Petra Gombos

Influence of Test Technique on Sensitization Status of Patients on the Kidney Transplant Waiting List

The exquisitely sensitive single antigen bead (SAB) technique was shown to detect human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in sera of healthy male blood donors. Such false reactions can have an impact on critical decisions, especially with respect to the determination of unacceptable HLA‐antigen mismatches in patients awaiting a kidney transplant. We tested pretransplant sera of 534 patients on the kidney waiting list using complement‐dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and SAB in parallel. Evidence of HLA antibodies was obtained in 5% of patients using CDC, 14% using ELISA, and 81% using SAB. Among patients without history of an immunizing event, 77% showed evidence of HLA antibodies in SAB. In contrast 98% of these patients were negative in ELISA and CDC. In patients without an immunizing event, SAB‐detected antibodies reacted not always weakly but with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values as high as 14 440. High‐MFI‐value antibodies were found in some of these patients with HLA specificities that are rather common in general population, consideration of which would lead to unjustified exclusion of potential kidney donors. False SAB reactions can be unveiled by testing with additional antibody assays. Denial of donor kidneys to recipients based on HLA‐antibody specificities detected exclusively in the SAB assay is not advisable.

Association of Kidney Graft Loss With De Novo Produced Donor-Specific and Non-Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies Detected by Single Antigen Testing

Background The association of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) with kidney graft failure has been addressed previously; however, the majority of studies were based on small numbers of patients with graft failure. Methods We investigated 83 patients with failed kidney transplants for a possible association of de novo development and persistence or loss of pre-existing DSA with graft failure. Single Antigen Bead assay-detected DSA and non-DSA antibodies were compared between patients with graft loss and matched controls with functioning grafts. Results The incidence of weak de novo DSA or non-DSA at a mean fluorescence intensity of 500 or higher was higher in the graft loss than in the nonrejector group (76% vs 40%, P < 0.001). Because of the low number of patients developing de novo DSA, the DSA results did not reach statistical significance (only 22% of patients with graft loss developed de novo DSA). However, at all cutoffs, there was a significantly higher rate of graft loss in patients with de novo non-DSA. The incidence of strong pretransplant DSA that persist after transplantation was higher in the graft loss group (10% vs 1%, P = 0.034). When C1q-binding ability in sera of rejectors and nonrejectors with posttransplant de novo or persistent DSA was compared, none of the nonrejectors demonstrated C1q positivity, whereas 43% of patients with graft loss showed C1q-positive antibodies, although not necessarily donor-specific (P < 0.001). Conclusions Our data show that the posttransplant presence of persisting or de novo HLA antibodies, especially if C1q binding, is associated with graft loss, even if the antibodies are not specific for mismatched donor HLA.

The collaborative transplant study registry.

The Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS) was initiated in 1982. Over the last 30 years, it has collected information on over half a million kidney, liver, heart, lung, and pancreas transplant procedures. Participation is voluntary and the study has strictly scientific objectives. Analyses of the CTS database serve as an international reference source in the field of solid organ transplantation.

Donor-specific antibodies require preactivated immune system to harm renal transplant

Highlights • Pretransplant DSA have a deleterious impact on graft survival only in the presence of high pretransplant serum levels of sCD30.• The majority of patients with pretransplant DSA might be transplanted safely without special pretreatment measures. Kidney transplantation in the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) is associated with a high failure rate due to antibody-mediated rejection. Many centers avoid transplantations if DSA are present. Others perform such transplantations after removal of DSA by apheresis under potent immunosuppression. We provide strong evidence that DSA positive recipients reject their grafts at a high rate only if the immune activation marker sCD30 is also high, suggesting that T-cell help from an activated immune system is necessary for pretransplant DSA to exert a deleterious effect on the graft. High-risk patients with DSA and sCD30 may benefit from special treatment measures. The presence of DSA alone may not be deleterious.

Clinical relevance of preformed IgG and IgM antibodies against donor endothelial progenitor cells in recipients of living donor kidney grafts

Literature reports suggest that non‐HLA‐antibodies against human endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) can be detected in pre‐transplant recipient serum and that EPC antibodies can have a deleterious influence on the graft.

Superiority of AbCross enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay cross-match over the B-cell complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity cross-match

BACKGROUND The AbCross enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) cross-match is a recently introduced solid phase cross-match technique with several technical advantages over the currently available Antibody Monitoring System ELISA cross-match. METHODS In the present study, we investigated the potential superiority of AbCross over the traditional complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) B-cell cross-match (BXM). Pretransplant sera of 271 kidney transplant recipients who were transplanted at our center between 1998 and 2010 were tested in ELISA screening for the presence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and in AbCross and CDC for antibody reactivity against solubilized donor HLA class I and II antigens and donor B cells, respectively. RESULTS Patients positive for HLA class I or II antibodies on ELISA screening had a significantly poorer graft outcome 2 years after transplantation than recipients who were negative for HLA antibodies (21% vs 6% graft loss; P = .002). Corresponding with this finding, 37 recipients positive for HLA antibodies in AbCross against donor HLA class I or II antigens had a 2-year post-transplant graft loss rate of 19%, which is significantly higher than the 8% rate in 186 recipients who were negative for both antibody classes in AbCross (P = .043). The 2-year graft loss rate in 34 AbCross positive but BXM negative patients was 21%, compared with 7% in 172 AbCross and BXM negative patients (P = .012) and 9% in 11 AbCross negative but BXM positive patients (P = .39). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that the AbCross ELISA cross-match is superior to the CDC BXM, most likely because it detects antibodies against donor HLA antigens at a higher sensitivity.

Endothelial precursor cell cross-match using Tie-2-enriched spleen cells

Non‐HLA antibodies against human endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in pre‐transplant recipient serum can have a deleterious influence on the graft. EPC enriched from peripheral blood have been commonly used for EPC cross‐matching. In the present study, we describe cross‐matches using EPC enriched from fresh or frozen‐thawed spleen cell preparations, thereby widening the sample source for deceased‐donor cross‐matching and retrospective studies.