Petter Svenberg

Improved Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Recent Years. A Single-Center Study

We analyzed the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) over the past 2 decades. Between 1992 and 2009, 953 patients were treated with HSCT, mainly for a hematologic malignancy. They were divided according to 4 different time periods of treatment: 1992 to 1995, 1996 to 2000, 2001 to 2005, and 2006 to 2009. Over the years, many factors have changed considerably regarding patient age, diagnosis, disease stage, type of donor, stem cell source, genomic HLA typing, cell dose, type of conditioning, treatment of infections, use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), use of mesenchymal stem cells, use of cytotoxic T cells, and home care. When we compared the last period (2006-2009) with earlier periods, we found slower neutrophil engraftment, a higher incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) of grades II-IV, and less chronic GVHD (cGHVD). The incidence of relapse was unchanged over the 4 periods (22%-25%). Overall survival (OS) and transplant-related mortality (TRM) improved significantly in the more recent periods, with the best results during the last period (2006-2009) and a 100-day TRM of 5.5%. This improvement was also apparent in a multivariate analysis. When correcting for differences between the 4 groups, the hazard ratio for mortality in the last period was 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.79; P < .001) and for TRM it was 0.63 (CI: 0.43-0.92; P = .02). This study shows that the combined efforts to improve outcome after HSCT have been very effective. Even though we now treat older patients with more advanced disease and use more alternative HLA nonidentical donors, OS and TRM have improved. The problem of relapse still has to be remedied. Thus, several different developments together have resulted in significantly lower TRM and improved survival after HSCT over the last few years.

Mixed chimerism in the B cell lineage is a rapid and sensitive indicator of minimal residual disease in bone marrow transplant recipients with pre-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

One of the major problems after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is a high frequency of leukemia relapse. We have prospectively studied the presence of donor- and recipient-derived chimeric cells in bone marrow recipients with pre-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (pre-B-ALL). The chimeric status of BMT recipients was compared to minimal residual disease (MRD) detection by analysis of immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) and T cell receptor (TcR) genes. Post-transplant blood and bone marrow samples from 12 patients with pre-B-ALL were studied. Five patients showed mixed chimerism (MC) in the CD19-positive cell fraction. Four of them have relapsed to date. The remaining patient with MC in the B cell lineage was also MRD positive in the same samples. All seven patients with donor chimerism in the B cell fraction remain in clinical remission (P = 0.01). In samples from all five patients having MC in the B cell lineage, the patient-specific IgH or TcR rearrangement was also detected. In three of four patients who relapsed, MC in the B cell lineage was seen more than 2.5 months prior to morphologically verified relapse. The results of this comparison suggest that routinely performed MC analysis of the affected cell lineage may facilitate post-BMT monitoring and rapid therapeutic decisions in transplanted patients with pre-B-ALL. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 843–851.

Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT in patients with non-malignant diseases, and importance of chimerism

In this retrospective study, we evaluated the chimerism status and outcome in 58 patients (64 transplants) with non-malignant diseases. Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) was given in half of the transplants. Mixed chimerism (MC) was defined as >1% recipient cells. Two consecutive samples showing >30% recipient cells were defined as high chimerism (high MC). Patients with high MC and the management of these patients were analyzed in greater detail. The overall survival rate was 87%. In total, 23 transplants were donor chimerism (DC) and 41 transplants showed some degree of MC. The incidence of MC was 78 and 50% after RIC and myeloablative conditioning, respectively (P=0.04). Acute GVHD of grades II–III was more common in patients with DC (39%) than in patients with MC (8%) (P=0.002). Owing to high MC, donor lymphocyte infusions were given in 17 cases. The level of MC was reduced in seven cases, unchanged in four cases, increased in one case and there was graft rejection in five cases. A second transplant was carried out in six cases with rejections, five are alive and in remission. We conclude that patients with non-malignant diseases, who develop MC after transplant have less acute GVHD. Despite the high incidence of MC, overall survival is promising.

A prospective randomized toxicity study to compare reduced-intensity and myeloablative conditioning in patients with myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

To our knowledge, no randomized toxicity studies have been conducted to compare myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and reduced‐intensity conditioning (RIC) in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Fludarabine-based disease-specific conditioning or conventional myeloablative conditioning in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of non-malignant diseases

Fludarabine-based conditioning (FBC) was given to 24 patients and conventional myeloablative conditioning (MC) to 33 patients, most children, before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for non-malignant diseases. The donors were human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A, -B, -DRβ1-identical related (33%) or unrelated (67%). In the FBC group, two grafts failed versus three in the MC group; all were successfully regrafted. Fever was more common in the MC patients (P=0.003). Bacteremia occurred in 25% of the FBC group and 50% in the MC group (P=0.1). In the FBC group, platelet engraftment was faster and transfusions were fewer (P<0.05). Mucositis and renal function were similar in the two groups. The MC group had higher maximum bilirubin (P=0.03) and less often normal spirometry (P=0.04) after HSCT. A 7-year-old girl in the MC group had permanent alopecia. No patients had severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Chronic GVHD was rare. Complete donor CD3+ chimerism was more common in the MC group (P=0.01), but CD33+ engraftment was better with FBS (P=0.03). Treatment-related mortality was 4 and 15%, and 5-year survival was 89 and 85% in the FBC and MC groups. Although survival was similar, FBC is a promising alternative to MC in non-malignant disorders.

Improved overall survival for pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - A comparison of the last two decades.

Pediatric protocols for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT have been altered during the last two decades. To compare the outcomes in children (<18 yr old), who underwent SCT at our center during 1992–2002 (P1) and 2003–2013 (P2). We retrospectively analyzed 188 patients in P1 and 201 patients in P2. The most significant protocol changes during P2 compared with P1 were a decrease in MAC protocols, particularly those containing TBI, an increase in RIC protocols, and altered GvHD prophylaxis. In addition, P2 had more patients with nonmalignant diagnoses (p = 0.002), more mismatched (MM) donors (p = 0.01), and more umbilical CB grafts (p = 0.03). Mesenchymal or DSCs were used for severe acute GvHD during P2. Three‐yr OS in P1 was 58%, and in P2, it was 78% (p < 0.001). Improved OS was seen in both malignant disorders (51% vs. 68%; p = 0.05) and nonmalignant disorders (77% vs. 87%; p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis showed that SCT during P2 was associated with reduced mortality (HR = 0.57; p = 0.005), reduced TRM (HR = 0.57; p = 0.03), unchanged relapse rate, similar rate of GF, less chronic GvHD (HR = 0.49; p = 0.01), and more acute GvHD (HR = 1.77, p = 0.007). During recent years, OS has improved at our center, possibly reflecting the introduction of less toxic conditioning regimens and a number of other methodological developments in SCT.

Myeloablative conditioning for hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with non-malignant diseases

Myeloablative conditioning for hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with non-malignant diseases