Petras J. Kundrotas
University of Kansas
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Petras J. Kundrotas.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2012
Petras J. Kundrotas; Zhengwei Zhu; Joël Janin; Ilya A. Vakser
Traditional approaches to protein–protein docking sample the binding modes with no regard to similar experimentally determined structures (templates) of protein–protein complexes. Emerging template-based docking approaches utilize such similar complexes to determine the docking predictions. The docking problem assumes the knowledge of the participating proteins’ structures. Thus, it provides the possibility of aligning the structures of the proteins and the template complexes. The progress in the development of template-based docking and the vast experience in template-based modeling of individual proteins show that, generally, such approaches are more reliable than the free modeling. The key aspect of this modeling paradigm is the availability of the templates. The current common perception is that due to the difficulties in experimental structure determination of protein–protein complexes, the pool of docking templates is insignificant, and thus a broad application of template-based docking is possible only at some future time. The results of our large scale, systematic study show that, surprisingly, in spite of the limited number of protein–protein complexes in the Protein Data Bank, docking templates can be found for complexes representing almost all the known protein–protein interactions, provided the components themselves have a known structure or can be homology-built. About one-third of the templates are of good quality when they are compared to experimental structures in test sets extracted from the Protein Data Bank and would be useful starting points in modeling the complexes. This finding dramatically expands our ability to model protein interactions, and has far-reaching implications for the protein docking field in general.
Proteins | 2010
Rohita Sinha; Petras J. Kundrotas; Ilya A. Vakser
Rapid accumulation of experimental data on protein‐protein complexes drives the paradigm shift in protein docking from “traditional,” template free approaches to template based techniques. Homology docking algorithms based on sequence similarity between target and template complexes can account for up to 20% of known protein‐protein interactions. When highly homologous templates for the target complex are not available, but the structure of the target monomers is known, docking by local structural alignment may provide an adequate solution. Such an algorithm was developed based on the structural comparison of monomers to cocrystallized interfaces. A library of the interfaces was generated from cocrystallized protein‐protein complexes in PDB. The partial structure alignment algorithm was validated on the DOCKGROUND benchmark sets. The optimal performance of the partial (interface) structure alignment was achieved with the interface residues defined by 12 Å distance across the interface. Overall, the partial structure alignment yielded more accurate models than the full structure alignment. Most templates identified by the partial structure alignment had low sequence identity to the target, which makes them hard to detect by sequence‐based methods. The results indicate that the structure alignment techniques provide a much needed addition to the docking arsenal, with the combined structure alignment and template free docking success rate significantly surpassing that of the free docking alone. Proteins 2010.
Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology | 2008
Ilya A. Vakser; Petras J. Kundrotas
The protein-protein docking problem is one of the focal points of activity in computational structural biology. Adequate computational techniques for structural modeling of protein interactions are important because of the growing number of known protein structures, particularly in the context of structural genomics. The protein docking methodology offers tools for fundamental studies of protein interactions and provides structural basis for drug design. The paper presents a critical review of the existing protein-protein docking approaches in view of the fundamental principles of protein recognition.
Nucleic Acids Research | 2007
Petras J. Kundrotas; Emil Alexov
The database of protein complexes (PROTCOM) is a compilation of known 3D structures of protein–protein complexes enriched with artificially created domain–domain structures using the available entries in the Protein Data Bank. The domain–domain structures are generated by parsing single chain structures into loosely connected domains and are important features of the database. The database () could be used for benchmarking purposes of the docking and other algorithms for predicting 3D structures of protein–protein complexes. The database can be utilized as a template database in the homology or threading methods for modeling the 3D structures of unknown protein–protein complexes. PROTCOM provides the scientific community with an integrated set of tools for browsing, searching, visualizing and downloading a pool of protein complexes. The user is given the option to select a subset of entries using a combination of up to 10 different criteria. As on July 2006 the database contains 1770 entries, each of which consists of the known 3D structures and additional relevant information that can be displayed either in text-only or in visual mode.
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules | 2008
Petras J. Kundrotas; Marc F. Lensink; Emil Alexov
Customary practice in predicting 3D structures of protein-protein complexes is employment of various docking methods when the structures of separate monomers are known a priori. The alternative approach, i.e. the template-based prediction with pure sequence information as a starting point, is still considered as being inferior mostly due to presumption that the pool of available structures of protein-protein complexes, which can serve as putative templates, is not sufficiently large. Recently, however, several labs have developed databases containing thousands of 3D structures of protein-protein complexes, which enable statistically reliable testing of homology-based algorithms. In this paper we report the results on homology-based modeling of 3D structures of protein complexes using alignments of modified sequence profiles. The method, called HOMology-BAsed COmplex Prediction (HOMBACOP), has two distinctive features: (I) extra weight on aligning interfacial residues in the dynamical programming algorithm, and (II) increased gap penalties for the interfacial segments. The method was tested against our recently developed ProtCom database and against the Boston University protein-protein BENCHMARK. In both cases, models generated were compared to the models built on basis of customarily protein structure initiative (PSI)-BLAST sequence alignments. It was found that existence of homologous (by the means of PSI-BLAST) templates (44% of cases) enables both methods to produce models of good quality, with the profiles method outperforming the PSI-BLAST models (with respect to the percentage of correctly predicted residues on the complex interface and fraction of native interfacial contacts). The models were evaluated according to the CAPRI assessment criteria and about two thirds of the models were found to fall into acceptable and medium-quality categories. The same comparison of a larger set of 463 protein complexes showed again that profiles generate better models. We further demonstrate, using our ProtCom database, the suitability of the profile alignment algorithm in detecting remote homologues between query and template sequences, where the PSI-BLAST method fails.
Nucleic Acids Research | 2010
Petras J. Kundrotas; Zhengwei Zhu; Ilya A. Vakser
Structural information on interacting proteins is important for understanding life processes at the molecular level. Genome-wide docking database is an integrated resource for structural studies of protein–protein interactions on the genome scale, which combines the available experimental data with models obtained by docking techniques. Current database version (August 2009) contains 25 559 experimental and modeled 3D structures for 771 organisms spanned over the entire universe of life from viruses to humans. Data are organized in a relational database with user-friendly search interface allowing exploration of the database content by a number of parameters. Search results can be interactively previewed and downloaded as PDB-formatted files, along with the information relevant to the specified interactions. The resource is freely available at http://gwidd.bioinformatics.ku.edu.
Pmc Biophysics | 2008
Kemper Talley; Carmen Ng; Michael Shoppell; Petras J. Kundrotas; Emil Alexov
Calculations of electrostatic properties of protein-protein complexes are usually done within framework of a model with a certain set of parameters. In this paper we present a comprehensive statistical analysis of the sensitivity of the electrostatic component of binding free energy (ΔΔGel) with respect with different force fields (Charmm, Amber, and OPLS), different values of the internal dielectric constant, and different presentations of molecular surface (different values of the probe radius). The study was done using the largest so far set of entries comprising 260 hetero and 2148 homo protein-protein complexes extracted from a previously developed database of protein complexes (ProtCom). To test the sensitivity of the energy calculations with respect to the structural details, all structures were energy minimized with corresponding force field, and the energies were recalculated. The results indicate that the absolute value of the electrostatic component of the binding free energy (ΔΔGel) is very sensitive to the force field parameters, the minimization procedure, the values of the internal dielectric constant, and the probe radius. Nevertheless our results indicate that certain trends in ΔΔGel behavior are much less sensitive to the calculation parameters. For instance, the fraction of the homo-complexes, for which the electrostatics was found to oppose binding, is 80% regardless of the force fields and parameters used. For the hetero-complexes, however, the percentage of the cases for which electrostatics opposed binding varied from 43% to 85%, depending on the protocol and parameters employed. A significant correlation was found between the effects caused by raising the internal dielectric constant and decreasing the probe radius. Correlations were also found among the results obtained with different force fields. However, despite of the correlations found, the absolute ΔΔGel calculated with different force field parameters could differ more than tens of kcal/mol in some cases. Set of rules of obtaining confident predictions of absolute ΔΔGel and ΔΔGel sign are provided in the conclusion section. PACS codes: 87.15.A-, 87.15. km
Proteins | 2014
Marc F. Lensink; Iain H. Moal; Paul A. Bates; Panagiotis L. Kastritis; Adrien S. J. Melquiond; Ezgi Karaca; Christophe Schmitz; Marc van Dijk; Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin; Miriam Eisenstein; Brian Jiménez-García; Solène Grosdidier; Albert Solernou; Laura Pérez-Cano; Chiara Pallara; Juan Fernández-Recio; Jianqing Xu; Pravin Muthu; Krishna Praneeth Kilambi; Jeffrey J. Gray; Sergei Grudinin; Georgy Derevyanko; Julie C. Mitchell; John Wieting; Eiji Kanamori; Yuko Tsuchiya; Yoichi Murakami; Joy Sarmiento; Daron M. Standley; Matsuyuki Shirota
We report the first assessment of blind predictions of water positions at protein–protein interfaces, performed as part of the critical assessment of predicted interactions (CAPRI) community‐wide experiment. Groups submitting docking predictions for the complex of the DNase domain of colicin E2 and Im2 immunity protein (CAPRI Target 47), were invited to predict the positions of interfacial water molecules using the method of their choice. The predictions—20 groups submitted a total of 195 models—were assessed by measuring the recall fraction of water‐mediated protein contacts. Of the 176 high‐ or medium‐quality docking models—a very good docking performance per se—only 44% had a recall fraction above 0.3, and a mere 6% above 0.5. The actual water positions were in general predicted to an accuracy level no better than 1.5 Å, and even in good models about half of the contacts represented false positives. This notwithstanding, three hotspot interface water positions were quite well predicted, and so was one of the water positions that is believed to stabilize the loop that confers specificity in these complexes. Overall the best interface water predictions was achieved by groups that also produced high‐quality docking models, indicating that accurate modelling of the protein portion is a determinant factor. The use of established molecular mechanics force fields, coupled to sampling and optimization procedures also seemed to confer an advantage. Insights gained from this analysis should help improve the prediction of protein–water interactions and their role in stabilizing protein complexes. Proteins 2014; 82:620–632.
PLOS Computational Biology | 2010
Petras J. Kundrotas; Ilya A. Vakser
The accuracy of protein structures, particularly their binding sites, is essential for the success of modeling protein complexes. Computationally inexpensive methodology is required for genome-wide modeling of such structures. For systematic evaluation of potential accuracy in high-throughput modeling of binding sites, a statistical analysis of target-template sequence alignments was performed for a representative set of protein complexes. For most of the complexes, alignments containing all residues of the interface were found. The full interface alignments were obtained even in the case of poor alignments where a relatively small part of the target sequence (as low as 40%) aligned to the template sequence, with a low overall alignment identity (<30%). Although such poor overall alignments might be considered inadequate for modeling of whole proteins, the alignment of the interfaces was strong enough for docking. In the set of homology models built on these alignments, one third of those ranked 1 by a simple sequence identity criteria had RMSD<5 Å, the accuracy suitable for low-resolution template free docking. Such models corresponded to multi-domain target proteins, whereas for single-domain proteins the best models had 5 Å<RMSD<10 Å, the accuracy suitable for less sensitive structure-alignment methods. Overall, ∼50% of complexes with the interfaces modeled by high-throughput techniques had accuracy suitable for meaningful docking experiments. This percentage will grow with the increasing availability of co-crystallized protein-protein complexes.
Proteins | 2013
Petras J. Kundrotas; Ilya A. Vakser
The increasing amount of structural information on protein–protein interactions makes it possible to predict the structure of protein–protein complexes by comparison/alignment of the interacting proteins to the ones in cocrystallized complexes. In the predictions based on structure similarity, the template search is performed by structural alignment of the target interactors with the entire structures or with the interface only of the subunits in cocrystallized complexes. This study investigates the scope of the structural similarity that facilitates the detection of a broad range of templates significantly divergent from the targets. The analysis of the target‐template similarity is based on models of protein–protein complexes in a large representative set of heterodimers. The similarity of the biological and crystal packing interfaces, dissimilar interface structural motifs in overall similar structures, interface similarity to the full structure, and local similarity away from the interface were analyzed. The structural similarity at the protein–protein interfaces only was observed in ∼25% of target‐template pairs with sequence identity <20% and primarily homodimeric templates. For ∼50% of the target‐template pairs, the similarity at the interface was accompanied by the similarity of the whole structure. However, the structural similarity at the interfaces was still stronger than that of the noninterface parts. The study provides insights into structural and functional diversity of protein–protein complexes, and relative performance of the interface and full structure alignment in docking. Proteins 2013; 81:2137–2142.