromboembolic complications and has an acceptable safety profile in HIT patients. Treatment should be initiated as soon as possible if HIT is suspected.

Clinical features of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia including risk factors for thrombosis A retrospective analysis of 408 patients

Immune mediated heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic adverse effect of heparin. However, only a subgroup of patients with HIT develops thromboembolic complications. We aimed to identify risk factors for developing HITassociated thrombosis. We analyzed a registry of patients with clinical suspicion of HIT who tested positive using a sensitive functional assay. Patient information was obtained by a standardized questionnaire. By multivariate analysis the association of age, gender, type of patient population, and magnitude of the platelet count decline with the frequency, type (venous or arterial), and temporal pattern of thrombotic events was assessed. In 408 HIT patients we observed predominance of venous thrombosis (2.4:1), with 40% of patients developing a pulmonary embolism. However, in the subgroup of post-cardiovascular surgery patients there was predominance of arterial thrombosis (1:8.5). The type of arterial thrombosis (limb artery thrombosis > thrombotic stroke > myocardial infarction) was the converse of that observed with typical atherothrombotic clots in non-HIT populations. In 59.8% of patients HIT-related thrombosis manifested either on the same day a platelet count decrease >50% was documented (26.3%) or before the decrease in platelet counts (33.5%). The most important risk factors for thrombosis were orthopedic/trauma surgery and the magnitude of platelet count decrease. HIT-associated thrombosis occurs in a considerable proportion of patients before platelet counts decrease by more than 50%.

Anaphylactic and Anaphylactoid Reactions Associated With Lepirudin in Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Background—Lepirudin (Refludan) is a hirudin derivative. It is a direct thrombin inhibitor obtained by recombinant technology from the medicinal leech and is approved for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia complicated by thrombosis. Because 3 cases of fatal anaphylaxis possibly associated with use of lepirudin have been reported, we initiated an investigation of putative lepirudin-associated anaphylaxis. Methods and Results—Aided by the manufacturer (Schering AG, Berlin, Germany), we used the lepirudin study databases to identify all patients in whom possible anaphylaxis/severe allergy was recorded from 1994 to September 2002. The 26 possible cases identified were reviewed independently by 2 investigators. After excluding patients with mild skin reactions, reactions likely caused by concomitant medications, poorly documented cases, and reactions that did not correspond temporally with lepirudin use, there remained 9 patients judged to have had severe anaphylaxis in close temporal association with lepirudin. All reactions occurred within minutes of intravenous lepirudin administration, with 4 fatal outcomes (3 acute cardiorespiratory arrests, 1 hypotension-induced myocardial infarction). In these 4 cases, a previous uneventful treatment course with lepirudin was identified (1 to 12 weeks earlier). We recorded high-titer IgG-anti-lepirudin antibodies in an additional patient with anaphylaxis. Because lepirudin has been used in ≈35 000 patients, the risk of anaphylaxis is ≈0.015% (5 of 32 500) on first exposure and 0.16% (4 of 2500) in reexposed patients (7.5% estimated reexposures). Conclusion—Lepirudin can cause fatal anaphylaxis, particularly in patients who are treated within 3 months of a previous exposure. The overall risk/benefit assessment of lepirudin as a treatment for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia remains favorable.

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: a prospective study on the incidence, platelet‐activating capacity and clinical significance of antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibodies of the IgG, IgM, and IgA classes

Summary.  Introduction: Platelet‐activating antiplatelet factor 4/heparin (anti‐PF4/heparin) antibodies are the major cause of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). However, the relative utility of functional (platelet activation) vs. antigen [enzyme‐immunoassay (EIA)] assays, and the significance of assay discrepancies remain unresolved.Methods: Consecutive patient sera (n = 1650) referred for diagnostic HIT testing were screened prospectively by both the heparin‐induced platelet activation (HIPA) test and anti‐PF4/heparin EIA – including individual classes (IgG, IgA, IgM) – with clinical correlations studied. Platelet microparticle and annexin‐V‐binding properties of the sera were also investigated.Results: Only 205 (12.4%) sera tested positive in either the HIPA and/or EIA: 95 (46.3%) were positive in both, 109 (53.1%) were only EIA‐positive, and, notably, only one serum was HIPA‐positive/EIA‐negative. Of 185 EIA‐positive sera, only 17.6% had detectable IgM and/or IgA without detectable IgG. Among sera positive for EIA IgG, optical density values were higher when the sera were HIPA‐positive (1.117 vs. 0.768; P < 0.0001), with widely overlapping values. Two HIPA‐positive but EIA‐IgG‐negative sera became HIPA‐negative following IgG depletion, suggesting platelet‐activating antibodies against non‐PF4‐dependent antigens. Clinical correlations showed that HIPA‐negative/EIA‐positive patients did not develop thrombosis and had reasons other than HIT to explain thrombocytopenia. IgM/A antibodies did not increase microparticle penetration, but increased annexin‐V binding.Conclusions: The anti‐PF4/heparin EIA has high (∼99%) sensitivity for HIT. However, only about half of EIA‐positive patients are likely to have HIT. Anti‐PF4/heparin antibodies of IgM/A class and non‐PF4‐dependent antigens have only a minor role in HIT.

Lepirudin in patients with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia – results of the third prospective study (HAT‐3) and a combined analysis of HAT‐1, HAT‐2, and HAT‐3

Summary.  Objectives: To assess efficacy and safety of lepirudin in patients with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in a prospective study (HAT‐3) as well as in a combined analysis of all HAT study data. Patients/methods: Patients with laboratory‐confirmed HIT were treated with lepirudin in three different aPTT‐adjusted dose regimen and during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Endpoints were new thromboembolic complications (TEC), limb amputations, and death and major bleeding. A historical control group (n = 120) was used for comparison. Results: After start of lepirudin in 205 patients treated in HAT‐3, the combined endpoint occurred in 43 (21.0%). Thirty (14.6%) patients died, 10 (4.9%) underwent limb amputation, and 11 (5.4%) new TECs occurred. Major bleeding occurred in 40 patients (19.5%) (seven during CPB surgery). Combining all prospective HAT trials (n = 403), after start of lepirudin treatment, the combined endpoint occurred in 82 patients (20.3%), with 47 deaths (11.7%), 22 limb amputations (5.5%), 30 new TECs (7.4%), and 71 (17.6%) major bleedings. Compared with the historical control group (log‐rank test), the combined endpoint after start of treatment was reduced (29.7% vs. 52.1%, P = 0.0473), primarily because of reduction in new thromboses (11.9% vs. 32.1%, P = 0.0008). Mean lepirudin maintenance doses ranged from 0.07 to 0.11 mg kg−1 h−1. Major bleeding was more frequent in the lepirudin‐treated patients (29.4% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.0148). Conclusions: The rate of new TECs in HIT patients is low after start of lepirudin treatment. The rate of major bleeding of 17.6% might be reduced by reducing the starting dose to 0.1 mg kg−1 h−1.

Incidence and clinical significance of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies of the IgG, IgM, and IgA class in 755 consecutive patient samples referred for diagnostic testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Abstract:  Background: Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is usually caused by anti‐platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies, leading to intravascular platelet activation. These antibodies can be detected by PF4/polyanion antigen assays or platelet activation assays. While antigen assays are very sensitive and recognize immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgA, and IgM antibodies, the role of IgM and IgA HIT‐antibodies is debated. Platelet activation assays recognize IgG and are more specific for clinical HIT. Methods: We analyzed sera from 755 consecutive patients referred for diagnostic testing for HIT using a PF4/heparin enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IgG, IgA, and IgM and by the heparin‐induced platelet activation (HIPA) test. Clinical information was provided by the treating physicians. Results: A total of 108 of 755 (14.3%) patients tested positive, 105 (13.9%) in the PF4/heparin IgG/A/M ELISA [28 (26.7%) only for IgM/A]; 53 (7.0%) sera were positive in the HIPA, of those 50 tested also positive in the ELISA. In 77 patients sufficient clinical information was provided. Available clinical information for 17 of the 28 patients who had only IgM and/or IgA detected showed plausible alternative (non‐HIT) explanations in four of seven who had thromboembolic complications and in nine of 10 who had isolated HIT. Conclusion: Detection of IgG, IgM and IgA class antibodies by PF4/heparin ELISA yields a positive test result about twice as often as does a platelet activation assay, with only a minority of the additional patients detected likely having HIT. Thus, there is a potential for considerable over‐diagnosis of HIT by laboratories that utilize only an ELISA for diagnostic testing.

Staphylococcus aureus Carriers Neutralize Superantigens by Antibodies Specific for Their Colonizing Strain: A Potential Explanation for Their Improved Prognosis in Severe Sepsis

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common causes of hospital-acquired infections. At the same time, 25% of healthy persons are symptom-free S. aureus carriers, and they have an increased risk of developing nosocomial S. aureus septicemia. Paradoxically, their prognosis is much better than that of noncarriers. We compared the antibody profiles for carriers and noncarriers toward S. aureus superantigens. In carriers, we found high titers of neutralizing antibodies specific for those superantigens that are expressed by their colonizing strain. The results show that carriage status confers strain-specific humoral immunity, which may contribute to protection during S. aureus septicemia.

The new ID‐heparin/PF4 antibody test for rapid detection of heparin‐induced antibodies in comparison with functional and antigenic assays

Summary. Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune‐mediated complication of heparin treatment. Several in vitro assays are available to detect the causative HIT antibodies: functional assays, usually requiring freshly prepared platelets and immunological tests based on the enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) principle. We compared a new, simple and rapid test based on the ID‐microtyping particle agglutination system with 14C‐serotonin release assay, heparin‐induced platelet activation (HIPA) test and two ELISAs. Sera from 100 confirmed HIT patients, 20 serologically negative suspected HIT patients and 20 healthy blood donors were used. The specificity and sensitivity of the new test was similar to the functional assays. Compared with the ELISAs, specificity was better at the cost of reduced sensitivity. As in all other immunological tests, HIT antibodies against less typical antigens, such as interleukin (IL)‐8 or neutrophil‐activating peptide (NAP) 2 could not be detected. Thus, although the ID‐Heparin/PF4 antibody test seems to be a quick, reliable and robust test to determine the presence of HIT antibodies, it should still be combined with a functional assay if possible. Evaluation of the test in a prospective setting as well as interlaboratory variation should be assessed as a next step.